Children's Health Defense told FDA why it could not authorize Pfizer's COVID vaccine for kids between 6 months and 5 years. FDA postponed its decision till April.
Children's Health Defense told FDA why it could not authorize Pfizer's COVID vaccine for kids between 6 months and 5 years. FDA postponed its decision till April.
Thank you for your involvement in the fight to protect our youngest members of society, Dr. Nass. This letter was exceptionally stated, cited and sourced. You and RFK JR make a great team and I look forward to the work you and he will continue to do to support humanity! Janet Woodcock does not deserve the title of MD......
What about the quality of the Pfizer trials themselves? The ones leading to authorization? That was before the requested delay for further results requested by Pfizser.
Link to the filing in the article below. Most of it is copied here.
In the race to secure billions in federal funding and become the first to market, Defendants deliberately withheld crucial information from the United States that calls the safety and efficacy of their vaccine into question. Namely, Defendants concealed violations of both their clinical trial protocol and federal regulations, including falsification of clinical trial documents.
7
Ventavia’s trial protocol and regulatory violations were so widespread, in fact, that Relator observed them on a near-daily basis during her brief employment period. For example, Relator observed:
• fabrication and falsification of blood draw information, vital signs, signatures and other essential clinical trial data;
• enrollment and injection of ineligible clinical trial participants, including Ventavia employees’ family members;
• failure to timely remove ineligible patients’ data from the trial;
• failure to maintain temperature control for the vaccine at issue;
• failure to monitor patients after injection as required by the trial protocol;
• principal investigator oversight failures;
• use of unqualified and untrained personnel as vaccinators and laboratory personnel;
• failure to maintain the “blind” as required, which is essential to the credibility and validity of the observer-blinded clinical trial;
• ethical violations, such as failure to secure informed consent and giving patients unapproved compensation;
• improper injection of the vaccine (i.e., by over-diluting vaccine concentrate or using the wrong needle size);
• failure to ensure that trial site staff were properly trained as required by good clinical practices;
• safety and confidentiality issues, including HIPAA violations; and
Meryl bless you and thank you from foggy Oregon. This constant pushing to get the word out and get the documents out there is finally parting the waters, your faith and goodness shines. I hope you get the care you need too, to breath deep and try to relax sometimes...best to you
Thank you for your involvement in the fight to protect our youngest members of society, Dr. Nass. This letter was exceptionally stated, cited and sourced. You and RFK JR make a great team and I look forward to the work you and he will continue to do to support humanity! Janet Woodcock does not deserve the title of MD......
What about the quality of the Pfizer trials themselves? The ones leading to authorization? That was before the requested delay for further results requested by Pfizser.
Link to the filing in the article below. Most of it is copied here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/WayOfTheBern/comments/sv6nr8/boooom_fabricated_covid_vaccine_data_2_billion/
"BOOOOM! FABRICATED COVID VACCINE DATA: $2 billion lawsuit against Pfizer/BioNTech. Unsealed today."
Lawsuit: https://cdn.locals.com/documents/47656/47656_e41yu6vd2x117dq.pdf
In the race to secure billions in federal funding and become the first to market, Defendants deliberately withheld crucial information from the United States that calls the safety and efficacy of their vaccine into question. Namely, Defendants concealed violations of both their clinical trial protocol and federal regulations, including falsification of clinical trial documents.
7
Ventavia’s trial protocol and regulatory violations were so widespread, in fact, that Relator observed them on a near-daily basis during her brief employment period. For example, Relator observed:
• fabrication and falsification of blood draw information, vital signs, signatures and other essential clinical trial data;
• enrollment and injection of ineligible clinical trial participants, including Ventavia employees’ family members;
• failure to timely remove ineligible patients’ data from the trial;
• failure to maintain temperature control for the vaccine at issue;
• failure to monitor patients after injection as required by the trial protocol;
• principal investigator oversight failures;
• use of unqualified and untrained personnel as vaccinators and laboratory personnel;
• failure to maintain the “blind” as required, which is essential to the credibility and validity of the observer-blinded clinical trial;
• ethical violations, such as failure to secure informed consent and giving patients unapproved compensation;
• improper injection of the vaccine (i.e., by over-diluting vaccine concentrate or using the wrong needle size);
• failure to ensure that trial site staff were properly trained as required by good clinical practices;
• safety and confidentiality issues, including HIPAA violations; and
Meryl bless you and thank you from foggy Oregon. This constant pushing to get the word out and get the documents out there is finally parting the waters, your faith and goodness shines. I hope you get the care you need too, to breath deep and try to relax sometimes...best to you
Love and blessings
Thanks for help ending child sacrifice