The Stockholm conference kerfuffle
I was there and here is what happened. Not a whole lot actually.
This was the best pandemic truth conference I have attended, though my own talk had little new information. In the closing moments of the conference, Astrid Stuckleberger, a PhD social scientist at University of Geneva and WHO contractor for many years, made several claims that not everyone agreed with.
She blamed the pandemic on, among others, Freemasons. She might be right. She mentioned magnetism and graphene oxide. She was not going “off-script” as stated below because as a presenter I can guarantee there was no script. No one reviewed my presentation ahead of time. I too talked about a coup to take over the world during my presentation.
No one stopped Astrid from completing her presentation. Every speaker had 40 minutes and she got hers. It was during the panel discussion that she was criticized.
There was concern by some that the entire conference would be tagged as “crazies” for Astrid’s statements. But conferences are not made or broken by one performance, and scientists disagree with each other; why not social scientists?
Ryan Cole, a pathologist on the panel, took the mike when it was his turn to comment, and blew apart the graphene oxide story, because it has been overturned by 3 different scientists, all of whom used sensitive instruments which revealed no graphene oxide. Which btw is colored black, and is easily visible to the naked eye. I have heard multiple presentations about graphene oxide and am convinced it is not in the shots. But I am no chemistry expert.
Just because there may be no graphene oxide does NOT mean anyone has ruled out the presence of other nefarious materials in the shots. Let’s admit that no one knows what is in these concoctions exactly, and with so many different bits of breakdown RNA in them, the vials cannot be tested to find out—it is simply impossible to characterize all the different materials in the vial, nor how they have changed during shipping, bottling and defrosting.
So there can be no true informed consent at this point. And we know there is no liability. And they were manufactured in the absence of regulatory oversight. You wouldn’t allow your pet to be jabbed with this stuff. Why take it yourself? Of that I am sure Astrid and Ryan agree.
Below is the inflammatory article traversing cyberspace. It is just intended to confuse everyone, I think.
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=155807
What really happened during the Covid ‘vaccine truth’ forum at the Pandemic Strategies Conference held in Stockholm on 1/22/23 and shown in the video posted above?! Posted on January 25, 2023 by State of the Nation
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger Silenced by Dr. Ryan Cole at Pandemic Strategies Conference 1-22-23
“Dr Glenn Dormer, an attendee in the audience said: “I was very emotionally touched and I stood up in the audience, there were 800 people, and I said: “this woman is risking her life to tell more truth than we have heard in the last 2 days in this congregation.”
She worked off-script. She actually started to show what the plan is, and she said: “this is what WHO was and what it has become, part of this control grid.” And the longer these 15 minutes went, the more it was clear to me, I told this to the people sitting next to me, “she’s going off-script”.
And I then noticed at the bottom at the front row where all the reserve seats for the people running the conference and speakers, suddenly a very great amount of activity, people running back and forth, Sven Roman, who was in charge of the Läkarupproret, I could see him going to the person sponsoring the conference.
I saw a little bit of panic, because they now had one of their own who was the last speaker at the conference, she was not only giving breadcrumbs, she was giving the whole picture. So one of the speakers, Dr Ryan Cole, stood up and basically took the microphone after 40 minutes. They had to have a reason why they had to demic her after only 40.”
The reality is that if everyone who is fighting for truth where in total agreement on everything, I would be suspicious that we were being set up. Seeing nations around the world all be completely unified about the official covid narrative was to me, proof in and of itself that something was off. It's hard to figure out who is right and who is wrong about each and every detail but letting people speak out is the only way to sort through it, I guess.
Before the covid debacle, I believed in about 10% of conspiracy theories. Those percentages have somewhat flipped in my mind now and while I do not know how many of them are true, I won't turn my nose up at any of them. Who could have predicted this situation we are in and how many bad actors there are? (except those who believed almost all the conspiracy theories and were very sinical)
Is it not possible that there is graphene oxide in SOME of the vials, but not others, as we know there are different batches with different lethality already. How does one explain the self-assembling threads that have been observed in real time? To claim that there is NONE without access to a wide sample seems unscientific to me.