Jeffrey Sachs didn't go away, he just upped the ante. Now he wants 1% of world GNP for his next vanity project
And 3% of savings
New Delhi: The world should aim to have at least an incremental $1 trillion every year to finance sustainable development for the world's poorest and most vulnerable countries, leading economist and director, Center for Sustainable Development, Columbia University, Jeffrey D Sachs said.
Sachs mooted a massive increase in multilateral development bank financing and routine rollover of amortisations for over 20 years for the G20 Leaders' Summit in September.Strengthening multilateral development banks is one of the key issues being pressed by India during its G20 presidency.
The G20 has set up a nine-member expert group, co-chaired by former US treasury secretary Larry Summers and the chairman of India's 15th Finance Commission NK Singh, to strengthen multilateral development banks. The idea is to identify ways to improve the ability of such institutions to fund a wide range of sustainable development goals and global challenges, including climate change and health issues.Sachs, who gave a presentation to G20 Sherpas on financing green development on Thursday, said that roughly 1% of world GDP and 3% of world savings should flow towards this. He pointed out that IMF and World Bank debt sustainability framework was deeply flawed with debt to GDP thresholds that were far too low, adding the reason for this was the conflation of two different kinds of risks - liquidity and solvency risks.
In other words, he is demanding the world take on much more debt. How to crash the world economy even quicker. Good work, Jeff. A few months ago you said we needed 0.1% of world GDP for the WHO. Now we need 1.0% for the green agenda. Will it be 10.0% for colonizing Mars next month?
didn't he already get his one percent when he looted the former soviet treasury back in the 90s?
Good one about colonizing Mars!
Then, after doing more thinking divorced from reality in his armchair, Jeffrey Sachs is going to recommend 110% of income be withdrawn for his projects. That means all your income goes to his initiatives, along with a 10% tax on all newborns that you have (even before they are born).
I mean, seriously, centralized "command economies" have worked so darn well in the past that he thinks that enlarging the centralization of planning and spending on a world scale this time will really be a boon.