Electronic voting machine fraud is known since a long time. I don't understand why it is still being used and legal. It should be banned. It should be only hand-counted paper ballots
US Lab Says Electronic Voting Machines Easy to Hack 3:08 min
The electronic machines should generate a paper copy that can be verified by the voter and kept in case there is any dispute. Easy-peasy, like the electronic check-out at Walmart. Why in the world wouldn't this be the standard?
Democrats/Marxists don’t want a system they can’t game as their radical agenda couldn’t be voted for in a fair honest election. No other reason for opening the border to millions of illegals and blocking voter ID legislation and other steps to insure election integrity. We are being played and too many sheeple are too Gaslighted to see it.
You need to school yourself on what in the hell has happened to the Democrat Party. RFK has a few ideas. China has Elite Captured Dems and a few Republicans. The CCP OWNS the Democrat Party of CA and basically the State
Certainly the Democrats are at least cultural Marxists, and arguably are economic Marxists of the Cloward-Piven type. We should probably not get too hung up on terminology. Those of us here and elsewhere in the know realize that we are in war with the one-world plutocrats/oligarchs.
The folks who make voting machines, also make ATM's (Dieboldt for example) You don't hear people complaining the the ATM didn't count their money properly. Or being hacked in 3 minutes. What's up with that?
Optical readers of paper ballots, paper kept in perpetuity; provide access to any ballot, matching each numbered ballot with voters' stubs, or even carbon-copies, for spot-verification at any time later. Same could be done with mail-in ballots. It would be good for voters to make their own copies of their paper ballots - private back-up.
I approach problems and solutions like this with this question:
Is it game-able?
If something can be "gamed" then it can be corrupted. A follow-up question is:
What method is the least game-able of all?
For the prospect of a hidden polling agency sneaking around to 2000 polling places, the answer to the question is this:
It is highly game-able (corruptible).
But then if you ask the follow-up question regarding which method would give the bad guys the most headaches, the most hurdles to jump over, and the most hoops to jump through, you arrive at paper-only ballots. It is least likely that bad guys can steal elections when it means they have to physically replace paper ballots that people (not machines) filled out.
Good point. Keep the big parties out of it. And keep all the exit-poll tallies on paper; post photos of each page, make a spreadsheet of all these tallies, open-source code, and verify the spreadsheets against the photos, and original paper tally's. Make the paper tallies available for inspection by the public, and several voter-integrity orgs.
I live in NY state, and you can write-in a candidate, but only if that candidate has registered with the NY state board of elections, otherwise your vote and maybe your whole ballot are thrown out, but the NY state board of elections doesn't publish the list of available write-in candidates. For president only the uniparty candidates are on the ballot, so there you go. Stalinism.
Good start, but does not take into account the million or two or whatever non-citizens who will be able to vote this time around. No ID, nothing. The Dems have the smug complacency, no matter how bizarre Harris and Walz appear, that says "we already got this".
It's more like just illegal voting, by who knows who, ballot stuffing, unverified ballots, no paper trail, multiple voting, voting by non-residents including out-of-state, voting by deceased, it all adds up. Could be a lot of non-citizen voters, who knows? But it is certainly a whole lot more than non-citizen voters.
Yeah, I know, and I know that none of the wars is about "saving Democracy". Qaddafi was killed, IMO, because he was planning an African currency based on gold. and if BRICS cannot be suborned, I would not travel in packs or hold big publicized meetings if I was a member. No one threatens the dollar with impunity, seems to me. Ukraine is a vast money-laundering operation, plus a piggy bank bursting with resources. which is what is wanted for Russia. And on and on. None of this can be fixed with elections, methinks, but hey, bread and circuses. Thanks for the link!
If the evangelicals vote, who are low propensity voters and then add that to the MAGA people; Trump will win. According to Richard Baris and Robert Barnes it looks dead even because they (the left wing pollsters) don’t know how to poll the Trump vote. Of course, we could go to war or Trump could get killed or put in jail or something like that. But I think it looks good for Trump, which in my case looks good for potential health freedom. Kamala is for continued erosion of all freedoms, and handing the country over to crooks and pedophilia types on a silver platter. People see that, too.
Trump has it, legally, but you can be sure a lot of chicanery will go on in the DemonRat side. They have all the money & power. And the RINO/Neocon/Uni-party Republicans would rather lose than have MAGA win. They just want to see the gravy train continue for themselves, don't matter whether they win or lose.
Died in the wool ong time progressive - I like this idea, for all the reasons proposed. Let'd do this.
No sure how to secure the funding - RNC and DNC, neither one of them might like it. The FEC ought to be all over this. $10,000,000. That is a pretty big Go Fund Me. It is a little late in the game to write for grants, though I can imagine that there are several foundations that would go for it.
Maybe we could all just vote on election day and stop this month-long voting. The longer you allow people to vote the more opportunity there is for fraud.
Electronic voting machine fraud is known since a long time. I don't understand why it is still being used and legal. It should be banned. It should be only hand-counted paper ballots
US Lab Says Electronic Voting Machines Easy to Hack 3:08 min
https://youtu.be/q7Oty69mQ80
America's Voting Machines Are Extremely Vulnerable to Hacking 5:13 min
https://youtu.be/BLtHW0G7DIs
Why Electronic Voting is a BAD Idea - Computerphile 8:20 min
https://youtu.be/w3_0x6oaDmI
Indeed
The electronic machines should generate a paper copy that can be verified by the voter and kept in case there is any dispute. Easy-peasy, like the electronic check-out at Walmart. Why in the world wouldn't this be the standard?
Why bother with the electronic voting machines at all? Documented corruptible, throw them out.
Too much money to be made by the manufacturers and going to the pols for payoffs.
Democrats/Marxists don’t want a system they can’t game as their radical agenda couldn’t be voted for in a fair honest election. No other reason for opening the border to millions of illegals and blocking voter ID legislation and other steps to insure election integrity. We are being played and too many sheeple are too Gaslighted to see it.
https://www.trevorloudon.com/2020/10/why-is-no-one-except-the-president-calling-out-kamala-harris-communist-ties/
Democratic (sic) Party members hardly are Marxists.You need to learn political ideology.
You need to school yourself on what in the hell has happened to the Democrat Party. RFK has a few ideas. China has Elite Captured Dems and a few Republicans. The CCP OWNS the Democrat Party of CA and basically the State
Certainly the Democrats are at least cultural Marxists, and arguably are economic Marxists of the Cloward-Piven type. We should probably not get too hung up on terminology. Those of us here and elsewhere in the know realize that we are in war with the one-world plutocrats/oligarchs.
Their leaders are.
https://online.hillsdale.edu/courses/promo/american-left
What you don’t see the Marxist coup we are in the middle of?
The folks who make voting machines, also make ATM's (Dieboldt for example) You don't hear people complaining the the ATM didn't count their money properly. Or being hacked in 3 minutes. What's up with that?
Optical readers of paper ballots, paper kept in perpetuity; provide access to any ballot, matching each numbered ballot with voters' stubs, or even carbon-copies, for spot-verification at any time later. Same could be done with mail-in ballots. It would be good for voters to make their own copies of their paper ballots - private back-up.
There is plenty of time to organize this.
I approach problems and solutions like this with this question:
Is it game-able?
If something can be "gamed" then it can be corrupted. A follow-up question is:
What method is the least game-able of all?
For the prospect of a hidden polling agency sneaking around to 2000 polling places, the answer to the question is this:
It is highly game-able (corruptible).
But then if you ask the follow-up question regarding which method would give the bad guys the most headaches, the most hurdles to jump over, and the most hoops to jump through, you arrive at paper-only ballots. It is least likely that bad guys can steal elections when it means they have to physically replace paper ballots that people (not machines) filled out.
Sounds naive to me but if you think it will help or work.
I would rather see an exit poll that the major parties don't endorse or approve of, used as a check on the integrity of the election.
Exactly, or two or three run by professional polling companies
They all have their biases.
Good point. Keep the big parties out of it. And keep all the exit-poll tallies on paper; post photos of each page, make a spreadsheet of all these tallies, open-source code, and verify the spreadsheets against the photos, and original paper tally's. Make the paper tallies available for inspection by the public, and several voter-integrity orgs.
However they do it in war zones, because the pathocrats are waging war on us.
I live in NY state, and you can write-in a candidate, but only if that candidate has registered with the NY state board of elections, otherwise your vote and maybe your whole ballot are thrown out, but the NY state board of elections doesn't publish the list of available write-in candidates. For president only the uniparty candidates are on the ballot, so there you go. Stalinism.
Good start, but does not take into account the million or two or whatever non-citizens who will be able to vote this time around. No ID, nothing. The Dems have the smug complacency, no matter how bizarre Harris and Walz appear, that says "we already got this".
this "non-citizen" voting narrative does not have much data behind it to support it.
actually there is. Once I get over COVID I will produce it.
It's more like just illegal voting, by who knows who, ballot stuffing, unverified ballots, no paper trail, multiple voting, voting by non-residents including out-of-state, voting by deceased, it all adds up. Could be a lot of non-citizen voters, who knows? But it is certainly a whole lot more than non-citizen voters.
https://youtu.be/LWX6K6PGF9A?si=R6yXVWrJD0DMt_u8 Watch and you’ll understand the big picture
Yeah, I know, and I know that none of the wars is about "saving Democracy". Qaddafi was killed, IMO, because he was planning an African currency based on gold. and if BRICS cannot be suborned, I would not travel in packs or hold big publicized meetings if I was a member. No one threatens the dollar with impunity, seems to me. Ukraine is a vast money-laundering operation, plus a piggy bank bursting with resources. which is what is wanted for Russia. And on and on. None of this can be fixed with elections, methinks, but hey, bread and circuses. Thanks for the link!
If the evangelicals vote, who are low propensity voters and then add that to the MAGA people; Trump will win. According to Richard Baris and Robert Barnes it looks dead even because they (the left wing pollsters) don’t know how to poll the Trump vote. Of course, we could go to war or Trump could get killed or put in jail or something like that. But I think it looks good for Trump, which in my case looks good for potential health freedom. Kamala is for continued erosion of all freedoms, and handing the country over to crooks and pedophilia types on a silver platter. People see that, too.
Trump has it, legally, but you can be sure a lot of chicanery will go on in the DemonRat side. They have all the money & power. And the RINO/Neocon/Uni-party Republicans would rather lose than have MAGA win. They just want to see the gravy train continue for themselves, don't matter whether they win or lose.
Great to reshare -- Josh did a terrific job in this analysis!
Died in the wool ong time progressive - I like this idea, for all the reasons proposed. Let'd do this.
No sure how to secure the funding - RNC and DNC, neither one of them might like it. The FEC ought to be all over this. $10,000,000. That is a pretty big Go Fund Me. It is a little late in the game to write for grants, though I can imagine that there are several foundations that would go for it.
Why vote all roads lead to WEF and Fink
Fat chance the demorats will agree to participate. Too much for them to lose.
Do you mean “January 6th, 2021”? Or are you talking about when Bush II stole the election?
https://youtu.be/LWX6K6PGF9A?si=R6yXVWrJD0DMt_u8
Whoever can control the most minds
The wars going on today were planned twenty or thirty years ago.
The US doesn’t want election integrity because it doesn’t want integrity.
I challenged a state politician on one of his “ask me anything” telethons and he suddenly “couldn’t hear me” when I asked about voting fraud.
Enjoy the show
Maybe we could all just vote on election day and stop this month-long voting. The longer you allow people to vote the more opportunity there is for fraud.