...As long as your country has signed and ratified international conventions. And while they have been trampled on, knowing you have them is the first step to regaining them
I agree 100%, but there are laws on the books that allow certain people to go around our rights and laws. These are emergency powers laws. The Patriot Act and the NDAA's that followed basically cancelled our protections against a rogue government. They must be overturned.
I have never figured out how any law that contravenes the Constitution can survive -- emergency or not. The point of the Constitution is that it CANNOT be overruled by "emergencies" which are almost always variations of someone's sham. What am I missing?
Bonnie, This is my point. One cannot pass a law that suspends the Constitution -- that is against the law, as it were. One can pass whatever one wants, but it can never be unConstitutional as I understand it. Thus my question.
Slavery, segregation, prohibition, reservations, internment camps, etc. US history is chock full of unconstitutional laws, campaigns, and institutions. They must all be individually challenged and struck down on that basis. Rights can only be maintained or restored thru the force of public will.
Of course. It is the slipperiest of all slopes. In recent memory, this action nearly occurred during the Iran-Contra mess under Ronald Reagan. It was Oliver North (who still sits on the NSA) who proposed it.
No mention of the right to bear arms and protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. New world order great reset is global totalitarianism…you will not be able to engage in commerce if you don’t take the vax. Papers pleeeze!
They want to usurp the US constitution with the UN Constitution (the international covenant on civil & political rights)… in the “international covenant”, the law can put a limit on your freedom of thought ( freedom of thinking), your freedom of expression, and there’s no mention of the right to bear arms. I’ll stick with the US constitution!
Unfortunately, the US has never met a treaty it wasn't willing to violate- whether ratified or not. Why, its 'leadership' has had little concerns with doing so. This attitude applies to international as well as domestic laws and treaties- right up to the Declaration and Constitution.
The US has a reputation for global bait-and-switch when it lobbies heavily for other nations to sign agreements and then promptly violates them!
It appears there are no honest brokers at the top.
Unfortunately, if we do not pull out of all the international globalist organizations -- UN, WHO, and the like -- our sovereignty will be lost. Declarations, founding documents, and the like simply don't matter to globalists who would deny us our rights.
We must stop complying with mandates and any laws that contradict our U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence. And we must resist ALL federalization of voting, like having the Postal Service oversee the ballot boxes (yes, this is happening!). In addition to all that Dr. Nass said above, we must ensure election integrity.
Election Integrity Matters!
• Poll workers and poll watchers help ensure fair and honest elections (election integrity); they are part of the county elections process.
• Sign up to be a poll worker (including Chief Judge or District Judge) or a poll watcher.
• VOTE IN-PERSON ON ELECTION DAY AT YOUR OFFICIAL POLLING PLACE.
• DO NOT vote early.
• DO NOT vote by mail / absentee.
• AVOID all ballot drop boxes, but especially unsecured, unmonitored, outside, or mobile.
It's a serious mistake to appeal to the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This document is full of exception clauses which give the UN the right to take away the very rights they're giving lip-service to. You even quoted in your article part of Article 18 which deals with thought, conscience, and religion. The article says in point 3., "Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others." This means if the UN passes a law to deny freedom of religion or beliefs and justifies it by saying it's to protect public safety, or order, or health, or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others, then that freedom can be taken away. That's exactly what's going on with censorship of your own views. You are not being allowed to "manifest" your "beliefs" about COVID-19 because that would endanger public "health". On the contrary, the First Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits ANY law which would restrict our freedoms; it says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Period. There are no limitations on those freedoms, or allowances for laws restricting those freedoms. The UN Covenant has those same "exception" or "limitation" clauses allowing the government to limit rights and freedoms in Article 9 (liberty in general), Article 12 (liberty of movement), Article 19 (liberty of expression), Article 21 (peaceful assembly), and Article 22 (freedom of association). The US' ratification of the UNCCPR is also illegal and invalid under the US Constitution, which requires any treaty (including international agreements of any kind) that conflicts with or supersedes a provision of the Constitution to have to go through the Article V amendment process, which requires ratification by 3/4 of the state legislatures, a higher bar for approval, which the UNCCPR did not go through. A treaty which does not violate the Constitution only requires 2/3 vote of the Senate and the president's signature, which is a lower bar for approval. Our SCOTUS has already ruled as such, that Article V cannot be ignored, as Senator Ted Cruz wrote in his 2014 article in the Harvard Law Review, "Limits on the Treaty Power". The UNCCPR is no protection at all - it's a threat. We need to repudiate the UNCCPR and "Get the US out of the UN, and the UN out of the US." The John Birch Society has been saying this for over 60 years, but nobody seems interested in even debating the idea! That's how successful the enemy has been in framing the issue.
Yes! We will, we ARE...(getting rights back). Attempting to keep positive in unity here....Thanks for your perspectives and keeping us informed of so much Dr. Nass.
Where is the right not to have our DNA f’d around with?
Our right to serve our god(s) in our own manner?
Our right to have proper actions which shall be adhered to IOT determine if a health emergency exists? Not just some arbitrary evil diplomat stepping on the rights of humanity, not being elected, nor qualified for any such eradication of anyone’s rights. IMO there should never be any caveat to infringe on rights ever, given the atrocious actions of evil in charge.
Agree! We have had some great victories which help too. Like the recent win for mandated health care workers who refused, then sued and won 10 million dollars. This kind of thing also builds precedent. Many people believed because the gov, hospitals, big corps, etc did it and majority agreed that it must be legal. It wasn't! So keep pushing back! If you were wronged make it right. America First Legal is taking many cases, many pro bono. It also doesn't hurt that the truth is setting us free almost daily now. People see they were lied to. Keep speaking truth and pushing back! We can do this.
Pfizer’s New Drug – And Pharmacists Can Prescribe It!
Pamela A. Popper, President
Wellness Forum Health
While medical boards all over the country are investigating and often suspending or revoking the licenses of doctors who prescribe off-label drugs for COVID or speak out about COVID vaccines, pharmacists have gradually gained the right to practice medicine. For example, pharmacists can override doctors’ decisions by refusing to fill prescriptions written by doctors for drugs to treat COVID, and in many states they have been mandated to notify the medical board when a doctor prescribes drugs like ivermectin or HCQ. This reporting then triggers disciplinary action.
Now, the FDA has specifically authorized pharmacists to screen patients and to prescribe Paxlovid, a recently approved drug made by Pfizer for the treatment of COVID-19.[1]
The insanity of this is hard to express. Ivermectin and HCQ have been demonstrated to be safe and effective for many uses and for decades. They are inexpensive and in some places are available over the counter. According to many government and health officials, doctors should not prescribe these.
On the other hand, pharmacists can and should prescribe Paxlovid, a new, experimental drug approved for use under an Emergency Use Authorization. There are no long-term safety studies supporting its use, and the drug is miserably ineffective. In fact, it makes patients worse. Mr. Fauci himself admitted that after taking Paxlovid, his symptoms returned and were worse than before. Here is what he told reporters:
"I turned positive about two weeks ago, with very minimal symptoms. When they increased, given my age, I went on Paxlovid for five days."
After five days on the drug, he tested negative. He had three consecutive days of negative tests. On the fourth day he tested positive again.
He continued, "It was sort of what people are referring to as a Paxlovid rebound. "Over the next day or so I started to feel really poorly, much worse than in the first go around."[2]
Even worse, studies show that people can pass COVID to others during a rebound. This led the CDC to issue new guidance concerning Paxlovid. According to this guidance, patients with rebound symptoms should isolate for five full days and should wear a mask for 10 days after the rebound.[3]
What’s not to like about a drug that causes the return of worsening COVID symptoms and promotes spread of COVID to others! And it can be obtained easily from your local drugstore.
But use caution: this drug is not only counter-productive, it’s outright dangerous. Paxlovid contains both Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir (Norvir).[4] Ritonavir is prescribed to AIDS patients and carries a black box warning stating that "potentially serious and/or life-threatening adverse events" can result from taking Ritonavir in combination with several commonly prescribed drugs. These include antiarrhythmic drugs like amiodarone; antifungal drugs, Colchicine (prescribed for gout), antipsychotics, St. John’s Wort, statin drugs like Lovastatin and simvastatin, and sedatives like midazolam (Versad) and triazolam (Halcion).[5] Side effects of Ritonavir include diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, heartburn, stomach pain, loss of appetite, headache, dizziness, tiredness, weakness, changes in taste, tingling/numbness in hands or feet or mouth, and changes in the shape or location of body fat (especially in the arms, legs, face, neck, breasts, and waist. Some of the more serious side effects include persistent muscle aches or weakness, joint pain, vision changes, signs of infection, signs of hyperthyroidism, and signs of Guillain-Barre Syndrome.[6]
Of course, pharmacists are well-versed on drugs, side effects, and interactions, and can ask patients about the drugs that they are taking. But that sounds a lot like practicing medicine, an important point. Pharmacists are not doctors. Their role has historically been to fill prescriptions, and to help patients understand how to take the drugs or the side effects of drugs prescribed by doctors.
So to summarize: doctors can be disciplined and even put out of practice for prescribing drugs to patients with whom they have a doctor/patient relationship, while pharmacists are now allowed to practice medicine. Additionally, pharmacists have the power to evaluate decisions made by doctors and if they do not like these decisions, they can notify medical boards and help to start an investigation that might end the careers of those doctors. Welcome to COVIDland!
Note: One of our major initiatives is defending doctors who are being investigated or disciplined by medical boards. To support our efforts, visit www.makeamericansfreeagain.com.
[1] US allows pharmacists to prescribe Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill. News4Jax July 6 2022
[2] Brenda Goodman, Virginia Langmaid. Fauci says his COVID rebounded after Paxlovid. CNN Health June 30 2022
Thank you for all you've done and do to expose these psyop scams on us and others. I sure don't know it all but I've had a text file on my desktop for years now where I copy, paste and save the best online information I can to share and email all over. I discovered The Tenth Amendment Center (TAC) about a year ago, followed them a good bit, and then joined them May 10, 2022. Michael Boldin and Michael Maharrey from TAC inspire me a lot. However, so far I've seen them talk about the problem-reaction-solution psyop scam concept, but haven't seen them acknowledge any details about some of these huge psyop scams on us and others (9/11 and on and on). But their knowledge of our Founders and the basic principles in our US Constitution is even more important to educate people on than they were in 2007 when Congressman Ron Paul taught me about these so-called "neocons'' in both our extremely corrupt two major US political parties. I've also learned that some of our main Founders were actually Deists. Why didn't we know that from school? I've got a pretty good idea why after 20 years of observing people in the world around me and even some of these high profile "truth advocates". Regardless of what some Americans expect us to believe, that they believe, it is against the law (and always has been) to do psyop scams on us and others. The US Constitution has never given anyone the authority to do psyop scams on us and others or police the world. Reality also dictates that anything other than legal, sensible immigration will not be good either. The answers to lots of these issues we've faced for a long time are elementary, but the US legacy mainstream media and all our US representatives obviously changed that long ago in many people's minds for their gain and not ours. For all Americans' consideration:
Tenth Amendment Center:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
"...and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other." -Benjamin Franklin
LibriVox audiobook recording of The Age of Reason, by Thomas Paine.
But after the Courts punish the malefactors, what do we do?
We have a huge debt and a huge economic crisis, which kills people. It is a form of slavery.
Reparations from the wealth of the felons are welcome, but that is not an economic recovery. The people with disabilities due to the forced vaccination need compensation not from taxpayer money, but from the people who harmed them. Same with the mortal victims. Justice demands that the big corporations be shredded to pieces, along with the Unjust Legislation that favors them to the detriment of our inalienable human rights.
This great tragedy has not happened because we had too much freedom. Those with legal Power chose not to defend the Law, thus enabling the attack. The Enemy Class and its friends have assaulted the persons and the property of the people. They must pay.
I conclude: The Western countries will have an economic recovery when Amazon goes under.
Absolutely correct but though I would like to share your optimism, I fear that "the illusion of democracy" is accompanied by "the illusion of justice". It will be a long slog.
Not only are many of these fundamental rights ignored but there are large doses of Government hypocrisy applied on top. For instance, in the context of "self-determination", irrespective of legal territorial claims, it's OK (allegedly) for the people of Taiwan to claim this right but NOT those in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Crimea, Donbas, Catalunya, Scotland etc.
Do you think the Cult is gonna give us rights back? There's A heavy strain of humanism in these substacks. (not singling out Meryl... Across the board) I find it all very naive.
It is so refreshing to witness this principled exposition of what it is that is the most important thing in the world: individual rights. A favorite early quote I found was from Richard Hooker, writing in 1593:
"They saw that to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery."
I agree 100%, but there are laws on the books that allow certain people to go around our rights and laws. These are emergency powers laws. The Patriot Act and the NDAA's that followed basically cancelled our protections against a rogue government. They must be overturned.
I have never figured out how any law that contravenes the Constitution can survive -- emergency or not. The point of the Constitution is that it CANNOT be overruled by "emergencies" which are almost always variations of someone's sham. What am I missing?
German constitution was pretty good , in 20s.... One of the best....
You're 'missing' the power handed over to FEMA when national emergencies are announced by the president as occurred on March 11, 2020.
FEMA is the shadow government. In its charge, the suspension of the Constitution is included.
They even have a You Tube channel.
Hidden in plain sight.
Bonnie, This is my point. One cannot pass a law that suspends the Constitution -- that is against the law, as it were. One can pass whatever one wants, but it can never be unConstitutional as I understand it. Thus my question.
Slavery, segregation, prohibition, reservations, internment camps, etc. US history is chock full of unconstitutional laws, campaigns, and institutions. They must all be individually challenged and struck down on that basis. Rights can only be maintained or restored thru the force of public will.
Of course. It is the slipperiest of all slopes. In recent memory, this action nearly occurred during the Iran-Contra mess under Ronald Reagan. It was Oliver North (who still sits on the NSA) who proposed it.
Excellent comment.
No mention of the right to bear arms and protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. New world order great reset is global totalitarianism…you will not be able to engage in commerce if you don’t take the vax. Papers pleeeze!
Thank you for this, it is good to get a reminder with all the attacks on our personhood.
They want to usurp the US constitution with the UN Constitution (the international covenant on civil & political rights)… in the “international covenant”, the law can put a limit on your freedom of thought ( freedom of thinking), your freedom of expression, and there’s no mention of the right to bear arms. I’ll stick with the US constitution!
Unfortunately, the US has never met a treaty it wasn't willing to violate- whether ratified or not. Why, its 'leadership' has had little concerns with doing so. This attitude applies to international as well as domestic laws and treaties- right up to the Declaration and Constitution.
The US has a reputation for global bait-and-switch when it lobbies heavily for other nations to sign agreements and then promptly violates them!
It appears there are no honest brokers at the top.
Unfortunately, if we do not pull out of all the international globalist organizations -- UN, WHO, and the like -- our sovereignty will be lost. Declarations, founding documents, and the like simply don't matter to globalists who would deny us our rights.
We must stop complying with mandates and any laws that contradict our U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence. And we must resist ALL federalization of voting, like having the Postal Service oversee the ballot boxes (yes, this is happening!). In addition to all that Dr. Nass said above, we must ensure election integrity.
Election Integrity Matters!
• Poll workers and poll watchers help ensure fair and honest elections (election integrity); they are part of the county elections process.
• Sign up to be a poll worker (including Chief Judge or District Judge) or a poll watcher.
• VOTE IN-PERSON ON ELECTION DAY AT YOUR OFFICIAL POLLING PLACE.
• DO NOT vote early.
• DO NOT vote by mail / absentee.
• AVOID all ballot drop boxes, but especially unsecured, unmonitored, outside, or mobile.
It's a serious mistake to appeal to the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This document is full of exception clauses which give the UN the right to take away the very rights they're giving lip-service to. You even quoted in your article part of Article 18 which deals with thought, conscience, and religion. The article says in point 3., "Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others." This means if the UN passes a law to deny freedom of religion or beliefs and justifies it by saying it's to protect public safety, or order, or health, or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others, then that freedom can be taken away. That's exactly what's going on with censorship of your own views. You are not being allowed to "manifest" your "beliefs" about COVID-19 because that would endanger public "health". On the contrary, the First Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits ANY law which would restrict our freedoms; it says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Period. There are no limitations on those freedoms, or allowances for laws restricting those freedoms. The UN Covenant has those same "exception" or "limitation" clauses allowing the government to limit rights and freedoms in Article 9 (liberty in general), Article 12 (liberty of movement), Article 19 (liberty of expression), Article 21 (peaceful assembly), and Article 22 (freedom of association). The US' ratification of the UNCCPR is also illegal and invalid under the US Constitution, which requires any treaty (including international agreements of any kind) that conflicts with or supersedes a provision of the Constitution to have to go through the Article V amendment process, which requires ratification by 3/4 of the state legislatures, a higher bar for approval, which the UNCCPR did not go through. A treaty which does not violate the Constitution only requires 2/3 vote of the Senate and the president's signature, which is a lower bar for approval. Our SCOTUS has already ruled as such, that Article V cannot be ignored, as Senator Ted Cruz wrote in his 2014 article in the Harvard Law Review, "Limits on the Treaty Power". The UNCCPR is no protection at all - it's a threat. We need to repudiate the UNCCPR and "Get the US out of the UN, and the UN out of the US." The John Birch Society has been saying this for over 60 years, but nobody seems interested in even debating the idea! That's how successful the enemy has been in framing the issue.
Yes! We will, we ARE...(getting rights back). Attempting to keep positive in unity here....Thanks for your perspectives and keeping us informed of so much Dr. Nass.
Where is the right not to have our DNA f’d around with?
Our right to serve our god(s) in our own manner?
Our right to have proper actions which shall be adhered to IOT determine if a health emergency exists? Not just some arbitrary evil diplomat stepping on the rights of humanity, not being elected, nor qualified for any such eradication of anyone’s rights. IMO there should never be any caveat to infringe on rights ever, given the atrocious actions of evil in charge.
Agree! We have had some great victories which help too. Like the recent win for mandated health care workers who refused, then sued and won 10 million dollars. This kind of thing also builds precedent. Many people believed because the gov, hospitals, big corps, etc did it and majority agreed that it must be legal. It wasn't! So keep pushing back! If you were wronged make it right. America First Legal is taking many cases, many pro bono. It also doesn't hurt that the truth is setting us free almost daily now. People see they were lied to. Keep speaking truth and pushing back! We can do this.
… hronicles:
Pfizer’s New Drug – And Pharmacists Can Prescribe It!
Pamela A. Popper, President
Wellness Forum Health
While medical boards all over the country are investigating and often suspending or revoking the licenses of doctors who prescribe off-label drugs for COVID or speak out about COVID vaccines, pharmacists have gradually gained the right to practice medicine. For example, pharmacists can override doctors’ decisions by refusing to fill prescriptions written by doctors for drugs to treat COVID, and in many states they have been mandated to notify the medical board when a doctor prescribes drugs like ivermectin or HCQ. This reporting then triggers disciplinary action.
Now, the FDA has specifically authorized pharmacists to screen patients and to prescribe Paxlovid, a recently approved drug made by Pfizer for the treatment of COVID-19.[1]
The insanity of this is hard to express. Ivermectin and HCQ have been demonstrated to be safe and effective for many uses and for decades. They are inexpensive and in some places are available over the counter. According to many government and health officials, doctors should not prescribe these.
On the other hand, pharmacists can and should prescribe Paxlovid, a new, experimental drug approved for use under an Emergency Use Authorization. There are no long-term safety studies supporting its use, and the drug is miserably ineffective. In fact, it makes patients worse. Mr. Fauci himself admitted that after taking Paxlovid, his symptoms returned and were worse than before. Here is what he told reporters:
"I turned positive about two weeks ago, with very minimal symptoms. When they increased, given my age, I went on Paxlovid for five days."
After five days on the drug, he tested negative. He had three consecutive days of negative tests. On the fourth day he tested positive again.
He continued, "It was sort of what people are referring to as a Paxlovid rebound. "Over the next day or so I started to feel really poorly, much worse than in the first go around."[2]
Even worse, studies show that people can pass COVID to others during a rebound. This led the CDC to issue new guidance concerning Paxlovid. According to this guidance, patients with rebound symptoms should isolate for five full days and should wear a mask for 10 days after the rebound.[3]
What’s not to like about a drug that causes the return of worsening COVID symptoms and promotes spread of COVID to others! And it can be obtained easily from your local drugstore.
But use caution: this drug is not only counter-productive, it’s outright dangerous. Paxlovid contains both Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir (Norvir).[4] Ritonavir is prescribed to AIDS patients and carries a black box warning stating that "potentially serious and/or life-threatening adverse events" can result from taking Ritonavir in combination with several commonly prescribed drugs. These include antiarrhythmic drugs like amiodarone; antifungal drugs, Colchicine (prescribed for gout), antipsychotics, St. John’s Wort, statin drugs like Lovastatin and simvastatin, and sedatives like midazolam (Versad) and triazolam (Halcion).[5] Side effects of Ritonavir include diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, heartburn, stomach pain, loss of appetite, headache, dizziness, tiredness, weakness, changes in taste, tingling/numbness in hands or feet or mouth, and changes in the shape or location of body fat (especially in the arms, legs, face, neck, breasts, and waist. Some of the more serious side effects include persistent muscle aches or weakness, joint pain, vision changes, signs of infection, signs of hyperthyroidism, and signs of Guillain-Barre Syndrome.[6]
Of course, pharmacists are well-versed on drugs, side effects, and interactions, and can ask patients about the drugs that they are taking. But that sounds a lot like practicing medicine, an important point. Pharmacists are not doctors. Their role has historically been to fill prescriptions, and to help patients understand how to take the drugs or the side effects of drugs prescribed by doctors.
So to summarize: doctors can be disciplined and even put out of practice for prescribing drugs to patients with whom they have a doctor/patient relationship, while pharmacists are now allowed to practice medicine. Additionally, pharmacists have the power to evaluate decisions made by doctors and if they do not like these decisions, they can notify medical boards and help to start an investigation that might end the careers of those doctors. Welcome to COVIDland!
Note: One of our major initiatives is defending doctors who are being investigated or disciplined by medical boards. To support our efforts, visit www.makeamericansfreeagain.com.
[1] US allows pharmacists to prescribe Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill. News4Jax July 6 2022
[2] Brenda Goodman, Virginia Langmaid. Fauci says his COVID rebounded after Paxlovid. CNN Health June 30 2022
[3] CDC Health Advisory. COVID-19 Rebound After Paxlovid Treatment. May 24 2022. https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2022/pdf/CDC_HAN_467.pdf
[4] https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ritonavir-boosted-nirmatrelvir--paxlovid-/
[5] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/209512lbl.pdf
[6] https://www.rxlist.com/norvir-side-effects-drug-center.htm
Dr. Nass,
'
Thank you for all you've done and do to expose these psyop scams on us and others. I sure don't know it all but I've had a text file on my desktop for years now where I copy, paste and save the best online information I can to share and email all over. I discovered The Tenth Amendment Center (TAC) about a year ago, followed them a good bit, and then joined them May 10, 2022. Michael Boldin and Michael Maharrey from TAC inspire me a lot. However, so far I've seen them talk about the problem-reaction-solution psyop scam concept, but haven't seen them acknowledge any details about some of these huge psyop scams on us and others (9/11 and on and on). But their knowledge of our Founders and the basic principles in our US Constitution is even more important to educate people on than they were in 2007 when Congressman Ron Paul taught me about these so-called "neocons'' in both our extremely corrupt two major US political parties. I've also learned that some of our main Founders were actually Deists. Why didn't we know that from school? I've got a pretty good idea why after 20 years of observing people in the world around me and even some of these high profile "truth advocates". Regardless of what some Americans expect us to believe, that they believe, it is against the law (and always has been) to do psyop scams on us and others. The US Constitution has never given anyone the authority to do psyop scams on us and others or police the world. Reality also dictates that anything other than legal, sensible immigration will not be good either. The answers to lots of these issues we've faced for a long time are elementary, but the US legacy mainstream media and all our US representatives obviously changed that long ago in many people's minds for their gain and not ours. For all Americans' consideration:
Tenth Amendment Center:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/
Show Archives: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/pathtoliberty/
Subscribe and Review on Apple:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/path-to-liberty/id1440549211
JOIN TAC: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
"...and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other." -Benjamin Franklin
LibriVox audiobook recording of The Age of Reason, by Thomas Paine.
Read by JoeD.
https://archive.org/details/ageofreason_1302_librivox/ageofreason2_01_paine.mp3
Deism for a humble, natural state.
https://slife.org/deism/
Unlawful charges in Canada too!
Yes, we have inalienable rights.
But after the Courts punish the malefactors, what do we do?
We have a huge debt and a huge economic crisis, which kills people. It is a form of slavery.
Reparations from the wealth of the felons are welcome, but that is not an economic recovery. The people with disabilities due to the forced vaccination need compensation not from taxpayer money, but from the people who harmed them. Same with the mortal victims. Justice demands that the big corporations be shredded to pieces, along with the Unjust Legislation that favors them to the detriment of our inalienable human rights.
This great tragedy has not happened because we had too much freedom. Those with legal Power chose not to defend the Law, thus enabling the attack. The Enemy Class and its friends have assaulted the persons and the property of the people. They must pay.
I conclude: The Western countries will have an economic recovery when Amazon goes under.
Absolutely correct but though I would like to share your optimism, I fear that "the illusion of democracy" is accompanied by "the illusion of justice". It will be a long slog.
Not only are many of these fundamental rights ignored but there are large doses of Government hypocrisy applied on top. For instance, in the context of "self-determination", irrespective of legal territorial claims, it's OK (allegedly) for the people of Taiwan to claim this right but NOT those in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Crimea, Donbas, Catalunya, Scotland etc.
Do you think the Cult is gonna give us rights back? There's A heavy strain of humanism in these substacks. (not singling out Meryl... Across the board) I find it all very naive.
It's but a part of solution.
It is so refreshing to witness this principled exposition of what it is that is the most important thing in the world: individual rights. A favorite early quote I found was from Richard Hooker, writing in 1593:
"They saw that to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery."