Last I checked, Dr. Drew was having a great deal of difficulty with the whole "mistakes were not made" line of thinking. David Martin presented him the facts in his usual systematic and persuasive fashion but Drew wasn't convinced. He's still in denial. Admittedly, it's been a few months, so I'm not sure where he stands today.
I'm having trouble with Drew injecting the poison into older people, long, I mean long after it was known to be extremely toxic. I was absolutely disgusted.
...Similarly, Dr. David Martin espouses Virions and their fictional gains of various functions-
he knows better, I can't but imagine - but last I checked, he is still in 'de Nile', and if you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you that crosses over it...!)
I'm sorry but anyone who still gives these shots - regardless of patients requesting them should be held accountable. Drew states he gives it to patients that ask for boosters and that he works in geriatric medicine so his patients are in their 80s and 90s. Does he inform the patients of the potential adverse effects or tell them that studies have shown that the vaccinated were more susceptible to COVID and other infections than the unvaccinated? That is, does he give them INFORMATION to make the decision? Why is it that if you are older then its ok to administer these shots? If I asked my physician for some drug which he knows has absolutely no benefit, but does have the potential to harm or kill me and he prescribes it and I was harmed- that physician could be held accountable. A physician is suppose to provide information to his patients and confer his knowledge on the issue. These fence sitting physicians justify the fact that they never bothered to do the research to inform their patients and when the research shows that there are issues - they can never fully accept it since doing so would mean they may have caused harm - so even with the tidal wave of information - they have to say not enough research has been done. God Help Us- it truly is a mirage of health
Great work in tandem with Naomi Wolf. Effective in both content and presentation. By contrast, I keep seeing high ranking officials appear before congressional committees and repeat ad nauseam that they don't know, or will be happy to provide answers later. The buck stops with them, well, but not really.
Last I checked, Dr. Drew was having a great deal of difficulty with the whole "mistakes were not made" line of thinking. David Martin presented him the facts in his usual systematic and persuasive fashion but Drew wasn't convinced. He's still in denial. Admittedly, it's been a few months, so I'm not sure where he stands today.
I'm having trouble with Drew injecting the poison into older people, long, I mean long after it was known to be extremely toxic. I was absolutely disgusted.
I didn't realize he was injecting people-
with anything other than the 'MIND VIRUS', that is...!
He still advocates this?
I don't follow him any more. He disgust me long ago.
let's just say some form of it is stenciled onto the case of the pillow he cradles at night...
Watch tonight’s interview of Dr. Nass and Naomi Wolf. You will see he has evolved. I found it all interesting.
I watched and once again Dr. Nass was amazing in it.
...Similarly, Dr. David Martin espouses Virions and their fictional gains of various functions-
he knows better, I can't but imagine - but last I checked, he is still in 'de Nile', and if you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you that crosses over it...!)
;)
Torches of Freedom, baby! Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em!
Adam Curtis did some good, although he worked for the BBC...
I'm sorry but anyone who still gives these shots - regardless of patients requesting them should be held accountable. Drew states he gives it to patients that ask for boosters and that he works in geriatric medicine so his patients are in their 80s and 90s. Does he inform the patients of the potential adverse effects or tell them that studies have shown that the vaccinated were more susceptible to COVID and other infections than the unvaccinated? That is, does he give them INFORMATION to make the decision? Why is it that if you are older then its ok to administer these shots? If I asked my physician for some drug which he knows has absolutely no benefit, but does have the potential to harm or kill me and he prescribes it and I was harmed- that physician could be held accountable. A physician is suppose to provide information to his patients and confer his knowledge on the issue. These fence sitting physicians justify the fact that they never bothered to do the research to inform their patients and when the research shows that there are issues - they can never fully accept it since doing so would mean they may have caused harm - so even with the tidal wave of information - they have to say not enough research has been done. God Help Us- it truly is a mirage of health
.
So There You Have It …
Vaccinated People
Were A Danger To Themselves
And To One Another.
Rest In Peace.
( And In Safety And Effectiveness )
.
.
Bigger Picture:
The Covid Vaccines
As Human Trafficking …
Each Shot
A Boarding Pass
‘The Fuck Out Of Here.
.
Great work in tandem with Naomi Wolf. Effective in both content and presentation. By contrast, I keep seeing high ranking officials appear before congressional committees and repeat ad nauseam that they don't know, or will be happy to provide answers later. The buck stops with them, well, but not really.
They Lied. Join the campaign to Take Action & Raise Public Awareness at
https://TheyLied.ca/
.
With your help, everyone will know TheyLied.ca
.
My friends,
I need your help to share THE FIRST Film EXPLOITING THE CORRUPTION OF COVID by Michael Angel Loayza Jr.
https://youtu.be/1KjgGgaJBaE?si=eXTF9vGpcnlc7J2r
Please, reach out, Like, Subscribe on YouTube and Instagram so I can continue to create this content:
Awakening Society With Purposeful Entertainment
www.instagram.com/thejackedpoet
www.youtube.com/lowwisezahstudios
www.mikeloayza.com
Your love is much appreciated.