Last I checked, Dr. Drew was having a great deal of difficulty with the whole "mistakes were not made" line of thinking. David Martin presented him the facts in his usual systematic and persuasive fashion but Drew wasn't convinced. He's still in denial. Admittedly, it's been a few months, so I'm not sure where he stands today.
I'm sorry but anyone who still gives these shots - regardless of patients requesting them should be held accountable. Drew states he gives it to patients that ask for boosters and that he works in geriatric medicine so his patients are in their 80s and 90s. Does he inform the patients of the potential adverse effects or tell them that studies have shown that the vaccinated were more susceptible to COVID and other infections than the unvaccinated? That is, does he give them INFORMATION to make the decision? Why is it that if you are older then its ok to administer these shots? If I asked my physician for some drug which he knows has absolutely no benefit, but does have the potential to harm or kill me and he prescribes it and I was harmed- that physician could be held accountable. A physician is suppose to provide information to his patients and confer his knowledge on the issue. These fence sitting physicians justify the fact that they never bothered to do the research to inform their patients and when the research shows that there are issues - they can never fully accept it since doing so would mean they may have caused harm - so even with the tidal wave of information - they have to say not enough research has been done. God Help Us- it truly is a mirage of health
Last I checked, Dr. Drew was having a great deal of difficulty with the whole "mistakes were not made" line of thinking. David Martin presented him the facts in his usual systematic and persuasive fashion but Drew wasn't convinced. He's still in denial. Admittedly, it's been a few months, so I'm not sure where he stands today.
I'm sorry but anyone who still gives these shots - regardless of patients requesting them should be held accountable. Drew states he gives it to patients that ask for boosters and that he works in geriatric medicine so his patients are in their 80s and 90s. Does he inform the patients of the potential adverse effects or tell them that studies have shown that the vaccinated were more susceptible to COVID and other infections than the unvaccinated? That is, does he give them INFORMATION to make the decision? Why is it that if you are older then its ok to administer these shots? If I asked my physician for some drug which he knows has absolutely no benefit, but does have the potential to harm or kill me and he prescribes it and I was harmed- that physician could be held accountable. A physician is suppose to provide information to his patients and confer his knowledge on the issue. These fence sitting physicians justify the fact that they never bothered to do the research to inform their patients and when the research shows that there are issues - they can never fully accept it since doing so would mean they may have caused harm - so even with the tidal wave of information - they have to say not enough research has been done. God Help Us- it truly is a mirage of health