New Zealand GP who told his patients the truth about experimental COVID vaccines and tried to import ivermectin in 2021 being prosecuted for it in 2026.

REALLY? There were no patient complaints, of course. Only the system clamping down on doctors who actually did their duty

Mar 28, 2026

Cross-posted by Meryl’s CHAOS letter (Critical Health Analysis and OpinionS)

"NZ found no evidence of patient harm, but the doctor didn't support the narrative, so they are going to take his medical license away to send a message to doctors to always follow the other sheep doctors; patient outcomes are not important."

- Steve Kirsch

https://easternbayapp.co.nz/news/articles/69bb840fb2e7ca00014579a4

Excerpt:

Doctor defends actions at tribunal hearing

Independent thinker: Bernard Conlon, alongside his wife, Dr Britta Noske, and Murupara kaumatua Pem Bird, prepares to enter the New Zealand Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal hearing this week. Photo Kathy Forsyth E5909-01

A disciplinary hearing into the conduct of Murupara GP Dr Bernard Conlon entered its final stages, with strong community support continuing to fill a Rotorua venue throughout the second week.
The hearing, between the Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) of the Medical Council of New Zealand and Dr Conlon has been held at the Arawa Park Hotel and concludes today.
The five-member tribunal, chaired by Truc Tran, has been examining allegations relating to Dr Conlon’s actions during a nine-month period in 2021 and early 2022, during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The PCC alleges Dr Conlon’s conduct – including public comments about the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, attempts to import ivermectin, advice and treatment provided to patients, and social media posts – amounts to professional misconduct. It says the actions, individually or collectively, could bring discredit to the medical profession.
Several witnesses for the PCC, all with name suppression, gave evidence during the first week of the hearing.
This week, Dr Conlon’s counsel, Adam Holloway, presented the defence case, followed by three days of evidence from Dr Conlon and his witnesses.
Mr Holloway told the tribunal Dr Conlon had been a GP in Murupara for 34 years and, until now, had never faced disciplinary action.
“Dr Conlon is an independent thinker, but he’s not a renegade. We say he practises good medicine,” Mr Holloway said.
He described his client as a long-serving rural doctor working with a high-needs community, often with limited access to healthcare services.
“All of Dr Conlon’s actions were centred on informing and caring for his patients, consistent with his values,” he said. “There are no allegations of patient harm.”