Thank you, Dr. Nass for sounding the alarm. As a small farmer in Texas, I've been sounding the alarm for years to all who eat food: There's not enough of us farmers to fight the food fight alone. We need everyone who puts food in their mouths to go after their elected servants - ((political officials) and demand in their state that real food be encouraged and farmers be left alone to raise it, sell it while growing it in the best conditions possible, which means without poison in the sky, ground and water.
I pray you light a fire under folks so they realize the truths you speak. By the way, as a side note, I'll be 70 in November and my husband will be 80 in July; we plan to keep doing what we can on the small farm we are blessed to live on, while we can for as long as we are able.
There is the Texas Slim Foundation and The Beef Initiative which offers people options of buying from ranchers directly. They have organized a list throughout the US for people to buy close to them and to support local farmers, if they don't live near a farm themselves. It is worth looking into this IMHO.
Not all of us can go vegan being an O blood type I found out the hard way. I am jealous of those who can. Living in Hawaii, where we should be able to grow nearly all of our food due to the warm temperatures, rich soil, and moisture. But 90% comes from the mainland. That's ridiculous. I try to only eat local grass fed beef and Neiman Ranch imported items as a splurge. We still aren't allowed to drink healthy raw milk, but hopefully that will change soon. Luckily we have people like Dr Carolyn Dean MD ND, who is spear heading biodynamic OKOA farms currently organizing small farms and back yard gardens to share equipment and in other ways support each other. It's a win win solution, what they grow is seasonal, beautiful, nutritious, and delicious.
When I grew up my grandfather grew a prodigious amount of veggies and fruit in our back yard. It was divine, and I carried on this tradition as long as I could.
OMG. 142,000 farms gone! I'm stuck on that. So what can we do? I already buy organic and support all local bee keepers, ranchers, fruit growers, farmers market. Your slides are fabulous with stats that I can share. But really what can we actually do?
Dr. D'Adamo (a naturopath, chiropractor, iridologist and astute lovely doctor--I went to him once when he was in his 80s) felt that different diets worked best for specific blood types. His son wrote "Eat Right for Your Type."
I am a vegetarian and an O so I decided not to follow his advice on this issue.
I'm type O. I tried being a vegetarian when younger. I felt like I was going to pass out a few days into the experiment. So I stopped. I'm mostly likely a candidate for an at least part-time Carnivore diet. Jordan Peterson's daughter suffered terribly until she went on a carnivore diet. I rather doubt that she is eating purely carnivore to this day, but the bigger point should be understood that there are many variables that go into what any one given individual needs at any given point in that person's life. The ONE THING I do NOT agree with is to adhere to a diet that is based ONLY IN YOUR HEAD, i.e., based in IDEOLOGY (that's where The Left's been living!!), and NOT rooted in biology. Our human ancestors most definitely were not vegetarians ;-).
My family has a small organic farm. We grow avocados and figs. Our neighbors are a large flower farmer, and they spray pesticides almost every day with a tractor fogger right next to our farm, and drift their pesticides onto our property regularly. We have made complaints to the county, but they say that our neighbors aren't breaking any rules. Here's a video from my bedroom window of our neighbors spraying their pesticide fogger along our fence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBJvoqa9xGE
So sorry. Perhaps you could spray something benign when the wind blows toward them (like Lime) and they might then realize two can play at this game, and then try to spray when there is no wind to avoid you spraying them?
That's sad and wrong that you are trying to do things right and finding it impossible through no fault of your own. Life ain't fair, that's for sure. Still, your efforts are likely producing food a lot better than what most are eating despite the pesticide drift.
Doctor, this runs in tandem with a debased dollar that has lost over 90% of its purchasing power since the creation of the illegitimate Fed Reserve Bank
One possible explanation is that the WEF members want to reduce populations one way or another. Synthetic, nutrient deprived calories can go under the radar for a long time. When eliminating farmers goes fast enough, MAHA will be of little use, also because the US no longer is a producer that can sell useful items, to buy quality food: it goes by increasing the debt.
IMO + experience there's no substitute for food grown in a way that at least maintains the fertility of the soil (permaculture, biodynamics). Whereas there's no lack of publications on the physical effects of malnutrition, effects like impaired IQ go under the radar.
Apparently the "owners of USA" still haven't understood the relationship between academic performance and malnutrition:
---
Impaired IQ and Academic Skills in Adults Who Experienced Moderate to Severe Infantile Malnutrition: A Forty-Year Study
"Real food is good medicine". The protocols reversing chronic disease REQUIRE nutrient dense, toxin-free foods. If we can bring root-cause medicine to local primary care and to reversing heart disease, dementia, diabetes, etc, we will increase demand for local food, save family farms, rebuild local food systems, and regenerate local economies and ecosystems. It depends us, as patients and consumers, engaging with healing and wellness.
Reversing heart disease is an incredibly interesting area. We see atherosclerotic plaque shrinkage (i.e. heart disease reversal) when a person's LDL is sustained below a certain level for a time period long enough for this process to take place. Even under the strictest confines, dietary interventions at best can lower a person's cholesterol 15%, which is significant, but not nearly enough for disease reversal.
As I thought, you do not know what you are talking about. Thus your moniker is accurate.
A very low carb diet can lower cholesterol more than this (I tried it on myself, it dropped about 21%) but LDL is not the cause of heart disease--get up to date on the multiplicity of causes.
Great anecdote to demonstrate that there is variance in data, but your N=1 is not reliably translatable. LDL is *A* cause of heart disease independent of any other risk factors, I never said it was the only cause.
Please familiarize yourself with the work of these top cardiologists: Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Pradip Jamnadas, Dr. Stephen Gundry, Dr. Philip Ovadia, and an increasing number of cardiologists as well as general practitioners including Dr. Suneel Dhand. Here Dr. Ovadia explains that lowering cholesterol has not lowered the incidence of heart disease; in fact, heart disease has INCREASED in the past 10 years in spite of aiming efforts at reducing dietary fat and LDL cholesterol: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/g_CUIKmVuN4 The typical physician in practice today also makes NO distinction between the types of cholesterol, label LDL as "BAD" cholesterol, which is not the truth. They stupidly do not differentiate or even recommend testing for small dense LDL. WHY? Probably for the same exact "reason" they give-- if you are stupid enough to waste your time trying to get an actual answer that makes sense from these order-following drug dispensers-- for subjecting women to regular small doses of ionizing radiation in a totally idiotic attempt to avoid breast cancer. When they could use the latest technology which does NOT rely on roentgen rays... Hey, kids: IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY. Because in current medical practice, we know that MONEY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE ITSELF~!!
Reversal would, of course, depend on many factors - age, severity, ability to address most causative factors (of which diet is only one) - but reversal does occur. Most notable example and covered by some insurers is the work of Dr Dean Ornish:
Yes, we're saying the same thing, reversal does occur. For heart disease specifically age would only matter if it were a time-limiting factor, i.e. a 90 year old would not have enough time for the process of plaque reversal to occur. Severity needs to be more specific. Severity is usually based upon what percent of the area of an artery is blocked; 30% vs 70% would make no difference on the possibility of reversal. What would matter is if that plaque has become calcified, then the mechanism of reversal would be blocked from taking place by that shield of calcium.
You're right of course. But there is a limit to how much providing knowledge and availability of good food can impact public health. Everybody already knows not to pig out on junk, but a large segment of the population does so anyway. Just look at those lining up to buy crap at junk food booths when you're at an event where they have those set up. And what those people look like. In my opinion that's OK, if someone thinks eating crap to his heart's content is worth making him look like crap and be unhealthy, go for it. I believe in freedom. IMO we need to accept that some don't care enough. Or are stupid. Just as many believe 72 vaccines are good for their kids, and MRNA jabs were a terrific idea. I feel sorry for those kids though. But we shouldn't be telling parents how they must raise their kids, either. Grown-ups are easy, live and let live. The kids are kind of a catch-22.
It's not about forcing anyone to do anything against their will, but rather putting better medicine within reach. And engaging the power of place-based community where cultures of health can grow to surround everyone. It's certainly not a fast solution but a more sustainable one. And one that empowers individuals, families, and communities with the kind of natural sovereignty that only wellness can grant.
I'm for MAHA. It can do a lot of good. I just don't think it will make America healthy again. I do think reducing corruption in CDC and FDA and removing the criminal vaccine recommendations will help. Although what really needs to be done is reduce their power since they'll inevitably become corrupt again - that's simply how it works. Changing agricultural subsidies so junk food isn't subsidized, and good food competes better economically can help. What won't change is most people will continue to eat poorly. As I said previously, everyone knows donuts, cookies, and soda should not anchor you diet. but they eat that way anyhow. They'll continue. I think there are environmental influences beyond diet, lack of exercise, and iatrogenic causes contributing to our bad health. Maybe glyphosate, estrogenic chemicals everywhere, etc. That won't change much, although I hope he tries. As far as "not about forcing anyone" Malhotra in a Rogan interview said we should be taxing unhealthy food. That's coercion, akin to forcing. I'm no Malhotra fan, he thinks a lot of stupid things IMO. Doesn't he realize following that path would have meant taxing eggs, lard, coconut oil, and red meat? Truly a moronic path to go down.
Most people go with the flow or the crowd. If the flow is to eat better they will come along, I think--especially when they become aware they are lowering their life expectancy considerably.
You are probably right to some degree. I disagree it will be because they "become aware" of harming themselves. If they "become aware" that their thought leaders and fellow lemmings have changed course they will follow. As you astutely alluded to. That I agree with wholeheartedly. They are not capable of an appreciable level of constructive self-direction. If they were, they'd already be doing a lot differently. Thank you for all you do!
That's completely irrelevant to the fact that virtually no child receives 72 vaccines. 72 is an inflated number used to scare people who don't know how vaccines and the immune system work. That number is fabricated by breaking up combination vaccines like MMR and counting them as 3 separate vaccines. If we want to break them up to count each pathogen that a child is vaccinated against, then a more appropriate measure would be the amount of antigens per vaccine and then look at the total amount of antigens.
Even though the number of vaccines a kid receives is completely irrelevant to any meaningful human outcome, here is the correct number: Excluding flu vaccines (because only 40-50% of kids get) the number is about 36. Including a flu vaccine every single year still only gets you to 54. I also excluded COVID vaccines because this claim originated before the era of COVID.
Thank you so much, Dr. Nass. I've been working on bringing this to peoples' awareness for a couple of decades, but have not given up hope yet. I'll never stop trying. I share your CHAOS letter often and will share this one. What you do is so very important.
It’s not a silent crisis unless one lives under a rock. Veganism is a statement. You can’t live on rabbit food and stay healthy. That’s for rabbits. So, I’ll eat the rabbit and get my veggies too.
Before the great flood yes we were vegetarians I assume. After Noah disembarked he was told them that they could now can eat the animals.
You should add to your list, that they are covering our farmland in useless solar panels and wind turbines, that only exist due to massive unheard-of-ever government subsidies:
Katie Hopkins about the SOLAR FARM Net Zero Narrative of LIES:
Which is made worse because they not only spoil the quality of living for their neighbors, they need to get insurance in case some machine like a pump on their farm seizes and catches fire, which spread to the solar or wind industrial site causing $millions in damages. That's exceedingly expensive insurance that small farmers can't afford. That's UN SDGoals right there.
And also energy negative SDG corn ethanol which uses 40% of the US corn crop. It's full lifecyle fossil consumption exceeds the fossil fuel it replaces. A total waste of money which only exists due to government subsidies and mandates.
The solar panels and wind farms were mentioned in the green globalist slide. I also mentioned the ethanol on one slide, but did not go into the details on ethanol.
How do we obtain the nutritious food we need? Unless you are able and willing to do what we do you can't. We grow, catch, kill and gather it. That's the only food we trust. We get raw milk from a farm down the street, and eggs from local chicken-owners. Those are probably pretty good, but come in second to what we source ourselves. We're not obsessive about it, and eat about 30% supermarket and restaurant food. It's nice to eat out. We get our drinking water where it comes out of the ground. How is it verified that food labeled "organic" really is? I've seen how business works, it's about the bucks, and not just in the medical cartel. A lot of "organic" food suppliers are honest, a lot are only about the bucks. How do you tell the difference? Sometimes you can, like if you visit the farm to buy. If you're buying organic off a store shelf, who knows?
And the imported organic produce is not held to the same standard as domestic. And the domestic standard is far from satisfactory. We need a better organic certification system.
Thank you, Dr. Nass for sounding the alarm. As a small farmer in Texas, I've been sounding the alarm for years to all who eat food: There's not enough of us farmers to fight the food fight alone. We need everyone who puts food in their mouths to go after their elected servants - ((political officials) and demand in their state that real food be encouraged and farmers be left alone to raise it, sell it while growing it in the best conditions possible, which means without poison in the sky, ground and water.
I pray you light a fire under folks so they realize the truths you speak. By the way, as a side note, I'll be 70 in November and my husband will be 80 in July; we plan to keep doing what we can on the small farm we are blessed to live on, while we can for as long as we are able.
There is the Texas Slim Foundation and The Beef Initiative which offers people options of buying from ranchers directly. They have organized a list throughout the US for people to buy close to them and to support local farmers, if they don't live near a farm themselves. It is worth looking into this IMHO.
https://beefinitiative.com/collections/best-selling?
YES. And Farm Match. And Weston Price. You just have to look for the options.
I am vegan, for decades, and boil the water I drink
But after your show with Peter what's his last name K I think I am just scared to death over the dammed evil skypainting.
Of course being scared don't help.
I've never been called an Eater before.
I try to get there food from the farmers at the market direct .
Why they want to kill us all. And doing a good job of it....?
Why , ?
dear Lord God have mercy
They have called us "useless eaters" for decades.
That makes me feel so much better. Right you are.
I'd forgotten how useless I am...
Suddenly I am not hungry
We just need to eat the bugs, own nothing, and be happy!
“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world”
~ Henry Kissinger (1973)
Not all of us can go vegan being an O blood type I found out the hard way. I am jealous of those who can. Living in Hawaii, where we should be able to grow nearly all of our food due to the warm temperatures, rich soil, and moisture. But 90% comes from the mainland. That's ridiculous. I try to only eat local grass fed beef and Neiman Ranch imported items as a splurge. We still aren't allowed to drink healthy raw milk, but hopefully that will change soon. Luckily we have people like Dr Carolyn Dean MD ND, who is spear heading biodynamic OKOA farms currently organizing small farms and back yard gardens to share equipment and in other ways support each other. It's a win win solution, what they grow is seasonal, beautiful, nutritious, and delicious.
When I grew up my grandfather grew a prodigious amount of veggies and fruit in our back yard. It was divine, and I carried on this tradition as long as I could.
I think geoengineering is affecting every form of life.
OMG. 142,000 farms gone! I'm stuck on that. So what can we do? I already buy organic and support all local bee keepers, ranchers, fruit growers, farmers market. Your slides are fabulous with stats that I can share. But really what can we actually do?
We will be pumping out a campaign in the coming weeks--and there will be lots to do at the state, local and federal level.
And we need to share the info and help our friends eat better.
I think cooking parties, where you share great, easy recipes with friends, is a great way to help others who don't know how to start eating right.
What is the relationship between O blood type and vegan? Interested. I am O-.
Dr. D'Adamo (a naturopath, chiropractor, iridologist and astute lovely doctor--I went to him once when he was in his 80s) felt that different diets worked best for specific blood types. His son wrote "Eat Right for Your Type."
I am a vegetarian and an O so I decided not to follow his advice on this issue.
I'm type O. I tried being a vegetarian when younger. I felt like I was going to pass out a few days into the experiment. So I stopped. I'm mostly likely a candidate for an at least part-time Carnivore diet. Jordan Peterson's daughter suffered terribly until she went on a carnivore diet. I rather doubt that she is eating purely carnivore to this day, but the bigger point should be understood that there are many variables that go into what any one given individual needs at any given point in that person's life. The ONE THING I do NOT agree with is to adhere to a diet that is based ONLY IN YOUR HEAD, i.e., based in IDEOLOGY (that's where The Left's been living!!), and NOT rooted in biology. Our human ancestors most definitely were not vegetarians ;-).
My family has a small organic farm. We grow avocados and figs. Our neighbors are a large flower farmer, and they spray pesticides almost every day with a tractor fogger right next to our farm, and drift their pesticides onto our property regularly. We have made complaints to the county, but they say that our neighbors aren't breaking any rules. Here's a video from my bedroom window of our neighbors spraying their pesticide fogger along our fence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBJvoqa9xGE
So sorry. Perhaps you could spray something benign when the wind blows toward them (like Lime) and they might then realize two can play at this game, and then try to spray when there is no wind to avoid you spraying them?
That's sad and wrong that you are trying to do things right and finding it impossible through no fault of your own. Life ain't fair, that's for sure. Still, your efforts are likely producing food a lot better than what most are eating despite the pesticide drift.
Raising cows is a revolutionary act!
People complain about the higher prices of local, family farmed meat. My response is
PAY NOW OR PAY LATER. The globalist food will be expensive AND garbage.
Doctor, this runs in tandem with a debased dollar that has lost over 90% of its purchasing power since the creation of the illegitimate Fed Reserve Bank
Wonderful. We are starting a family farm in North Idaho. No experience but a lot of passion for this cause.
One possible explanation is that the WEF members want to reduce populations one way or another. Synthetic, nutrient deprived calories can go under the radar for a long time. When eliminating farmers goes fast enough, MAHA will be of little use, also because the US no longer is a producer that can sell useful items, to buy quality food: it goes by increasing the debt.
IMO + experience there's no substitute for food grown in a way that at least maintains the fertility of the soil (permaculture, biodynamics). Whereas there's no lack of publications on the physical effects of malnutrition, effects like impaired IQ go under the radar.
Apparently the "owners of USA" still haven't understood the relationship between academic performance and malnutrition:
---
Impaired IQ and Academic Skills in Adults Who Experienced Moderate to Severe Infantile Malnutrition: A Forty-Year Study
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3796166/
---
From that perspective, they're committing cultural and economic suicide (just like happens in the EU).
"Real food is good medicine". The protocols reversing chronic disease REQUIRE nutrient dense, toxin-free foods. If we can bring root-cause medicine to local primary care and to reversing heart disease, dementia, diabetes, etc, we will increase demand for local food, save family farms, rebuild local food systems, and regenerate local economies and ecosystems. It depends us, as patients and consumers, engaging with healing and wellness.
https://livingwelllocally.substack.com/p/the-best-of-living-well-locally
Reversing heart disease is an incredibly interesting area. We see atherosclerotic plaque shrinkage (i.e. heart disease reversal) when a person's LDL is sustained below a certain level for a time period long enough for this process to take place. Even under the strictest confines, dietary interventions at best can lower a person's cholesterol 15%, which is significant, but not nearly enough for disease reversal.
As I thought, you do not know what you are talking about. Thus your moniker is accurate.
A very low carb diet can lower cholesterol more than this (I tried it on myself, it dropped about 21%) but LDL is not the cause of heart disease--get up to date on the multiplicity of causes.
Great anecdote to demonstrate that there is variance in data, but your N=1 is not reliably translatable. LDL is *A* cause of heart disease independent of any other risk factors, I never said it was the only cause.
Please familiarize yourself with the work of these top cardiologists: Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Pradip Jamnadas, Dr. Stephen Gundry, Dr. Philip Ovadia, and an increasing number of cardiologists as well as general practitioners including Dr. Suneel Dhand. Here Dr. Ovadia explains that lowering cholesterol has not lowered the incidence of heart disease; in fact, heart disease has INCREASED in the past 10 years in spite of aiming efforts at reducing dietary fat and LDL cholesterol: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/g_CUIKmVuN4 The typical physician in practice today also makes NO distinction between the types of cholesterol, label LDL as "BAD" cholesterol, which is not the truth. They stupidly do not differentiate or even recommend testing for small dense LDL. WHY? Probably for the same exact "reason" they give-- if you are stupid enough to waste your time trying to get an actual answer that makes sense from these order-following drug dispensers-- for subjecting women to regular small doses of ionizing radiation in a totally idiotic attempt to avoid breast cancer. When they could use the latest technology which does NOT rely on roentgen rays... Hey, kids: IT'S ABOUT THE MONEY. Because in current medical practice, we know that MONEY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE ITSELF~!!
There's no ionizing radiation in a mammogram...it's an MRI.
Reversal would, of course, depend on many factors - age, severity, ability to address most causative factors (of which diet is only one) - but reversal does occur. Most notable example and covered by some insurers is the work of Dr Dean Ornish:
https://www.ornish.com/
Yes, we're saying the same thing, reversal does occur. For heart disease specifically age would only matter if it were a time-limiting factor, i.e. a 90 year old would not have enough time for the process of plaque reversal to occur. Severity needs to be more specific. Severity is usually based upon what percent of the area of an artery is blocked; 30% vs 70% would make no difference on the possibility of reversal. What would matter is if that plaque has become calcified, then the mechanism of reversal would be blocked from taking place by that shield of calcium.
Thanks for the reading, will check it out
TAKE YOUR NATTOKINASE!!!
You're right of course. But there is a limit to how much providing knowledge and availability of good food can impact public health. Everybody already knows not to pig out on junk, but a large segment of the population does so anyway. Just look at those lining up to buy crap at junk food booths when you're at an event where they have those set up. And what those people look like. In my opinion that's OK, if someone thinks eating crap to his heart's content is worth making him look like crap and be unhealthy, go for it. I believe in freedom. IMO we need to accept that some don't care enough. Or are stupid. Just as many believe 72 vaccines are good for their kids, and MRNA jabs were a terrific idea. I feel sorry for those kids though. But we shouldn't be telling parents how they must raise their kids, either. Grown-ups are easy, live and let live. The kids are kind of a catch-22.
It's not about forcing anyone to do anything against their will, but rather putting better medicine within reach. And engaging the power of place-based community where cultures of health can grow to surround everyone. It's certainly not a fast solution but a more sustainable one. And one that empowers individuals, families, and communities with the kind of natural sovereignty that only wellness can grant.
I'm for MAHA. It can do a lot of good. I just don't think it will make America healthy again. I do think reducing corruption in CDC and FDA and removing the criminal vaccine recommendations will help. Although what really needs to be done is reduce their power since they'll inevitably become corrupt again - that's simply how it works. Changing agricultural subsidies so junk food isn't subsidized, and good food competes better economically can help. What won't change is most people will continue to eat poorly. As I said previously, everyone knows donuts, cookies, and soda should not anchor you diet. but they eat that way anyhow. They'll continue. I think there are environmental influences beyond diet, lack of exercise, and iatrogenic causes contributing to our bad health. Maybe glyphosate, estrogenic chemicals everywhere, etc. That won't change much, although I hope he tries. As far as "not about forcing anyone" Malhotra in a Rogan interview said we should be taxing unhealthy food. That's coercion, akin to forcing. I'm no Malhotra fan, he thinks a lot of stupid things IMO. Doesn't he realize following that path would have meant taxing eggs, lard, coconut oil, and red meat? Truly a moronic path to go down.
Most people go with the flow or the crowd. If the flow is to eat better they will come along, I think--especially when they become aware they are lowering their life expectancy considerably.
You are probably right to some degree. I disagree it will be because they "become aware" of harming themselves. If they "become aware" that their thought leaders and fellow lemmings have changed course they will follow. As you astutely alluded to. That I agree with wholeheartedly. They are not capable of an appreciable level of constructive self-direction. If they were, they'd already be doing a lot differently. Thank you for all you do!
The 72 vaccines claim might be the flimsiest of all anti-vaccine arguments. It can only be convincing as an argument with zero immunology knowledge.
And yet it is hard to explain away the vax vs unvaxxed studies that mostly show unvaccinated kids to be healthier.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-studies-compare-vaccinate-Of_pCYJVTB6XSx1Dj50wew
That's completely irrelevant to the fact that virtually no child receives 72 vaccines. 72 is an inflated number used to scare people who don't know how vaccines and the immune system work. That number is fabricated by breaking up combination vaccines like MMR and counting them as 3 separate vaccines. If we want to break them up to count each pathogen that a child is vaccinated against, then a more appropriate measure would be the amount of antigens per vaccine and then look at the total amount of antigens.
Even though the number of vaccines a kid receives is completely irrelevant to any meaningful human outcome, here is the correct number: Excluding flu vaccines (because only 40-50% of kids get) the number is about 36. Including a flu vaccine every single year still only gets you to 54. I also excluded COVID vaccines because this claim originated before the era of COVID.
Thank you so much, Dr. Nass. I've been working on bringing this to peoples' awareness for a couple of decades, but have not given up hope yet. I'll never stop trying. I share your CHAOS letter often and will share this one. What you do is so very important.
It’s not a silent crisis unless one lives under a rock. Veganism is a statement. You can’t live on rabbit food and stay healthy. That’s for rabbits. So, I’ll eat the rabbit and get my veggies too.
Before the great flood yes we were vegetarians I assume. After Noah disembarked he was told them that they could now can eat the animals.
You should add to your list, that they are covering our farmland in useless solar panels and wind turbines, that only exist due to massive unheard-of-ever government subsidies:
Katie Hopkins about the SOLAR FARM Net Zero Narrative of LIES:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OF2DmtfX9eo
Which is made worse because they not only spoil the quality of living for their neighbors, they need to get insurance in case some machine like a pump on their farm seizes and catches fire, which spread to the solar or wind industrial site causing $millions in damages. That's exceedingly expensive insurance that small farmers can't afford. That's UN SDGoals right there.
And also energy negative SDG corn ethanol which uses 40% of the US corn crop. It's full lifecyle fossil consumption exceeds the fossil fuel it replaces. A total waste of money which only exists due to government subsidies and mandates.
The solar panels and wind farms were mentioned in the green globalist slide. I also mentioned the ethanol on one slide, but did not go into the details on ethanol.
What a summary of the situation. I signed up for SOFAF's newsletter. I will do what I can to help.
I'm trying to think of more ways, too, to tell people about the farm that supplies my meat. The farm couple needs their delivery truck to be fuller.
How do we obtain the nutritious food we need? Unless you are able and willing to do what we do you can't. We grow, catch, kill and gather it. That's the only food we trust. We get raw milk from a farm down the street, and eggs from local chicken-owners. Those are probably pretty good, but come in second to what we source ourselves. We're not obsessive about it, and eat about 30% supermarket and restaurant food. It's nice to eat out. We get our drinking water where it comes out of the ground. How is it verified that food labeled "organic" really is? I've seen how business works, it's about the bucks, and not just in the medical cartel. A lot of "organic" food suppliers are honest, a lot are only about the bucks. How do you tell the difference? Sometimes you can, like if you visit the farm to buy. If you're buying organic off a store shelf, who knows?
And the imported organic produce is not held to the same standard as domestic. And the domestic standard is far from satisfactory. We need a better organic certification system.