The flu injections have been marvelous for me since I have avoided them all and haven't gotten the flu in over 25 years. See CDC, you are the most useless of agencies.
I would started taking the flu shot in my late 30’s -early 40’s. Weeks after the shot I would develop transitory hyperthyroidism. I would lose 25 pounds in a month and my heart rate would be 160 while sitting and other unpleasant symptoms. The endocrinologist asked if I had the flu just before the onset of symptoms and I responded that I had not had any flu symptoms prior to the symptoms and I mentioned I had received a flu shot. Anyway it took several terrible episodes of hyperthyroidism and zero medical explanations as to the cause for me to do some research. I learned there was a link between the flu shot and transitory hyperthyroidism. I never took another shot and guess what…I never had another episode of hyperthyroidism.
When we say efficacy, as usual, it is the relative efficacy rate RRR used for advertising. What is meaningful for individuals is the absolute efficacy rate ARR.
For example, if 1,000 people out of 1 million are infected, and if million of them are vaccinated and the number of infected people falls to 100, then the CDC's stated efficacy rate (relative) is 90%. However, since 999,000 people would not be infected whether they were vaccinated or not, the absolute efficacy rate is only 0.1%. The deception methods used by the CDC and pharmaceutical companies are extremely malicious! Both the CDC and Pfizer said that BNT162b2 had an efficacy rate of 95%, but when calculated based on the figures in the Phase I clinical trial report, the absolute efficacy rate was only 0.716%.
Absolute efficacy rate ≡ [1-{1-number of people who developed symptoms in placebo/total number of people who received placebo} / {1-number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated people/total number of people who received vaccine}] * 100 [%]
That's right. The problem is that even ordinary doctors believe that if they are told that the vaccine is 95% effective, the chances of an individual becoming infected will be reduced by 95%. Because they believe this, they recommend it to patients as 95% effective, and the doctors themselves will vaccinate them. The doctors who died in Canada by the fall of 2022 were probably just as kind. It's a bit old, but https://brightlightnews.com/90-canadian-doctor-deaths-dr-william-makis-md/
In fact, my relative, a cardiologist, had vaccinated the whole family up to twice until I advised him not to. Fortunately, he is still alive.
Some flu shots (and others) still include thimerosal, which contains mercury. But of course, the cdc says there is "no evidence" of harm from mercury in these shots which is why they (fda) have tried to lower the quantity used. They go so far as to say this is a less dangerous or damaging mercury, as though they can modify an element. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/faqs.html
By now, I'm an expert on the CDC's myriad flu season reports.
What does "efficacy" even mean? That it prevents the flu in every one who got the flu shot?
I've seen quotes from Fauci himself who said the effectiveness for the flu shots is only "10 percent" in some flu seasons.
Consider data for the 2017-2018 Flu season, which is said to be one of the worst in the last 40 years. According to this chart, the flu vaccine that season had an efficacy of "38 percent." Still, 50 percent of the country dutifully got their flu shots - and 40-million plus Americans still got the damn flu.
And the estimates of "cases" and "flu deaths" are also always later revised by the CDC. In 2017-2018, the CDC estimated that 80,000 Americans died from the flu that year. That was the estimate reported on websites and press stories for almost two years. Then the CDC revised the death numbers to 61,000. Today, the CDC says that only 51,000 Americans died from the flu that flu season.
In other words, flu deaths magically decreased by 30,000 with two computer adjustments.
(Also, the flu shot uptake for those over 65 is 70 percent. That's who died from that flu - the group where almost 3/4 of them had gotten a flu shot).
... I'm still waiting for the day when "Covid deaths" are revised downward by 36 percent with one CDC press release.
P.S. Even when the flu shot clearly doesn't match that year's flu strain (like it didn't in 2018 or right before official Covid, the flu season of 2019-2020), every story I've read on terrible flu outbreaks always includes this statement from some doctor or public health experts:
"Experts say it's not too late to get your flu shot."
That is, it's not too late to get that shot ... that clearly doesn't work. But get it anyway.
Are there any studies or CDC "guidance" that should be taken as fact anymore? Shouldn't every one, even smoking guidance be fact checked again? Now that we know all peer-review medical journals are compromised beyond repair, who fact checks quasi-governmental agencies? What a nightmare!
They will never fund a project measuring blood value of Vitamin D versus incidence of flu and recovery time. The 30 million dollar
Harvard study ignored blood testing. Study was designed to underplay true value of the Active hormonal form of D that controls the expression of about 3000 genes.
I wonder what else their flu shots have caused. Maybe damage to the immune system causing other diseases, who knows? we certainly will not be told. All of the numbers and graphs they produce are smoke and mirrors and they have practicing their illusions for a very long time.
You know what is efficacious - EGCG with or without theaflavin (EGCG from Green tea and theaflavin for black tea... these herbal extracts will block the HxNx flu viruses from infecting cells.
CDC = Criminal Drug Cartel
Constant disinformation campaign
Center for Disingenuous Coercion
Communists' Dirty Campaign.......
Certain Death Coming
The flu injections have been marvelous for me since I have avoided them all and haven't gotten the flu in over 25 years. See CDC, you are the most useless of agencies.
Here too! No shots no flu in 40 years! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
I would started taking the flu shot in my late 30’s -early 40’s. Weeks after the shot I would develop transitory hyperthyroidism. I would lose 25 pounds in a month and my heart rate would be 160 while sitting and other unpleasant symptoms. The endocrinologist asked if I had the flu just before the onset of symptoms and I responded that I had not had any flu symptoms prior to the symptoms and I mentioned I had received a flu shot. Anyway it took several terrible episodes of hyperthyroidism and zero medical explanations as to the cause for me to do some research. I learned there was a link between the flu shot and transitory hyperthyroidism. I never took another shot and guess what…I never had another episode of hyperthyroidism.
Wow! Very interesting! Glad you are fine! I detest these jabs! 😤🤬
Wow Saoirse , glad you’re fine .
none ever
unfortunately is it worse, They are without question genocidal.
When we say efficacy, as usual, it is the relative efficacy rate RRR used for advertising. What is meaningful for individuals is the absolute efficacy rate ARR.
For example, if 1,000 people out of 1 million are infected, and if million of them are vaccinated and the number of infected people falls to 100, then the CDC's stated efficacy rate (relative) is 90%. However, since 999,000 people would not be infected whether they were vaccinated or not, the absolute efficacy rate is only 0.1%. The deception methods used by the CDC and pharmaceutical companies are extremely malicious! Both the CDC and Pfizer said that BNT162b2 had an efficacy rate of 95%, but when calculated based on the figures in the Phase I clinical trial report, the absolute efficacy rate was only 0.716%.
Absolute efficacy rate ≡ [1-{1-number of people who developed symptoms in placebo/total number of people who received placebo} / {1-number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated people/total number of people who received vaccine}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site
https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
That's right. The problem is that even ordinary doctors believe that if they are told that the vaccine is 95% effective, the chances of an individual becoming infected will be reduced by 95%. Because they believe this, they recommend it to patients as 95% effective, and the doctors themselves will vaccinate them. The doctors who died in Canada by the fall of 2022 were probably just as kind. It's a bit old, but https://brightlightnews.com/90-canadian-doctor-deaths-dr-william-makis-md/
In fact, my relative, a cardiologist, had vaccinated the whole family up to twice until I advised him not to. Fortunately, he is still alive.
Those numbers are beyond embarrassing. And they offer a side of aluminum with each flu shot.
No thanks.
let us be clear for others, Al or aluminum is used as an adjuvant to increase the immune response exponentially. As you have resolved JUST SAY NO
Some flu shots (and others) still include thimerosal, which contains mercury. But of course, the cdc says there is "no evidence" of harm from mercury in these shots which is why they (fda) have tried to lower the quantity used. They go so far as to say this is a less dangerous or damaging mercury, as though they can modify an element. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/faqs.html
I took my first flu shot in 1980s a a preventative measure and I got sick the next day. That was my first and last flu shit.
and now we now the truth: https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/
Never get shots, almost never sick.
There is no truth coming out of the CDC anymore
True beleebers don’t need no stinkin’ proof of efficacy.
Hit me momma!💉💉💉
By now, I'm an expert on the CDC's myriad flu season reports.
What does "efficacy" even mean? That it prevents the flu in every one who got the flu shot?
I've seen quotes from Fauci himself who said the effectiveness for the flu shots is only "10 percent" in some flu seasons.
Consider data for the 2017-2018 Flu season, which is said to be one of the worst in the last 40 years. According to this chart, the flu vaccine that season had an efficacy of "38 percent." Still, 50 percent of the country dutifully got their flu shots - and 40-million plus Americans still got the damn flu.
And the estimates of "cases" and "flu deaths" are also always later revised by the CDC. In 2017-2018, the CDC estimated that 80,000 Americans died from the flu that year. That was the estimate reported on websites and press stories for almost two years. Then the CDC revised the death numbers to 61,000. Today, the CDC says that only 51,000 Americans died from the flu that flu season.
In other words, flu deaths magically decreased by 30,000 with two computer adjustments.
(Also, the flu shot uptake for those over 65 is 70 percent. That's who died from that flu - the group where almost 3/4 of them had gotten a flu shot).
... I'm still waiting for the day when "Covid deaths" are revised downward by 36 percent with one CDC press release.
P.S. Even when the flu shot clearly doesn't match that year's flu strain (like it didn't in 2018 or right before official Covid, the flu season of 2019-2020), every story I've read on terrible flu outbreaks always includes this statement from some doctor or public health experts:
"Experts say it's not too late to get your flu shot."
That is, it's not too late to get that shot ... that clearly doesn't work. But get it anyway.
Are there any studies or CDC "guidance" that should be taken as fact anymore? Shouldn't every one, even smoking guidance be fact checked again? Now that we know all peer-review medical journals are compromised beyond repair, who fact checks quasi-governmental agencies? What a nightmare!
They will never fund a project measuring blood value of Vitamin D versus incidence of flu and recovery time. The 30 million dollar
Harvard study ignored blood testing. Study was designed to underplay true value of the Active hormonal form of D that controls the expression of about 3000 genes.
The evidence for Hormone D is as great as any evidence on offer.
Waiting for Harvard or the Fake News to deliver? That will be a long wait.
I wonder what else their flu shots have caused. Maybe damage to the immune system causing other diseases, who knows? we certainly will not be told. All of the numbers and graphs they produce are smoke and mirrors and they have practicing their illusions for a very long time.
no need to wonder, the "epidemic" of auto immune disease, malignancy, infertility or a combo, it is but one of the shots against "virus" boogeymen
There is no virus! So what is this bs about?
what it is about is world views, and the fact that the best educated among us were
indoctrinated with lies including the "virus" story
CDC puppets with there safe and effective bioweopens
Um no on your stinking flu shot! HARD PASS!!! 🤬
You know what is efficacious - EGCG with or without theaflavin (EGCG from Green tea and theaflavin for black tea... these herbal extracts will block the HxNx flu viruses from infecting cells.
One of many references: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3594666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9503507/
Criminal Death Cult