142 Comments

Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have clearly documented that in the case of the C19 shot as an EUA product, that there is absolutely no legal requirement for any testing, good manufacturing processes, or disclosures of any kind. In the case of this inoculation there is a total legal fortress that permits fraud, injury, death etc. with no liability. In fact in this case the FDA has no requirement to be involved and in their opinion, the sham trials, mmeant to give the appearance for marketing purposes that the rules for regulated products were being followed. One must realize that these are not regulated products and that instead they are military countermeasures. It is the entire legal wall or regulations, acts etc. such as the PREP act which must be addressed.

Expand full comment

Challenge away. 100 years from now, the last surviving humans will still be drugged to death by big pharma and the globalists. The FDA and CDC are immovable in their determination to destroy humanity. They can not be fixed, altered or remade. Like the DC Swamp, they must be plowed over and buried deep, very deep.

Expand full comment

my snake oil contains trade secrets so i'm not going to tell you what's in it.

what i'm also not telling you is that it's actually not snake oil. it's a chemical weapon

Expand full comment
author

I personally think that taking a Covid vaccine, whose only indication is for Covid and calling a licensed product an EUA doesn’t seem to me to be within the letter or the meaning of the law

But I must admit, I have not studied this since 2021. And there were no cases back then.

Remember I am no lawyer. I am someone who has read the prep act many times, and tried to make sense of it.

Expand full comment

highly informative and comprehensive analysis by Gortler. He raises excellent points.

Expand full comment

Secrecy is the name of the game now. And for awhile it was fine because the people trusted our prestigious institutions such as the CDC, FDA, NIH, clinical leaders and practitioners. The TRUST is BROKEN. It is obvious that the intent is to harm, not help.

Expand full comment

And now that he has surfaced all of this - where do we go from here? Which battle is this information the most useful for?

I just printed 6 copies. I will take 3 to my local drugstore and 3 to the grocery store pharmacy. I will send it to local media reps, the NC General Assembly Senators and Representatives, and my distribution list. I will use it for the training on the perfidy of the "US Bio-Security Complex" at our upcoming Freedom Meetings.

Expand full comment

We are and can be our own lawyers. No courts no lawyers needed for all to serve an affidavit and judical notice against all their leaders and all systems including the fda and the WHO

Expand full comment

Because the FDA has no jurisdiction over these DOD EUA products. It's a sham. Designed to fool us. Latypova and Watt give a master course on this.

Expand full comment

Dr Nass, I am disappointed that this article wasted so many people's time and energy. I thought you knew what several of the commenters (Sukey Watson & Carmen von Richthofen are two) shared, these products are not dependent upon FDA approval because they are legally "countermeasures" manufactured through DoD contracts with no studies or investigations even allowed, no good manufacturing procedures necessary, and no liability protections for consumers. All of David Gortler's wonderful knowledge and comments are totally useless and unrelated to what has been rolled out as a medical product but is actually a military biodefence product aka a bioweapon. How is Mr Gortler's information suppose to be useful at all? If you want to help us with your expertise and passion, you must get more plugged in to Sasha Latypova's and Kathrine Watts' knowledge about what this jab is all about. IT IS NOT A VACCINE OR MEDICAL PRODUCT OF ANY KIND BY LAW OR HOW THEY WERE PRODUCED AND DISTRUBUTED. Pretending we should be concerned with anything to do with our medical community is useless except how they were all duped. Are you duped too? I did not think so.

Expand full comment

No matter how transparent and verifiable the manufacturing or ingredients, the idea of using a prophylactic product to prevent or minimize a cold or flu is ridiculous. Full stop.

Sunshine, laughter, good food and fresh air, mixed with exercise. Whether you are talking about 1800s cure all concoctions or 2000s chemotherapy drugs and everything in between.

Very scary about pharmaceutical products being manufactured in India and China, but how much better would the quality control be in Atlanta, Chicago, New York or Los Angeles?

It’s a scary world and kinda sad that we all need the intestinal constitution of a junkyard dog to survive all the potential food and drug manufacturing mishaps and slack hygiene in preparation.

Expand full comment

Why hasn’t congress made this a priority? They ask specialists to testify but to what end? It seems to make sense that different batches have caused extreme adverse reactions while others have not. This leads to people to not understanding the possible danger and Russian roulette that they are participating in when getting a shot. Congress should make decisions that will change something instead of just spinning their wheels and getting nowhere, constantly, about everything !

Expand full comment

We have all somehow ended up in "The Twilight Zone."

Expand full comment

A private sector “ FDA “ might be a solution. Free from politics. Nobody getting a fat pension solely based on how long they pushed papers.

We need something lean and mean. Something that fits in nicely with the concepts of capitalism: survival of the fittest.

Expand full comment

Until we truthfully label government “agencies”, their value must be rigorously questioned.

Expand full comment