One can only hope and pray that these Members of Parliament--most of whom could not even be bothered to show up during critical debates about their shoddy handling of the Covid-19 pandemic response--can even muster the level of literacy & intelligence to actually read & comprehend the Telegraph's perfectly reasonable commentary.
WHO New Deputy Director: "While billions of low risk people were receiving vaccines, & sometimes multiple vaccines, that is something we need to examine & is being examined by Member States right now.
How can an MP be so right about the reasons for the UK not to sign the fake WHO 'health treaty' but be so blind as to think that the UK's response to the 'plandemic' was world leading? My guess is that the 'WHO Treaty' and the amendments to the IHR were planned long before the COVID con was unravelled and that the British Government is/was in on the deadly deed long before it was launched. It is to be the driving force behind the ultimate 'globalist' objectives of the tri/party UN/WHO/WEF. The botched and delayed 'COVID' enquiry is an attempt to kick the can down the road to beyond the forthcoming election in the hopes that the WHO can conjure up another 'Pandemic' - maybe 'Climate Emergency' - in time to relegate their COVID scam to history.
My guess is that the writer was "pandering" to the narcissicism endemic in the politician cohort. By pretending to believe that they did a good job, the intention may have been to avoid alienating the obviously low-voltage intellect of these "public servants".
I love how they talk about their c0v1d response like c0v1d was a thing. They reacted to the common cold and flu, same as we've had throughout human history.
And yes that includes the "Spanish Flu" of 1918. An "outbreak" that didn't, in fact, start in Spain, but in an American military base after a new vaccination had been administered and of which upwards of 90% of deaths were from bacterial pneumonia. (Look it up)
Their response was to shut people in their homes for the common cold and flu.
Their response was to isolate seniors for the common cold and flu.
Their response was to shut down the economy for the common cold and flu.
Their response was to force untested vaccines that were "safe and effective" for the common cold and flu.
I could go on and on here.
The point is, the only response that would have been the right response would have been no response at all. (See Sweden)
So, for their to be any inquiry that come to any conclusion other than that they screwed up everything with their useless, and dangerous, meddling is nothing but a smoke screen.
John Redwood is one of our far-too-few decent Parliamentarians.
Perhaps his boldness will encourage others to speak out.
Fingers crossed, maybe we are now creeping in the right direction.
Thanks, Dr. Nass
One can only hope and pray that these Members of Parliament--most of whom could not even be bothered to show up during critical debates about their shoddy handling of the Covid-19 pandemic response--can even muster the level of literacy & intelligence to actually read & comprehend the Telegraph's perfectly reasonable commentary.
Finally some sanity.
Great news Dr. Nass!
Meanwhile there is a push in the US to discredit any anti WHO ACCORD information.
It’s a slick campaign online on Twitter, targeted at young voters
Hear! Hear!
As USA's founders used Our Creator's wisdom to build, now the world uses Satan's wisdom to tear down and enslave the world!
I wish you all could see me dancing now
Small correction: Redwood is Conservative, not Liberal.
THE WHO, THE WEF, THE UN ARE ALL PART OF THE SAME GLOBALIST TOTALITARIAN GROUP WHOSE ULTIMATE GOAL IS TO
BE THE WORLD GOVERNMENT! GLOBAL COMPACT ON MIGRATION OF THE UN IS AN EXAMPLE....OUR LOW LIFE POLITICIANS
LIJELY ALL SIGNED OFF ON IT! THE PLANDEMIC AND THE COVID BIO WEAPON HIGHLY ORCHESTRATED BY DOD,MIC,NIH,FAUCI,
MORE GOOD NEWS! Thank you, Meryl!!!
WHO New Deputy Director: "While billions of low risk people were receiving vaccines, & sometimes multiple vaccines, that is something we need to examine & is being examined by Member States right now.
Hello WHO - We have been saying that same thing since day 1 and ridiculed by WHO Staff... Better late to get up to speed than never we guess... https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/who-new-deputy-director-while-billions
How can an MP be so right about the reasons for the UK not to sign the fake WHO 'health treaty' but be so blind as to think that the UK's response to the 'plandemic' was world leading? My guess is that the 'WHO Treaty' and the amendments to the IHR were planned long before the COVID con was unravelled and that the British Government is/was in on the deadly deed long before it was launched. It is to be the driving force behind the ultimate 'globalist' objectives of the tri/party UN/WHO/WEF. The botched and delayed 'COVID' enquiry is an attempt to kick the can down the road to beyond the forthcoming election in the hopes that the WHO can conjure up another 'Pandemic' - maybe 'Climate Emergency' - in time to relegate their COVID scam to history.
My guess is that the writer was "pandering" to the narcissicism endemic in the politician cohort. By pretending to believe that they did a good job, the intention may have been to avoid alienating the obviously low-voltage intellect of these "public servants".
Agree completely!!!
dang! (in a good way!)
John Redwood was a Conservative minister & is a Conservative MP.
He’s long been detested by non-conservative in Britain, especially for serving in Thatcher’s government.
So a LOT of Brits will dismiss what he says out of hand.
Still, he’s raised his voice against the WHO global coup & that’s to be welcomed. The more OPPOSITION, the merrier!
oh thanks . a ray of hope.
I love how they talk about their c0v1d response like c0v1d was a thing. They reacted to the common cold and flu, same as we've had throughout human history.
And yes that includes the "Spanish Flu" of 1918. An "outbreak" that didn't, in fact, start in Spain, but in an American military base after a new vaccination had been administered and of which upwards of 90% of deaths were from bacterial pneumonia. (Look it up)
Their response was to shut people in their homes for the common cold and flu.
Their response was to isolate seniors for the common cold and flu.
Their response was to shut down the economy for the common cold and flu.
Their response was to force untested vaccines that were "safe and effective" for the common cold and flu.
I could go on and on here.
The point is, the only response that would have been the right response would have been no response at all. (See Sweden)
So, for their to be any inquiry that come to any conclusion other than that they screwed up everything with their useless, and dangerous, meddling is nothing but a smoke screen.