36 Comments
User's avatar
Rob D's avatar

The WHO, and many other monsters, want to erect an "infrastructure of fear" that will be the backbone of everything they do moving forward, because people who are terrified do whatever they are told. We saw this clearly in 2020/21. I still believe that fear is the true goal of these people. If they keep the population terrified of "lab leaks", "germs", etc, they can pretty much say whatever they want about a scary new disease that was "leaked" or released and the people will fall in line... and accept the new "cure", once these sociopathic societal engineers have built this permanent state of fear. We must choose courage. We have to. We really don't have any choice anymore. If we don't choose to be brave in the face of everything that is still being planned for us, we deserve what we get. Thanks for this great post Dr Nass!

Truth Seeker's avatar

Your assessment is very accurate. Have taken the pulse of international resisters for many years. It is also true that the fearmongering is not sticking as it did for Covidiocy.

We always have choice.

As you point out resist, Health does not now or ever come from needles.

Dave's avatar

The US just needs to stop playing footsies with these jerks and drop the hell out.

Skupe's avatar

DJT did drop out of the WHO but not the UN yet! He needs to do both!

Sukey Watson's avatar

Thanks for your diligence in presenting all the facts and ramifications of the globalist entity organizations whose desire is to totally control us all, and likely eliminate many of us. They want to role out a techno-dystopian nightmare marketed as a Utopia. I doubt their techno dystopian nightmare if it comes to fruition can actually even keep humans alive. Their hubris blinds them to how nature, the climate, and all of biological creatures and plants actually work and interact with each other. We can throw in the Sun cycles, planetary alignments, gravitational and magnetic fields too while we are at it since those things not only are probably the biggest drivers of climate but probably also other forces of which we are not even aware. Hubris is always a dangerous position to take especially for any leaders or organizations.

Marago's avatar

I believe the end game is de-population.

Annette O's avatar

Thank-you for this concise explanation and the work you do Dr Meryl. Fighting hard Downunder. #australiaexitsthewho #ausexits

Bon Kwi Kwi's avatar

The WHO has 6.8 billion rea$ons to oversee future pandemics with the same kind of alacrity they used in the Covid scamdemic.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Where did you find that information.

If accurate, they are well funded.

Truth Seeker's avatar

thank you

Just went there and its word salad.

They disclosed an "ambitious" project to raise triple billion

It appears that the Agency is in deep financial trouble

The website is also lame with large fonts and frames.

That looks very suspect.

Peter Taylor's avatar

I salute you Dr Nass, your work in bringing into a much sharper focus the malfeasance of this odious organisation and those who lead it is exemplary and a benefit to humanity. Every essay you write, opinion offered, presentation made is but another strand in a rope created so strong that it is hoped they, the WHO will result in being totally trussed, tied up so tightly they won’t ever again be able to propose such criminal and antithetical behaviour against humanity ever again…

How it is even remotely possible that they believe and continue via iteration after iteration of their “treaty or agreement” to push this agenda through is beyond belief..

Personally I avidly read every article you have forwarded regarding the WHO, its surreptitious agenda to usurp humanity, the global populace, our governments and all that we are… and believe in..

Kia Kaha (stay strong) From New Zealand

Deep Dive's avatar

"Why would the WHO owners want to do this? So pandemics can be released in future, and no one will be able to tell where they came from."

That's right, Dr. Nass. What they are after is "plausible deniability."

Jon Olsen's avatar

Excellent brief summary of the risks. Above all Do not TRUST those who consistently lie. Trust has turned to Rust. Worthless.

Te Reagan's avatar

What do our grandchildren have to look forward to? I’ve lived my life and am ready to meet my maker when that time comes.

Our children and grandchildren are going to live an entirely different life.

The age the internet of everything is still something most of us can’t imagine. But, it’s coming…

This is also the age of contagion, bioweapons, and countermeasures.

The Great Culling is happening right now. It’s a slow kill for some, and a fast kill for others.

After a while sudden death from cancer, and pathogens will become normalized.

And just as people stood by helplessly watching the elderly become isolated, jabbed, and denied care… the same will happen to everyone. No one will step up for fear of being next. And then,, their day will come. Repeat over and over again until no one is left to care or fear.

Roisin Dubh's avatar

They will encroach on those who let them.

Ruth Williams's avatar

It’s the kill box! BIS & DOD INVOLVED. Trump can’t stop the globalists! Look at who he has surrounded himself with…technocrats

Suzanne Kerr's avatar

Exactly! Trust NO ONE!

Truth Seeker's avatar

With this sleuthing, it is crystal clear why the manuvering of the globalists at the WHO need scrutiny despite DJT pulling the US out twice. What to do?

It is possible or likely that without US funding they have been cobbled.

Bankruptcy may be on their horizon.

They need constant exposure until that occurs.

Goeff's avatar

A couple of us attended a medical meeting yesterday, organized by a friend of mine who's a practicing infectious disease specialist, which was nothing more than high pressure propaganda emphasizing the notion that vaccines are safe. It was shockingly primitive stuff, repeated repeatedly (!!) without a shred of substantiation, aimed at doctors, not one of which questioned anything about the validity of the claim. Not one.

I spoke with one of them about it afterwards, a lovely person who I know personally, and she was all on board, and adamantly so, with the propaganda. Very sad, but as stated by Jacques Ellul in "Propaganda," "intellectuals" are more sensitive than peasants to propaganda.

If anyone knows of effective ways of cracking those nuts, please share.

Meryl Nass's avatar

An event in Albany last week featured a family that was affected. The family was said to have made a big impression on lawmakers.

Goeff's avatar

PS: Neither evidence nor reasoning has any effect on the true believers in my experience.

Meryl Nass's avatar

You have to make it personal, put a face on a name, etc.

So they say.

Crixcyon's avatar

The ONLY reason for a panny agreement is to give the WHO the power to forcibly vaccinate the planet with deadly mRNA poisons. Health is and never will be considered. Only the murder of humanity initiated from a central locus. Do not be deceived.

Doug Cragoe's avatar

The problem with this theory is that deliberate pandemics can hurt or kill the people that are deliberately releasing them. So why would anyone do this? You think people are willing to die themselves just to depopulate the planet and “save” the earth? I don’t. I’ve heard the same theory that COVID was deliberately released in China. Chinese media sure said that at the beginning. They said it was a released as a way to attack them. If so, it did not work as China was quite happy to spread the disease around the world and make the rest of the world also suffer.

If a contagious bio weapon or contagious nasty virus is developed that could be controlled to limit the spread, then the deliberate release might be plausible. But in our modern world with international travel that seems unlikely. If you think this kind of limited release is possible tell us about it.

Yes I understand weapons are being developed along with secret vaccines that would protect friendly populations. But those vaccines would eventually be stolen, bought, or somehow obtained by the unfriendly populations.

Meryl Nass's avatar

History proves you wrong--covid in particular, but many other examples. The US tends to attack islands or use anthrax, which does not spread.