Evidence why the PREP Act is a joke and needs to be repealed or amended
Just stumbled on this incriminatory CDC statement
Read the statement below. It states clearly that no emergency is needed to issue an EUA. I have explained this before. You only need the potential for an emergency.
Note that a potential H7N9 emergency is still extant—it never got revoked, even though it has been over 7 years since there was an H7N9 outbreak in the US (which never affected a single person).
“Note that issuance of this EUA does NOT indicate that an actual public health emergency exists in the United States. Distribution of diagnostic test kits domestically is a preparedness measure. For information on the latest available FDA H7 molecular assays via EUA, see the FDA website. These EUAs will cease to be effective when the declaration of emergency is terminated under section 564(b)(2) of the Act or when the EUA is revoked under section 564(g) of the Act.”
https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/php/severe-potential/h7n9-testing-laboratories.html
WHAT DOES ALL THIS MEAN? It means the PREP Act allows the US government to roll out any test, mask, drug, vaccine, ventilator or any other medical product it likes as an EUA on the basis of an invisible emergency that can go on forever.
Here is the language of the PREP Act:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/247d-6d
This is a trick to get unlicensed or unlicensable (because they are not actually safe or effective) products into the population. The public still pays for them through its taxes, even though they allegedly receive the product for “free.” We must get this law revoked. Or amended. No potential emergencies. A high level of scrutiny as soon as the EUA product is rolled out, with a serious review to be done very quickly. Or better yet, a reasonable degree of testing must be required before rolling out unlicensed products.
We also need a law establishing a false review to be scientific misconduct (as well as other forms of scientific misconduct) and it must be a felony crime, so that doctors will be afraid of losing their medical license if they participate in false product reviews.
Seems to me that the prep act and all related 'laws' are designed to achieve totalitarianism legally. The goal should be to burn them and not amend them. We have learned quite a bit from the scamdemic haven't we?
I'm not usually a fan of Wikipedia, but just had a quick look re the PREP Act, where it states: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Readiness_and_Emergency_Preparedness_Act
QUOTE
The act specifically affords to drug makers immunity from actions related to the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration and use of medical countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear agents of terrorism, epidemics, and pandemics. PREPA strengthens and consolidates the oversight of litigation against pharmaceutical companies under the purview of the secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). PREPA provides $3.8 billion for pandemic influenza preparedness to protect public health in the case of a pandemic disease outbreak.
Vaccine manufacturers lobbied for the legislation, which would effectively preempt state vaccine safety laws in the case of an emergency declaration by HHS, by making clear they would not produce new vaccines unless the legislation was enacted. Injured parties are compensated by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.
END OF QUOTE
So it seems the PREP Act is all about serving the best interests of pHarma, as usual...
Wonder if the new HHS Secretary can do anything about it?
It's also interesting to consider the people who supported the PREPA legislation...
For instance Senator Bill Frist, an American physician among other things. I wonder if he could clarify for us whether the PREP Act protects vaccination providers who inject people under mis/disinformation, coercion and mandates, which obviously goes against their obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Frist
Also check out Congressman Dennis Hastert, who now has a very unsavoury history in regard to receipt of federal funds while a lobbyist, and a sex abuse scandal... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Hastert
Interesting to think about the quality of politicians who are impacting on legislation affecting millions of people...