Commonwealth Fund again finds the US healthcare system worthy only of derision
No surprise. The worse the outcomes, the better the system is paid
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024
Abstract:
Goal: Compare health system performance in 10 countries, including the United States, to glean insights for U.S. improvement.
Methods: Analysis of 70 health system performance measures in five areas: access to care, care process, administrative efficiency, equity, and health outcomes.
Key Findings: The top three countries are Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, although differences in overall performance between most countries are relatively small. The only clear outlier is the U.S., where health system performance is dramatically lower.
Conclusion: The U.S. continues to be in a class by itself in the underperformance of its health care sector. While the other nine countries differ in the details of their systems and in their performance on domains, unlike the U.S., they all have found a way to meet their residents’ most basic health care needs, including universal coverage. [That phrase again?—Nass]
The OECD generally shows us the same thing (below) but compares us to many more countries than just 10. When will this get fixed? Think MAHA!
After the last four years, I don't even trust them to take my temperature correctly.
So...I've heard stories of people waiting for months for a CT scan, then finding out their cancer is too advanced to do anything about. I have heard of people drinking water out of their flower vases because they have insufficient staff to deliver a pitcher of fresh water to each patient every morning. How is it that the NHS cannot find their butt in the dark with both hands, and our health care is bad?