This is linked to an earlier effort by 30 Dutch parliamentarians demanding that their Parliament approve the amendments, since they are a treaty, according to Dutch law
Good on you, Van Haga. May the United States make the same concerted and concrete effort to keep our country, and your country, independent and sovereign, absent of any Global mandates.
It was the US under Biden Admin who put forward the proposal( as part of the amendments in 2022) to shorten the length of time for raising objections from 18 to 10 months! So the WHO could railroad things through!
This is an excellent summary. Thank you! I will forward it to my Canadian MP. I sent the New Zealand response 2 days ago and asked him to read the new WHO and IHR amendments. Increasingly I realize that our role is to educate our elected officials. Health Canada is trying to get rid of natural health products and his response to me was with regards to Vanessa's Law and that's when it dawned on me he didn't know what that law was or that it is not applicable to natural health products. We really do need to work with them if we want any representation of the public's best interest.
Something isn't adding up for me. MEP Rob Roos, in his letter advises that this was 'voted' on May 28, 2022 and requests the vote count, the member nations involved as well as the recording of said vote. It appeared on the WHO website (no date specified). Was everyone aware of this and what has been the response from the US? Has the US generated a formal letter? It appears totally dishonest and people seem caught off guard.
I understand this from reading MEP Rob Roos letter to the WHO. I'm not understanding how seemingly nobody caught this until
yesterday or today and where this stands WRT the US official response or position. Just this morning I contacted my representative to refresh his mind. I've missed something, perhaps the date that the information was available on the WHO webpage would be helpful to explain how the wool seemingly was pulled over our eyes. What is the path forward?
Rob you have a great point ccp run who along with gates. That could only get worse we need the truth on the who's response. People need to see this change or any other.
All you can see on the website is a video of the WHO person asking if anybody objected - quick look around the room, and said no , passed! The room might have been empty for all we knew! The Dutch MP is correct, no formal vote. The WHO just writes its own rules and makes it up as it goes along , hoping nobody will notice!. The only people who behave like that are those who know that what they are doing is shady at best!
Given articles 55 and 60 were not followed, why are all countries not objecting to the entire WHO IHS process? We truly live in an insane, upside down world.
You notice that smaller countries are the ones ojecting. You will not see US, UK , Germany, or Canada object as they are the ones in league with the WHO/WEF/UN and want the agenda to go through unhindered
Thank you Dr. Nass. Your information on this is so helpful to understanding what is going on globally and giving me the ability to bring it forward to elected officials.
Any idea what kind of political game is being played in the Netherlands right now? Nothing to be happy about, unfortunately. Although most votes have gone to center/right in the last two elections, chances are we‘ll end up with a center/left government and they are all aboard with the WHO.
Hi Meryl, this is what I found a while ago, on Wikipedia concerning the Belgian government...same story...
'Treaties with foreign countries are concluded by the government (the King). When it comes to trade treaties, or treaties that bind Belgians or impose objections on the state, they can only take effect in Belgium after the approval of parliament.'
would that our Resident in Chief, our Senate Majority Leader had the balls that this lady has. Unfortunately the Big Guy sold his balls to the CCP and Shucky Choomer, well his are likely gone to the highest bidder (or left on Epstein's Island
Wybren van Haga was not voted back into parliament last election and neither Pepijn van Houwelingen. These were the two members who were most active against everything that was going on during the plandemic.
Indeed, something is not right in the Netherlands. I think Wilders won so that they could push Baudet's party sneakely to the back. Was Wilder's win a set up? Mind you, the Belgians will probably head the same direction next year. There is probably election-manipulations going on behind the scene in both countries.
Sadly Wybren van Haga was not voted back into parliament last election and neither Pepijn van Houwelingen. These were the two members who were most active against everything that was going on during the plandemic.
There is hope for humanity
Good on you, Van Haga. May the United States make the same concerted and concrete effort to keep our country, and your country, independent and sovereign, absent of any Global mandates.
It was the US under Biden Admin who put forward the proposal( as part of the amendments in 2022) to shorten the length of time for raising objections from 18 to 10 months! So the WHO could railroad things through!
rotten to the core
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
👊Finally & slowly it's all unraveling! Thank u4this + all your work & devotion 2help enlighten &save us.
This is a good summary:
https://twitter.com/evavlaar/status/1729576391614607712?s=46&t=69yjmxtQy6UhE_r_8_X7aQ
This is an excellent summary. Thank you! I will forward it to my Canadian MP. I sent the New Zealand response 2 days ago and asked him to read the new WHO and IHR amendments. Increasingly I realize that our role is to educate our elected officials. Health Canada is trying to get rid of natural health products and his response to me was with regards to Vanessa's Law and that's when it dawned on me he didn't know what that law was or that it is not applicable to natural health products. We really do need to work with them if we want any representation of the public's best interest.
Something isn't adding up for me. MEP Rob Roos, in his letter advises that this was 'voted' on May 28, 2022 and requests the vote count, the member nations involved as well as the recording of said vote. It appeared on the WHO website (no date specified). Was everyone aware of this and what has been the response from the US? Has the US generated a formal letter? It appears totally dishonest and people seem caught off guard.
This post from James Roguski may help clarify re the vote or lack thereof
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski/p/follow-the-damn-rules?r=1cmbrn&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I understand this from reading MEP Rob Roos letter to the WHO. I'm not understanding how seemingly nobody caught this until
yesterday or today and where this stands WRT the US official response or position. Just this morning I contacted my representative to refresh his mind. I've missed something, perhaps the date that the information was available on the WHO webpage would be helpful to explain how the wool seemingly was pulled over our eyes. What is the path forward?
Rob you have a great point ccp run who along with gates. That could only get worse we need the truth on the who's response. People need to see this change or any other.
All you can see on the website is a video of the WHO person asking if anybody objected - quick look around the room, and said no , passed! The room might have been empty for all we knew! The Dutch MP is correct, no formal vote. The WHO just writes its own rules and makes it up as it goes along , hoping nobody will notice!. The only people who behave like that are those who know that what they are doing is shady at best!
Given articles 55 and 60 were not followed, why are all countries not objecting to the entire WHO IHS process? We truly live in an insane, upside down world.
You notice that smaller countries are the ones ojecting. You will not see US, UK , Germany, or Canada object as they are the ones in league with the WHO/WEF/UN and want the agenda to go through unhindered
Thank you Dr. Nass. Your information on this is so helpful to understanding what is going on globally and giving me the ability to bring it forward to elected officials.
God Bless this man.
Ah, but does the action of one parliamentarian constitute a legal reservation on behalf of an entire country?
I'm glad the Dutch have gotten fed up with being pushed around!
:-D
From the good-Who: We're Not Gonna Take It
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRCrmuALDEE
Any idea what kind of political game is being played in the Netherlands right now? Nothing to be happy about, unfortunately. Although most votes have gone to center/right in the last two elections, chances are we‘ll end up with a center/left government and they are all aboard with the WHO.
I love this song and message!
Hi Meryl, this is what I found a while ago, on Wikipedia concerning the Belgian government...same story...
'Treaties with foreign countries are concluded by the government (the King). When it comes to trade treaties, or treaties that bind Belgians or impose objections on the state, they can only take effect in Belgium after the approval of parliament.'
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgische_federale_regering
I sent this info to the Ministers (Prime Minister and Department for Health) in Brussels!
DR NAOMI WOLF
https://twitter.com/naomirwolf/status/1729925213263908958
Unmissable interview of mine with Dr Michael Nehls. Neuroscience explains how our loved ones turned into zombies.
😱🧠
https://dailyclout.io/dr-michael-nehls-mrna-injections-erase-autobiographical-memory-in-hippocampus/
would that our Resident in Chief, our Senate Majority Leader had the balls that this lady has. Unfortunately the Big Guy sold his balls to the CCP and Shucky Choomer, well his are likely gone to the highest bidder (or left on Epstein's Island
Wybren van Haga was not voted back into parliament last election and neither Pepijn van Houwelingen. These were the two members who were most active against everything that was going on during the plandemic.
Indeed, something is not right in the Netherlands. I think Wilders won so that they could push Baudet's party sneakely to the back. Was Wilder's win a set up? Mind you, the Belgians will probably head the same direction next year. There is probably election-manipulations going on behind the scene in both countries.
So you can just walk in take the crown now your in charge...
Awesome observation by the Dutch and a great move on their part!
Sadly Wybren van Haga was not voted back into parliament last election and neither Pepijn van Houwelingen. These were the two members who were most active against everything that was going on during the plandemic.
From Mark Playne at NotOnTheBeeb.com:
"Summary of Country Positions (written by WCH)
• Eleven Members of Parliament in Estonia issued a letter rejecting IHR amendments and the proposed pandemic treaty.
• New Zealand’s new coalition government will reserve against proposed amendments to IHR.
• Slovakia’s prime minister announced the government will not support strengthening the WHO.
• A comprehensive bill by a congressman is gaining traction and public support in the Philippines.
• Two South African parliamentarians champion the WHO Withdrawal Bill and mobilise on it.
• A Parliamentarian in the Netherlands filed a letter making a reservation due to lack of due process.
• Eleven European Union parliamentarians are formally challenging procedural failures in IHR amendments.
• Bill HR 79 (to defund and exit WHO) was introduced by United States Congressman Andy Biggs.
• Parliamentarians continue advocating to reject IHR amendments and question the WHO in Japan.
• A letter from the Australian people communicates rejection of the WHO’s proposed amendments to the IHR.
To do something, see the UKMFA and SOR campaign here."