Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charlie Stephens's avatar

I think Mr. Miller's assertions are spot on, as far as they go. Divide and conquer has been an authoritarian strategy for millennia, because in general it works. And it seems to me a majority in the West are still seeing our daily events through a right-left, liberal-conservative, Christian-Muslim, or a host of other oppositional labels, all given to us by those running the psyops. Years ago, after studying the West's economic and governance systems and the historical outcomes generated by these systems for many years, it finally dawned on me that the people running the West are simply gangsters - organized crime. Further study traced the origins of the current crime syndicate back hundreds of years. It's been run out of the City of London, and then Wall Street, for several hundred years. They're in control because they commandeered the privilege of credit creation, ultimately using the wealth generated to buy up control of whole countries. They lost control of their American colonies in our Revolutionary War. It took them several attempts (the First Bank of the United States, the Second Bank of the United States, supporting the Confederacy in the American Civil War and assassinating Abraham Lincoln), and their coup d'etat was finally successful on December 23rd, 1913 when they took control of monetary policy with their ownership of the Federal Reserve System. They attempted to take control of the entire government with a military coup in 1933, but were turned in to Congress (the records from those hearings are still secret). They founded the CIA after creating the OSS during WW2. The CIA, allied with MI6 and Mossad, are their enforcers. When an American president says "hand over the loot or we'll wreck your country," it's the CIA (the jackals, as John Perkins called them) that leads the destruction (as in Chile in 1973, and dozens of other countries). If that doesn't work, they send in the military (e.g., Libya in 2011). These trillionaires aren't left or right or liberal or conservative or anything else. They're criminals. They don't believe the rule of law applies to them, and with good reason, given what they've gotten away with over the last couple of centuries. They're psychopathic gangsters, with no limits on their greed and determination to control it all. As it is, they control both of our major political parties, all of our important public institutions, our economy, and what we believe it true. If we can't properly identify the enemy, we'll never win the war that they've declared on us.

David Schmitt's avatar

And it is not necessarily the difficulty of communication between polar opposite views that troubles me. That is perhaps to be expected and accepted. It is for everyone in between to interact with the poles as much as their position enables them to do so. The poles have sincere and valid perspectives at least in parts. Rather, what bothers me is the crafty manner in which dissension seems to have be injected into what were once close political and cultural relationships and alliances. Maybe some some of those alliances needed testing at their theoretical levels for soundness. After all, we grow in our ideas and some ideas need to be jettisoned just as some traditional wisdom needs to be restored to practice.

The JFK-RFK assassinations, the killing of MLK, the dubious OKC Bombing, 9/11-Building 7, the Las Vegas "Forensic Messicre," the COVID scam (as I largely view it), the self-killing of Fentanyl George and--now--the bizarre claims by the police regarding the apparent assassination of Charlie Kirk, have all been hammers used to shatter the psyches of Americans and Westerners as well as to unglue the European nations. Why? We must not succumb to these blows, either as individuals or as Citizens. We must create new fora for Conversation---hard, uncomfortable conversations based on trust in the capacity of humans to succeed against the odds.

46 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?