43 Comments

How about this?

RECOMMENDING SM-102 (MODERNA) TO CHILDREN SHOULD MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL

STOP THE GENOCIDE

https://outraged.substack.com/p/recommending-sm-102-moderna-to-children

SAFETY DATA SHEETS must show the content and hazards of each ingredient in the chemical product supplied. The SDS for Cayman's SM-102 (Item No. 33474) accurately depicts that the mixture of chemicals in this product is 90% ethanol (a common solvent) and 10% SM-102. Although a common solvent, ethanol has several known serious hazards, which are addressed in Cayman's SDS. Neither the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Register of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), nor the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Inventory of Classification and Labeling list any hazards associated with SM-102.

Cayman Chemical

TO CALL IT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IS A CRIME

Expand full comment

10% SM - 102 •¥• Product Description •¥•

“SM-102 is an ionizable amino lipid that has been used in combination with other lipids in the formation of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs).1 Administration of luciferase mRNA in SM-102-containing LNPs induces hepatic luciferase expression in mice. Formulations containing SM-102 have been used in the development of LNPs for delivery of mRNA-based vaccines.

Read our statement on SM-102 for research use only

WARNING This product is not for human or veterinary use.” https://www.caymanchem.com/product/33474/sm-102 https://www.caymanchem.com/product/33474/sm-102

Expand full comment

This is what is DECLARED and is not SAFE. But what about the undeclared ones? They claim there is no causation - of course there is.

They MUST declare ALL ingredients.

The toxicity of these ingredients causes deaths and adverse reactions.

So, WHAT IS MONITORED UNDER EAU, IF THEY DON'T DECLARE WHAT IS POTENTIALLY TOXIC?

How about stopping the butchery?

Expand full comment

“Interview Dr’s Love/Young N.D’S. A Patented Genocide Delivered by a Chimeric Nano Lipid Capsid of Graphene & GMO Parasites” … —-“chikungunya, pneumococcal vaccines, flu vaccines, meningococcal vaccines, RSV vaccines, monkeypox vaccines and dengue vaccine.”—- … https://rumble.com/v1lu77g-a-patented-genocide-delivered-by-a-chimeric-nano-lipid-capsid-via-many-vect.html

Expand full comment

“Interview Dr’s Love/Young N.D’S. A Patented Genocide Delivered by a Chimeric Nano Lipid Capsid of Graphene & GMO Parasites” … —-“chikungunya, pneumococcal vaccines, flu vaccines, meningococcal vaccines, RSV vaccines, monkeypox vaccines and dengue vaccine.”—- … https://rumble.com/v1lu77g-a-patented-genocide-delivered-by-a-chimeric-nano-lipid-capsid-via-many-vect.html

Expand full comment

To add to your points Dr. Nass

Expand full comment

That’s not 1 lie, it’s actually 2

Expand full comment

This is one of the reasons that I spend lots of time trying to persuade the world to abandon the concepts of "mainstream media" and view Twitter, et. al, as anything other than an Animal Farm narrative and censorship device.

All of this was out there very early. Two years later and it's a "bombshell".

And yet people continue to cling Big Tech social media, or worse, the Jimmy Dores and Russell Brands and Dr. John Campbells of the world, and way, way worse...the Tucker Carlsons to make something "real".

Expand full comment

Telegram can be good, depending on who you subscribe to.

Expand full comment

In all reality, people don't know where to find some of this stuff, but most of it can be attributed to intellectual laziness. I was not a medically oriented person and I was able to find a some of what Meryl has shared, and other things not mentioned (yet?). Let me share one with you that I found, and was easily missed, for obvious reasons when you watch this. (don't blink, it goes by VERY fast - you'll need to slow it way down, and even then it goes by fast.)

The date is seen on this FDA presentation. It was long before the vaccines rolled out. And I think someone accidentally left a slide in their deck. It took me a few tries before I could get a screenshot of this slide because it went by in about 1/5 of a second.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg&t=9219s

Expand full comment

I did the same thing and screen shot that slide, #16 I think, quite a while ago

Expand full comment

It is very difficult b/c we have come to rely on a curator to funnel out "misinformation" and it's simply tough to grasp that the chief purveyor of misinformation is corporate owned news.

And now Psy Op gov't Social media.

Expand full comment

It's hard for most (even me!) to not want to rely on experts. But it's not just their expertise at play anymore. There are questionable motives and intents, pressures from unseen areas (threats to jobs, lives, etc) that have to be contended with.

Most people are good, and want to assume that others are good as well. When a snake in the grass lurks around, and you don't know who the snakes are, then distrust for everyone goes up, and division occurs.

Time to get back to the basic judeo-christian principles espoused in the Bible, and separate ourselves from those who seek to do harm, so that they are isolated and powerless. And should they try to use power against us, then it's time to destroy them. Why let evil continue to plague us? Expose them to the light, and let others see those works as well.

So much of this has opened the eyes of many, and sadly, there had to be casualties along the way. Hopefully, we're on a good direction where good people are standing up for themselves and exposing the evil work of those who seek to enrich themselves at the cost of everyone else.

Let good be called good, and evil - evil. Sounds too simple. But it is what it is. We're at a point where we need to pick sides, even when it comes at a cost.

I was reminded recently that only about 3% of the population stood up for our freedoms during the revolutionary war.

Stop and think about that small percentage.

It can seem discouraging (and it is!) to know that so few were willing to fight for their freedoms. No wonder our vets come home so discouraged that their lives were on the line so that people could fawn over the Kardashians drama-filled lives, and raise them up to be cultural idols, or so that companies could sell more weapons or take natural resources of other countries.

At some point, I hope the populace wakes up to how pervasive the propaganda is, and can muster the courage to stand up to it. Many have been lulled to sleep through authorities who have said "Trust us", and told WHAT to think.

And now we're seeing what the loss of due diligence, self confidence, self-identity and trust in our fellow man has done.

Seems like Jesus had it right. Love one another. (and not with conditions). And forgive.

That's a hard thing to do because it involves making ourselves vulnerable.

But look what the alternative has brought.

Expand full comment

Relevant song quotes from Mr. Dylan seem appropriate:

1. "Not even Jesus could forgive what you do,"

2. "And I'll stand on your grave till I'm sure that you're dead." Both from Masters of War

3. "At midnight all the agents and their superhuman crew, go out and round up everyone who knows more than they do. Then they bring them to the factory where the heart attack machine is strapped upon their shoulders, and then the kerosene is brought down from the castles by insurance men who go, check to see that nobody is escaping from Desolation Row." (song: Desolation Row)

Expand full comment

CDC/ACIP 100% captured by Pfizer. RE all things COVID the FDA is not involved except as a shell. The DoD runs the FDA on COVID.

What seems to be lacking in current discussions is that a private corporation, convicted felon is a sense, has been running the USA government with the full force of the Pentagon.

Expand full comment

Pls name the company and felon.

Expand full comment

Pfizer fined $2.3 billion for illegal marketing in off-label ...

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617

Pfizer Has a Criminal Record. Is It Relevant? - World Freedom ...

https://worldfreedomalliance.org/au/news/pfizer-has-a-criminal-record-is-it-relevant/

Expand full comment

Implications re personal medical care:

1. You can no longer trust the "narrative." Therefore:

2. All drugs and other interventions including vaccines must be researched carefully before taking same.

3. If you can find one, you need to find an MD who thinks "out of the box" and is not afraid to do so. These are rare, and are punished by the system. Not good.

4. The prescribed hospital protocols are dangerous, and the reimbursement schemes reward dosing with dangerous drugs and reward killing people rather than saving them. At least that's how it looks from here. I would prefer to see positive outcomes rewarded higher than negative outcomes, but my understanding: this does not seem to be the case. This is either idiocy or by design, you decide. Net result: Avoid hospitals.

5. How long will this continue?

6. How can this be good for the reputation of US medical care or pharma for that matter? Its certainly not good for patients.

Expand full comment

yes that was what I heard too, I thought it was someone from phfizer who said the jab did not prevent infection and transmission. That is when I decided not to get it, because what is it good for if it does not stop the spread? And then I saw it contains PEG, a substance I do not want in my shampoo, so why would I want it injected? More than half of the population is allergic to it. I met that product when I worked in a cosmetics lab. And the the hurry and the pressure, all for an illness about like flu. And only one in 5 had symptoms. I might have had it and not even know !

Expand full comment

Thank you for all you do Dr. Nass. God bless you.

Expand full comment

They all knew and they couldn’t care less.

Expand full comment

When are we going to STOP this madness and make 'LIABILITY' apply to ALL MEDICINES and deadly injections, mistakenly referred to as 'vaccines'. It just COMMON SENSE! Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer.

Expand full comment

"Way to go" Meryl ■ stay [s]trong; Prayers continuously.

Expand full comment

This is the only thing that matters in determining health care policy.

Pfizer gross profit for the quarter ending June 30, 2022 was $19.094B, a 60.41% increase year-over-year.

Pfizer gross profit for the twelve months ending June 30, 2022 was $62.976B, a 60.46% increase year-over-year.

Pfizer annual gross profit for 2021 was $50.467B, a 52.16% increase from 2020.

Pfizer annual gross profit for 2020 was $33.167B, a 0.96% increase from 2019.

Pfizer annual gross profit for 2019 was $32.851B, a 3.18% increase from 2018.

Expand full comment

Meryl, thank you for your long and enduring diligence and care in recording this, and in sharing this. I want to contribute this for your collection. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg&t=9219s

Slow it way down, because the relevant slide goes by VERY fast. Note the date.

Expand full comment

It would be fascinating to see what the 2 VRBAC members who requested data have to say now with the data releases.

Thanks for revisiting this history! Have to wonder if more had seen this early on how that would have influenced certain decisions.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this superb contribution to Covid investigation, Dr. Nass. I most likely read it "Back then" and nodded in agreement to myself, since it confirmed the same things I was learning -- but in looking back, the scope and depth of your examination was completely unrivaled by anyone not working for one of the agencies or pharma companies (and their work was anything BUT objective). THIS is precisely what reporters for the NYT, WaPo, etc. should have been compiling and publishing, but DID NOT, and WOULD NOT. You covered all the logical and important questions that should be asked in such an emergent situation, and you found sources to answer (HONESTLY) a large number of those questions. If this post had been widely circulated, the entire scamdemic charade would have been short-circuited, and an inconceivable amount of suffering and damage (psychological, social, and economic) would have been avoided.

The recent targeted assault on your professional credentials is shameful and morally reprehensible. It seems to be a last-gasp parting shot from a losing faction whose only motive is self-interest and resentment. I hope you can overcome the vindictive persecution and return to normal, productive pursuits as soon as possible.

Thank you for all your work, particularly during these recent crazy years.

- Don from NC

Expand full comment

I think we started hearing that CDC posted the information in February of 2021 that the COVID quackcines did not stop illness and did not stop transmission-- never mind "Brought to you by Pfizer's" chief talking head, Rachel "Mad Cow's" adamant assertions that it "definitely" would bring a hard stop of the virus when you got the clot shots. Apparently almost no one got the memo.

Expand full comment

So many things to comment on it would take a book (which would be far too depressing to read, let alone write). Just one thing, then. There actually is hard evidence that the mRNA in Pfizer's shots (I refuse to call them vaccines -- they do not fit the definition) not only can be but IS reverse transcribed into DNA and inserted into the human genome.

Retroviruses themselves do this trick routinely -- it's their #1 evolutionary strategy [e.g. 1] . Our DNA is packed with the little devils. That's why once you get a viral disease like Herpes and shingles it keeps coming back -- it inserts itself into our DNA and keeps popping out intermittently to test the waters. When the immune system is working well, it zaps them whenever they show their sweet little faces. When it isn't, they flourish and we get a recurrence of the disease.

Now actual retroVIRUSes (like SARS-CoV-2) bring their own reverse transcriptases (enzymes that produce DNA from RNA). But the shots don't -- so it's POSSIBLE that their designers thought they were safe. Probably not though, because it's been known for quite a while that human cells have endogenous reverse transcriptases, which do the job just fine [e.g. 2].

At the very beginning of this whole affair, NZ's very own self-proclaimed "single source of truth" (Prime Minister Ardern) sent round letter-box flyers telling us all that the social media claim that mRNA jabs could modify our DNA was "misinformation". I wrote to her office pointing out that actually it's true. " 'No answer', was the stern reply" (as a duck in one of my childhood books said).

[1] Zhang et al (2021). Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105968118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118

[2] Aldén et al (2022) Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 44, 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073.

Expand full comment