Discussion about this post

User's avatar
skipper's avatar

The key statement is in the beginning where is says that the amendments proposed by the US make it binding instead of advice. Then, it goes on to suggest the resistance that the US should provide (basically against itself). Contradictions are acceptable it seems. The US is just an oligarchy.

Lost is the notion that an unconstitutional law is void at the start if the constitution is supreme. It does not matter (in theory only) that treaties or executive orders contrary to the constitution are void and unenforceable. Face it: the constitution is dead and cannot enforce itself.

Excellent section on the uselessness of defunding. Just exit the whole damn spiders web thing and throw off the yoke or suffer enslavement. you cannot negotiate with liars and cheats and win. This is an old Hegelian dialectic strategy of thesis-antithesis leading to synthesis = you lose!

Expand full comment
Darlene Corkan Motley's avatar

Criminals are going to do what they do. They can legally pass all sorts of laws. I have no fear. At this point I am convinced each of us will stand alone before Jesus. It is written fear not what men can do to you...

One only needs to knock.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts