3 important things wrt legal efforts and the WHO

1. In the important case of Paul Marik, Mary Talley Bowden et al v FDA, yesterday in oral arguements FDA’s lawyer had to say that FDA explicity approves doctors using IVM to treat COVID. She dodged commenting on whether FDA’s IVM tweet was a command not to use it. Here is the 5 min clip:

   https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1688965831294652437?s=20

2. In the exceedingly important case First Amendment case Missouri v Biden, for which CHD has been added as a party, there will be oral arguments tomorrow. You can watch on CHD-TV.

   When: Thursday, August 10th, at 2pm ET (11am PT) 

   What: Oral Arguments for State of Missouri, Et Al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Et Al. Appellants

   Where: Livestreamed on CHD.TV

   Original Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (en banc courtroom link will be live during the hearing)

   Case Files: Court Listener Link

   Synopsis:

   Source: NCLA Website

   "Social media platforms, acting at the federal government’s behest, repeatedly censored NCLA’s clients for articulating views on those platforms in opposition to government-approved views on Covid-19 restrictions. This insidious censorship was the direct result of the federal government’s campaign to silence those who voice perspectives that deviate from those of the Biden Administration. "

   Read More Background on Meryl Nass' Substack.

   Watch Live 2pm ET Thursday August 10th.

   

3. The WHO has issued COVID recommendations today and some of them (there are over 20) are intended to get countries implementing the pandemic preparedness and response agenda even before countries vote on the IHR amendments and treaty next May. Things are moving apace.

   https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/standing-recommendations-for-covid-19-issued-by-the-director-general-of-the-world-health-organization-(who)-in-accordance-with-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-(ihr)