158 Comments
User's avatar
Deb's avatar

Yep, Geoengineering. The particles are sprayed, then hit with microwave transmissions which spread them out in strange patterns. We never saw anything like this when we were kids, but the meteorologists keep coming up with new names for the weird formations just to make it seem normal. Dane Wiggington talks about this phenomenon regularly.

Lawyerlisa's avatar

I took environmental science prior to law. One of my courses was meteorology. Ok. This cloud was not presented in my studies in 1994.

Now also I've noted that this cloud follows the lines drawn by planes by about 8 to 10 hours. My thesis now is that they are dropping the chem trails at night more and more. I see them start evening.

We are in a world full of child pimping satanic elite. You are a light and a force.

Meryl Nass's avatar

Are names like "Cirrus fibratus" in the old meteorology textbooks?

You too are a light and a force, Lisa.

Herman's avatar

Yes, the term was introduced in 1921 by the French meteorologist Louis Besson. Before that, these clouds were referred to as "filosus". They look natural to me - if they were "generated" I would expect more large scale regularity in the patterns. These are typical for warm air when moving on top of colder air.

I wouldn't call them "fibratus" because that's more for the feathery/fluffy high clouds, the ones in your pictures are mainly cirrocumulus (high cauliflower clouds).

(Note: nothing in this reply is intended to deny the existence of geoengineering)

[typo]

Jamie's avatar

We need more conscious environmental lawyers, are you aware of the ICLEI agenda / attacks?

https://www.kiclei.ca/

https://rumble.com/v4ut9ge-bc-rising-wed-apr-24-2024-meeting-maggie-braun-on-kiclei-bctownhalls2024.ca.html

Lisa's avatar

I can’t post photos which I have, but that’s exactly the pattern of clouds a day after the cross hatching release of chemical from jets, which is geoengineering over Charlotte, NC. I’m disabled and stay home most of my days. I’m on the fifth floor looking out my sliding door window daily.

Family of aerospace engineers like mine, would know.

Nina's avatar

We are seeing those kinds of cloud formations also in Tennessee, and they aren’t natural.

Sepp Hasslberger's avatar

Definitely geoengineering I would say. The patterns in the clouds suggest they are being structured by electromagnetic or similar influences.

Kathy M.'s avatar

Good for you. Thanks. I heard that it takes the chemicals and the man-made electromagnetic efforts to cause things like hurricane Helene that decimated the mountains of western North Carolina.

Jamie's avatar

How did a hurricane sustain the eye so far inland?

...never happened before.

Seen this? The Dimming https://geoengineeringwatch.org/the-dimming-full-length-climate-engineering-documentary/

Keep spreading the word

Kathy M.'s avatar

See the problem? Therein lies the rub as Shakespeare would say! Yes, everyone should watch The Dimming.

Saakshin's avatar

After reading the comments here a familiar melody came to mind. The words are a bit like this:

We've looked at clouds from both sides now,

from up and down and still somehow,

it's clouds illusions we recall,

we really don't know clouds at all!

LW's avatar

DO so LOVE …that song and her voice!

Malcolm Borlace's avatar

The clouds turn like that after being hit with HAARP, high power radio waves.

Ellen Rixford's avatar

I remember seeing these formations in the sky as a child, 75 years ago. Whether or not it was geoengineering then I don't know. But it seems perfectly obvious that any unusual and/or extreme weather conditions are now due to somebody evil monkeying around with the weather. If there is nice real estate to be stolen, innocent people to be sacrificed to BlackRock and/or the military-industrial or pharmaceutical-medical complex, surely the weather manipulators will be all over it.

Meryl Nass's avatar

I don't recall seeing them as a child. I am 75 years old.

Vivian's avatar

I don't recall those clouds as a child either. These clouds were never in children's drawings/art.

Ellen Rixford's avatar

Our family had a place in the countryside, and I spent a lot of time looking up. The really suspicious cloud formations are what are called "mares' tails"...long streaks across the sky. They are supposed to presage rainy and stormy weather....maybe weather manipulation. Weather monkey business has been around a lot longer than most of us are aware.....I think since WWII maybe way before. We should be very skeptical and suspicious of every extreme weather event, and ask who is benefitting from it.

LW's avatar
Jul 11Edited

Me either— no recollection as a child.

….AND growing up in Houston with voluminous clouds/proximity to ocean, I spent HOURS and HOURS laying in the grass looking at clouds… seeing what I could see.

Tricia's avatar

Mackerel skies. I use to see them a lot on the Florida coast as a child. 60 + years ago.

The checkerboard skies are geoengineering. And who knows your skies could be a combination.

But when we saw a mackerel clouds we knew the ocean would be calm and a good day for the beach.

Marago's avatar

Vast increase of flights? That would be those geoengineering flights that I see all the time. Chemtrails in a “design” crisscrossing all over at low levels.

Gloria Kegeles's avatar

Please watch THE DIMMING on Rumble.

Subscribe to GeoEngineeringWatch.com

Very important for us all to learn about the toxic metal nanoparticles

being sprayed globally so we can do something about it!!

Meryl Nass's avatar

My problem with the Dimming is that it repeats old claims that all we need to do is acknowledge that geoengineering exists. But most people already know that. We need to go beyond that and initiate laws to stop it for good and expose the millitary projects.

Gloria Kegeles's avatar

Most people I talk to, don't know about the recent surge or at all -- of geoengineering, esp. the daily spraying of toxic metal nanoparticles, now in the air, water and food. Many gardeners don't understand why recently their gardens do poorly (the sun is dimmed). We do need to initiate laws to stop it for good. I believe Tennessee succeeded in doing so but haven't heard the results. States could consult TN's law.

The Cherry On Top's avatar

Climate Viewer is an excellent source. https://climateviewer.com/ Much better than the scaremongering variety. I’ve been documenting the weather for years since I noticed big changes in the weather. It’s one heck of a rabbit hole!

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

Those are natural clouds that I've been above, inside, and below many times during my 3 decades of flying large passenger jets all over the globe. Jet exhaust can turn into clouds also (cirrus homogenitus) that reflect solar energy away from above and trap heat below depending on the time of day. There is no "secret spray" program that creates those white lines in the sky. We're doing it to ourselves, but we can fix it. https://rumble.com/v792s12-i-turned-jet-fuel-into-white-lines-in-the-sky.html

Tim's avatar

Very good highly qualified perspective. Your film provides practical information that confirms my common sense point of view that the intentional spraying of such massive quantities for nefarious purposes would not be easily hidden. And I have always had a casual interest in cloud formations and have no trouble understanding condensation trail formations and your film does a good job explaining the phenomenon. I have also watched “The Dimming” and did not find it convincing, and makes many assertions that would require simply finding qualified voices like yours to offer a first hand knowledge that can offer knowledgeable rebuttal of some fantastical claims. And as you acknowledge, the public has plenty of reason to mistrust institutions today, but to play into the hands of those who would sow mistrust purely to their advantage is a trap to carefully avoid. Dr. Nass’ research is a terrific resource for anyone who is interested in learning the truth and it’s good that her site draws people from broad areas of expertise to help all of us sort through all the noise and find the signal.

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

Yes, several times. It's full of lies.

Jamie's avatar

Really? That’s a bizarre claim. Care to back up your slander with any evidence?

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

Show me any evidence of purposeful spraying of tons of chemicals from jets as he claims. You won't find any. Also his testing methods for metals are flawed.

Jamie's avatar

the documentary is full of evidence.

your ridiculous statements are what's unimpressive

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

I’ve watched The Dimming several times and I understand why it’s so convincing for people; it’s a very well-produced film that ties together a lot of concerns people have about the sky, the weather, and government transparency. But there’s a big difference between a compelling documentary and physical evidence, and that’s where the film falls apart for me. My issue with the film isn't that I don't want to believe it, it’s that the 'evidence' it presents doesn't bridge the gap between 'the sky looks different' and 'a global spraying program is active.'

For example: The 'Spraying' Equipment: The film points to standard aircraft hardware, like fuel vents, drain masts, and aerodynamic fairings—and calls them 'nozzles.' I flew those aircraft, and they are not nozzles. Any mechanic who works on these planes can show you the maintenance manuals and the part numbers that identify those as standard safety equipment. If those were spray nozzles, they’d be in the aircraft's type certificate, not hidden.

The Mass-Balance Problem: Even if you ignore the maintenance records, the film implies a massive, global scale of material dispersal. But when you look at the global aviation fuel burn, the satellite aerosol data, and the chemical composition of the atmosphere, those 'megatons' of chemicals simply aren't there. If we were spraying the planet on that scale, the atmosphere wouldn't just look 'white'—it would be chemically saturated with traceable pollutants that every university lab in the world would be measuring.

The 'Evidence' itself: Most of the film's 'proof' comes from filtered, uncalibrated samples or misinterpreted radar imagery, rather than peer-reviewed, chain-of-custody data. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and after years of searching, the aviation and scientific communities have yet to find a single fuel manifest, flight order, or hardware modification that proves this program exists. Attorneys for thegeofight.com have been actively seeking a pilot whistleblower with hard evidence of a covert spray operation. We'd have one by now. We don't.

I agree that we need transparency and that we should be asking hard questions about how human activity affects the climate. But we’re being distracted. While we're looking up at white stripes that are well-understood by physics, and have been up there ever since we started flying combustible engines in the troposphere, someone wants you to believe they are a result of something being purposefully sprayed from aircraft.

Yes, those white stripes can affect the climate, and yes jet exhaust contains toxic elements. We can fix those things by reducing sulfur and aeromatic compounds that are naturally in jet fuel, and we can avoid flying through ice supersaturated layers of the atmosphere. If we do those things, we'll get our blue skies back. If we don't, we'll be looking for the boogeyman spray planes that don't exist.

Robert Auld's avatar

He would need to write an article. But his line of work gives his comments some authority. I have seen The Dimming, and I was not impressed. It wasted a lot of time showing us people in hazmat suits bending over instruments in labs and then making assertions about what they found that were not backed up by published data you could investigate for yourself.

Jamie's avatar

Where do you expect them to publish them? and is their evidence not on their website?

nano aluminum in rain, etc has been confirmed many times

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

I’ve seen those lab reports about aluminum, and it's true—if you take a sample of rainwater or snow and run it through an ICP-MS (mass spectrometer), you will almost always find aluminum. The machine is incredibly sensitive, and aluminum is the third most abundant element in the Earth's crust, so it’s everywhere.

The question isn't whether the aluminum is there; the question is where it came from. When independent researchers or environmental labs analyze that aluminum, they don’t find a 'special' type of engineered nano-aluminum that doesn't exist in nature. They find aluminosilicates, clays, and oxides—the exact same chemical fingerprint found in the soil, the continental dust, and the volcanic ash that the wind lofts into the atmosphere every single day. If that aluminum were being sprayed by aircraft as part of a clandestine program, the chemical 'fingerprint' would be distinct. It would show three things:

1. A specific isotopic ratio that doesn't match the local soil.

2. A spatial pattern that follows flight corridors rather than wind and weather patterns.

3. A lack of associated elements (like silica, iron, or titanium) that naturally accompany aluminum in crustal dust.

Instead, when you look at the broad, multi-decade datasets from the EPA’s NADP or global aerosol networks, the aluminum levels in our rain and snow haven't spiked in correlation with the growth of aviation. They correlate perfectly with wind events, volcanic activity, and natural soil erosion.

I’m not discounting the findings. I’m saying that finding 'nano-aluminum' in rain is like finding salt in the ocean—it’s expected, it’s natural, and it’s been there for millions of years. Calling it 'proof of spraying' is a leap that the chemical evidence doesn't support. If you have a specific lab report that shows an aluminum-to-silica ratio or an isotopic signature that couldn't possibly be natural soil dust, I am genuinely interested in seeing that data—because that would be a world-changing discovery. And Dane Wigington certainly doesn't have it.

LW's avatar

Ha ha ha!!!

Justin Cartier's avatar

Cymatics following engagement of H.A.A.R.P. that creates cloud formations as outlined in many patents. The USAF has said we will control the weather by 2025. Those cloud patterns are not God's design.

Kathy M.'s avatar

Interesting. Cymatics is the science of making sound and vibration visible. By placing physical materials—such as sand, salt, or water—on a vibrating surface, frequencies create geometric, symmetrical, and mandala-like patterns. Changing the pitch or tone alters the shapes, revealing the invisible physics of standing waves.H

Justin Cartier's avatar

Spray aluminum, barium and stromium from airplanes and engage HAARP creating clouds and controling the weather. Bonus for the oligarchs are the microbes killed when aluminum is attempted to be broken down. Our food has less nutrients and their eugenics plan expands. 5G towers are also HAARP arays.

Dara Buenos Dias!'s avatar

They look like normal pre frontal moisture coming in. Sorry. I do not see a geoengineered sky there.

Meryl Nass's avatar

what does "normal pre frontal moisure" mean?

Fred Jewett's avatar

Cirrus Fibratus clouds were observed in the 1800s and officially classified in 1921 before any aircraft could reach the floor of 6000 metres for this cloud type. I wouldn't pin my wife's obsession with chem trails on this cloud type. We see suspicious "contrails" in our area however as we are between Toronto and Detroit there are a lot of commercial flights overhead every day so they can't all be "chemtrails".

Jamie's avatar

I get contrails, and less often chemtrails here

Tatyana Monakhova's avatar

Clouds like these often appear over Moscow. I call them fascist because the pilots are well aware they're using a toxic weapon against civilians.

Kathy M.'s avatar

Thank you for the corroboration!