31 Comments
User's avatar
Diamond's avatar

What do you think about the apparent full assault on our food supply? Very suspicious that outbreaks are occurring in multiple species at the same time. My opinion is someone is doing gain of function research, using nature as the laboratory. This is incredibly dangerous. Bird flu transmission to other birds and mammals is a form of passaging and the likelihood of pathogenicity increasing as the virus jumps from species to species is high. At present, human susceptibility is low and human to human transmission is very low. Viruses are very adept at mutation. When the virus successfully mutates to a form affecting humans and easily transmissible, we could be in a very precarious position, much worse than COVID.

William Smith's avatar

And Bill Gates has funded University work to create a mutation that is transmissible from mammal to mammal.

My question: is all this testing PCR based?

Ruth's avatar

And why would want that mutation?!

Troll Hunter's avatar

Hah hah-- YOu need to put that science fiction novel down and go read Due Diligence and Art on substack.

William Smith's avatar

Dr Nass posted that he funded this research.

Diamond's avatar

Only a coward is insulting from behind the screen of the Internet.

Rob D's avatar

Is that Troll Hunter for real? Or are they the troll? I'm confused. Haha. I guess some people just love them some Bill Gates because he's rich. I hold no love for this monster after the things he's had his tentacles in for decades now.

Brian King's avatar

America - adding to the national debt taxpayers not even born yet will have to pay off. We have the SAME problem here in Canada with Trudeau spending money we don't have either.

Troll Hunter's avatar

This is a virus that doesn't exist except in a lab and in the small minds of perhaps millions of reality-challenged science fiction fans ;-)

Bon Kwi Kwi's avatar

Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test, repeatedly emphasized that PCR should not be used as a diagnostic tool. Here are some key points from various reports:

- **PCR's Purpose**: PCR is a method used to amplify specific DNA sequences, making them large enough to study. It was originally designed for biomedical research and criminal forensics, not for diagnosing diseases

- **False Positives**: PCR tests can produce false positive results, especially when run for a high number of cycles. Dr. Mullis warned that cycle thresholds above 30 are unreliable and can detect insignificant amounts of viral material

- **Cycle Thresholds**: The World Health Organization (WHO) and other experts have noted that high cycle threshold (CT) values can lead to false positives. A CT value of 25 is generally considered sufficient to indicate a true infection, but many labs have been using CT values up to 45, which can detect even minute amounts of viral RNA

- **Misuse in COVID-19 Testing**: Despite these warnings, PCR tests have been widely used for diagnosing COVID-19. This has led to concerns about the accuracy of the test results and the potential for overestimating the number of active infections

- **Scientific Community's Concerns**: Other scientists, including Dr. Mike Yeadon, have echoed Dr. Mullis's concerns, stating that the misuse of PCR tests has contributed to the perception of a pandemic and the implementation of restrictive measures

- **WHO Guidance**: The WHO released a guidance memo on December 14, 2020, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests can result in false positives. However, this information was available much earlier, raising questions about why it was not acted upon sooner

- **Historical Context**: Dr. Mullis was critical of the scientific community's misuse of PCR for medical diagnostics, stating, "Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it."

These reports highlight the ongoing debate and concerns about the reliability and appropriate use of PCR tests in the context of diagnosing infectious diseases like COVID-19.

Cynthia's avatar

You can’t tell me that all this is not known by whoever is in charge. Rise, repeat. Stop lying to people would be so difficult for these perpetrators. What a farce , “Contagion”. Musk better buckle up quickly on his historical knowledge

Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

Read Sasha Latypova’s post today

The Ineffable's avatar

Nothing to show for it? I respectfully beg to differ. There are loads upon loads of profit being made off of this for the benefit of select psychopaths, who in turn use that profit to buy more politicians and bureaucrats, who in turn make laws and policies that further keep select psychopaths happy in amassing more power and keeping their profiteering off of mass murder, maiming, trafficking, enslavement, and theft gravy train rolling along.

Barbara Charis's avatar

All connected to this Bird Flu Scam should lose every asset they own! There is none so devious and deceptive as those whose agenda involves killing massive numbers of another species in order to feather their own nests. ...

Jan Barendrecht's avatar

"Nothing to show for it" re "we the people" but surely a bonanza for a select few, related to big pharma and bureaucracies. "Nothing to show for it" applies to many other costly projects like the 4ever wars, environment, infrastructure that already was failing over 2 decades ago. Unless a potential for racketeering existed, no action would be taken and that was a bipartisan policy. DOGE could have recognized the pattern from the start and have eliminated the potential irreversibly but it isn't too late yet.

Crixcyon's avatar

It hardly matters as the government wastes trillions of dollars every year with NO care in the world.

John Day MD's avatar

It's almost time to cash-in!

Dee's avatar

Well when they are trying to start a plandemic so that they can have a one world digital controlled government it is going to cost big bucks and I don't mean just driving up the cost of a dozen eggs to 15 dollars a dozen.

Bon Kwi Kwi's avatar

This racket has been going on for years

2015 Bird Flu Outbreak:

• Total Indemnities: During the 2015 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak, the USDA paid over $950 million in indemnities to poultry producers[1].

• Number of Claims: The 2015 outbreak affected a large number of flocks, with over 50 million birds culled. The number of individual indemnity claims would be in the thousands, reflecting the scale of the outbreak.

Gary B Myers OD's avatar

Has a lit to show for it....jacked up the price of eggs

Troll Hunter's avatar

Egg prices are stable here, though eggs are scarce. They're plentiful, however, in Trump country, my spies tell me.

Jamie's avatar

Money being stolen at alarming rates literally everywhere. Theft is the reason theres any debt at all in America. There were roads and bridges before they started stealing our paychecks.

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

Part 3, INHUMANE PRODUCTION, COLLECT BIRDFLU MONEY FOR THE DEAD CHICKENS.

THEY KNOW NO SHAME, NO LAWS AGAINST IT. IF IT WERE A PUPPY MILL IT WOULD HAVE.

https://gailhonadle.substack.com/p/inhumane-production-collect-birdflu

The INHUMANE TREATMENT OF TREATMENT OF CHICKENS BY MAJOR PRODUCERS, WE TAX PAYERS PAID COMPENSION FOR ALREADY, BISON, WILD HORSES, Comments contain info on Child Abuse Laws that came out of the Animal abuse laws.

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

$5 a dozen: major egg companies may be using avian flu to hike US prices, new report finds

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/04/egg-prices-bird-flu-corporate-profits

“Powerful corporations that control every step of the supply chain – from breeding hens to hatching eggs to processing and distributing eggs – are making windfall profits off this crisis, raising their prices above and beyond what is necessary to cover any rising costs.”