101 Comments
User's avatar
Marilyn Langlois's avatar

I guess this is a step in the right direction, but it's still way too many vaccines. And very disconcerting that they didn't eliminate the HPV vaccine, which is the worst.

Problem is, even if some of the shots are no longer officially recomnended, the captured American Pediatric Assn will still strongly recommend them and browbeat any doctors who aren't already brainwashed enough to continue to convince their patients to take them.

L. Ayres's avatar

Yes, and most doctors will continue to browbeat the parents who show any hesitation... and/or kick them out as patients, because they 'will not comply with the American Pediatric Assn recommended guidelines.' It's a vicious circle and an adversarial, corrupt racket.

Marilyn Langlois's avatar

Indeed! That's why all states need to follow Florida's lead and pass a law prohibiting pediatricians from denying care to patients who decline the shots. Joe Ladapo said recently they're working on this in Florida, not sure if it's passed yet.

Truth Seeker's avatar

you make the case that the state decides and "we" follow

Howz about voting with ones feet? A novel concept.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Browbeating works, but so does firing patients

Why exactly do young parents go??? That is on the parents...

Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

We have got to somehow expose the APA. They are the worst of the worst alphabet lobbying groups.

Truth Seeker's avatar

So the solution? Why exactly do young parents go to Pediatricians??

Howz about firing these quacks?? Howz about find a doctor (probably not an MD)

who knows something about health??

Where is the finger best pointed? The Gubmint? Big P? The Medical Cartel? or...

clueless parents???

Truth Seeker's avatar

Is it not patently obvious, if tardy, the trajectory we are witnessing??

None are safe, None are effective // All are harmful, Some Genocidal

The Amish, with their 8th grade educations, got it right.

Since DJT ordered RFK to review the entire "schedule" now 6 have been

removed. Expect the entire vax quax debacle to crumble.

Res Publius's avatar

It’s a good start.

Susan P ...'s avatar

Yes, it is a good start, however, I will be doing a full happy dance when ALL childhood vaccines are taken off the schedule, for they are all toxic. In God we Trust ...

Truth Seeker's avatar

then there would be no schedule

Would be well pleased to join that dance

Karen Bracken's avatar

We cannot live with "good starts" as our children are disabled and murdered. I am very disappointed with RFK Jr. For years he fed us with data about the dangers of all vaccines and he felt HPV was the worst. This is information most parents will not even know about and doctors will continue to push all 17 of the vaccines.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Not making any excuses. Mercury (thimerosal) removed / Aluminum the adjuvant in the crosshairs. 6 removed from the schedule

The entire Schedule undre review.

Children cannot be disabled or murdered without clueless parents yeah?

RFK in the crosshairs??

Dave's avatar

Great. Only 11 to go.

Ollie's avatar

I know, right? The odds of dying from Polio are one in a trillion however the odds of dying from the polio vaccine are one in two-hundred-and-fifteen thousand;-)

Truth Seeker's avatar

howz about exposing the entire fraud, once

And if there is fraud, when is the last time fraud exploded?

Is there one bad apple in the bushel? or is the entire bushel rotten?

James roth's avatar

It will be interesting to see if the autism numbers drop with the decrease in childhood vaccinations.

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

I’d say yes and no.

Yes, because autism is tied directly with vaccination so we will see it decrease…

But No, because the diagnosis of autism is so broad that I can see them still increasing the cases.

Here are some pieces I’ve wrote on both of these:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-the-dsm-iii-and-tv-shows-rebranded

L. Ayres's avatar

Very important points you made. Because, yes, these powerful, monied-interests have learned all the strategies for muddying the waters, and preventing the ability for previously rigorous and standard scientific inquiry to analyze the data and determine clear correlations between their products (or services) and harms caused to recipients (the Covid travesty was the next-level of this corruption and tyranny over the population). Changing the definition(s) of autism, Asperger's, etc. has muddied the waters exponentially. It certainly makes me/us wonder if that DSM change, several years back, was part of a decades-long strategy to 'wash themselves clean' of any potential future liability for that particular set of harms... which 'they' all knew full well was correlated to the jabs they've been forcing on the population.

It's all so ugly and nefarious, it has fractured my trust in humanity.

PS: Please re-read your 2nd sentence -- You may want to edit it: '...because autism is tied directly with autism so....'

PPS: Thanks for linking your 2 articles -- I'm going over to read them next.

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

Thank you so much for this callout! I fixed the line to reflect vaccines tied to autism.

And you’re spot on, the muddying of the water is what they’ve been doing for decades. I’ve covered vaccinations extensively and here’s another link if you’re interested:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/a-black-friday-gift-that-could-actually

James roth's avatar

What is your opinion of Dr. Michael J. Goldberg and his opinion that most of what we call autism is really caused by virus which grow strong from immune problems

Truth Seeker's avatar

well stated, Peer Review is Pay to Play, soooo Just say no

The Medical Cartel are the delivery boys, has not been different

since the Flexner Report

Truth Seeker's avatar

not really, because Data cruncher extract data to serve narrative...

LW's avatar

Dr Nass, realize you’re well aware of all am about to write.

It’s a small start, which sounds better by the numbers than the actual reality.

MMR and DPT are known for higher rates of vaccine injury. Polio… Why?

Great article on pros and cons of each on the childhood vaccine schedule :

https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwesterndoctor/p/determining-the-risks-and-benefits?

Laura Kasner's avatar

Are vaccinated children healthier?

According to this study by ID Dr. Markos Zervos, they are not. 18,000 children were studied.

https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/

Truth Seeker's avatar

and we needed a study for that???

Truth Seeker's avatar

Pros??? that is simply untrue

Gordon Groves's avatar

I disagree with ANY vaccine on the schedule. The Amish don't take them and by millions of samples they are the healthiest people in America with the least hospital and doctor visits.

Truth Seeker's avatar

I know Amish Organic farmers for over 27 years. Spoke to their young folk regarding the harassment the Medical Cartel was conducting on their expectant parents. In general they are resistent to Quaxcines. They are mostly Pure Bloods.

sifubernie's avatar

Gaslighting. Should be ZERO.

Bernita's avatar

Vaccinations should be a parents choice after a discussion with their physician. Take the Educational System completely out of the picture. For far too long schools have been enforcers of the vaccine schedule. This needs to stop. Universities and colleges should not be allowed to keep students out of programs of study unless the students can prove they have been vaccinated.

Truth Seeker's avatar

So clueless parents can choose to inject toxins into their children???

Exemptions for the win, until sanity prevails

Home schooling for the win.

Heather's avatar

I will say how grateful I am to having RFK jr in the HHS position. I shudder to think if he did got get into office. Let’s imagine how many MORE shots might be put on the schedule instead of less. It’s been a vaccine goldmine since 1986. RFK jr has put a giant stopper on that for now. Yes, I would want to see zero shots on that schedule, or at least no pressure to do any. Let those who believe, have as many shots as they want. They should have mandated informed consent of true data before making their decision, not mandated shots.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Indeed, massive change in course. Expect great things in '26. Crowing about the finish line without realizing it is possible to JUST SAY NO is sophomoric.

Brook Hines's avatar

HPV stays on?! jfc.

TAMMY A.'s avatar

END THE VACCINE HOLOCAUST !!! 2026

fritzy_boo_boo's avatar

also disagree with HPV on the schedule. the 2 spikes on the VAERS data over the last 25 years are: HPV and Covid. HPV is much smaller than covid since far fewer people got it not because it's necessarily safer. The Gardasil vaccine (HPV) also had some very iffy approval circumstances including a whistle blower claiming they never proved it prevented cancer. high risk low reward imo. hard pass.

Rob D's avatar

Originally this HPV shot was for cervical cancer prevention. Since then they have conveniently expanded it's range of cancers it supposedly protects from to vagina, vulva, penis, anus, and throat, causing them to justify giving it to boys and girls.

In 2022, 755,000 people *worldwide* supposedly died from HPV related cancers. That is .008 percent of the world's population. I mean, come on!

For a bit of comparison, appx 1.19 million people die in traffic accidents every year worldwide.

This evil money making shot needs to be 100% voluntary. (Or, better yet, taken off the market)

Truth Seeker's avatar

that is the story, its a lie Reread until it sinks in. We have been systematically lied

to. Many drank the kool aid. Social justice Warriors set up stands.

Riff Raffer's avatar

How easy will it be for parents to opt out altogether?

Truth Seeker's avatar

Just saying no is infectious...

Sukey Watson's avatar

It is a start. Not good enough for me. HPV needs to be removed, and the rest should all be shared decision making with absolutely no mandated requirements.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Hows about drawing a line in the sand?

Rob D's avatar

And now, with the stroke of a pen, all mandates to receive a product with no liability for damages or death need to end. Where there is any risk, we must have freedom to choose, without requiring a "permission slip" ("exemption") from someone who gets to decide whether our philosophical, religious, or medical reason for not wanting a man-made product shot forcefully through our largest protection system (our skin) and into our body (or child's body) passes muster. A simple informed yes please or NO thank you should suffice and we shouldn't have to face the ire of a fanatical nurse or doctor for our choice either.

L. Ayres's avatar

As you said, "...A simple informed yes please or NO thank you should suffice and we shouldn't have to face the ire of a fanatical nurse or doctor for our choice either."

Hear, hear! I couldn't agree more. 🌟

Truth Seeker's avatar

Lets raise the bar shall we? Lets go on the offensive to protect the defenseless!!

Truth Seeker's avatar

Mandate (interesting word) have ended, past tense. Now howz about exposing the great fraud?? It is our responsibility to pull the frozen over the finish line.