The BMGF and the FDA: working together on biodefense and population control
Thanks to a reader for providing these links
“To assess the feasibility of exposure-based paradigm for the development of long-acting [permanent?—Nass] contraceptive products.” You don’t title a million dollar grant with a word salad unless you are trying to conceal its meaning.
I had thought until now that all the bribes to FDA, CDC and NIH went to the FDA (and other) Foundations, but it seems the FDA found a way to take in the bribes directly, without any intermediaries who might interfere with how the monies are to be used…
Fits with what we learned about how FDA advises its revolving door employees that they can still influence FDA after they have taken their payoff jobs.
https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2486
BTW, below is an incredible resource for looking at all the organizations funded by BMGF—there are so many interlocking relationships. It seems most of all of the grantees who get a lot of money also donate to the WHO, for example, and some donate back to each other. An incestuous mix.
https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukema/viz/BMGF_16781899135930/BMGFDashboardJAN-2024
You are on a roll lately, you go girlfriend...
Thankyou several billion times from all the good humans.
It is long past the time when we should have abolished all tax-exempt foundations. Many of the largest ones are not only not beneficial to the United States or to humankind. Their entire endowments should be considered as income the first year and fully taxed at the corporate rate, and all income in future years should be taxable. If they want to continue to exist, then they should not be subsidized by taxpayers.