70 Comments

It would cause grievous harm to Biden's dictatorship.

Expand full comment

And the psychopaths double down on their lies.

I hope it can be easily proven that they knowingly used their censorship campaign to mass murder people, so we can get to work on putting them in front tribunals. Executives for big pharma, banking, BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, as every player in “journalism” and science (maybe even social media trolls) need to answer for their crimes against humanity.

We need a hundreds or even thousands of Reiner Fuellmichs.

Although unlike the first Nuremberg trials, the highest ranking criminals will actually have to pay the price for the evils they perpetrated on us.

#nuremberg20

Expand full comment

This is tentatively good news for the constitution and freedom loving Americans. However notice that the reaction of the opponents is not "We respect the judicial system so we will modify our behavior." Rather it is "We do not respect any individual or system that says anything we don't like, so we're going to attack and go around it."

Expand full comment

If, as they claim, they haven't been censoring anyone, they shouldn't have a problem with being banned from doing so.

Expand full comment

You cannot block this huge win for We the people!!

Expand full comment

You knew this was coming.

Biden’s immediate supervisor had to be seeing red over this ruling prohibiting him from trying to muzzle the press.

Expand full comment

All censorship is evil.

Expand full comment

People who have sworn to uphold The Constitution yet assert there are exceptions, detest me.

Expand full comment

Judge Doughty's order causes grave harm to the Biden regime's globalist operations and plans.

That's the ONLY harm this corrupt and treasonous administration cares about.

"Protecting people against dangerous mis- and disinformation" is pure gaslighting propaganda.

Expand full comment
Jul 7, 2023·edited Jul 7, 2023

It seems quite the oxymoron, to suggest :

" the ruling ... could hamper attempts to squelch misinformation on topics including health and elections ".

'Pot' calling the 'Kettle' black ?

Expand full comment

Quoting from Dr. Nass' article:

Government lawyers "said it could prevent the Biden administration from “speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes.” "

NOTE: There is nothing in the ruling to prevent Biden from addressing the nation directly via live (well, in Biden's case, semi-live) speeches in person or on television, on video, or in print media. His handlers can issue press releases.

It's the underhanded, insidious control of the press in all its forms including social media that is against Freedom of Speech AND Freedom of the Press.

The government lawyers also said, “These immediate and ongoing harms to the Government outweigh any risk of injury to Plaintiffs if a stay is granted.”

NOTE: The U.S. Constitution exists to protect the PEOPLE, NOT the government. I'm disgusted by this argument made by government lawyers. It should be thrown out on its face.

Expand full comment

So now censorship is the bedrock of our Democracy! All the founding fathers just rolled over in their graves.

It's interesting they seem to lack faith in their armed forces, to kill mom and dad on command, or why even care what we think we know?

Expand full comment

I believe the 14th amend protects our right to be free of needlerape

Expand full comment

Such an interesting decree from the American Palace of the Emperor of Ice Cream and his son the Emperor of White Powder for the Palace. More like the court of an old English king.

Expand full comment

The mean “grave harm” to pharmaceutical companies, bankers and other corporate thieves and their “shareholders.”

Expand full comment

Grave harm?

That's rich!

The O'Biden syndicate wants to keep America in the dark about it's activities and quid pro Joe's!!!

Expand full comment