You have to give him credit for continuing to insist the Emperor has clothes when nearly everyone else is tittering about the fools who still believe what is so obviously and ridiculously false.
Absolutely it’s generally safe. That’s why I went from the top of my game and eight days later developed debilitating Afib. That bastard needs keel hauled following his neutering along with the rest that are responsible. Scum-sucking bottom feeders.
I agree with you that many will, but I think the number may be closer to 50% than 75%. A small difference, you may say, but I think it matters. Given that 10-20% of the population submitted reluctantly, because of threats of job loss, fear of social opprobrium, or just with mixed feelings, and given that 30% didn't get the jab, that leaves only 50-60% who willingly accepted it. The numbers here are likely less now, so that even if your number of 75% is correct, that 50-60% becomes more like 38-45% who line up like sheep to the slaughter. We the non-compliant have become the majority. And, if it is true that roughly 50% of the population know of someone injured or killed by the vaccine, even with denial, I'd say the numbers may be lower. If only 50% would follow like lemmings, that leaves only 25-30% as suckers. This leaves a whopping 70-75% as potential resisters. The con-men, with either statistic are likely to be out-gunned. And with the higher estimate, it will be a massacre, and they may end up in jail or worse (finally).
Mattias Desmet says something similar in his book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism. I can't find the exact quote just now but I think your percentages are correct: Desmet estimates about a third of the population who will gullibly accept and do anything they're told at almost any time. What I call the "hard of thinking" crowd.
Then there's a large "soft middle" composed of the people you mention, who are either threatened with job loss or simply "go along to get along" and avoid conflict. That leaves the vital percentage of dissenters who will question everything as it unfolds, which in my view is typically only about 10% of the population. That percentile will increase in situations like post-Covid, as more and more bodies stack up from the jabs.
Here's a quote from Desmet: "Without dissenting voices to break the massive resonance of the mass narrative, a totalitarian system lapses into radical self-destructiveness; the hypnosis becomes complete. The totalitarian state then becomes, as (Hannah) Arendt described, 'A monster that devours its own children.'" (p. 117)
I was injured by my one and only pfizer shot. Biggest regret of my life. Although my closest friend has been very supportive of me going through this nightmare, she and her husband have had 10 shots. I can understand why they believe as they’ve never had covid or suffered an adverse effect. Although her husband was hospitalized for a night with an inflammed pancreas. He put it down to some lactic pills he tried. I know two more couples who have kept up to date with their shots. How is it I got injured by one and they’re living their lives normally? I wish there were answers.
Like you, I know people who got multiple jabs. I wonder if Pfizer started selling vials of saline after a while? Once the news was out - even partially - about adverse effects did they maybe decide they could get the same money for salt water & avoid the SAE blowback?
We’ll probably never know all the twists & turns in this vast crime.
Vivien: The shots contained different substances. The howbadisyourbatch.com data from Denmark shows that some people got what amounts to a placebo, others a moderately toxic dose, and others (about 4%) a highly toxic dose. Also there is differential sensitivity among different recipients. There are ways to detox. You should contact react19.org for help.
“there is differential sensitivity among different recipients.”
And Mark, not just different sensitivities to the LNPs & spike but also the shots are entirely unpredictable. One person makes hardly any spike. Another makes a LOT of it.
Traditional shots would deliver a uniform quantity of pathogen, live or attenuated. Even then, people reacted differently. But with the artificial mRNA, its behavior in the body is entirely unpredictable.
Not just in terms of volume of pathogen created - but have you also heard of frame-shifting? The mRNA can & does make errors so that it doesn’t make the spike but produces some other random non-human protein, also with totally unforeseeable results.
I didn't know they called him Proffit lol. OK, here's what's weird, Grok is spouting this same archaic line of talking points that everyone and his brother has known was BS for years now. Why? There must be a demographic they are hoping to pacify into keeping taking the shots. I fear it is the uneducated and those that can be intimidated by white coats. And, and this pisses me off, the huge eldercare industry, of SNFs, assisted livings, and memory cares. I know private equity has been sucking the pennies off the eyes of the dead at nursing homes as Mayor Duggan in Detroit, (after Poisy Hat, our vulpine cortisol lipped Xi and Klaus loving governor, put the infected into the nursing homes in 2020) had to call Doctors Without Borders into the nursing homes as private equity was not funding them properly. On the plane from CA a few years ago I saw an ad in the Delta magazine for a franchise for the cognitively impaired, with a soda shoppe and a petting zoo, Alzheimer's Disneyland basically, so the bloodsucking forces of Blackrock want to totally monetize the elderly. So this means they'll be forced into shots and boosters until they don't know who they are or come down with a lucrative disease. One of the things the playbook does is DELAY, so old Dr. Off Them is trying to squeeze as much out of the demographic that's left as he can. I do wish we weren't already governed by some evil global power structure so Bobby could save those who will be forced into these shots by circumstance or lack of education.
No, no, no, no, no, Astragale, you are too cynical, I am sure Saint Offit genuinely holds that the redemption of humanity from the scourge of evil infectious disease can only be achieved by giving every baby world wide a thousand ( or more) "vaccines" on the first day of life and that any profits accruing to him for this righteous work are only for the administration of this glorious vision. Never forget that the road to perfect health is through drug taking. More drugs equal more health. Saint Offit has told us this and so it must be true.
He kind of resembles Fauci - maybe a relative? I belong to a FB group made up of primarily older (60+) women and a question was posed as to whether everyone planned to get their next booster and the comments saying "of course" and "anyone who doesn't is foolish" were abundant.
True here too, but also a thundering herd that lines up every year for whatever the industry tells them to.
You are right the younger folk have been immersed in operant conditioning since birth. During the rituals of 2020 it was mostly elders that were a little doubtful, but a lot of people were overcome by the wall to wall repetition and omnipresent imagery, scary stories and seeming universal agreement that fatal danger and imminent horrible hospital death or fines and imprisonment was at hand if they didn’t do as they were told.
Rebecca, Sadly for me, FB is really the only connection I have to some relatives and old friends, and one of the easiest ways to find out what is happening in my neighborhood. I don't argue with some of these booster morons but it is interesting to see how brainwashed they are. Also scary to see how the major news outlets have spouted headlines saying that RFKJr has "canceled MRNA vaccine contracts" without completing the sentence that he's redirecting research funds to better alternatives.
I agree with you on that. He thinks he’s doing the right thing and he believes he’s been right for so long. I think that his subconscious is protecting his cognitive mind from reality because it would lead to an ego death.
What irks me the most is that the combined risk for COVID hospitalization from the two Phase 3 trials was just 1.5 per 1,000 person-years -- when the fully-annualized risk for flu hospitalization in 2017/18 was about 2 per 1,000 person-years.
And 2020 data from 555 medical centers revealed that the hospital death rate had come down to below 7% (under 7% of those COVID-hospitalized died). Even the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was below 7%.
Put together you get less than a half-million expected COVID hospitalizations per year, and just under 35,000 expected COVID deaths per year (using 7% of the hospitalized). Even doubling these figures to account for the "healthy trial participant" effect does not wash with how they describe COVID.
--under 7% death in those COVID-hospitalized: PMC8547263
In 2020 I watched Genevieve Briand analyze the death statistics for the first part of the year. The recording may still be up somewhere. She showed how and when the statistics were rearranged to boost the number of covid deaths by decreasing heart disease, pneumonia/flu which were historically stable numbers. Assigning cause was even in the news when the nervous black lady official got up and said people die with covid, not necessarily from covid---and nobody even blinked. That seems to have vanished from the interwebs. I dunno if this was before or after U107 code and positive tests for accounting.
Briand was attacked for offending the dead and bereaved and had to apologize, retract, defend etc. What was amusing is that at the end of her talk she made the point that all deaths affected people and had meaning.
A few years ago before all this nonsense I was interested in how the number of 'flu' deaths was boosted by reclassifying pneumonias and combining flu and pneumonias to make 'Influenza Like Illness', ILI. I confirmed this for myself by examining New York statistics which had almost a hundred different pneumonias in the breakdown. For example the statistic is fluffed up by lumping aspiration pneumonia into ILI. This is the data used to market the need for flu and pneumonia vaccines.
One of my comments they accepted: "Kennedy is highly knowledgeable in this field and has some of the most accomplished and honest professionals from Ivy League colleges that are advising him.
" These types of knee-jerk political responses are not true or helpful. Have you read the reports of large numbers of adverse health effects? Top, open-minded medical professionals have poked holes in all the pro-pharma propaganda as you're parroting here. It's impossible to know which lives were saved and which were lost with the mRNA vaccines as you cannot possibly know what would have happened had less invasive protocols been followed such as the greater use of repurposed anti-viral drugs. Monoclonal antibodies had provable positive effects. I've spent thousands of hours looking at the science and would agree with Kennedy who's explained his rationales."
We're just not seeing open and meaningful debates during this administration; the "cancel culture" is moving against those who question our Israel-occupied politics and it looks like Alex Berenson's free speech case is getting dismissed, not backed up by the Trump people.
Since the "liberals" are rightly against Trump's dictatorial politics how could we possibly expect progress against the Offits and the Hotez creeps?
From David Zweig (01-27-22) “Why Are We Boosting Kids?” – The CDC and the FDA have ignored other countries’ caution, the WHO’s chief scientist, American experts, and their own data. https://www.thefp.com/p/why-are-we-boosting-kids
"“... if you are a young male who is vaccinated you have two choices. Option A: don’t get a booster and run a 0.3 in 100,000 risk of ending up in the hospital with Covid. Option B: get the booster and run a 10 in 100,000 risk of getting myocarditis. The risk/reward calculation seemed so crazy that I thought I was misunderstanding it. Did the CDC notice what I was seeing in their slides?
"…“. Paul Offit … is considered one the country’s top authorities on pediatric vaccine policy. He recently said that getting boosted would not be worth the risk for the average healthy 17-year-old boy and he advised his son, who is in his 20s, not to get a third dose. ..."
I'd love to see him held to account.
You have to give him credit for continuing to insist the Emperor has clothes when nearly everyone else is tittering about the fools who still believe what is so obviously and ridiculously false.
Absolutely it’s generally safe. That’s why I went from the top of my game and eight days later developed debilitating Afib. That bastard needs keel hauled following his neutering along with the rest that are responsible. Scum-sucking bottom feeders.
I had a stroke after mine. I only took one.
Against my better judgment, I was dumb thrice. Nothing until I got the crap itself, then just as I was getting over it - wham - Afib.
So sorry…
They knew it was harmful.
They knew it would deliver toxic nanoparticles & create unpredictable amounts of NON-HUMAN protein for unpredictable lengths of time.
They knew it would move round the body & settle in one person’s heart, another person’s brain.
It was either reckless, for the money.
Or deliberately created to harm people.
Those behind this CRIME must be jailed.
I wish that were true but the 75% that took the Puss injection will line up for whatever... all the way to the showers.
I agree with you that many will, but I think the number may be closer to 50% than 75%. A small difference, you may say, but I think it matters. Given that 10-20% of the population submitted reluctantly, because of threats of job loss, fear of social opprobrium, or just with mixed feelings, and given that 30% didn't get the jab, that leaves only 50-60% who willingly accepted it. The numbers here are likely less now, so that even if your number of 75% is correct, that 50-60% becomes more like 38-45% who line up like sheep to the slaughter. We the non-compliant have become the majority. And, if it is true that roughly 50% of the population know of someone injured or killed by the vaccine, even with denial, I'd say the numbers may be lower. If only 50% would follow like lemmings, that leaves only 25-30% as suckers. This leaves a whopping 70-75% as potential resisters. The con-men, with either statistic are likely to be out-gunned. And with the higher estimate, it will be a massacre, and they may end up in jail or worse (finally).
Mattias Desmet says something similar in his book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism. I can't find the exact quote just now but I think your percentages are correct: Desmet estimates about a third of the population who will gullibly accept and do anything they're told at almost any time. What I call the "hard of thinking" crowd.
Then there's a large "soft middle" composed of the people you mention, who are either threatened with job loss or simply "go along to get along" and avoid conflict. That leaves the vital percentage of dissenters who will question everything as it unfolds, which in my view is typically only about 10% of the population. That percentile will increase in situations like post-Covid, as more and more bodies stack up from the jabs.
Here's a quote from Desmet: "Without dissenting voices to break the massive resonance of the mass narrative, a totalitarian system lapses into radical self-destructiveness; the hypnosis becomes complete. The totalitarian state then becomes, as (Hannah) Arendt described, 'A monster that devours its own children.'" (p. 117)
Sean - in the EU the propaganda was overwhelming.
People heard “Get vaccinated” dozens of times a day.
It was absolutely extraordinary.
And STILL many couldn’t see it was pure clichéd Orwellian propaganda.
They've been softening up the public mind for decades through various psy-ops so I'm not surprised.
We are the white spot in the dark portion of the yin yang that gives a glimpse into the brighter light that exists in another realm.
Regardless of the numbers and percentages, don’t take the fricking jab!
Mark - I hope you’re right!
There were also people counted as “vaccinated” who just bought the QR Code & evaded the shots.
So the real vaxxed number is probably a good few % points lower than official claims.
I was injured by my one and only pfizer shot. Biggest regret of my life. Although my closest friend has been very supportive of me going through this nightmare, she and her husband have had 10 shots. I can understand why they believe as they’ve never had covid or suffered an adverse effect. Although her husband was hospitalized for a night with an inflammed pancreas. He put it down to some lactic pills he tried. I know two more couples who have kept up to date with their shots. How is it I got injured by one and they’re living their lives normally? I wish there were answers.
Vivien - so sorry that happened…
Like you, I know people who got multiple jabs. I wonder if Pfizer started selling vials of saline after a while? Once the news was out - even partially - about adverse effects did they maybe decide they could get the same money for salt water & avoid the SAE blowback?
We’ll probably never know all the twists & turns in this vast crime.
Vivien: The shots contained different substances. The howbadisyourbatch.com data from Denmark shows that some people got what amounts to a placebo, others a moderately toxic dose, and others (about 4%) a highly toxic dose. Also there is differential sensitivity among different recipients. There are ways to detox. You should contact react19.org for help.
“there is differential sensitivity among different recipients.”
And Mark, not just different sensitivities to the LNPs & spike but also the shots are entirely unpredictable. One person makes hardly any spike. Another makes a LOT of it.
Traditional shots would deliver a uniform quantity of pathogen, live or attenuated. Even then, people reacted differently. But with the artificial mRNA, its behavior in the body is entirely unpredictable.
Not just in terms of volume of pathogen created - but have you also heard of frame-shifting? The mRNA can & does make errors so that it doesn’t make the spike but produces some other random non-human protein, also with totally unforeseeable results.
😱
He is triple quadrupling down.
It got broadcast because Pfizer paid for it to be broadcast.
I didn't know they called him Proffit lol. OK, here's what's weird, Grok is spouting this same archaic line of talking points that everyone and his brother has known was BS for years now. Why? There must be a demographic they are hoping to pacify into keeping taking the shots. I fear it is the uneducated and those that can be intimidated by white coats. And, and this pisses me off, the huge eldercare industry, of SNFs, assisted livings, and memory cares. I know private equity has been sucking the pennies off the eyes of the dead at nursing homes as Mayor Duggan in Detroit, (after Poisy Hat, our vulpine cortisol lipped Xi and Klaus loving governor, put the infected into the nursing homes in 2020) had to call Doctors Without Borders into the nursing homes as private equity was not funding them properly. On the plane from CA a few years ago I saw an ad in the Delta magazine for a franchise for the cognitively impaired, with a soda shoppe and a petting zoo, Alzheimer's Disneyland basically, so the bloodsucking forces of Blackrock want to totally monetize the elderly. So this means they'll be forced into shots and boosters until they don't know who they are or come down with a lucrative disease. One of the things the playbook does is DELAY, so old Dr. Off Them is trying to squeeze as much out of the demographic that's left as he can. I do wish we weren't already governed by some evil global power structure so Bobby could save those who will be forced into these shots by circumstance or lack of education.
I suppose Paul Offit thinks more drugs means more health. It is hard to remain calm when faced with monumental idiocy such as this this.
David - Offit knows more injections mean more money for him.
No, no, no, no, no, Astragale, you are too cynical, I am sure Saint Offit genuinely holds that the redemption of humanity from the scourge of evil infectious disease can only be achieved by giving every baby world wide a thousand ( or more) "vaccines" on the first day of life and that any profits accruing to him for this righteous work are only for the administration of this glorious vision. Never forget that the road to perfect health is through drug taking. More drugs equal more health. Saint Offit has told us this and so it must be true.
He kind of resembles Fauci - maybe a relative? I belong to a FB group made up of primarily older (60+) women and a question was posed as to whether everyone planned to get their next booster and the comments saying "of course" and "anyone who doesn't is foolish" were abundant.
oh no
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/rfk-jr-halts-500-million-for-mrna-vaccine-research/vi-AA1K2YRW?ocid=socialshare
Another MRNA supporter
Unfortunately, 60+ seems to be a phase where kindergarten is repeated, like continuing education.
Most of the people I know who opposed/rejected the plandemic/jabs are over 50 - many are over 60!
Younger people don’t seem so aware of the ideas of medical freedom, bodily autonomy, the Nuremberg Code.
Many urged their parents/grand parents to « vaccinated ».
Just my experience.
True here too, but also a thundering herd that lines up every year for whatever the industry tells them to.
You are right the younger folk have been immersed in operant conditioning since birth. During the rituals of 2020 it was mostly elders that were a little doubtful, but a lot of people were overcome by the wall to wall repetition and omnipresent imagery, scary stories and seeming universal agreement that fatal danger and imminent horrible hospital death or fines and imprisonment was at hand if they didn’t do as they were told.
AnnMarie. Why are you still on Facebook? In my opinion, that's the mentality of anyone still using Facebook.
Rebecca, Sadly for me, FB is really the only connection I have to some relatives and old friends, and one of the easiest ways to find out what is happening in my neighborhood. I don't argue with some of these booster morons but it is interesting to see how brainwashed they are. Also scary to see how the major news outlets have spouted headlines saying that RFKJr has "canceled MRNA vaccine contracts" without completing the sentence that he's redirecting research funds to better alternatives.
Yikes.
AnnMarie - you mean they’re on, what, shot number 10 or 11? 😳
They get it in conjunction with their flu shots.
Unbelievable.
These guys just make stuff up and start believing it.
I agree with you on that. He thinks he’s doing the right thing and he believes he’s been right for so long. I think that his subconscious is protecting his cognitive mind from reality because it would lead to an ego death.
Why do we always try to explain away shear greed and power. Call it what it is. #no justification left!!
What irks me the most is that the combined risk for COVID hospitalization from the two Phase 3 trials was just 1.5 per 1,000 person-years -- when the fully-annualized risk for flu hospitalization in 2017/18 was about 2 per 1,000 person-years.
And 2020 data from 555 medical centers revealed that the hospital death rate had come down to below 7% (under 7% of those COVID-hospitalized died). Even the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was below 7%.
Put together you get less than a half-million expected COVID hospitalizations per year, and just under 35,000 expected COVID deaths per year (using 7% of the hospitalized). Even doubling these figures to account for the "healthy trial participant" effect does not wash with how they describe COVID.
--under 7% death in those COVID-hospitalized: PMC8547263
--1.5 COVID hospitalizations per 1,000 person-years: https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/expected-covid-hospitalization-rate
In 2020 I watched Genevieve Briand analyze the death statistics for the first part of the year. The recording may still be up somewhere. She showed how and when the statistics were rearranged to boost the number of covid deaths by decreasing heart disease, pneumonia/flu which were historically stable numbers. Assigning cause was even in the news when the nervous black lady official got up and said people die with covid, not necessarily from covid---and nobody even blinked. That seems to have vanished from the interwebs. I dunno if this was before or after U107 code and positive tests for accounting.
Briand was attacked for offending the dead and bereaved and had to apologize, retract, defend etc. What was amusing is that at the end of her talk she made the point that all deaths affected people and had meaning.
A few years ago before all this nonsense I was interested in how the number of 'flu' deaths was boosted by reclassifying pneumonias and combining flu and pneumonias to make 'Influenza Like Illness', ILI. I confirmed this for myself by examining New York statistics which had almost a hundred different pneumonias in the breakdown. For example the statistic is fluffed up by lumping aspiration pneumonia into ILI. This is the data used to market the need for flu and pneumonia vaccines.
All very scientific don't you think?
"The NY Times" had an article on this yesterday, and would only accept the most mild criticisms on the mRNAs. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/05/health/rfk-jr-vaccine-funding.html
One of my comments they accepted: "Kennedy is highly knowledgeable in this field and has some of the most accomplished and honest professionals from Ivy League colleges that are advising him.
" These types of knee-jerk political responses are not true or helpful. Have you read the reports of large numbers of adverse health effects? Top, open-minded medical professionals have poked holes in all the pro-pharma propaganda as you're parroting here. It's impossible to know which lives were saved and which were lost with the mRNA vaccines as you cannot possibly know what would have happened had less invasive protocols been followed such as the greater use of repurposed anti-viral drugs. Monoclonal antibodies had provable positive effects. I've spent thousands of hours looking at the science and would agree with Kennedy who's explained his rationales."
We're just not seeing open and meaningful debates during this administration; the "cancel culture" is moving against those who question our Israel-occupied politics and it looks like Alex Berenson's free speech case is getting dismissed, not backed up by the Trump people.
Since the "liberals" are rightly against Trump's dictatorial politics how could we possibly expect progress against the Offits and the Hotez creeps?
Offut himself does not get covid boosters - he is concerned about side effects
https://www.drvinayprasad.com/p/paul-offit-72-is-not-getting-a-booster
From David Zweig (01-27-22) “Why Are We Boosting Kids?” – The CDC and the FDA have ignored other countries’ caution, the WHO’s chief scientist, American experts, and their own data. https://www.thefp.com/p/why-are-we-boosting-kids
"“... if you are a young male who is vaccinated you have two choices. Option A: don’t get a booster and run a 0.3 in 100,000 risk of ending up in the hospital with Covid. Option B: get the booster and run a 10 in 100,000 risk of getting myocarditis. The risk/reward calculation seemed so crazy that I thought I was misunderstanding it. Did the CDC notice what I was seeing in their slides?
"…“. Paul Offit … is considered one the country’s top authorities on pediatric vaccine policy. He recently said that getting boosted would not be worth the risk for the average healthy 17-year-old boy and he advised his son, who is in his 20s, not to get a third dose. ..."
I call him get Off it!
Ok. Maybe he can’t be turned.
I'm a giving person. He can have all of my injections. :)
Dr. Offit is in it to profit... with no concern for the injured or dead.
If it were 200 years ago, it would be off with his head.
Offit is a vile specimen who has no feeling for men, women or children.
He is in the same category as psychopathic Bill Gates.
Just a personal opinion-- I believe Dr. PrOffit needs to be terminated from the airwaves with extreme prejucice.
(Pr)Offit
Yes, that is the nickname often used for him, Paul for Profit.