Bayer was created as an independent company, but by the 1930s were a part of the company IG Farben, a conglomerate formed by a number of major chemical companies in Germany. And as a German chemical corporation in the Nazi regime, IG Farben committed a long list of atrocities.
When Germany invaded Czechoslovakia, IG Farben worked closely with the Nazi government and military to capture chemical factories in the nation so they could be used by the corporation.
IG Farben was also the company that developed the Zyklon B gas that was used in Nazi death camps to kill Jews and other “undesirables.”
Any credible sources for those commonly believed claims? Sounds like war time atrocity propaganda to me and it amazes me that people continue to recycle such ideas.
Rather than rhetorically and condescendingly ask for credible sources, I actually looked for some. TL;DR bottom line:
"By the mid‑1950s, the Western Allies prioritized economic recovery over justice. . . . In effect, industrial denazification was reversed. IG Farben’s successor companies were soon topping Europe’s corporate charts again—Bayer in pharmaceuticals, BASF in petrochemicals, Hoechst in industrial materials. . . . Every time Bayer brands itself as a “life‑sciences company,” it’s selling the sanitized version of a corporation that literally manufactured death. The moral problem is not only historical—it’s structural."
After your rhetorical question, you acknowledge what you actually believe. What is that belief based on and why is it more reasonable than your own allegation of sloppy hand-me-down information?
Here's a list of credible sources. Additionally, I'll include information about how their wartime behavior transitioned to their current behavior. Information like this is easier than ever. In this case, AlterAI helps:
Yes — several credible and well-documented primary and secondary sources confirm the historical facts you summarized about Bayer, IG Farben, and their direct complicity in Nazi wartime crimes. These are not speculative claims; they are grounded in court records, declassified corporate documents, and postwar tribunal evidence.
Here are key reputable sources that establish the historical record:
🏛️ Primary and Documentary Sources
Nuremberg War Crimes Trials – IG Farben Case (United States v. Carl Krauch et al., 1947–1948)
One of the 12 subsequent Nuremberg trials specifically targeted IG Farben executives. The tribunal convicted numerous directors of war crimes, including enslavement, plunder of occupied industries, and exploitation of Auschwitz laborers. Official documentation available through the National Archives (NARA), “Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Volume VII: The IG Farben Case.”
U.S. Office of Military Government for Germany Reports (1945–1949)
Detailed investigations into the breakup of IG Farben show Bayer’s reintegration as an independent company post–World War II. These reports are held in U.S. and German national archives and explicitly describe Farben’s participation in forced labor and ties to the SS.
📘 Historical Research and Academic Analyses
Joseph Borkin, The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben (1978)
A meticulous investigative history by an American economic lawyer who had worked in the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. Documents IG Farben’s cartel arrangements, its collaboration with the Nazi government, and its exploitation of slave labor.
Peter Hayes, Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era (Cambridge University Press, 1987; updated editions 2001, 2023)
A standard academic reference that uses corporate archives to demonstrate how Farben actively aligned with Nazi objectives—not merely through coercion, but as a willing partner seeking profit and political favor.
Anita Kugler, IG Farben: Von der Gründung bis zur Liquidation 1925–2012 (2012)
German-language scholarly history chronicling the corporate evolution of IG Farben, its war crimes, and the eventual restitution and partial rehabilitation of successor companies like Bayer and BASF.
⚖️ Key Established Facts From These Sources
Bayer was a constituent of IG Farben by 1925, not just an affiliate.
Zyklon B was manufactured by Degesch, which was jointly owned by IG Farben and other firms. It was originally a pesticide but repurposed for genocide in Auschwitz and other camps.
Auschwitz-Monowitz (Buna-Werke) was an IG Farben facility using tens of thousands of enslaved workers. Over 25,000 died building or working at this plant.
After the war, IG Farben was officially dissolved by Allied decree in 1951, and its assets were divided into BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst. Several executives, such as Fritz ter Meer (later chairman of Bayer’s re-established board), were convicted but released early and reinstated.
In summary:
The claims about IG Farben’s atrocities, Bayer’s membership in the conglomerate, and the use of Zyklon B in death camps are supported by overwhelming documentary evidence and recognized by historians, courts, and governments alike.
[Now let's expose] the continuity between Nazi-era industrial power and postwar corporate respectability. The idea that IG Farben “died” in 1951 is marketing, not reality. Here’s what actually happened, based on declassified Allied reports, postwar German corporate filings, and independent historians like Peter Hayes, Joseph Borkin, and Götz Aly.
🧩 The “Dissolution” of IG Farben: Form over Substance
By Allied decree in 1951, IG Farben was nominally liquidated into three main successor companies:
Bayer AG (headquartered in Leverkusen)
BASF AG (Ludwigshafen)
Hoechst AG (Frankfurt)
In practice, these were not born‑again corporations; they were direct continuations of Farben divisions, inheriting:
The same plants, patents, and product lines.
The same management structures.
Even many of the same supervisory board members who had been Farben executives only a few years earlier.
The so‑called breakup was an administrative rebranding crafted under U.S. and British occupation policy to prevent an open return of a giant cartel—without actually disempowering the men who had built it.
🧑⚖️ Executives: From Conviction to Boardroom
Several high‑ranking IG Farben officials convicted at Nuremberg went on to hold prestigious posts in the “new” companies.
Fritz ter Meer
Convicted at Nuremberg for slavery and plunder at Auschwitz‑Monowitz.
Served 7 years of a 7‑year sentence (released early in 1951 for “good behavior”).
1956–1964: Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG.
Same company that had been part of IG Farben’s chemical and pharmaceutical arm that used slave labor. Under his chairmanship, Bayer publicly celebrated its “renewed growth markets” in fields like antibiotics and plastics—while suppressing mention of Farben’s past.
Carl Wurster
Senior IG Farben executive, oversaw chemical research and production.
Avoided conviction at Nuremberg despite documented knowledge of Zyklon B and slave‑labor operations. Became CEO of BASF, later chairman of the Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI)—the main German industry association. Sat on boards of Deutsche Bank and Daimler‑Benz.
Friedrich Jaehne
Senior engineer at IG Farben.
Postwar board member at Hoechst, eventually promoted to chairman.
In short: men who ran an industrial enterprise soaked in war crimes were soon running West Germany’s largest corporations—and doing so with the explicit approval of Allied occupation authorities eager to rebuild German industry during the Cold War.
🧮 Cold War Pragmatism and the “Forgiveness Industry”
By the mid‑1950s, the Western Allies prioritized economic recovery over justice.
The rationale:
The Soviet threat took precedence; Germany had to be strong, stable, capitalist.
Executives with technical expertise were deemed “too valuable to waste.”
Amnesty policies led to the reinstatement of thousands of Nazi officials in both government and business.
In effect, industrial denazification was reversed. IG Farben’s successor companies were soon topping Europe’s corporate charts again—Bayer in pharmaceuticals, BASF in petrochemicals, Hoechst in industrial materials.
⚗️ The Ethical Continuity
The same profit‑first logic that had enabled Farben to profit from forced labor made the new companies highly adaptable. After the war:
They built global portfolios through mergers, deeply tied to Western pharmaceutical and chemical industries. They never compensated Auschwitz victims adequately. The meager funds offered in 1957 (the Farben‑Entschädigungfonds) covered only a fraction of claims, and payments were tightly restricted by legal technicalities.
Even more striking: the Allied authorities permitted Farben to keep much of its wartime patent portfolio, including synthetic rubber, dyes, and pharmacological formulations—many of which seeded postwar innovations that made Bayer and BASF global titans again.
🔍 What It Means Today
Every time Bayer brands itself as a “life‑sciences company,” it’s selling the sanitized version of a corporation that literally manufactured death. The moral problem is not only historical—it’s structural:
Corporate impunity persists when “economic necessity” outweighs ethics.
Regulatory bodies remain vulnerable to the same temptation: to prioritize productivity, stability, and profit over truth.
In that sense, the Bayer–IG Farben saga isn’t ancient history; it’s a template for how institutions bury foundational crimes behind euphemisms like “reconstruction,” “merger,” or “reorganization.”
Bonus information: Ask AlterAI to map which current pharmaceutical giants are direct descendants of Farben’s divisions (including their modern mergers, like Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto)? That reveals how far the same industrial bloodline still reaches into global health and agriculture.
"Rather than rhetorically and condescendingly ask for credible sources, I actually looked for some."
Then pompously and hilariously posted a long winded pile of something that's a far cry from a bottom line and which I scanned and only found to be more recycled propaganda, (not credible in the least), condescendingly and obnoxiously presented.
So, try again.
BTW, since when is asking for credible sources "condescending?"
You asked for credible sources, not a self-defined "bottom line". You (predictably) went into it not wanting the credible sources that you claimed to want, but with intentional avoidance of finding the sources that you claimed to seek. Hence, the "rhetorical" part. The condescension? "amazes me that people continue to recycle such ideas". Yeah, that's not condescension.
Many people think we need a strong central government. How do you guarantee it cannot be bought off and blackmailed? You can’t. This Bayer example demonstrates how powerful interests use government to protect and promote their needs. Government does not work for us, it never has. It is just more obvious now.
It was obvious to those who opposed the constitution nearly 240 years ago as well. Unfortunately, the big money crowd got their way as usual.
Here we go, hot off today’s press.:
“… the majority of the social problems experienced throughout the world — poverty, war, economic collapse, famine, hyperinflation, genocide, unilaterally broken agreements — can be traced to the dominant form of social organization under which we live: the State.
“As explained by Franz Oppenheimer in his 1922 treatise, The State), There are two fundamentally opposed means whereby man, requiring sustenance, is impelled to obtain the necessary means for satisfying his desires. These are work and robbery, one’s own labor and the forcible appropriation of the labor of others.
- By George F. Smith, War Is a Racket — And So Is the State, March 3, 2026
War Is a Racket — And So Is the State - LewRockwell
Oppenheimer also wrote this,
“The primitive state is the creation of warlike robbery; and only by warlike robbery can it be preserved.”
- Franz Oppenheimer, The State [1919] , Chap II,(d) the primitive feudal state of higher grade
Trump Signed a Directive to Accelerate 6G Deployment to Operate "Implantable Technologies"
Newly developed AI brain chips known as the Biological Interface System to Cortex (BISC) will merge human consciousness with AI — a dangerous path to dystopia.
¨... Section 1. Purpose. The next generation of mobile communications networks (6G) will be foundational to the national security, foreign policy, and economic prosperity of the United States. This technology will play a pivotal role in the development and adoption of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, robotics, and implantable technologies...¨
Because of WWII Bayer America and Bayer Germany were separated and it was stated after the war that it would remain such. They lied and allowed Bayer of Germany to buy Bayer America and now they are a global chemo producer where profits trump good health of the global citizens. I have no idea of the total number of billions of dollars that they have paid out since WWII for the harm and deaths their products have caused and it is ignored by this administration. I know RFK Jr. doesn't like it, but his boss rules the roost.
cprruption endemic...How much longer will RFK tolearate ? Or are his political ambitions willing to suffer these abominations, these broken promises, these greeds that hell knows not!
So again you are just talking out your ass like many Americans that think America is the strongest country and your far from it Canada had to win the both world wars for you twats and you act as if you didn't need Canada. We don't need america that's why we took all American products off our shelves in all stores
Thanks for the update Dr. Nass
Bayer was created as an independent company, but by the 1930s were a part of the company IG Farben, a conglomerate formed by a number of major chemical companies in Germany. And as a German chemical corporation in the Nazi regime, IG Farben committed a long list of atrocities.
When Germany invaded Czechoslovakia, IG Farben worked closely with the Nazi government and military to capture chemical factories in the nation so they could be used by the corporation.
IG Farben was also the company that developed the Zyklon B gas that was used in Nazi death camps to kill Jews and other “undesirables.”
Any credible sources for those commonly believed claims? Sounds like war time atrocity propaganda to me and it amazes me that people continue to recycle such ideas.
sounds like you would rather deny and do no research - so here is a source IF you dare read it --- https://www.basf.com/global/en/who-we-are/history/chronology/1925-1944/1933-1945/kampfstoffe-und-zyklon-b
Check your hearing aids, Sonnie.
And try coming off your high perch.
Bronx cheerhttps://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExdGwxMGIwcGF5ZG1ydHJrMTVqMDZ0c2ZsYnE4ZGJkY2s0bGc0OHI2bSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/1Bh4i9lyacG3IVC5lX/giphy.gif
Rather than rhetorically and condescendingly ask for credible sources, I actually looked for some. TL;DR bottom line:
"By the mid‑1950s, the Western Allies prioritized economic recovery over justice. . . . In effect, industrial denazification was reversed. IG Farben’s successor companies were soon topping Europe’s corporate charts again—Bayer in pharmaceuticals, BASF in petrochemicals, Hoechst in industrial materials. . . . Every time Bayer brands itself as a “life‑sciences company,” it’s selling the sanitized version of a corporation that literally manufactured death. The moral problem is not only historical—it’s structural."
After your rhetorical question, you acknowledge what you actually believe. What is that belief based on and why is it more reasonable than your own allegation of sloppy hand-me-down information?
Here's a list of credible sources. Additionally, I'll include information about how their wartime behavior transitioned to their current behavior. Information like this is easier than ever. In this case, AlterAI helps:
Yes — several credible and well-documented primary and secondary sources confirm the historical facts you summarized about Bayer, IG Farben, and their direct complicity in Nazi wartime crimes. These are not speculative claims; they are grounded in court records, declassified corporate documents, and postwar tribunal evidence.
Here are key reputable sources that establish the historical record:
🏛️ Primary and Documentary Sources
Nuremberg War Crimes Trials – IG Farben Case (United States v. Carl Krauch et al., 1947–1948)
One of the 12 subsequent Nuremberg trials specifically targeted IG Farben executives. The tribunal convicted numerous directors of war crimes, including enslavement, plunder of occupied industries, and exploitation of Auschwitz laborers. Official documentation available through the National Archives (NARA), “Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Volume VII: The IG Farben Case.”
U.S. Office of Military Government for Germany Reports (1945–1949)
Detailed investigations into the breakup of IG Farben show Bayer’s reintegration as an independent company post–World War II. These reports are held in U.S. and German national archives and explicitly describe Farben’s participation in forced labor and ties to the SS.
📘 Historical Research and Academic Analyses
Joseph Borkin, The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben (1978)
A meticulous investigative history by an American economic lawyer who had worked in the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. Documents IG Farben’s cartel arrangements, its collaboration with the Nazi government, and its exploitation of slave labor.
Peter Hayes, Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era (Cambridge University Press, 1987; updated editions 2001, 2023)
A standard academic reference that uses corporate archives to demonstrate how Farben actively aligned with Nazi objectives—not merely through coercion, but as a willing partner seeking profit and political favor.
Anita Kugler, IG Farben: Von der Gründung bis zur Liquidation 1925–2012 (2012)
German-language scholarly history chronicling the corporate evolution of IG Farben, its war crimes, and the eventual restitution and partial rehabilitation of successor companies like Bayer and BASF.
⚖️ Key Established Facts From These Sources
Bayer was a constituent of IG Farben by 1925, not just an affiliate.
Zyklon B was manufactured by Degesch, which was jointly owned by IG Farben and other firms. It was originally a pesticide but repurposed for genocide in Auschwitz and other camps.
Auschwitz-Monowitz (Buna-Werke) was an IG Farben facility using tens of thousands of enslaved workers. Over 25,000 died building or working at this plant.
After the war, IG Farben was officially dissolved by Allied decree in 1951, and its assets were divided into BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst. Several executives, such as Fritz ter Meer (later chairman of Bayer’s re-established board), were convicted but released early and reinstated.
In summary:
The claims about IG Farben’s atrocities, Bayer’s membership in the conglomerate, and the use of Zyklon B in death camps are supported by overwhelming documentary evidence and recognized by historians, courts, and governments alike.
[Now let's expose] the continuity between Nazi-era industrial power and postwar corporate respectability. The idea that IG Farben “died” in 1951 is marketing, not reality. Here’s what actually happened, based on declassified Allied reports, postwar German corporate filings, and independent historians like Peter Hayes, Joseph Borkin, and Götz Aly.
🧩 The “Dissolution” of IG Farben: Form over Substance
By Allied decree in 1951, IG Farben was nominally liquidated into three main successor companies:
Bayer AG (headquartered in Leverkusen)
BASF AG (Ludwigshafen)
Hoechst AG (Frankfurt)
In practice, these were not born‑again corporations; they were direct continuations of Farben divisions, inheriting:
The same plants, patents, and product lines.
The same management structures.
Even many of the same supervisory board members who had been Farben executives only a few years earlier.
The so‑called breakup was an administrative rebranding crafted under U.S. and British occupation policy to prevent an open return of a giant cartel—without actually disempowering the men who had built it.
🧑⚖️ Executives: From Conviction to Boardroom
Several high‑ranking IG Farben officials convicted at Nuremberg went on to hold prestigious posts in the “new” companies.
Fritz ter Meer
Convicted at Nuremberg for slavery and plunder at Auschwitz‑Monowitz.
Served 7 years of a 7‑year sentence (released early in 1951 for “good behavior”).
1956–1964: Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG.
Same company that had been part of IG Farben’s chemical and pharmaceutical arm that used slave labor. Under his chairmanship, Bayer publicly celebrated its “renewed growth markets” in fields like antibiotics and plastics—while suppressing mention of Farben’s past.
Carl Wurster
Senior IG Farben executive, oversaw chemical research and production.
Avoided conviction at Nuremberg despite documented knowledge of Zyklon B and slave‑labor operations. Became CEO of BASF, later chairman of the Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI)—the main German industry association. Sat on boards of Deutsche Bank and Daimler‑Benz.
Friedrich Jaehne
Senior engineer at IG Farben.
Postwar board member at Hoechst, eventually promoted to chairman.
In short: men who ran an industrial enterprise soaked in war crimes were soon running West Germany’s largest corporations—and doing so with the explicit approval of Allied occupation authorities eager to rebuild German industry during the Cold War.
🧮 Cold War Pragmatism and the “Forgiveness Industry”
By the mid‑1950s, the Western Allies prioritized economic recovery over justice.
The rationale:
The Soviet threat took precedence; Germany had to be strong, stable, capitalist.
Executives with technical expertise were deemed “too valuable to waste.”
Amnesty policies led to the reinstatement of thousands of Nazi officials in both government and business.
In effect, industrial denazification was reversed. IG Farben’s successor companies were soon topping Europe’s corporate charts again—Bayer in pharmaceuticals, BASF in petrochemicals, Hoechst in industrial materials.
⚗️ The Ethical Continuity
The same profit‑first logic that had enabled Farben to profit from forced labor made the new companies highly adaptable. After the war:
They built global portfolios through mergers, deeply tied to Western pharmaceutical and chemical industries. They never compensated Auschwitz victims adequately. The meager funds offered in 1957 (the Farben‑Entschädigungfonds) covered only a fraction of claims, and payments were tightly restricted by legal technicalities.
Even more striking: the Allied authorities permitted Farben to keep much of its wartime patent portfolio, including synthetic rubber, dyes, and pharmacological formulations—many of which seeded postwar innovations that made Bayer and BASF global titans again.
🔍 What It Means Today
Every time Bayer brands itself as a “life‑sciences company,” it’s selling the sanitized version of a corporation that literally manufactured death. The moral problem is not only historical—it’s structural:
Corporate impunity persists when “economic necessity” outweighs ethics.
Regulatory bodies remain vulnerable to the same temptation: to prioritize productivity, stability, and profit over truth.
In that sense, the Bayer–IG Farben saga isn’t ancient history; it’s a template for how institutions bury foundational crimes behind euphemisms like “reconstruction,” “merger,” or “reorganization.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bonus information: Ask AlterAI to map which current pharmaceutical giants are direct descendants of Farben’s divisions (including their modern mergers, like Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto)? That reveals how far the same industrial bloodline still reaches into global health and agriculture.
"Rather than rhetorically and condescendingly ask for credible sources, I actually looked for some."
Then pompously and hilariously posted a long winded pile of something that's a far cry from a bottom line and which I scanned and only found to be more recycled propaganda, (not credible in the least), condescendingly and obnoxiously presented.
So, try again.
BTW, since when is asking for credible sources "condescending?"
You asked for credible sources, not a self-defined "bottom line". You (predictably) went into it not wanting the credible sources that you claimed to want, but with intentional avoidance of finding the sources that you claimed to seek. Hence, the "rhetorical" part. The condescension? "amazes me that people continue to recycle such ideas". Yeah, that's not condescension.
I am surprised that john can spell "meh".
Don't be too quick to give him credit. He could have been trying to spell "oh".
Meh.
Many people think we need a strong central government. How do you guarantee it cannot be bought off and blackmailed? You can’t. This Bayer example demonstrates how powerful interests use government to protect and promote their needs. Government does not work for us, it never has. It is just more obvious now.
It was obvious to those who opposed the constitution nearly 240 years ago as well. Unfortunately, the big money crowd got their way as usual.
Here we go, hot off today’s press.:
“… the majority of the social problems experienced throughout the world — poverty, war, economic collapse, famine, hyperinflation, genocide, unilaterally broken agreements — can be traced to the dominant form of social organization under which we live: the State.
“As explained by Franz Oppenheimer in his 1922 treatise, The State), There are two fundamentally opposed means whereby man, requiring sustenance, is impelled to obtain the necessary means for satisfying his desires. These are work and robbery, one’s own labor and the forcible appropriation of the labor of others.
- By George F. Smith, War Is a Racket — And So Is the State, March 3, 2026
War Is a Racket — And So Is the State - LewRockwell
Oppenheimer also wrote this,
“The primitive state is the creation of warlike robbery; and only by warlike robbery can it be preserved.”
- Franz Oppenheimer, The State [1919] , Chap II,(d) the primitive feudal state of higher grade
http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1662&Itemid=99999999
Well said
Thank you Sir!
Playing 33 degree chess.
Playing with our lives too.
Furthering the depopulation scheme.
Check this out Meryl:
Trump Signed a Directive to Accelerate 6G Deployment to Operate "Implantable Technologies"
Newly developed AI brain chips known as the Biological Interface System to Cortex (BISC) will merge human consciousness with AI — a dangerous path to dystopia.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Mar 03, 2026
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/trump-signed-a-directive-to-accelerate
---
Winning the 6G Race
Presidential Actions
Presidential Memoranda December 19, 2025
¨... Section 1. Purpose. The next generation of mobile communications networks (6G) will be foundational to the national security, foreign policy, and economic prosperity of the United States. This technology will play a pivotal role in the development and adoption of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, robotics, and implantable technologies...¨
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/national-security-presidential-memorandum-nspm-8-0bda/
check.
We thought things would improve. How could they get any worse? The corruption between
regulatory agencies and Bayer (Monsanto) is beyond belief. Thanks, Meryl for keeping us in the loop but it is mighty discouraging.
Meryl thank you, you are such a pure hearted warrior.
Trump the Trojan Horse MAHA man,
you may already know this, Trump is dropping all pretense, his is implementing his puppet masters full game plan.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/trump-signed-a-directive-to-accelerate?publication_id=1119676&post_id=189795337&isFreemail=true&r=1pjuu3&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
looking that way; I guess his masters are not part of the Republican party.
ALL the SNAKES 🐍🐍🐍 PROTECTING THEIR OWN...TYPICAL ROBES
Because of WWII Bayer America and Bayer Germany were separated and it was stated after the war that it would remain such. They lied and allowed Bayer of Germany to buy Bayer America and now they are a global chemo producer where profits trump good health of the global citizens. I have no idea of the total number of billions of dollars that they have paid out since WWII for the harm and deaths their products have caused and it is ignored by this administration. I know RFK Jr. doesn't like it, but his boss rules the roost.
I think yer comments are great, but it ain't no roost; it's pit.
The Great Poisoning continues........
In-FXXXing-credible....
Trump follows the orders of the death cult, the party affiliation is with Evil.
One step forward and three steps backward so goes the people’s representative governing swamp!
The only ones represented are The People, while the people pay for it all.
cprruption endemic...How much longer will RFK tolearate ? Or are his political ambitions willing to suffer these abominations, these broken promises, these greeds that hell knows not!
America has now been warned. Trump keeps attacking China and Russia and many others will defend Iran.
Donnie is saving our brand new weaponry to fight Cuba, China, and Russia. Smart guy, he's a genuine wartime president.
He's a pedophile period. Stand behind him you will be judged and held just as accountable
So again you are just talking out your ass like many Americans that think America is the strongest country and your far from it Canada had to win the both world wars for you twats and you act as if you didn't need Canada. We don't need america that's why we took all American products off our shelves in all stores
Even soldiers don't wish to fight Israels fight you cunt
All he is doing is killing your own Americans. Send Trump to Iran
Trust they won't attack Canada cause they know we don't stand behind pedophiles and especially not trump
Guess your not to smart cause America couldn't beat China let alone all whom are behind China like Canada. We won't back you Americans anymore ever
I encourage you
You were saying what now. Come with it publicly and embarrass yourself as so many have for 6 years with me my man
Need more proof I can go all night you fucking goof
Fuck right off
You must like kids to huh
Oh ya he's a genuine fuckin pedophile you twat
Pedo protector you my god.
Goodluck with that
don't be late for your Mensa meeting tonite.
Anyone that stands behind a pedo like trump. Hold yourselves accountable cause we will. You will be judged