The irony is that the more powerful a force becomes, the more it gets savaged. There's probably a mathematical formula for this. Apparently the attacks are about distracting, demoralizing, and limiting reach, but, you know, they can just shut the front door as my Southern relatives say. https://www.emerald.tv/p/substack-has-gone-woke
I definitely noticed "changes" in Substack, it like other "media" is likely data collecting. A restaurant is as good as its last meal. Go woke, go broke and other simple attempts to describe the insanity. If Subs go south then so be it.
I'm very glad you did this comparison--for precisely that reason. But I can't force myself to actually read the analysis. I hate these bureaucrats too much for that...
Just want to add - for many of us who have been in this fight for so long, the value of comparing the resulting IHR amendments to the IHRs suggested some time ago by WHO helps put into perspective the impact we all contributed to. I personally feel a sense of pride in all the effort put forth and am encouraged to continue this "David and Goliath Battle" with more intensity.
Thank-you So much for taking the time to demonstrate the differences in a clear way- this even better demonstrates just how amazing your work is. Thank you!!!
She presented/discussed both the adopted changes and the proposed changes, so readers can know what was adopted, firstly, and secondly, know the proposed items that didn’t get adopted. I don’t see an issue with the comprehensive approach taken.
tbh a completely pointless, manufactured conflict - waste of energy and time. who tf cares how someone calls it win/lose. what’s important is understanding what’s happening and stopping further erosion of liberty and regaining what we lost.
I’ve been reading them, but the language is so dense that it takes a lot of time and study. I find the comparison to be useful for sure, and perhaps better than reading the 2024 IHR docs in isolation. Having said that now I’m going to read the 2005 version with 2007 amendments and directly compare the two. You’re right when you say, nobody reads them for themselves. And that’s why I started reading and re-reading them over and over a few weeks ago. It is very heavy going.
Thankyou for your comment. I do follow James and his analysis. However given I work in a complex policy environment I have the skills to parse the documents and form my own views concerning its interpretation. In the meantime I’m interested in how all the substack reviewers frame the outcomes of IHR amendments; that doesn’t mean I take their analysis as ‘truth’. Rather I prefer to come to my own conclusions without pressure or politics
Yes it may have been better, but at least she has tried to look at current v proposed to check the differences. I found that to be quite useful. I would imagine it’s time consuming work. Perhaps you or others could analyse the actual amendments? That’s what James Roguski did right?
I have a customer who has a fancy water treatment contraption perched on her kitchen countertop that some fast-talking hack talked her into, devise has been there for years without any service to my knowledge, so she has no idea what it’s producing. She has numerous health “issues”, some of which she swears that the thing has relieved her of. (Yet thinks nothing of drinking untreated water south of the border, however. ) Got one covid jab, a booster, gave that process a pass after the third one showed its teeth, without any sort of interest in what was being dumped into her. I suppose that she gave no consideration to what her treatment options would have been had not Dr. Nass and Co. beaten back the forces who would’ve mandated God-knows-what, post-adverse reaction!
A mechanic friend of mine once told me, “The difference between rape and consensual sex is pure salesmanship.” Rude as it may seem, it’s a reasonable assessment of our current status as patients under the ”care” of what passes for practitioners these days. I’ll qualify by adding “any of such who still believe in the obviously failed mRNA experiment, that is”
We have arrived at pre-three letter, medical board, (and other such now-defunct governing body), days. We’re back to caveat emptor health care.
Just do not comply , who the hell the WHO thinks it is , is not our concern . Getting your state government to make laws against any foreign body is the cure.
Keith, ok and how are you going to go about it, what strategy do you have, on my side I tried all possible ways to the national novau, and I am not the only one, I do not know how many others, it was not enough, I guess, otherwise we would have achieved something. So I am willing to receive practical advice (not theories) to do so, because your statement is actually a sentence.
Without forgetting for this to succeed, many nations would have to abandon the WHO, do you think it is possible ?
I do not share your opinion at all, “Just do not comply”, unfortunately it is not enough, many of us do, but from the point of view of the entire population, how to know.
Meryl, Amazing work...once again. Very much appreciate the time and effort you put into making all of this easily understandable. Always look forward to your posts.
Question: Why is there a variation of either 10 months or 18 months for African nations to issue a reservation or rejection of the surveillance and notifiaction provisions - and are the categories limited to just the surveillance and notifiaction provisions?
I thought I answered half your question but don't see my answer.
Countries that opted out of the 2022 amendments which changed the time periods during which new amendments can be rejected or go into force still have 18 months to reserve (partial rejection) or fully reject new amendments. We know that Slovakia, Iran and New Zealand did so, probably Netherlands which has kept it secret, and perhaps other countries rejected 2022 amendments.
This is why the sudden adoption on June 1 was not so terrible and nations went along--they still have lots of time left to say no going forward.
Nations can reject any amendments they want to, no restrictions. Not just African nations.
For nations that accepted the 2022 amendments to the IHR which speeded things up, they have 10 months going forward to reject some or all of the new amendments.
Meryl, have you seen my question ? can you answer please ? I think it is verry important that we explain wat we mean after suchs words. The situation is verry dangerous in or world.
I don’t speak English very well, do you mean that J Roguski is an agent of chaos. It is true that trolls are quite numerous.
I thought it was ridiculous for our government to require the Covid vaccine of our military. Why would they unleash something on them that would or might weaken our military security? Or was their vaccine something else, like a mind control drug?
Dies anyone out there know if,in fact, our military was forced to take the same shot as the rest of the population?
Or what was the incidence of Covid cases in relation to civilians that took the shot or to the population at large?
I know any reports on this may be pie in the sky because "liers figure," but these may be important questions to consider.
Thanks again to all those on Point in this battle along with the officers like Dr. Nass.
Larry, this is not ridiculous at all, it is intentionally, if we want to establish a world government, not accepted by the majority of peoples, if it really knew what it implies, we must weaken its armies, therefore each country participating in this NWO, acts in this direction. They certainly do not want it to be supported by the army, most of whom do not want to be dominated by a psychopathic elite.
A militia and an army in the shadows are ready to take over.
I am happy that Roguski and his trolls have now come out of the closet and exposed themselves for what they truly are: chaos agents.
The irony is that the more powerful a force becomes, the more it gets savaged. There's probably a mathematical formula for this. Apparently the attacks are about distracting, demoralizing, and limiting reach, but, you know, they can just shut the front door as my Southern relatives say. https://www.emerald.tv/p/substack-has-gone-woke
Bless you, Dr. Meryl Nass.
Emerald's piece is extremely interesting about how Substack has changed; I had no idea!
Very interesting indeed! Come on Substack do the right thing and be truthful! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
I definitely noticed "changes" in Substack, it like other "media" is likely data collecting. A restaurant is as good as its last meal. Go woke, go broke and other simple attempts to describe the insanity. If Subs go south then so be it.
Out of the ashes...
We are in fact in the outing phase, where false beliefs are front row and center.
Will not ascribe motives, as that is speculative. However a restaurant is as good as its
last meal. Roguski is a wildcard more than a troll.
I'm very glad you did this comparison--for precisely that reason. But I can't force myself to actually read the analysis. I hate these bureaucrats too much for that...
Meryl, I don’t speak English very well, do you mean that J Roguski is an agent of chaos. It is true that trolls are quite numerous.
What is your argument that it is highlighted?
Meryl,
You are awesome.
Feel free to subscribe to my YouTube Channel for more of my films and creations: www.youtube.com/lowwisezahstudios
Thank you!
Elaborate. Because your sarcastic tone is irrelevant from any useful discourse
Just want to add - for many of us who have been in this fight for so long, the value of comparing the resulting IHR amendments to the IHRs suggested some time ago by WHO helps put into perspective the impact we all contributed to. I personally feel a sense of pride in all the effort put forth and am encouraged to continue this "David and Goliath Battle" with more intensity.
Thank-you So much for taking the time to demonstrate the differences in a clear way- this even better demonstrates just how amazing your work is. Thank you!!!
Thankyou for your considered comparison.
She presented/discussed both the adopted changes and the proposed changes, so readers can know what was adopted, firstly, and secondly, know the proposed items that didn’t get adopted. I don’t see an issue with the comprehensive approach taken.
tbh a completely pointless, manufactured conflict - waste of energy and time. who tf cares how someone calls it win/lose. what’s important is understanding what’s happening and stopping further erosion of liberty and regaining what we lost.
I’ve been reading them, but the language is so dense that it takes a lot of time and study. I find the comparison to be useful for sure, and perhaps better than reading the 2024 IHR docs in isolation. Having said that now I’m going to read the 2005 version with 2007 amendments and directly compare the two. You’re right when you say, nobody reads them for themselves. And that’s why I started reading and re-reading them over and over a few weeks ago. It is very heavy going.
Thankyou for your comment. I do follow James and his analysis. However given I work in a complex policy environment I have the skills to parse the documents and form my own views concerning its interpretation. In the meantime I’m interested in how all the substack reviewers frame the outcomes of IHR amendments; that doesn’t mean I take their analysis as ‘truth’. Rather I prefer to come to my own conclusions without pressure or politics
Yes it may have been better, but at least she has tried to look at current v proposed to check the differences. I found that to be quite useful. I would imagine it’s time consuming work. Perhaps you or others could analyse the actual amendments? That’s what James Roguski did right?
I have a customer who has a fancy water treatment contraption perched on her kitchen countertop that some fast-talking hack talked her into, devise has been there for years without any service to my knowledge, so she has no idea what it’s producing. She has numerous health “issues”, some of which she swears that the thing has relieved her of. (Yet thinks nothing of drinking untreated water south of the border, however. ) Got one covid jab, a booster, gave that process a pass after the third one showed its teeth, without any sort of interest in what was being dumped into her. I suppose that she gave no consideration to what her treatment options would have been had not Dr. Nass and Co. beaten back the forces who would’ve mandated God-knows-what, post-adverse reaction!
A mechanic friend of mine once told me, “The difference between rape and consensual sex is pure salesmanship.” Rude as it may seem, it’s a reasonable assessment of our current status as patients under the ”care” of what passes for practitioners these days. I’ll qualify by adding “any of such who still believe in the obviously failed mRNA experiment, that is”
We have arrived at pre-three letter, medical board, (and other such now-defunct governing body), days. We’re back to caveat emptor health care.
Well the state of Louisiana has started the ball rolling . If 26 states go this way , the SCOTUS will rule the right way .
https://scnr.com/article/louisiana-senate-passes-bill-affirming-independence-from-who-un-wef_33c81824f1c811ee9c930242ac1c0002
And Oklahoma--next session let's get a lot more states passing such legislation and protecting themselves from the globalists.
Just do not comply , who the hell the WHO thinks it is , is not our concern . Getting your state government to make laws against any foreign body is the cure.
Keith, ok and how are you going to go about it, what strategy do you have, on my side I tried all possible ways to the national novau, and I am not the only one, I do not know how many others, it was not enough, I guess, otherwise we would have achieved something. So I am willing to receive practical advice (not theories) to do so, because your statement is actually a sentence.
Without forgetting for this to succeed, many nations would have to abandon the WHO, do you think it is possible ?
I do not share your opinion at all, “Just do not comply”, unfortunately it is not enough, many of us do, but from the point of view of the entire population, how to know.
Thanks in advance.
Meryl, Amazing work...once again. Very much appreciate the time and effort you put into making all of this easily understandable. Always look forward to your posts.
Question: Why is there a variation of either 10 months or 18 months for African nations to issue a reservation or rejection of the surveillance and notifiaction provisions - and are the categories limited to just the surveillance and notifiaction provisions?
I thought I answered half your question but don't see my answer.
Countries that opted out of the 2022 amendments which changed the time periods during which new amendments can be rejected or go into force still have 18 months to reserve (partial rejection) or fully reject new amendments. We know that Slovakia, Iran and New Zealand did so, probably Netherlands which has kept it secret, and perhaps other countries rejected 2022 amendments.
This is why the sudden adoption on June 1 was not so terrible and nations went along--they still have lots of time left to say no going forward.
Nations can reject any amendments they want to, no restrictions. Not just African nations.
For nations that accepted the 2022 amendments to the IHR which speeded things up, they have 10 months going forward to reject some or all of the new amendments.
I am too old to physically fight these days . So I use verbal jujitsus on my opponents.
Thank you, thank you, Meryl Nass!! I admire your strength, honesty, integrity, and stamina to share the truth! Thank you for all you do!
I am surprised that no one asks Meryl for explanations about what she wrote about J. Roguski!
Is it trolls who like his comment or those who take sides instead of uniting in this fight against evil?
I hope Meryl will answer my question, that kind of comment needs to be clarified.
Meryl, have you seen my question ? can you answer please ? I think it is verry important that we explain wat we mean after suchs words. The situation is verry dangerous in or world.
I don’t speak English very well, do you mean that J Roguski is an agent of chaos. It is true that trolls are quite numerous.
What is your argument that it is highlighted?
I thought it was ridiculous for our government to require the Covid vaccine of our military. Why would they unleash something on them that would or might weaken our military security? Or was their vaccine something else, like a mind control drug?
Dies anyone out there know if,in fact, our military was forced to take the same shot as the rest of the population?
Or what was the incidence of Covid cases in relation to civilians that took the shot or to the population at large?
I know any reports on this may be pie in the sky because "liers figure," but these may be important questions to consider.
Thanks again to all those on Point in this battle along with the officers like Dr. Nass.
It was probably the same; many got sick.
Larry, this is not ridiculous at all, it is intentionally, if we want to establish a world government, not accepted by the majority of peoples, if it really knew what it implies, we must weaken its armies, therefore each country participating in this NWO, acts in this direction. They certainly do not want it to be supported by the army, most of whom do not want to be dominated by a psychopathic elite.
A militia and an army in the shadows are ready to take over.
Psychop: Epoch Times headline who says man died of comorbidities not bird flu ie to me this represents a marketing ploy to build trust for the WHO
Just go stir the pot , so to speak . Take a look at water bear eggs . What do you see?
My phone changed “to” to go ^