61 Comments

Electronic voting machine fraud is known since a long time. I don't understand why it is still being used and legal. It should be banned. It should be only hand-counted paper ballots

US Lab Says Electronic Voting Machines Easy to Hack 3:08 min

https://youtu.be/q7Oty69mQ80

America's Voting Machines Are Extremely Vulnerable to Hacking 5:13 min

https://youtu.be/BLtHW0G7DIs

Why Electronic Voting is a BAD Idea - Computerphile 8:20 min

https://youtu.be/w3_0x6oaDmI

Expand full comment

The electronic machines should generate a paper copy that can be verified by the voter and kept in case there is any dispute. Easy-peasy, like the electronic check-out at Walmart. Why in the world wouldn't this be the standard?

Expand full comment

Why bother with the electronic voting machines at all? Documented corruptible, throw them out.

Too much money to be made by the manufacturers and going to the pols for payoffs.

Expand full comment

The folks who make voting machines, also make ATM's (Dieboldt for example) You don't hear people complaining the the ATM didn't count their money properly. Or being hacked in 3 minutes. What's up with that?

Optical readers of paper ballots, paper kept in perpetuity; provide access to any ballot, matching each numbered ballot with voters' stubs, or even carbon-copies, for spot-verification at any time later. Same could be done with mail-in ballots. It would be good for voters to make their own copies of their paper ballots - private back-up.

Expand full comment

There is plenty of time to organize this.

Expand full comment

Democrats/Marxists don’t want a system they can’t game as their radical agenda couldn’t be voted for in a fair honest election. No other reason for opening the border to millions of illegals and blocking voter ID legislation and other steps to insure election integrity. We are being played and too many sheeple are too Gaslighted to see it.

Expand full comment

Democratic (sic) Party members hardly are Marxists.You need to learn political ideology.

Expand full comment

You need to school yourself on what in the hell has happened to the Democrat Party. RFK has a few ideas. China has Elite Captured Dems and a few Republicans. The CCP OWNS the Democrat Party of CA and basically the State

Expand full comment

Certainly the Democrats are at least cultural Marxists, and arguably are economic Marxists of the Cloward-Piven type. We should probably not get too hung up on terminology. Those of us here and elsewhere in the know realize that we are in war with the one-world plutocrats/oligarchs.

Expand full comment

Their leaders are.

Expand full comment

What you don’t see the Marxist coup we are in the middle of?

Expand full comment
Oct 7·edited 19 hrs agoLiked by Meryl Nass

I approach problems and solutions like this with this question:

Is it game-able?

If something can be "gamed" then it can be corrupted. A follow-up question is:

What method is the least game-able of all?

For the prospect of a hidden polling agency sneaking around to 2000 polling places, the answer to the question is this:

It is highly game-able (corruptible).

But then if you ask the follow-up question regarding which method would give the bad guys the most headaches, the most hurdles to jump over, and the most hoops to jump through, you arrive at paper-only ballots. It is least likely that bad guys can steal elections when it means they have to physically replace paper ballots that people (not machines) filled out.

Expand full comment
founding

Sounds naive to me but if you think it will help or work.

I would rather see an exit poll that the major parties don't endorse or approve of, used as a check on the integrity of the election.

Expand full comment
author

Exactly, or two or three run by professional polling companies

Expand full comment

They all have their biases.

Expand full comment

Good point. Keep the big parties out of it. And keep all the exit-poll tallies on paper; post photos of each page, make a spreadsheet of all these tallies, open-source code, and verify the spreadsheets against the photos, and original paper tally's. Make the paper tallies available for inspection by the public, and several voter-integrity orgs.

Expand full comment
founding

However they do it in war zones, because the pathocrats are waging war on us.

Expand full comment
founding

I live in NY state, and you can write-in a candidate, but only if that candidate has registered with the NY state board of elections, otherwise your vote and maybe your whole ballot are thrown out, but the NY state board of elections doesn't publish the list of available write-in candidates. For president only the uniparty candidates are on the ballot, so there you go. Stalinism.

Expand full comment

Good start, but does not take into account the million or two or whatever non-citizens who will be able to vote this time around. No ID, nothing. The Dems have the smug complacency, no matter how bizarre Harris and Walz appear, that says "we already got this".

Expand full comment

this "non-citizen" voting narrative does not have much data behind it to support it.

Expand full comment
author

actually there is. Once I get over COVID I will produce it.

Expand full comment

It's more like just illegal voting, by who knows who, ballot stuffing, unverified ballots, no paper trail, multiple voting, voting by non-residents including out-of-state, voting by deceased, it all adds up. Could be a lot of non-citizen voters, who knows? But it is certainly a whole lot more than non-citizen voters.

Expand full comment

https://youtu.be/LWX6K6PGF9A?si=R6yXVWrJD0DMt_u8 Watch and you’ll understand the big picture

Expand full comment

Yeah, I know, and I know that none of the wars is about "saving Democracy". Qaddafi was killed, IMO, because he was planning an African currency based on gold. and if BRICS cannot be suborned, I would not travel in packs or hold big publicized meetings if I was a member. No one threatens the dollar with impunity, seems to me. Ukraine is a vast money-laundering operation, plus a piggy bank bursting with resources. which is what is wanted for Russia. And on and on. None of this can be fixed with elections, methinks, but hey, bread and circuses. Thanks for the link!

Expand full comment

If the evangelicals vote, who are low propensity voters and then add that to the MAGA people; Trump will win. According to Richard Baris and Robert Barnes it looks dead even because they (the left wing pollsters) don’t know how to poll the Trump vote. Of course, we could go to war or Trump could get killed or put in jail or something like that. But I think it looks good for Trump, which in my case looks good for potential health freedom. Kamala is for continued erosion of all freedoms, and handing the country over to crooks and pedophilia types on a silver platter. People see that, too.

Expand full comment

Trump has it, legally, but you can be sure a lot of chicanery will go on in the DemonRat side. They have all the money & power. And the RINO/Neocon/Uni-party Republicans would rather lose than have MAGA win. They just want to see the gravy train continue for themselves, don't matter whether they win or lose.

Expand full comment

Great to reshare -- Josh did a terrific job in this analysis!

Expand full comment

Died in the wool ong time progressive - I like this idea, for all the reasons proposed. Let'd do this.

No sure how to secure the funding - RNC and DNC, neither one of them might like it. The FEC ought to be all over this. $10,000,000. That is a pretty big Go Fund Me. It is a little late in the game to write for grants, though I can imagine that there are several foundations that would go for it.

Expand full comment

Why vote all roads lead to WEF and Fink

Expand full comment

Fat chance the demorats will agree to participate. Too much for them to lose.

Expand full comment

Do you mean “January 6th, 2021”? Or are you talking about when Bush II stole the election?

Expand full comment

https://youtu.be/LWX6K6PGF9A?si=R6yXVWrJD0DMt_u8

Whoever can control the most minds

Expand full comment

The wars going on today were planned twenty or thirty years ago.

Expand full comment

Maybe we could all just vote on election day and stop this month-long voting. The longer you allow people to vote the more opportunity there is for fraud.

Expand full comment

I had someone respond to a comment I made about voting fraud back 8 months or so ago. They siad they worked for an election integrity group studying the integrity of elections. They found more Republican fraud in the 2016 which was overshadowed by a huge surge in election fraud favouring the Democrats in the 2020 election. I pass this along for what it is worth.

Expand full comment