I consider David Bell the best expositor of what WHO is doing with the International Health Regulations, so am re-posting his long article in full here. Thanks to Jeffrey Tucker for hosting him.
Thanks for this Meryl, you can't take your eyes of Brownstone they write so many brilliant and informative articles it is hard to keep up with all of them, so thanks for the heads up.
Harmacide scamdemic is the new Holocaust, just getting underway.
Like the carousel in Logan's run, they want you to voluntarily submit and obey whatever they say, and facilitate your own demise and that of all of Womanity.
Now that was a lot of information. I will start with my oldest Daughter's quip. Which is "I treat everyone the same. I just hate all people." Luckily she has decided not act on Her sence of humer. The US is unfortunately becoming more Authoritarian which normally occurs in times of War. I guess at least in one of my classes the US Government is on a sliding scale from total individual freedom to bone cracking totalitarianism. If you travel across our Country and talk to people living differently you will see that sliding scale in miniature from Cities to individual homesteading in Alaska. Unfortunately our Government is evolving into a State to command everyone to mold themselves using only one mold. Again it's the same for our News Media. Much of what you have written is born out by watching a politician say a word and for 7 days straight it's repeated 20,000 times so outsiders can't judge our citizens on what's happening. Because they are kept in the dark. Then if you grab a flashlight and attempt to illuminate them they have been trained to "run from the light."
It's hard to read this..."In recent decades the WHO has evolved as its support base of core funding allocated by countries, based on GDP, evolved to a model where most funding is directed to specified uses, and much is provided by private and corporate interests. The priorities of the WHO have evolved accordingly, moving away from community-centered care to a more vertical, commodity-based approach. This inevitably follows the interests and self-interests of these funders"... and not recognize the very same corporate funding--and resulting influence in decision-making--at the FDA and CDC.
I confess TL:DR, eye glazed over. But I get the gist that some organization controlled by the donor class, mainly Gates & buddies want to control the world. They want this for our own good, you see. They won't have any financial benefit coming from the hand in your pocket. Sure. hope the Congress says no.
I did a bit of research on the subject a while back. One of the things that I discovered is that even if an international treaty is ratified by the Senate, all or some of it can be overturned by the Supreme Court if it is in conflict with the constitution. So, the current Supreme Court would not allow the implementation of clauses restricting free speech although a future court very well might. On the other hand, federal vaccine mandates are not necessarily prohibited by the constitution. Some people mistakenly think that was the outcome of the OSHA case, but then they weren't paying attention to the Medicare facility case. Depending on how the authorizing laws written, the imposition of federal mandates such as this may or may not be constitutional. For the time being, no new executive branch legislation nor any revisions to existing agency authorizations are likely to occur. Even if a sizable percentage of Republicans would actually be amenable to such legislation, they know it will be their last term in Congress if they vote in favor of it. In addition, the current Supreme Court is not amenable to any new legislation regarding the powers of executive agencies. There's some indication that the current Supreme Court is getting pretty close to overturning the so-called chevron doctrine. Specifically meaning that if an executive agency is not explicitly authorized in the constitution, they do not necessarily have any enforceable power at all. That would definitely be an extreme interpretation, but give the liberals enough rope to hang themselves and… Long story short, I don't see any way that whatever might end up being in the final WHO amendments will become enforceable policy in the United States until after the 2024 elections. If the D-bags try to make a federal case out of this prior to 2024, that will be a great campaign talking point for Ron DeSantis.
I certainly hope we have a good Solid legal advice on this earth changing sinister plot. Where can I donate money to the cause of sanity Fredo and the inalienable right to just be happy
It is tough to read this and not have feelings that lean toward either giving up or going radical. However, there is ammo here for me to share with more people & that is something I CAN DO. Thank you Dr Nass & the Brownstone writers/facilitators for sharing so much critical information and insight.
Thanks for this Meryl, you can't take your eyes of Brownstone they write so many brilliant and informative articles it is hard to keep up with all of them, so thanks for the heads up.
This is a red carpet for Peter Hotez to take over the world Medicine and let his disinformation dogs chase down free speech
What a load of narcissistic puppets who put that together! How on earth can a single country align their people to such vicious ’laws’??
I agree with Tim Boyers’ daughter
One world government = WHO
Harmacide scamdemic is the new Holocaust, just getting underway.
Like the carousel in Logan's run, they want you to voluntarily submit and obey whatever they say, and facilitate your own demise and that of all of Womanity.
End of comment.
All you need to know:
The WHO Director General declares Monkeypox a global emergency https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/23-07-2022-who-director-general-declares-the-ongoing-monkeypox-outbreak-a-public-health-event-of-international-
concern
WHO itself is the menace to society
Now that was a lot of information. I will start with my oldest Daughter's quip. Which is "I treat everyone the same. I just hate all people." Luckily she has decided not act on Her sence of humer. The US is unfortunately becoming more Authoritarian which normally occurs in times of War. I guess at least in one of my classes the US Government is on a sliding scale from total individual freedom to bone cracking totalitarianism. If you travel across our Country and talk to people living differently you will see that sliding scale in miniature from Cities to individual homesteading in Alaska. Unfortunately our Government is evolving into a State to command everyone to mold themselves using only one mold. Again it's the same for our News Media. Much of what you have written is born out by watching a politician say a word and for 7 days straight it's repeated 20,000 times so outsiders can't judge our citizens on what's happening. Because they are kept in the dark. Then if you grab a flashlight and attempt to illuminate them they have been trained to "run from the light."
It's hard to read this..."In recent decades the WHO has evolved as its support base of core funding allocated by countries, based on GDP, evolved to a model where most funding is directed to specified uses, and much is provided by private and corporate interests. The priorities of the WHO have evolved accordingly, moving away from community-centered care to a more vertical, commodity-based approach. This inevitably follows the interests and self-interests of these funders"... and not recognize the very same corporate funding--and resulting influence in decision-making--at the FDA and CDC.
I confess TL:DR, eye glazed over. But I get the gist that some organization controlled by the donor class, mainly Gates & buddies want to control the world. They want this for our own good, you see. They won't have any financial benefit coming from the hand in your pocket. Sure. hope the Congress says no.
After Russia is done with NATO, "WHO" is going to become "WTF?"... just as irrelevant.
I did a bit of research on the subject a while back. One of the things that I discovered is that even if an international treaty is ratified by the Senate, all or some of it can be overturned by the Supreme Court if it is in conflict with the constitution. So, the current Supreme Court would not allow the implementation of clauses restricting free speech although a future court very well might. On the other hand, federal vaccine mandates are not necessarily prohibited by the constitution. Some people mistakenly think that was the outcome of the OSHA case, but then they weren't paying attention to the Medicare facility case. Depending on how the authorizing laws written, the imposition of federal mandates such as this may or may not be constitutional. For the time being, no new executive branch legislation nor any revisions to existing agency authorizations are likely to occur. Even if a sizable percentage of Republicans would actually be amenable to such legislation, they know it will be their last term in Congress if they vote in favor of it. In addition, the current Supreme Court is not amenable to any new legislation regarding the powers of executive agencies. There's some indication that the current Supreme Court is getting pretty close to overturning the so-called chevron doctrine. Specifically meaning that if an executive agency is not explicitly authorized in the constitution, they do not necessarily have any enforceable power at all. That would definitely be an extreme interpretation, but give the liberals enough rope to hang themselves and… Long story short, I don't see any way that whatever might end up being in the final WHO amendments will become enforceable policy in the United States until after the 2024 elections. If the D-bags try to make a federal case out of this prior to 2024, that will be a great campaign talking point for Ron DeSantis.
I certainly hope we have a good Solid legal advice on this earth changing sinister plot. Where can I donate money to the cause of sanity Fredo and the inalienable right to just be happy
https://lawyerlisa.substack.com/p/hierarchy-of-needs
It is tough to read this and not have feelings that lean toward either giving up or going radical. However, there is ammo here for me to share with more people & that is something I CAN DO. Thank you Dr Nass & the Brownstone writers/facilitators for sharing so much critical information and insight.