Clearly important to gain control of the narrative because of the plans for more pandemics-coming-soon--and as a hit against RFK, Jr. I bolded the section discussing me and added 3 screenshots.
Ugh — thank you for posting this, although I couldn't get too far in WaPo's prose without retching. THANK YOU for standing up for real medicine, and good luck with your next (good grief, how many are there going to be?!?!?) hearing!
You are confusing your terms. "Misinformation" refers to honest information that is inconvenient for corporate profits. The statement of "Safe and effective" was not misinformation. It is best characterized as a bald faced lie.
Actually, we have a brand new word for truth that is inconvenient for the government & pharm narrative: MALinformation. You can’t make this shit up, but they can
I made the comment in response to the newspaper article. They used the term gratuitously, I used the term in response, simple as that. Merriam Webster claims that "Misinformation is incorrect or misleading information." Of the two, "misleading" is closer to the mark. Upon further reflection, I would describe the WaPo article as "irrelevant": it mischaracterized medical studies whose authors failed to comprehend the use of the drug, or - very likely - DID understand, but deliberately designed the study to fail.
Ivermectin's staunchest advocates repeatedly stressed that the drug was most effective when given within the first three days of the onset of symptoms. The avowed goal from the very beginning was to avoid hospitalizations, what could be better? So what was the purpose of conducting "studies" on Ivermectin's effectiveness in treating patients who had already spent days or weeks in hospital?
The English language is a minefield at times. Thanks to one and all for commenting;-)
The purpose was to sully Iver reputation, I believe. They could say, “See, it kills people & therefore it has to banned” w/out adding that it is most effective early AND that anyone who died after getting it late died of WuFlu itself or anything BUT the Iver.
How far the mighty have fallen. WaPo's article is obvious propaganda--note how they insert "falsely claimed" and "disproven" wherever they want to disparage a statement they disagree with, and offering very poor substantiation, if any at all, for their "debunking." WaPo is nakedly political: note how they cast Democrat and Republican responses differently, and how they write "Trump" instead of "President Trump." They clearly think the public is stupid, but I see people catching on to this nonsense more and more every day.
The Medical Priesthood is doomed. Real doctors will survive this. Meryl, you are a hero!
its all about the "science because 'we said so'". debunked, because 'we said so'. disproven because 'we said so'. I guess all the folks who were SUCCESSFULLY treated, must be lying.
Thank you for posting this. Thank you for being my hero. I wish you could be my doctor. The gratitude I feel for all that you have sacrificed in standing for your principles and for the scientific fact is unmeasurable. This article infuriates me as I hope it does all those who read it here. As a retired scientist I find this an abomination and have NO respect for those who do not conduct their own due diligence and find the myriad of studies with good science which show how bogus this article is. How dare the writer of this article say that HCQ and invermectin are ineffective while they push a so called vaccine which even Pfizer, the producer, admits is NOT EFFECTIVE AND is responsible for far more death than has been cited in this disgraceful pile of words. You are an example of the courage which we all need to follow. Thank you for being you. Please be kind to yourself. You are loved by so many of us.
It’s time for another, better investigation into the death rates of hospitals which recommended covid vaccines and remdesivir versus the doctors who used ivermectin, HCQ and other alternative treatments. This should be grimly interesting, considering how many patients died in hospital covid death traps.
When I read the headline, I thought “ wow, the WP is finally going to shine the light on the coward doctors who would not treat Covid patients and the evil doctors who killed them in hospitals!”. Boy was I wrong! Their notion of misinformation is my notion of brave and brilliant doctors prescribing treatments that work! Quite the valley between “them” and “us”!!🙁
In January of 2022, both myself and my wife got COVID. We treated ourselves according to the FLCCC treatment protocols with a minor modification (Ivermectin+HCQ+Zinc+VITAMIN D and Azithromycin). For us the fever and other symptoms were gone in three days, we had complete recovery in a few more days.
And as far as consensus on treatment & the jab are concerned, it's an interesting concept to immediately start bringing the hammer down on everyone that starts "coloring outside the lines" at the beginning of the pandemic, sanctioning, fining, and cancelling licenses, and then call what you have left a "consensus."
That was so difficult to read and any one of us could pull apart all the flaws- how about all the deaths from lack of treatment, from ineffective and dangerous treatment or death and injury from the injection- no mention of that in the article.
What still sickens me the most are the people that read and believe this crap including my husband’s family who are coming soon for a 1-week stay.
Total hack job. Pure propaganda of the devious sort we have come to expect from drug peddlers and their captured stooges. Disgusting.
Ugh — thank you for posting this, although I couldn't get too far in WaPo's prose without retching. THANK YOU for standing up for real medicine, and good luck with your next (good grief, how many are there going to be?!?!?) hearing!
I rarely seek opportunities to retch.
But when I do, I'll have this WaPo hit piece to satiate the urge.
LOL! I don't think I've ever searched out a reason to retch... But I suppose it could come in handy in my first aid kit.
Don't you mean to facilitate the urge? Every medicine cabinet needs a good emetic.
The allegation that covid vaccines were "safe and effective"? There's your "misinformation" right there.
You are confusing your terms. "Misinformation" refers to honest information that is inconvenient for corporate profits. The statement of "Safe and effective" was not misinformation. It is best characterized as a bald faced lie.
No, that's MALinformation. Let's get our new terms straight..... (LOL)
Indeed, the "Dysinformation" was that "there is no effective treatment for COVID, so we need an EUA vaccine".
"Misinformation" was the bats/pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2.
"Malinformation", as Kennedy points out, is Truth, when the official narrative is lies.
Actually, we have a brand new word for truth that is inconvenient for the government & pharm narrative: MALinformation. You can’t make this shit up, but they can
I made the comment in response to the newspaper article. They used the term gratuitously, I used the term in response, simple as that. Merriam Webster claims that "Misinformation is incorrect or misleading information." Of the two, "misleading" is closer to the mark. Upon further reflection, I would describe the WaPo article as "irrelevant": it mischaracterized medical studies whose authors failed to comprehend the use of the drug, or - very likely - DID understand, but deliberately designed the study to fail.
Ivermectin's staunchest advocates repeatedly stressed that the drug was most effective when given within the first three days of the onset of symptoms. The avowed goal from the very beginning was to avoid hospitalizations, what could be better? So what was the purpose of conducting "studies" on Ivermectin's effectiveness in treating patients who had already spent days or weeks in hospital?
The English language is a minefield at times. Thanks to one and all for commenting;-)
The purpose was to sully Iver reputation, I believe. They could say, “See, it kills people & therefore it has to banned” w/out adding that it is most effective early AND that anyone who died after getting it late died of WuFlu itself or anything BUT the Iver.
Thank you for fighting these criminals and saving thousands of lives!
They always accuse others of what they themselves are doing.
How far the mighty have fallen. WaPo's article is obvious propaganda--note how they insert "falsely claimed" and "disproven" wherever they want to disparage a statement they disagree with, and offering very poor substantiation, if any at all, for their "debunking." WaPo is nakedly political: note how they cast Democrat and Republican responses differently, and how they write "Trump" instead of "President Trump." They clearly think the public is stupid, but I see people catching on to this nonsense more and more every day.
The Medical Priesthood is doomed. Real doctors will survive this. Meryl, you are a hero!
It’s almost like WaPo writes Wikipedia entries for Covid dissenters. They sure like to use “debunked” and “disproven” a lot.
its all about the "science because 'we said so'". debunked, because 'we said so'. disproven because 'we said so'. I guess all the folks who were SUCCESSFULLY treated, must be lying.
Dr Nass,
Thank you for posting this. Thank you for being my hero. I wish you could be my doctor. The gratitude I feel for all that you have sacrificed in standing for your principles and for the scientific fact is unmeasurable. This article infuriates me as I hope it does all those who read it here. As a retired scientist I find this an abomination and have NO respect for those who do not conduct their own due diligence and find the myriad of studies with good science which show how bogus this article is. How dare the writer of this article say that HCQ and invermectin are ineffective while they push a so called vaccine which even Pfizer, the producer, admits is NOT EFFECTIVE AND is responsible for far more death than has been cited in this disgraceful pile of words. You are an example of the courage which we all need to follow. Thank you for being you. Please be kind to yourself. You are loved by so many of us.
Beautifully written. I share your sentiments.
Bravo Dianne...agree to every beautifully written word.
It’s time for another, better investigation into the death rates of hospitals which recommended covid vaccines and remdesivir versus the doctors who used ivermectin, HCQ and other alternative treatments. This should be grimly interesting, considering how many patients died in hospital covid death traps.
good idea of course but you'll never see it reported on in the MSM
When I read the headline, I thought “ wow, the WP is finally going to shine the light on the coward doctors who would not treat Covid patients and the evil doctors who killed them in hospitals!”. Boy was I wrong! Their notion of misinformation is my notion of brave and brilliant doctors prescribing treatments that work! Quite the valley between “them” and “us”!!🙁
In January of 2022, both myself and my wife got COVID. We treated ourselves according to the FLCCC treatment protocols with a minor modification (Ivermectin+HCQ+Zinc+VITAMIN D and Azithromycin). For us the fever and other symptoms were gone in three days, we had complete recovery in a few more days.
Not only will there never be punishment, but they will NEVER admit the
GENOCIDE
that THEY participated in gleefully to the detriment of humanity
They actively sought out any healthcare provider who was REPUTABLE to
destroy them and their reputation.
What is more personal is how those of us who opted for therapeutic were treated
by family and friends as though we should have been ringing a little bell, as lepers
did during ancient days, to warn people around them that they were
infectious.
While I can forgive, and have, I can NEVER forget what some said. . .the
disparaging and demeaning words that have left a scar on my soul
"Advocacy journalism" pieces like this explain quite well why the WaPo is on track to lose $100M this year, and has lost 500K subscribers.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-lose-100-million-2023-one-decade-after-jeff-bezos-bought-paper-report
And as far as consensus on treatment & the jab are concerned, it's an interesting concept to immediately start bringing the hammer down on everyone that starts "coloring outside the lines" at the beginning of the pandemic, sanctioning, fining, and cancelling licenses, and then call what you have left a "consensus."
That was so difficult to read and any one of us could pull apart all the flaws- how about all the deaths from lack of treatment, from ineffective and dangerous treatment or death and injury from the injection- no mention of that in the article.
What still sickens me the most are the people that read and believe this crap including my husband’s family who are coming soon for a 1-week stay.
I wish you good luck during that difficult week of their visit. They have been blinded. Just pray!
Apparently The Washington Post is working toward the prohibition of second opinions. (You are a warrior, Dr. Nass.)
I have to agree with this headline, "Doctors who put lives at risk with covid misinformation rarely punished" but my reasoning is not like theirs.
The doctors I have in mind are Fraudci, Birx, Collins, and all the others who suppressed the truth in favor of a deadly vaccine.
NUREMBERG 2.0 NOW!
Appears that they put out this article just in time for your Friday hearing. (-: -- Best wishes.