A quote that has been attributed to George Washington: "“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence,—it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.”
I'm really unhappy that the force of government has been such a sneaky, opaque, dishonest and creeping entity in this modern phase that I have to spend more hours exercising vigilance, hours stolen from my art work. Every time I turn around they are up to some more bullshit. Even when we stop some bullshit, they repackage it under slightly different-worded bullshit and put it through again. So distressing and so damned annoying.
It's just shy of 58 min. People routinely watch 1 hour TV shows and only bitch about the commercials, which this does not have. What's the problem?
Sufficient information to make good decisions in this world cannot be gained in 10 minutes or less. A refusal to inform one's self appropriately about the state of the various geopoliitical machinations going on in the world and how they WILL affect you unless action is taken (because it's too damned inconvenient) is partially what got us all into this situation...
He missed your sarcasm but has the facts right. Actually,
“Man stealing” is the issue. Slavery is a Biblical institution to care for those who needed it for a shot period. Big responsibility was placed on the “owner”.
There is a bill to get the US out of the UN AND ALL AFFILIATE AFENCIES. It is an excellent bill and we need to get behind it. Now that we lost the Senate I Rep. Rogers (R-AL) should amend his bill to defund or the House should refuse any funding for the UN and ALL affiliate agencies. HR7806. AND HR8748 to defund the WEF/DAVOS. Join our US group on Substack for details and actions. withdrawun.substack.com
Good that you point out the fact that these are just pretexts to install states of emergency. Like the centuries-old eugenics discourse, this is the other essential concept that people can understand and has to be driven home every day in every article. Giorgio Agamben who normally used to be a favorite author among academic progressives, had written a book about that a few years after the 9/11 onset of the biosecurity state, namely 2003. He points out how already the French Revolution relied heavily on the state of emergency tool. Once people realize how this has through the centuries been legitimized with fancy distracting pretexts, they will not be able to unsee it. But beyond the so many technicalities of the ineptitude of the particular pandemic states of emergency, it is important to point out again and again what the basic mechanism is, and most importantly, how it goes back in the centuries. That, like with eugenics, is what convinces people once they see proof. Any warnings regarding a possible future development alone, are felt to be paranoid pessimism. The important thing is showing how the current developments constitute a continuation and maybe culmination of a pattern that can be recognized reaching far back. That is what convinces. It was what convinced me.
The Compact for Migration is another treaty that was ratified a few years ago. I recall that Austria, then under Kurz, did ratify, but also enclosed a comment saying that they considered the Compact as not legally binding to them. That too would be a minimal solution for the US and other countries, but that might be difficult to bring about, given the purpose and complicities.
I think there's a parallel here to military alliances, which overrule the sovereignty of countries to choose whether to go to war. That leaves them open to false flag attacks as the means of triggering the obligation. From WWI to Ukraine and NATO, a military alliance benefits global rulers who gain power over everyone without firing a shot. The WHO's One Health does the same.
You probably already know this, but Representative Chip Roy has introduced HB7931 (https://legiscan.com/US/bill/HB7931/2021) calling for the US to withdraw from the WHO.
And you likely have seen my series of articles on the WHO, but just in case, here they are:
How can any law put a limit on your freedom of thought (for instance)? Let's not give too much of our agency away. And if we are to believe that some rights are immutable and given of God, then it appears (by logic) that we must oppose any such efforts to squelch our rights.
Didn't a chap by the name of Solzhenitsyn try and warn humanity that the UN was flawed from the start? It was never a 'united' nations - and could never have been, when despotic and totalitarian countries had the power of veto. We must not simply defund WHO but also - if not especially - UN. And, while we are at it, stop giving tax deductions which encourage money laundering (and economic blackmail) under the guise of philanthropy. No tax deductible 'donations' to politicians or to 'not-for-profits' would stop a lot of this mess. If you need to be 'incentivised' to give to what you believe are worthy causes - maybe ask yourself why? As someone who is iatrogenic-injured and forced to live below the tax threshold, none of my donations are tax deductible.
The "treaties" are a naked grab for global surveillance and control as you and Corbett beautifully described. In the history of international relations more benign agreements (nuclear, chemical and biological weapons restrictions for example) has never been respected. We should exit the WHO and get our house (and senate) in order. Forget the corrupted 2/3rds , No such dastardly treaty should ever be allowed to come to a vote.
MERYL; You and James Corbett are fantastic together. Both with such a vast sweep of knowledge and understanding of one of the most contentious issues facing mankind today. Thanks for ‘shoveling a glimpse into the ditch of’ what WHO means
Thank You for the WARNING; This is a coming wave of legal and political "Tricks" We need to ignore these new "Rules" that have been magically forced upon us by those who have no real authority.
A clearly and comprehensibly formulated text about a dangerously overlooked and underappreciated problem. WHO has accelerated timing and non-transparency of processes and uses manipulative techniques when "creating" the IHR. We will not even know how the IHR is implemented in national jurisdictions. It would be irresponsible to rely again on the disapproval of small African states.
The article should have more publicity. Only sporadic texts on Substack, Daily Sceptic, PANDA, etc., are not a strong enough voice to penetrate the politicians of the governments of individual countries. In addition, a strong group of experienced technocrats is grouped in the WHO.
No way will I ever comply with anything the terrorists at WHO dream up. WHO is a gates funded terrorist organization along with the UN and WEF. Not taking part in any of this BS.
This feels like a hostage takeover. Concentrated power like this is too dangerous for all of us because like the saying goes...power corrupts. Even good people can be corrupted when financial incentives are dangling in front of them and secrecy keeps their crimes undetected. What would happen if people with bad intentions forcefully, in one way or another, removed the self described "good people" in power? Things might get worse than anyone could imagine. Don't people ever think about that when they write this stuff up?
and no CBDC. that's the most fundamental part of their plan for 'control'. our own money to punish or reward us with.
A quote that has been attributed to George Washington: "“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence,—it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.”
I'm really unhappy that the force of government has been such a sneaky, opaque, dishonest and creeping entity in this modern phase that I have to spend more hours exercising vigilance, hours stolen from my art work. Every time I turn around they are up to some more bullshit. Even when we stop some bullshit, they repackage it under slightly different-worded bullshit and put it through again. So distressing and so damned annoying.
This is the problem with Corbett - his videos are too darn long, so only the choir will watch them
It's just shy of 58 min. People routinely watch 1 hour TV shows and only bitch about the commercials, which this does not have. What's the problem?
Sufficient information to make good decisions in this world cannot be gained in 10 minutes or less. A refusal to inform one's self appropriately about the state of the various geopoliitical machinations going on in the world and how they WILL affect you unless action is taken (because it's too damned inconvenient) is partially what got us all into this situation...
There are hundreds of people out there after my attention. If I gave them all an hour of my time I'd die from lack of sleep...
Indeed I already 'waste' far too much of my time on substack and youtube as it is.
I would suggest that if this were the case you might consider addressing the hundreds all at once as does Corbett.
Del Bigtree's weekly videos usually run close to 3 hours, but usually worth watching. Crank up the speed to 1 1/4 time.
Listen while committing.
I have an hour and generally get in 7 to 8 sermons from sermon audio. com a week.
Well, and you should know that if George Washington said anything we should ignore it all because he was a dirty evil SLAVE OWNER!!!
Truth is not determined by the messenger, but stands on its own merits.
I'm making fun of Wokeism here, (duh...).
Every "tribe" were owners and/ or slaves st some point in history. Get past it and move on.
....ummm, you didn't "get it," quite...
He missed your sarcasm but has the facts right. Actually,
“Man stealing” is the issue. Slavery is a Biblical institution to care for those who needed it for a shot period. Big responsibility was placed on the “owner”.
Makes for a very interesting Bible Study.
"Mansplaining" is a big issue, too... as in: "GET PAST IT AND MOVE ON," translated: "PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!!!" ;-)
There is a bill to get the US out of the UN AND ALL AFFILIATE AFENCIES. It is an excellent bill and we need to get behind it. Now that we lost the Senate I Rep. Rogers (R-AL) should amend his bill to defund or the House should refuse any funding for the UN and ALL affiliate agencies. HR7806. AND HR8748 to defund the WEF/DAVOS. Join our US group on Substack for details and actions. withdrawun.substack.com
How embarrassing. Thank you very much.
Don't be embarrassed! Since you edited your original url, I deleted my comment. Feel free to do the same and we'll finish cleaning this up...
Good that you point out the fact that these are just pretexts to install states of emergency. Like the centuries-old eugenics discourse, this is the other essential concept that people can understand and has to be driven home every day in every article. Giorgio Agamben who normally used to be a favorite author among academic progressives, had written a book about that a few years after the 9/11 onset of the biosecurity state, namely 2003. He points out how already the French Revolution relied heavily on the state of emergency tool. Once people realize how this has through the centuries been legitimized with fancy distracting pretexts, they will not be able to unsee it. But beyond the so many technicalities of the ineptitude of the particular pandemic states of emergency, it is important to point out again and again what the basic mechanism is, and most importantly, how it goes back in the centuries. That, like with eugenics, is what convinces people once they see proof. Any warnings regarding a possible future development alone, are felt to be paranoid pessimism. The important thing is showing how the current developments constitute a continuation and maybe culmination of a pattern that can be recognized reaching far back. That is what convinces. It was what convinced me.
The Compact for Migration is another treaty that was ratified a few years ago. I recall that Austria, then under Kurz, did ratify, but also enclosed a comment saying that they considered the Compact as not legally binding to them. That too would be a minimal solution for the US and other countries, but that might be difficult to bring about, given the purpose and complicities.
I think there's a parallel here to military alliances, which overrule the sovereignty of countries to choose whether to go to war. That leaves them open to false flag attacks as the means of triggering the obligation. From WWI to Ukraine and NATO, a military alliance benefits global rulers who gain power over everyone without firing a shot. The WHO's One Health does the same.
You probably already know this, but Representative Chip Roy has introduced HB7931 (https://legiscan.com/US/bill/HB7931/2021) calling for the US to withdraw from the WHO.
And you likely have seen my series of articles on the WHO, but just in case, here they are:
• “Letter to the WHO” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-who)
• “Letter to the US HHS Office of Global Affairs” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-us-hhs-office-of-global)
• “What If They Threw a Pandemic and Nobody Came?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/what-if-they-threw-a-pandemic-and)
I plan to write an article focused on #StopTheWHO with a clear call to exit it in the future.
Appears it is still in committee. Will it ever come to a vote? Will it be reintroduced with new Congress? Do you have any other information?
I thought I remembered signing a petition about it a while back but am having trouble finding it. Not sure what the status is beyond that.
Yeah, scary stuff…and the international covenant on civil & political rights is the devil…
The law can put a limit on your freedom of thought, your freedom of expression, and there is no right to bear arms…our rights
Are inalienable. The WHO, & WEF and their one world government can go to hell. You will not have technology in my body that will
Determine my carbon footprint by 2030. No mark of the beast for me devil!
How can any law put a limit on your freedom of thought (for instance)? Let's not give too much of our agency away. And if we are to believe that some rights are immutable and given of God, then it appears (by logic) that we must oppose any such efforts to squelch our rights.
As JD says, "Defund the THOUGHT Police!!"
Didn't a chap by the name of Solzhenitsyn try and warn humanity that the UN was flawed from the start? It was never a 'united' nations - and could never have been, when despotic and totalitarian countries had the power of veto. We must not simply defund WHO but also - if not especially - UN. And, while we are at it, stop giving tax deductions which encourage money laundering (and economic blackmail) under the guise of philanthropy. No tax deductible 'donations' to politicians or to 'not-for-profits' would stop a lot of this mess. If you need to be 'incentivised' to give to what you believe are worthy causes - maybe ask yourself why? As someone who is iatrogenic-injured and forced to live below the tax threshold, none of my donations are tax deductible.
The "treaties" are a naked grab for global surveillance and control as you and Corbett beautifully described. In the history of international relations more benign agreements (nuclear, chemical and biological weapons restrictions for example) has never been respected. We should exit the WHO and get our house (and senate) in order. Forget the corrupted 2/3rds , No such dastardly treaty should ever be allowed to come to a vote.
MERYL; You and James Corbett are fantastic together. Both with such a vast sweep of knowledge and understanding of one of the most contentious issues facing mankind today. Thanks for ‘shoveling a glimpse into the ditch of’ what WHO means
Thank You for the WARNING; This is a coming wave of legal and political "Tricks" We need to ignore these new "Rules" that have been magically forced upon us by those who have no real authority.
A clearly and comprehensibly formulated text about a dangerously overlooked and underappreciated problem. WHO has accelerated timing and non-transparency of processes and uses manipulative techniques when "creating" the IHR. We will not even know how the IHR is implemented in national jurisdictions. It would be irresponsible to rely again on the disapproval of small African states.
The article should have more publicity. Only sporadic texts on Substack, Daily Sceptic, PANDA, etc., are not a strong enough voice to penetrate the politicians of the governments of individual countries. In addition, a strong group of experienced technocrats is grouped in the WHO.
Pharaoh's army got drowned in the sea.
No way will I ever comply with anything the terrorists at WHO dream up. WHO is a gates funded terrorist organization along with the UN and WEF. Not taking part in any of this BS.
This feels like a hostage takeover. Concentrated power like this is too dangerous for all of us because like the saying goes...power corrupts. Even good people can be corrupted when financial incentives are dangling in front of them and secrecy keeps their crimes undetected. What would happen if people with bad intentions forcefully, in one way or another, removed the self described "good people" in power? Things might get worse than anyone could imagine. Don't people ever think about that when they write this stuff up?