144 Comments

Robert Kennedy, Jr. has done a lot of good...and I subscribe to Children's Health Defense. It was disappointing to see him choose the ex-wife of Sergy Brin as a VP. Who would want to see this wealthy divorcee who, a strong supporter of Hillary and the DNC in this position? If anything happened ...would people be happy to see her in a presidential role? I understand Kennedy's third wife, actress Cheryl Hine's suggested her.; possibly because she donated $4M to his campaign.

Expand full comment
May 12Liked by Meryl Nass

Perhaps she has woken up. Like I did, during the pandemic. Now I see the lies in everything, vaccines, covid pandemic, monkeypox virus, bird flu N5H1, climate change.

Ex-democrat here. Will vote for RFK.

Expand full comment

why do you want to vote for a guy who's still fooled by the pHarm industry and thinks that vaccines work?

Expand full comment
author

WTF? Stop spreading lies or more likely propaganda here. Tell the truth or go away.

Expand full comment

perhaps you could clarify that. Are you saying that RFK Jr. is not fooled by the pHarm industry? Are you saying that he doesn't think any vaccines work?

Expand full comment

Yup. We even heard RFK talking about that on a video last year in which he stated that he experienced basically the loss of his voice after having taken an annual flu vaccine. He looked up the possible side effects of the flu vax and loss of voice was one of the side (translated: new symptoms) effects. He sure as hell doesn't do that any more. So here it is, in case you didn't get it the first time: Yes, RFK Jr. is not on board with vaccines. Why are YOU, still (here)???

Expand full comment

because I'm not referring to whether he's on board, I'm referring to what he says when he wants the support of certain groups. Like all of them, it changes depending who's in the audience. It wouldn't be hard to find him saying something recent in favor of vaccines, the only hard part is listening to that voice.

Expand full comment

He is against certain, proven to be harmful vaccines.

But mostly, he has integrity.

Expand full comment

but he's for a whole bunch that are not proven to be at all useful. Maybe we can find somebody who's got both integrity and an ability to distinguish fact and fiction?

Expand full comment

I kind of doubt that.

He’s the best we’ve got this time around.

And by the way, I don’t agree with all his policies.

Expand full comment

I really don't like that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a hunter. Killing innocent animals - how vile it is! But RFK is a hero because he fights the globalist system.

Expand full comment

I wonder what you doubt. Is it his belief in the other vaccines or that none of them are proven to have any use (other than to make obscene profits for the perpetrators and to harm the public)?

Expand full comment

L.O.L.-- You are soooo hilariously F U N N Y, pretending that all our candidates MUST BE PERFECT, OR ELSE-- what a ruse, hah hah hah hah haaaah! Looks to me like you're a paid infiltrator working overtime for a failed system that desperately is trying to force us all into continuing to keep it in power, using bribes, lies, threats and brutality, topped off with a liberal (over)dose of pharmaceutical POISONS.

Expand full comment

you don't seem particularly bright.

Expand full comment
May 12Liked by Meryl Nass

Anyone who wants to use her wealth to beat the uniparty candidates welcome her candidacy.

Expand full comment

Nicole Shanahan got the money by marrying a Silicon Valley Russian Technocrat. I did not just look at Wikipedia...it stated some of the organizations she was invested in. People need to check out the background of the people, before they get in office. Too many of uur officials have let us down, because we did not investigate their backgrounds, before they got into office. Today, especially, there are radical elements out to take over America.

Expand full comment

The American colonists who beat the British Navy constituted a radical element.

Expand full comment

Taxation without representation! Was it radiacal?

Expand full comment

It wasn't any more radical than it is currently.

Expand full comment

Today it is totally radical, the 'unelected' taking advantage in every way of the people! Every move it makes...is out to destroy America.

Expand full comment

I don't recall that happening. I thought that those colonists beat some Hessian mercenaries. What are you thinking about? The star spangled banner? Maybe I've forgotten the propaganda they shoved up us in grade school. It's been a while.

Expand full comment

You'd have to be almost 300 years old to recall that happening.

Expand full comment

do I ask you personal questions? I don't look a day over 130.

Expand full comment

A person who has no personal integrity? Who slept her way into wealth, that's who will defend values and freedoms? Now who is irrational? It's okay, you're not a serious person, or to be taken seriously. When you, your loved ones, things you purport to care about fall into disarray, take a good look in the mirror, if you still can. You had the common man in your corner, back then we were meaningless to you, but what goes around, must.. 😉

Anyway, I have better things to do than engage with a cerebrally constrained, morally compromised individual. This will be the last communication we have.

Have a nice life.

Expand full comment

Thank you for resorting to easy ignored ad hominem attacks exclusively.

Expand full comment

I had been wondering what a "karun" was. Now I know.

Expand full comment

My best guess was a Karen that can't capitalize or spell her own name.

Expand full comment

I can't figure out why all the presidential candidates, including RFK Jr, make such disastrous VP choices. Shanahan has no national following to take advantage of, and no military or foreign policy experience. How can the populace believe she's capable of standing in as Commander-In-Chief? Reagan was very astute in his first election. He chose Bush I (who was the next runner up) to be VP, bringing in all his supporters. RFK Jr's obvious VP choice, if he really wanted to win, would have been Tulsi Gabbard. She would've galvanized the campaign and brought in huge support. Right now, the millions of Gabbard supporters have been abandoned. The choice of Shanahan only tells me Bobby's not serious about becoming president. And if he's not serious, why should I vote for him?

Expand full comment

Agreed! It was a poor decision! He appears to have been influenced by his wife!

Expand full comment

He has several views on issues which are inconsistent as well with reality. He is finished. It's unfortunately down to the bull in the china shop, who is being neutered (Trump). Hoping Vivek takes VP or a very senior leading role to save the nation, at least from the very real, most serious threat, the 6 minute problem, but at this point I don't feel anyone really understands architecture of democracy or leadership, so we won't be seeing fixes to architecture that are required, much less discussions on them.

Expand full comment

Isn't it also amazing that right now all Tulsi Gabbard supporters are being left in the cold? She's such an obvious choice considering her experience and popularity among independents and young people. Trump I expect will bungle his choice again but there's no excuse for RFK Jr. Although I donated to RFK several times, after Shanahan I'm no longer donating and I remain uncommitted. How I vote will depend on how terrible Trump's choice is.

Expand full comment

Some people suggest that she's making the rounds and her dress sense and such position her as the next VP. I think people who carefully saw the Don Junior interview know that she wasn't selected but he tried to suggest she could be bought. She literally said she will not compromise her integrity for anyone, and she also stated "thank you for finally calling me on for an interview," suggesting that they are resistant to her. Trump is on record suggesting he dislikes people getting to big for their shoes, something a VP and any administration requires. Folks need to decide, democratic processes and autonomy of leadership trying to repair the systems or not...

There are real conflicts within this man that he has to iron out, but since we don't know him personally, we cannot attempt to reason with and make him understand how to think.. to do the right thing. He got the entire swamp ladt time, the Goldman Sachs CEO, the Rex Tillersons and all the worst people imaginable, like Bolton. He pushed for war with Venezuela over their high tech minerals, yet claims Bolton only wanted it. The list of criticisms of him are enormous, I could fill libraries with his flaws.

I don't think Tulsi is the right person for the serious vast scope of challenges ahead, and there are massive landmines, metaphorically. I really hope Vivek is able to do something.. but in the absence of top down leadership, the common people need to look out for one another with compassion, decency, empathy, dignity, reason, tolerance and more.

Most people don't understand the architecture of democracy or what leadership should look like, so in a quick 10 second blurb, I can summarize that. When you look for qualities in any relationship, nation state, administration, or people you like, you're saying you want, transparency, accountability, trust, dedication to "us," inclusion, loyalty, and there are several other pillars. If any fall, they all do and these fail. Relationships (like a citizen's to their nation) fail when you get humiliated, insulted, isolated, pushed away, and several other factors.

Trump or anyone else is not going to fix our problems. We just have to be leaders and act with dignity to those around us, that's all that we can do.

My own perspective is, with what's coming and already here is the war is about to be over, and I don't see a u-turn, at least not in the west.

Expand full comment

He is talking about you in the video.

Expand full comment

Oh really? Somehow I think r/whoosh is a better way to respond to the unfounded, as you don't understand my point of view, yet think it's a caricaturized version depicted for your projected side battles. Carry on, it seems nobody is interested in a rational discourse, because people don't understand the basic hard lessons learned.

Expand full comment

It is impossible to understand a point of view based on unmitigated belief in irrationalities.

Expand full comment

our only solution is to deprive them of everything but their violence by helping our handicapped 90% of co-citizens who believe in logical fallacy and deny logic. A tall order. Mark Twain said it best.

Expand full comment

Eventually the trillion dollar increase in the national debt every 100 days will lead to hyperinflation that the Fed can't fix with changes in the overnight rate.

Expand full comment

Give us the top five things he'll be great as a president:

I'll wait.....

In my book, he already fails by supporting abortion up to the day that the baby is born.. Are you all right with that ?

Expand full comment

Please clarify! I am not for PRO-Choice or Abortion! Who is the "He?"

Expand full comment

A radio commentator said he was reading a bio of Bezos. He concluded that, unlike the train barrons of over a century ago, the Bezos and Silicon Valley titans believe gov't is irrelevant and they are in charge. It was an off-handed comment but has left me wondering if it is true - or soon to be true.

Expand full comment

Actually, they are.

Expand full comment
founding

Perhaps in this case Trump can take a page of history from Xi Jinping who arrested the head of Alibaba when they too thought they were more important than the CCP.

Expand full comment

as an EX -Democrat ( 1981-2015) the Democrats have been hijacked by psychopaths.

Anyways, Kennedy is really a Democrat at heart he's only running as an independent because the Democrat party doesn't want anybody running against Joe Biden. Kennedy is as crazy as those other off the rocker Democrats, including his support for abortion up to the day the baby is born.

Look for his interview he did. it's on rumble.com@ BonginoReports

Expand full comment

Yep, any person that can take that position has a dark heart.

Expand full comment

it's worse than that. he has no access to his emotions at all.

Expand full comment

I looked at Wikipedia...and Nicole Shanahan is involved in many enterprises that made me think...he should not have selected her.

Expand full comment

The Gov loves to be able to re-write history, Wiki does that. Wiki is 100% controlled by some shadowy people.

Expand full comment

Wikipedia rewrites the truth when convenient and is not a reputable source.

Expand full comment

I read other things too, other than Wikipedia. I also get gut feelings about things that usually are right. I ask for guidance...and something really struck me that this was a very bad choice.

Expand full comment

Remember: “War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength. “

I have a shirt with that quote. This one: t.co/gp7BK55eFB

War is peace is a slogan, indicating unity in hatred. Freedom is slavery is another, urging individuals to find themselves in the party. The last is ignorance is strength, which means that the Party knows best.

Expand full comment

A while ago, when I questioned RFK's position on what is happening in Gaza, Meryl stated that she would not comment on RFK's positions in his campaign. This posting by Meryl seems like a back door way of endorsing him. On March 21, 2024, The Times of Israel published an article titled "2024 dark horse RFK Jr. questions need for Gaza truce, defends Israeli offensive." Its initial paragraph: "Independent US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. offered staunch support for Israel in a Reuters interview, calling it a 'moral nation' that was justly responding to Hamas provocations with its attacks on Gaza and questioning the need for a six-week ceasefire backed by President Joe Biden.

As I have commented previously: I am flabbergasted and crestfallen. RFK, Jr. is our only hope for unplugging the war machine, Big Pharma, etc. He has proven himself, working very hard for many years to benefit the environment and public health, he's sharp, learned, a courageous truth-teller, he dares explicitly uncover that the CIA murdered both his uncle and his father. Yet, he espouses Zionism as it perpetrates genocide. How could anyone see through the Ukraine psy-op and not see through the Israel psy-op. How??

Expand full comment

My sentiments exactly. He checks all the right boxes, but for Gaza, which means a moral dilemma for me come the Nov. elections. Can I vote for him in spite of this is the question.

Expand full comment

No it’s a front door way of calling out censorship. You don’t have to like Kennedy to be against censorship.

Expand full comment

Facebook / Meta should have been shut down years ago. Their totalitarian attempts and partial success at silencing the truth on numerous fronts are absolutely deplorable. Sensible people should have boycotted the company and walked away permanently. The forum's master manipulators need to be taught a lesson they'll never forget.

Expand full comment

but they still have billions of customers who don't want to give up their accounts, so legislating morality seems like a waste of time. The problem is not the service, it's the clients. Bunch of dambarses using these booby traps and then whining about them being booby traps instead of just agreeing to meet elsewhere. The people creating the content for those filthy latrines would have to move to where the viewers move to. Unfortunately something like 80 or 90% of said clients have their heads so far up their arses that they don't notice the foul odor of facebook and twitter.

Expand full comment

Very well stated. I agree wholeheartedly.

Expand full comment

one can't remove a facebook account. Mine has been there for years, I wrote "facebook is a piece of shit, if you want to contact me, here's my email." I've never received one email though I know that many people have wanted to contact me and many others did contact me. So they shadow-banned that content. They'll let me go talk to one person at a time, or make banal comments, but that's hidden.

Expand full comment
founding

When we went after a careless driver who killed my stepson the first advice the lawyer gave was "get off facebook" We did so and the settlement was 15 time what another relative in the insurance industry said we would get. A third relative launched a claim with an insurer over a dog bite but did not take our passing along this advice and the insurer showed her pictures of her dancing from facebook and denied her claim.

Expand full comment

so an insurance company can let a dog get away with biting a person if it can be proven that that person danced once in their life? Hmm.

Expand full comment
founding

Yup, that is what happened.

Expand full comment

I think you're only giving me part of the story. I"m guessing that what happened is that she was whining about how injured she was and the photo of her dancing and looking quite comfortable was from the same time period when she was claiming to be so damaged. That's an old story. I bet that's it and I agree with the judgment if it is so.

Expand full comment
founding

The whole story is she visited her mum who had a dog known to bite. She got bit and we pointed out that the bad bite she got may cause her issues down the road. She decided to collect on her mums insurance, much to the dismay of her mum. We advised her to get off facebook which she did not due and the rest of the story you have from my earlier comment.

Expand full comment

Some of us did, we were ridiculed decades ago when it first showed up and now everyone wakes up just like ex-alcoholics suddenly realizing the right reasons not to use those, and are celebrated for having the right views.. well we knew the story then, still do, most do not. We saw these NSA goons show up to cryptography let's call them conferences where they asked for advice and help on how to build surveillance state type dragnet systems and they were insulted and laughed out of these as objectionable, later they did it anyways using the William Binney's of the world (who suddenly pretend they have a conscience or integrity). Anyway, flash forward years later and the CIA has its tool used by billions who essentially are also enjoying their opinions going into centralized forums (Twitter..) and is it surprising that you are all easy targets? This planet is fucked. People are beyond help and frankly not worth saving as it seems.

Expand full comment

It was originally funded by the Sea I A . That tells you everything you need to know

Expand full comment

Exactly.

Expand full comment

And they thought they were free.....

We know how this ends.

Expand full comment

and yet Congress continues to allow Facebook and Twitter to censor anybody who does not sing

from liberal lunacy's hymn book.

I had posted on FB the story of rapes in Europe (particularly of blonde blued eyed) by Muslim males (well documented on numerous news sites)

FB deleted it.

When I ? they replied "for safety issues for our subscribers"

When I replied "And the women affected?"

They deleted that too.

I scrubbed them letting them know I did NOT need 30 days to decide, I was done

Twitter is no better. I was repeatedly suspended (first time under Dorsey for 12 days for

stating: While truth has no fear, censorship is ripe with it"

I was shadowbanned (from Twitter's statistics for my account, one 28 day period I had 178K impressions but saw no more than a handful

of replies during that time.)

I was suspended regularly and when Agrawal took over permanently suspended in June of '22 for stating I had opted for an alternative protocol (had 15.K followers)

Then in March of '23 Musk reinstated me only to permanently suspend me 3 months later

At no time did I use vile, vulgar or profane language nor did I threaten anyone or advocate

violence

My profile and speaking TRUTH was my 'offense' in both FB AND Twitter

Expand full comment

Similar with me. No longer did I wish to support this evil platform in anyway shape or form.

Expand full comment

FB shills for Big Pharma and that's why it was censored. Someone should tell Kennedy though, because he keeps repeating it, WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY. And he wants to be president? Hello? This from a guy who also has no problem murdering babies up to full term. Just no.

Expand full comment

we're not supposed to be a democracy, we're supposed to be a republic. Getting us all to refer to america as a democracy was a previous successful psy-op. You must know the definition of a democracy, two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. In the republic, the sheep has a gun.

Expand full comment

What is it that you think I said? I just got through saying Kennedy keeps calling us a democracy and he's wrong. Is there another way to say so?

Expand full comment

I wasn't correcting you. I'm still not sure there's not a misunderstanding of little importance between us, I'm pretty sure we agree with each other. I just profited from what you said to go on and remind people who don't seem to know that we were intended to be a republic and then I shared my overheard definition of what a republic is. Kennedy is of no interest. He's still a boy and a bad boy at that.

Expand full comment

The Democratic Party has colonized private industry. America is looking more like China every day.

Expand full comment

Although I am not a big fan of Bobby, this is wrong. Facebook is 100% against the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.

It's a purpose built Propaganda tool that receives your Tax $$$ from the O'Biden admin to control their desired narrative, censor, shadow ban, demonize good doctors

and restrict access to vital medical information which harmed many thousands of Americans.

I have been off it now for 4 years. zero regrets

Expand full comment

the problem we've been having is that people who know that their (fake) "money" has been used against them all of their lives continue to indulge that short term comfort of 'making a living" in a way in which they accept to pay more than half of their (fake) "money" to their mortal enemy. Funny idea of comfort. Everybody needs to stop having and being employees and simply work with people or alone and don't accept to pay any of these taxes. Why isn't it obvious to everybody that the only reasons to have taxes to pay is to surveill, control and impoverish us all? You're all so busy anxiously wanting to show off or so far down the tubes that we couldn't pull you out without ripping your limbs off like a 9 month abortion.

Expand full comment

The Private Central Bank that creates debt based money (with interest) out of thin air is the reason we have taxes in the first place. Central Bank came into existence in 1913, about the same time the IRS came into existence. All the taxes go to pay the interest on the "borrowed money". This ability to print endlessly is why we have so much corruption, bribes, wars, and suffering. The people have become debt slaves. Soon, I believe it will all come to an end.

Expand full comment

and it will be the fault of the people for being so completely unwilling to use reason. They just want to believe the lies that were told to them in the first 20 or 24 years of their lives. It seems that people really don't want to change their minds, because they can't get past the ego pain of accepting that they'd been fooled up till then. Have they never had the experience of figuring out that somebody they knew and were impressed by had been lying to them all along and how exposing one lie makes all of the other lies visible? In 1929 there were more than 5000 local currencies set up quickly. But it was possible then because most people knew how to do something useful. These last 40 or 50 years in usa we've been continuing to get paid for what we do, but most of what people do is thoroughly useless. now when they crash the economy, we will have nothing to fall back on. It will be ugly

Expand full comment

what is suing them going to accomplish? They'll just get to be like the pHarm companies. After the judge imposes a fine which won't hurt them, their stock will rise because their investors will take that as a sign that they got away with it again, that they now are sure that they'll own the new president. It seems to me that there'd be more utility in getting places like substack to a point where none of its users give a crap about latrines like facebook and twitter.

Expand full comment

Mistake?? Laughable..

Expand full comment

I watched it a week ago. A+

Woody Harrelson is perfect as the narrator ... and it directly addresses the most-common objection people might have to RFK, Jr. - e.g. that's he's some kind of "kook" or "crank."

If you think this, you might not after viewing this mini-documentary. I'm not surprised Meta censored it.

Expand full comment