71 Comments

Does ANYBODY need a booster of a "vaccine" that has health risks and negative effacasy?

Expand full comment

How does one design a clinical trial to measure the efficacy of a therapy for a purported disease which has NO MEANINGFUL TEST, NO distinguishing clinical expression, therefore, NO OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA?

Expand full comment

How about the virus already mutated into whatever something the shot could not ever be prepaired to before it already mutated again?

Expand full comment

> How about the virus already mutated into whatever

How about the Blue Unicorn already transmogrified into 12 Jackalopes just before they was taken via transporter-beam into the alien spacecraft waiting in geosynchronous orbit?

Virus? What virus!?

There's no effing virus.

Talk about Chimeras!

SARS-CoV-2 is Chimeric in the Digital Domain. You're talking about FICTIONS.

Part CGI, part Metagenomics, part Abbott Laboratories® m2000 System, running the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay. Part Interactive Real-time Pandemic Dashboard & Map. Part MSM Digital Transmissions from satellites beamed into our homes. There's your chimera.

"A 'virus' is nothing more than a Mental Construct." -- Stefan Lanka

Expand full comment

Thank you, than chimera is what I ment!

Expand full comment
Oct 18, 2022·edited Oct 18, 2022

“You might want it because you want to protect older people"

And here I thought this was well established as misinformation?

Expand full comment

I'm so tired of them spewing their BS. They never tested if it stopped transmission.....why do they keep acting as if they did?

Expand full comment

and how would that protect older people?

Expand full comment

It doesn't...but I just red the new vaccines are going to prevent you from getting ill, and that is really awesome because it doesn't matter anymore that the virus is always mutated when the vaccine is ready..in what types or whatever of virus and so you never will be missing doing anything you like! Isn't that fantastic! And.. he knows exactly what he is talking about because last 20 years he took every year his annual flu-shot! Eh... but...he! Wait a minute...those flu shots...everybody I know that took it, was ill like all, let me say.. the whole time during the year after the flushot was injected...and also far worse than ever before.

I don't believe mr Moderna took flu shots and certainly not before 2020...

Expand full comment

With what we know about mRNA injections, I am certain no-one at the top of moderna or pfizer are actually taking them, their doses would have been saline.

Expand full comment

Maybe if more younger people took the experimental injection then we would have more younger deaths thereby inadvertently protecting the elderly?

Only plausible scenario I can think of. And they are sick enough to think that way.

Expand full comment

If less young people survived into old age, that would reduce the elderly death rate over time. 🧐

Expand full comment

Correct! That is in fact misinformation, and you are right too that this is commonknowledge.

Actually, at the time mister Moderna opens his mouth, all I heard were lies...

Expand full comment

When they are lying so often, it is difficult to keep the story consistent.

Expand full comment

I don’t need their boosters and I am 66.

Expand full comment

Oh, the CEO thinks we need to protect the "older people."

The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants. ~ Camus

Expand full comment

how bout I think I don't want it because it is a potentially deadly and/or disabling injection that does not stop transmission or infection.

end stop

Expand full comment

It doesn't stop transmission of the virus which does not exist?

Expand full comment

😲

Butt-covering time?

Expand full comment

I'll bet. Then watch them change their "plans" before you know it, after maneuvering and scheming further "plans". Seems like they are ironing out kinks and buying time or something. It still feels so deceptive.

Expand full comment

Somebody needs to tell ACIP.

Expand full comment

File your opinion here. We need to flood these people with our opinions for putting it on the childhood schedule.

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/CDC-2022-0111-0001

Expand full comment

Why?

Expand full comment

“You might want it because you want to protect older people"... Unbelievable. These ghouls are still trying to foist this toxic sludge on the few remaining people who are somehow still unaware that it has negative efficacy.

Expand full comment

They’ll be putting it on the childhood vax schedule on Thursday. Please comment you can file anonymously or use your name, please don’t put your address, for obvious reasons.

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/CDC-2022-0111-0001

Expand full comment

Commented. And thank you.

Expand full comment

Yes when you mention it exactly how it is, I consider mister Moderna even more evil than 5 minutes ago..

Expand full comment
Oct 18, 2022·edited Oct 18, 2022

All the young people dying is exposing the vaccine business to too much scrutiny. It's much easier to cover up the vaccine induced death of older people as natural.

Expand full comment

No one needs a toxic Clotshot FOR A "DISEASE" WHICH DOES NOT EXIST!

Let's recap:

👉NO new, unique, or DISTINGUISHING SYNDROME/clinical expression

👉NO RIGOROUS ETIOLOGY, including a search for toxic causes of the Non-distinguishing Syndrome

👉NO SUSPECT PATHOGEN ISOLATED (SARS-CoV-2 is a computer model NEVER observed in the real-world, based on fraudulent models)

👉NO PROOF of cause

👉NO TEST for the fictitious in-silico computer model virus.

👉NO objective diagnostic criteria whatsoever

etc etc.

Expand full comment

the slow walk back. pathetic. like that's gonna save him

Expand full comment

...only if you want heart inflammation or a blood clot.

Expand full comment

“I don’t think a normal healthy person is going to need a booster.” He said. “Except maybe if you have two or more comorbidites that our original shot caused…then you should consider a booster.”

Expand full comment

Yes that is correct, but he forgot to mention you need a suicide/deathwish as well

Expand full comment

Right. It's the Nazi M.O. of wanting to OFF the weak, frail and elderly, first and foremost. And it kills me that the majority of people buy in, hook, line and sinker, their inversion jazz that it's for a legitimate good objective of PROTECTING those demographics first and foremost. Satanic inversion-speak par excellence.

Expand full comment

More gaslighting by BIg Pharma disguised as reason. You younglings may not need an annual booster, but do consider it to protect granny. It is your sacred duty younglings, is implied. I call BS! I am not aware of any evidence that the various flu vaccines prevent the spread of flu or reduce severity of an infection (the annual sales pitch from our doctors). Better to have granny’s vitamin D levels tested annually and supplement (cholecalciferol or calcifediol) as needed, not forgetting K2 and magnesium. In general, a healthy, low carbohydrate diet would also do wonders while lowering her BP.

Expand full comment

I'm just about 60. I don't want anybody risking their life with an experimental gene therapy to possibly protect me. I'll take care of myself, thank you. 

Expand full comment