Dr. Nass, you are a treasure, & I am so late in saying so. Thank you so much for your work! A while back you posted a most amazing graphic/quote - the latter from Rudolph Steiner, about our urgent need to NOT fear the future. It has so inspired & comforted me! (I got a copy made & have it up in a prominent place in my kitchen. So I don't forget.) Thanks for keeping up with & posting about the ACIP meetings. I sure hope you are getting some rest on your retreat in Venice. Blessings on you!!
Thanks for this good news. The document they passed is fair and well-written. It is highly informative and enables freedom of choice and parental decision making.
How about mandated history "for the good of the people" forced at the point of losing your kid, to the [so-called] child protective services, for not jabbing them up with toxic ASD indusing vaccines?
Anyone who cannot make decisions about what happens to their own body, or to the bodies of their children - who come into this world through the parents' bodies - only think they are free.
Either we are all serfs or slaves, (serfs were essentially slaves that were transferred with the land, like timber & wildlife) - or so-called 'child protective services' are the government practicing kidnapping whenever they take a child without probable cause, a sworn affidavit attesting to direct knowledge of actual harm to the child or imminent danger equivalent to that required to support a self-defense claim in a shooting, and a jury trial BEFORE the parents lose their parental rights.
Reportedly, there are financial incentives for CPS to take children from their parents. Parents also do not get true "due process", and "family courts" are not really courts - but administrative hearings.
Differences include -the proceedings are not open to the public; and -their is no right to a trial by jury- which is a violation of Constitutionally protected Rights of We the People under Amendments IV, V, VI, IX, X, and XIV - and the 1st Paragraph.
My favorite CPS case was exposed in the Take Care of Myra case, a 225 million dollar jury award & Netflix movie! Better yet was the Baby Allen Yerko, "shaken baby case." Where forsed vaccines made the baby sick, then iatrogenic quack medicine killed baby Yerko, & pop was sentenced to life in prison, then after the real truth came out that quack doctors' medicine killed the baby, the evil court made dad to plea deal or spend another your in jail before release! (So dad pleaded guilty for allowing the killer jab! (How fair is that?) With no punishment for the stupid killers in this case!
If We the People bother to LEARN what the Founding Documents of the United States of America say,and to teach our families, friends, and our servants in public office, it would be fa more difficult for those who volunteered to serve us in government positions - elected, appointed, or hired - to break their Oaths and steal our Rights.
Our original States were declared "Free and Independent", "...in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these (former) colonies...". This was the purpose:
"We hold these Truth (not opinions, nor viewpoints) to be self-evident:
-that all men* are created Equal (not identical),
-that they are endowed by their Creator with certain UNalienable Rights;
-that to secure these Rights governments are instituted among Men*, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed.
- That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundations on such principles, and organizing it powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their future Safety & Happiness.
Declaration of Independence
It is the responsibility of We the People to hold the "trustees and servants of the people" (GA Constitution) accountable.
Grand juries were under the control of We the People, and the sheriffs they elected to protect our Rights until ~1947. These grand juries had the power to indict those who abused the authority of government positions.
If "We the (actual) People of the United States, in order to... establish Justice...and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity", who 'ordained and established' "this Constitution for the United State of America" do not know what it says, or what it means, how can we keep those who volunteered to serve us in government positions from 'stripping it of its meaning'?
You must understand that "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other," as John Adams, the second U.S. president, told some of us.
I.e., NOT a neo Sodom Gomorrah, LGBTQA+ promoting, mass baby killing, mob of Godless Hell bound evil people! It's what we get and deserve for dumping God from your "Our Creator" inspired One Nation under God!
Here's another one! "A republic, if you can keep it" is a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin in response to a woman asking what kind of government the Constitutional Convention had created. The full, recorded exchange was Franklin's reply to Elizabeth Willing Powel's question, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?". Most "cogs' were told to "think." Democracy, i.e., two wolves and a lamb voting, what's for lunch! Liberty is a well-armed [2nd amd. empowered] lamb, protesting the vote!
...and in support of parents' right to be fully informed of all possible benefits & risks, and to make the final decision about what medical products their children receive.
Thank you for this summary, Meryl. It is factual and succinct. It leaves out everything but the recommendations..
I also appreciated Aaron Siri's presentation, which was groused at by the 3 "Drs. No", but Drs. Offit and Hotez were also offered the opportunity to present, and turned it down.
The right way to evaluate vaccine policy is to do a long-term study evaluating all aspects of a child's health following different combinations of vaccines or no vaccines at all. We should be following the precautionary principle and not injecting something into healthy children unless we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the child will be healthier in general with the injection than without it.
The CDC has plenty of data that would make an enormous study like this possible. We've already done the experiment in America of the last 40 years. But no one in government, in industry, or in academia seems eager to do this study. And for statisticians like me who are outside government, the data we would need has not been released. So we're chewing on little fragments of data that leak out, like Paul Thomas's pediatric practice and the Medicaid data from Florida around the turn of the century.
Wasn't RFKjr planning to have a vigorous study conducted on the anonymized health data already in the possession of the federal government- but something happened to the data before he was confirmed as secretary of the HHS?
Dr. Thomas' study was validated by another study of the same data which compared the overall health of children who were never vaccinated with those who were vaccinated.
I don't know of RFK Jr. plan, but it would make sense. Dr. Thomas study showed unvaccinated children were much healthier than their vaccinated cohorts, and he was punished. He maintains Pediatricians depend on high vaccination rates of their kids, to cover their business costs. I really like his show, and he is a sincere person, so he is in the minority.
We appreciate Dr. Thomas and his commitment to the truth. Did you know that the medical board in Oregon where his practice was located revoked his medical license with no due process - no hearing? Then offered to reinstate it if he agreed to conduct no more research. To his credit, he declined.
It might be time to consider whether state licensing boards that issue permission for certain people to practice certain professions are essentially illegal monopolies.
The payments which physicians receive in exchange for administering certain medical products, like vaccines, creates a clear conflict of interest.
Independent physicians, and veterinarians, who do not accept insurance do not work for insurance companies, hospitals, or other corporations - but work only for their patients, who pay them directly. The provide the paperwork patients can submit to their insurance companies for reimbursement - but not accepting corporate or government insurance directly saves them a massive amount of time & money, often resulting in lower fees - and prevents insurance corporations or government from basically dictating what medical care people receive.
The American Association of Physicians & Surgeons has been supporting the doctor-patient relationship since 1943. They have a list of independent phyicians.
This is a excellent point. I read somewhere that RFK Jr. had planned to used data the federal government already had to compare the health of children who received one or more vaccines to those who had received none - no one can be unvaccinated - but the data was 'returned to the insurance companies' or something... before this could be done.
It would be simple to require this information under ACA, Medicare & Medicaid.
In the meantime, have you see the documentary, 'An Inconvenient Study', about the analysis of a long term data set of both vaccinated and not vaccinated children?
Though the researcher, a true believer in vaccination, promised to publish the results of the study, whatever they were, when the results showed that children who had never been vaccinated were far healthier than those who receive some, or all of the vaccines on the CDC's "recommended childhood vaccine schedule", he refused to publish the study.
Listen up nurses, I encourage you to say NO to giving vaccines as if your religion says not to.
I am a conscientious objector: "Someone who refuses to fight in an armed conflict because of religious or moral principles." Yes as in inject poisons into an arm....leg of other body part...YOU nurses need to stop complying and stop supporting this atrocity.
When Pharma dope is pimped on TV or the media, it must tell you the adverse effects, but when your pharma pimping [so-called] doctor Only tells you, "It's safe and effective."/ Yes, for his and pharma's bottom line! Not so much for the fools & suckers!
At least the parents must give consent under these guidelines. Hopefully, the parents will be enlightened enough to take a pass on the two-month old Hep B vax too…..unless the parents are drug users, or have HepB themselves.
However, the problem is that most new mothers want to do what's best for their infant, and if they trust their MD, they nearly always feel pressured to do what the white coat says, in spite of any private concerns they may have . . . .
If there's enough ruckus over the CDC's entire vaccine schedule, hopefully more new moms will do their research and wake up to hideous, criminal scam of "vaccinology".
Even if parents, or others who have regular casual contact with an infant or child, have Hepatitis B, the chance of transmitting it to the child is near zero - *unless* they have sexual contact with the child, or are sharing used needles.
The rare cases where people living in the same home without sexual contact or needle sharing reportedly included sharing of razors, presumably with cuts involved.
Hep B among children has always been extremely low, with most cases among recent immigrants.
Thanks for keeping us up to date. It would be interesting to know the three who wanted the Hep B to be given newborns. Is there any way to find this info out.?
Yes, they voted out loud during the meeting today so you can forward the recordings to that part. Dr. Meissner voted against, but I cannot recall the other two. One was the balding grey haired man with the accent sitting on the end.
Yes, little on what other countries are actually doing regarding vaccines and rates of autism and other rising numbers in disease here vs. there is rarely reported on and very hard to get from google. Basic data is almost impossible for the average person to get now.
You may get much better results when searching the Internet using DuckDuckGo or Brave.
Go Ogle -the accurate spelling of the name- is a surveillance organization that also seeks to controls what people think & do by controlling their access to information.
'How to de-Google Your Life' - and why it matters:
Dr. Nass, you are a treasure, & I am so late in saying so. Thank you so much for your work! A while back you posted a most amazing graphic/quote - the latter from Rudolph Steiner, about our urgent need to NOT fear the future. It has so inspired & comforted me! (I got a copy made & have it up in a prominent place in my kitchen. So I don't forget.) Thanks for keeping up with & posting about the ACIP meetings. I sure hope you are getting some rest on your retreat in Venice. Blessings on you!!
@Janet: God Jesus tells us, "Not to fear the future"! It appears 365 times in the good book! So the wise Rudolph Steiner, must be right! Right?
"For God has not give us the spirit of fear, but of power, of love, and a sound mind."
2 Timothy 1:7
Yes, amen to that!
krissaj51f.substack.com/p/a44
Thanks for this good news. The document they passed is fair and well-written. It is highly informative and enables freedom of choice and parental decision making.
Gee, " freedom of choice," what a new & novel idea!
Throughout history, the only people whose parental rights were not honored were slaves.
How about mandated history "for the good of the people" forced at the point of losing your kid, to the [so-called] child protective services, for not jabbing them up with toxic ASD indusing vaccines?
Anyone who cannot make decisions about what happens to their own body, or to the bodies of their children - who come into this world through the parents' bodies - only think they are free.
Either we are all serfs or slaves, (serfs were essentially slaves that were transferred with the land, like timber & wildlife) - or so-called 'child protective services' are the government practicing kidnapping whenever they take a child without probable cause, a sworn affidavit attesting to direct knowledge of actual harm to the child or imminent danger equivalent to that required to support a self-defense claim in a shooting, and a jury trial BEFORE the parents lose their parental rights.
Reportedly, there are financial incentives for CPS to take children from their parents. Parents also do not get true "due process", and "family courts" are not really courts - but administrative hearings.
Differences include -the proceedings are not open to the public; and -their is no right to a trial by jury- which is a violation of Constitutionally protected Rights of We the People under Amendments IV, V, VI, IX, X, and XIV - and the 1st Paragraph.
My favorite CPS case was exposed in the Take Care of Myra case, a 225 million dollar jury award & Netflix movie! Better yet was the Baby Allen Yerko, "shaken baby case." Where forsed vaccines made the baby sick, then iatrogenic quack medicine killed baby Yerko, & pop was sentenced to life in prison, then after the real truth came out that quack doctors' medicine killed the baby, the evil court made dad to plea deal or spend another your in jail before release! (So dad pleaded guilty for allowing the killer jab! (How fair is that?) With no punishment for the stupid killers in this case!
The U.S. Constitution was fair & well-written also. As Dr. Phil would say, "How's that workin' for you (all)?"
If We the People bother to LEARN what the Founding Documents of the United States of America say,and to teach our families, friends, and our servants in public office, it would be fa more difficult for those who volunteered to serve us in government positions - elected, appointed, or hired - to break their Oaths and steal our Rights.
Our original States were declared "Free and Independent", "...in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these (former) colonies...". This was the purpose:
"We hold these Truth (not opinions, nor viewpoints) to be self-evident:
-that all men* are created Equal (not identical),
-that they are endowed by their Creator with certain UNalienable Rights;
-that to secure these Rights governments are instituted among Men*, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed.
- That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundations on such principles, and organizing it powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their future Safety & Happiness.
Declaration of Independence
It is the responsibility of We the People to hold the "trustees and servants of the people" (GA Constitution) accountable.
Grand juries were under the control of We the People, and the sheriffs they elected to protect our Rights until ~1947. These grand juries had the power to indict those who abused the authority of government positions.
https://RestoreGrandJuryRights.org
It's no longer the U.S. Constitution when it's stripped of its meaning!
If "We the (actual) People of the United States, in order to... establish Justice...and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity", who 'ordained and established' "this Constitution for the United State of America" do not know what it says, or what it means, how can we keep those who volunteered to serve us in government positions from 'stripping it of its meaning'?
You must understand that "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other," as John Adams, the second U.S. president, told some of us.
I.e., NOT a neo Sodom Gomorrah, LGBTQA+ promoting, mass baby killing, mob of Godless Hell bound evil people! It's what we get and deserve for dumping God from your "Our Creator" inspired One Nation under God!
Glad you found & used the Adams quote - Americans don't appreciate the word "moral" anymore.
Here's another one! "A republic, if you can keep it" is a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin in response to a woman asking what kind of government the Constitutional Convention had created. The full, recorded exchange was Franklin's reply to Elizabeth Willing Powel's question, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?". Most "cogs' were told to "think." Democracy, i.e., two wolves and a lamb voting, what's for lunch! Liberty is a well-armed [2nd amd. empowered] lamb, protesting the vote!
Thank you Dr Malone and the other members who voted pro infant.
...and in support of parents' right to be fully informed of all possible benefits & risks, and to make the final decision about what medical products their children receive.
Thank you for this summary, Meryl. It is factual and succinct. It leaves out everything but the recommendations..
I also appreciated Aaron Siri's presentation, which was groused at by the 3 "Drs. No", but Drs. Offit and Hotez were also offered the opportunity to present, and turned it down.
Today's ACIP meeting was awesome!!!!! :) Thank you Dr. Nass for your dedicated work for all of mankind. Janet is right, you are a treasure.
This is awesome news for all our babies! God bless all the members who voted this off the vaccine schedule! 🙏❤️
Amen!
The right way to evaluate vaccine policy is to do a long-term study evaluating all aspects of a child's health following different combinations of vaccines or no vaccines at all. We should be following the precautionary principle and not injecting something into healthy children unless we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the child will be healthier in general with the injection than without it.
The CDC has plenty of data that would make an enormous study like this possible. We've already done the experiment in America of the last 40 years. But no one in government, in industry, or in academia seems eager to do this study. And for statisticians like me who are outside government, the data we would need has not been released. So we're chewing on little fragments of data that leak out, like Paul Thomas's pediatric practice and the Medicaid data from Florida around the turn of the century.
And, Dr. Thomas lost his license for it.
Yes -- maybe that says all we need to know about why these studies are not being done.
Wasn't RFKjr planning to have a vigorous study conducted on the anonymized health data already in the possession of the federal government- but something happened to the data before he was confirmed as secretary of the HHS?
Dr. Thomas' study was validated by another study of the same data which compared the overall health of children who were never vaccinated with those who were vaccinated.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-unvaccinated-healthier-vaccinated-kids/
Dr. Paul Thomas, MD now has a regular show on CHD.tv with Childrens Health Defense.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/pediatric-perspectives-with-paul-thomas/
I don't know of RFK Jr. plan, but it would make sense. Dr. Thomas study showed unvaccinated children were much healthier than their vaccinated cohorts, and he was punished. He maintains Pediatricians depend on high vaccination rates of their kids, to cover their business costs. I really like his show, and he is a sincere person, so he is in the minority.
We appreciate Dr. Thomas and his commitment to the truth. Did you know that the medical board in Oregon where his practice was located revoked his medical license with no due process - no hearing? Then offered to reinstate it if he agreed to conduct no more research. To his credit, he declined.
It might be time to consider whether state licensing boards that issue permission for certain people to practice certain professions are essentially illegal monopolies.
The payments which physicians receive in exchange for administering certain medical products, like vaccines, creates a clear conflict of interest.
Independent physicians, and veterinarians, who do not accept insurance do not work for insurance companies, hospitals, or other corporations - but work only for their patients, who pay them directly. The provide the paperwork patients can submit to their insurance companies for reimbursement - but not accepting corporate or government insurance directly saves them a massive amount of time & money, often resulting in lower fees - and prevents insurance corporations or government from basically dictating what medical care people receive.
The American Association of Physicians & Surgeons has been supporting the doctor-patient relationship since 1943. They have a list of independent phyicians.
https://aapsoline.org
This is a excellent point. I read somewhere that RFK Jr. had planned to used data the federal government already had to compare the health of children who received one or more vaccines to those who had received none - no one can be unvaccinated - but the data was 'returned to the insurance companies' or something... before this could be done.
It would be simple to require this information under ACA, Medicare & Medicaid.
In the meantime, have you see the documentary, 'An Inconvenient Study', about the analysis of a long term data set of both vaccinated and not vaccinated children?
https://rumble.com/v708dfw-an-inconvenient-study-feature-film.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_upp_a
Though the researcher, a true believer in vaccination, promised to publish the results of the study, whatever they were, when the results showed that children who had never been vaccinated were far healthier than those who receive some, or all of the vaccines on the CDC's "recommended childhood vaccine schedule", he refused to publish the study.
It's well worth watching.
At least the change in recommendations will hopefully make people stop and think.
It's not everything, but it is something. Hopefully far fewer children will be permanently harmed as a result moving forward.
Listen up nurses, I encourage you to say NO to giving vaccines as if your religion says not to.
I am a conscientious objector: "Someone who refuses to fight in an armed conflict because of religious or moral principles." Yes as in inject poisons into an arm....leg of other body part...YOU nurses need to stop complying and stop supporting this atrocity.
When Pharma dope is pimped on TV or the media, it must tell you the adverse effects, but when your pharma pimping [so-called] doctor Only tells you, "It's safe and effective."/ Yes, for his and pharma's bottom line! Not so much for the fools & suckers!
After the last 5 years, I guess I'm just too jaded and cynical about today's message:
> "Don't jab your newborn with this toxic brew on Day #1, but any time after 2 months, feel free to jab 'em up."
I know, I know ~ baby steps.
But, why, pray tell, does a 2-month-old *infant* need "protection" from a disease that is transmitted sexually or through sharing drug needles?
At least the parents must give consent under these guidelines. Hopefully, the parents will be enlightened enough to take a pass on the two-month old Hep B vax too…..unless the parents are drug users, or have HepB themselves.
That certainly is my hope.
However, the problem is that most new mothers want to do what's best for their infant, and if they trust their MD, they nearly always feel pressured to do what the white coat says, in spite of any private concerns they may have . . . .
What encourages me even more, however, is this:
> https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/breaking-president-trump-just-signed
If there's enough ruckus over the CDC's entire vaccine schedule, hopefully more new moms will do their research and wake up to hideous, criminal scam of "vaccinology".
Even if parents, or others who have regular casual contact with an infant or child, have Hepatitis B, the chance of transmitting it to the child is near zero - *unless* they have sexual contact with the child, or are sharing used needles.
The rare cases where people living in the same home without sexual contact or needle sharing reportedly included sharing of razors, presumably with cuts involved.
Hep B among children has always been extremely low, with most cases among recent immigrants.
Thanks for keeping us up to date. It would be interesting to know the three who wanted the Hep B to be given newborns. Is there any way to find this info out.?
Yes, they voted out loud during the meeting today so you can forward the recordings to that part. Dr. Meissner voted against, but I cannot recall the other two. One was the balding grey haired man with the accent sitting on the end.
The third was the retired male Public Health Service officer who was a bit pushy. Sorry I did not take down names.
Hallelujah
And a big thanks to you Doc. It’s people like you that make a difference. So it’s a ten star score from me. **********
Yes, little on what other countries are actually doing regarding vaccines and rates of autism and other rising numbers in disease here vs. there is rarely reported on and very hard to get from google. Basic data is almost impossible for the average person to get now.
You may get much better results when searching the Internet using DuckDuckGo or Brave.
Go Ogle -the accurate spelling of the name- is a surveillance organization that also seeks to controls what people think & do by controlling their access to information.
'How to de-Google Your Life' - and why it matters:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/google-surveillance-agency-de-google-your-life-cola/
Go Ogle and its parent company have deep ties to Big pHarma:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/google-censored-vaccine-info-before-covid-parent-company-alphabet-pharma-ties/
Use Yandex or Brave.