CDC and NY Times stopped revealing the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed case and death comparisons 6 and 8 weeks ago, when the graphs began to show no benefit from vaccination
CDC and NY Times stopped revealing the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed case and death comparisons 6 and 8 weeks ago, when the graphs began to show no benefit from vaccination
The NY Times runs a very detailed website, updated daily, with COVID cases, hospitalizations, tests, deaths, vaccinations. It is chock full of charts and graphs. Much of the data is granular down to counties. Some of it relates to the whole world. It's a one-stop shop where you can find data on almost everything COVID-related.
CDC and NY Times stopped revealing the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed case and death comparisons 6 and 8 weeks ago, when the graphs began to show no benefit from vaccination
This cessation of the data-feed was "necessary" after the definition of "unvaccinated" to mean anybody prior to 2 weeks post the second jab, and anybody more than 6 months after the second jab, failed to cover up the awkward "negative vaccine efficacy".
The UK Public Health, CDC and friends decided to stop shooting their narrative in the foot by releasing factual data which prove it increasingly false.
Thank you so much for this heads up!!! Pure manipulation. I thank principled and vigilant MDs like you to keep us informed of what is really going on. I am shocked and dismayed at the majority who are still trying to receive, yet, another booster. Because of information like this, I am becoming more emboldened to say outright to them, “Don’t do it!”
Aren't the earlier data based on defining "vaccinated" as 14 days after 2nd mRNA or 1st J&J - so if someone dies within 13 days of the shot they are counted as unvaxed?
Here in Ontario (Canada), we found out that the public health data collectors deliberately assigned all cases of Covid diagnosed from 1- 14 days after the person's last gene jab into "unvaccinated" category. So the person could have had two doses already but if they got symptomatic and had a positive test result a few days after their first booster (third jab) - which is remarkably not uncommon - they were still counted as unvaccinated.
Steve Kirsch has found an Attorney General willing to help stop the covid shot craziness. He is looking for people that work in the Healthcare field (any capacity from Doctor, Nurse, Paramedic…. to other) to give him just a small amount of time. See survey in article below. Please share this with any you know that work in Healthcare.
Yes, England and Wales, and also Scotland, all stopped publishing their comparisons in March this year, wth a lot of waffle about why they were doing it 'because the figures were being used to show that vaccines don't work' .
Yes, maybe that is because vaccines do not, in fact, confer any benefits... but if so, then why are the WHO still saying on Facebook that people who have had Covid should still get their jabs, when this is patently nonsense?
My question has been, for months, if vaccination is intended to create immunity, why are the graphs not tracking immunity/antibodies. That is the biggest red flag for me!
New Zealand still updating. Vaccination status of new hospitalisations per 100,000 of population segment https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/7871616/ Vaccination status of new cases per 100,000 of population segment
I guess its time for them to stop as the boosted and unvaxed rates of hospitalisations are pretty much the same the double vaxed winning the hospital game
CDC and NY Times stopped revealing the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed case and death comparisons 6 and 8 weeks ago, when the graphs began to show no benefit from vaccination
This cessation of the data-feed was "necessary" after the definition of "unvaccinated" to mean anybody prior to 2 weeks post the second jab, and anybody more than 6 months after the second jab, failed to cover up the awkward "negative vaccine efficacy".
The UK Public Health, CDC and friends decided to stop shooting their narrative in the foot by releasing factual data which prove it increasingly false.
Imagine their consternation! :-o
We're not supposed to know that the vaxxed are getting sick and dying more than the unvaxxed.
Thank you so much for this heads up!!! Pure manipulation. I thank principled and vigilant MDs like you to keep us informed of what is really going on. I am shocked and dismayed at the majority who are still trying to receive, yet, another booster. Because of information like this, I am becoming more emboldened to say outright to them, “Don’t do it!”
Aren't the earlier data based on defining "vaccinated" as 14 days after 2nd mRNA or 1st J&J - so if someone dies within 13 days of the shot they are counted as unvaxed?
Here in Ontario (Canada), we found out that the public health data collectors deliberately assigned all cases of Covid diagnosed from 1- 14 days after the person's last gene jab into "unvaccinated" category. So the person could have had two doses already but if they got symptomatic and had a positive test result a few days after their first booster (third jab) - which is remarkably not uncommon - they were still counted as unvaccinated.
Steve Kirsch has found an Attorney General willing to help stop the covid shot craziness. He is looking for people that work in the Healthcare field (any capacity from Doctor, Nurse, Paramedic…. to other) to give him just a small amount of time. See survey in article below. Please share this with any you know that work in Healthcare.
Thank you.
We have a red-pilled Attorney General!!
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/now-we-are-cooking-with-gas-i-have?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1ODgwMTM3NiwicG9zdF9pZCI6NTc0NTY3NDQsIl8iOiJXK25ZWSIsImlhdCI6MTY1NDA4OTk1OSwiZXhwIjoxNjU0MDkzNTU5LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTQ4MzU0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.OArS2WCEDaHXqYn1bas5alPOQPeLToTKBwITim0krOM&s=r
When the stats don’t fit the narrative, just go poof! It’s gone. Just like Pfizer and the FDA.
Yes, England and Wales, and also Scotland, all stopped publishing their comparisons in March this year, wth a lot of waffle about why they were doing it 'because the figures were being used to show that vaccines don't work' .
Yes, maybe that is because vaccines do not, in fact, confer any benefits... but if so, then why are the WHO still saying on Facebook that people who have had Covid should still get their jabs, when this is patently nonsense?
Did those GENE THERAPY graphs EVER show any benefit, real or perceived...? Thanks.
My question has been, for months, if vaccination is intended to create immunity, why are the graphs not tracking immunity/antibodies. That is the biggest red flag for me!
Well...the NY ”Slimes” & the (C)riminal (D)epartment of (C)onfusion are at it again - just like da “vaxxx” - they are dirty.
What is it We're Not Supposed To Know?? It's EVERYTHING!!!
I’m sure they’re busy working out yet another way to skew and fake the data.
When in doubt leave it out. Criminals.
New Zealand still updating. Vaccination status of new hospitalisations per 100,000 of population segment https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/7871616/ Vaccination status of new cases per 100,000 of population segment
https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/7871379/
I guess its time for them to stop as the boosted and unvaxed rates of hospitalisations are pretty much the same the double vaxed winning the hospital game
Isn’t it getting exhausting to be on guard for the RAMPANT gaslighting coming at us daily? I am!