The breadth of injury is too thorough to be accidental or “negligent”. Add to that: the unknowing don’t drag branches to obscure their tracks. The hiding do.
Some are architects of the Cult, most just follow.
Like my Oregon Governor, she believes WEF is saving us. She believes counselors who ease the path to wack genitals is preventing suicide. Sad, but truth is people are stupid.
Imho, and with due respect, the spiritual battle can't so easily be intellectualized, nor is it attributable to the intelligence quotient of the respective parties. More than a few years of planning(premeditation) has gone into this, demonstrating considerable and orchestrated intent, to say nothing of the deliberate commission of acts requisite to its execution at every level. This was methodical criminality. There's rationally no straddling the fence of ignored safety signals WHILE claiming the very "safety of the public" was the paramount impetus. The CDC's own graphics identified the infection fatality rate as nominal! The conventional protections already in place were brazenly set aside, curatives purposely suppressed, orthodox definitions abandoned, public outcry silenced, all in the name of a very sinister and deadly unity of spirit! And I do mean SPIRIT. No lipstick is beautifying this PIG.
It's provably not a mere secular difference of opinion. (With "validating" data in hand, WHERE have the robust "Follow the Science" debates been? 🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗)
Self-extinction is simply not a human appetite. Look through a larger, older, historically storied lens. We were warned.
Excellent article, best anlysis that I have read. "Follow the money" usually prevails in my mind leading one down the path of who is paying for these gender transformation surgeries and lifelong care.
According to the article, Obama's CMS in 2016 would not approve gender surgeries yet how has this become so lucrative. Is the taxpayer paying for this? THOUGHTS?
Regarding the costs of gender reassignment surgeries and life-long care, how can we distill any degree of true/reliable empirical data from a shell-game government which column-shuffles every unsavory agenda appropriation funded by unwilling taxpayers?
This administration unabashedly admits to BILLIONS in unaccounted-for Ukraine aid! The very same fiduciary malfeasance played out surrounding another "stimulus" cash bonanza in which the current president had a hand: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
So, in brief, do we have any legit idea who's picking up the transgender tab? NO.
Thank you. Cheeps for posting your research and information. I dont understand why more people are not asking about this lucrative funding as nobody seems to know. I am certain insurance companies are not paying if they won't pay for fertility treatments for infertile couples. I believe if money WAS THE OBJECT, individuals would accept their sex determined at conception and move on with life, recognizing that the moral degradation and decay of every aspect of our society is not without outside influences and has been in subtle transition for almost 100 years.. Thank you again, I will keep asking. Most grateful to have these platforms for the exchange of information!
I don't. I think they are willfully blind and ignorant. With all the evidence to the contrary they cannot possibly have a righteous belief that these shots are not harmful.
I think they really believe in their jobs and in their science. I worked with people like this in hospitals and universities. They live in a bubble and they buy into completely. They feel rather proud of themselves and enjoy being above it all, which makes it easy for them to objectify others who do not operate within their system.
People are ignorant because they haven't received information that might change their thinking. For example, if they read the Real Anthony Fauci - which most book stores have banned .... as I confirmed from a recent visit to one of the Southeast's most famous book stores.
A large part of the problem is they aren't looking for information to change their thinking. Of course another part of the problem is so much information has been hidden from the masses. BTW I had no problem finding RFK, Jr's book. I pre-ordered it on Amazon, but I recently noticed it is in Barnes & Noble.
I ordered it on-line too. I've heard from other readers who said that it was not available at their Barnnes & Noble. Some said they could find it at Books-A-Million, another bookstore chain. I'm most interested in the "independent" book-sellers like Sundog Books.
I much prefer to focus on the issues, and not the people, but in this case I could not help but notice that Iona Munjal has the same blank look that so many others who are involved in nefarious dealings in the recent past. As soon as I saw her picture, it reminded me of the blank look in so many western politicians currently. For example, Justin Trudeau of Canada. Have these people been subjected to some horrible form of brain-washing? I have no idea, but it seems odd to me that so many prominent people in the west have blank looks on their faces.
I refer to a new movie released only last month entitled "Nefarious"(it's not a documentary), based on a book by Steve Deace, dealing with demonic possession.
Seeing the countenance allows one to use some measure of discernment.
Mind control tech is real and has been deployed. This is not to provide get out of jail free passes. Regardless of the conjecture, they have been involved in genocide and must pay fully for the crime.
They have been taught how to lie - with a straight face! Some of them - in order for them to be in the profession of telling lies to the public - probably have at least minor psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies (thus they have minimal conscience )
Funny how the WHO’s guidance is paramount when it aligns with the narrative and swept under the carpet when it doesn’t. I’m just amazed the WHO dared to say this aloud.
Meryl, I wanted to let you know I included your excellent CHD interview with Sucharit in the piece I published on him yesterday:
I also launched an #IStandWithSucharit campaign and include graphics people can use for that on social media. I know you are as concerned as the rest of us about his upcoming trial and thought you might want to share this to help build a groundswell of support prior to May 23.
No one recommended it for pregnant women in Jan 2021. CDC was the first I know of to advise it in pregnancy--claiming in April 2021 (maybe May) they had data showing it was safe in pregnancy. Then Rochelle had to walk that back. Then roughly a week later CDC announced they DID have data showing pregnancy safety and they continue lying about that to this day and pushing the shot on pregnant women.
Ah, thank you for that clarification, Meryl—thank goodness your memory is so good. I have been subscribed to the daily propaganda reports from Oregon Health Authority, and I remember being appalled when they started pushing it on pregnant women, seemingly from the beginning, but I’d have to wade through the archives to try and find a specific date. I’ll bet it was after the CDC pulled that fast one, though, since they just took marching orders from them.
and did we not already have volumes of evidence that these agencies are woefully corrupt? For this reason this country need to revode membership immediately. Trump was right again...
What one must realize: if one has poison injected into oneself, that poison is in the body working its black magic until it is removed. Just because adverse effects are not felt or realized does not mean one is not poisoned. Oh, and I do not accept Pfizer's numbers. And nobody should. It is a joke that they are discussed whatsoever. Yes, because Pfizer admits to these numbers, we can agree that AT A MINIMUM we can expect "1 in 200 mothers to have a serious adverse event , 1 in 250 to have a severe adverse event (the difference between serious and severe is unknown) and 1 in 500 to have a life-threatening event". Needless to say, Pfizer would never admit to these lower limits if not provably true, but they will never admit that 100% of the people they helped poison are poisoned until further action or notice. It is, as they say, what it is.
THANK YOU!!! The patent he shows us for the antigen (the F protein) is from HHS, and a patnet owner, Barney Graham, one of Fauci's boys, heads the NIAID Vaccine Research Center.
Barney, like Baric, is a great indicator to watch for the next moves. Baric is heavy in the Dengue world now. I'm linking Barney's patents/grants from newest to oldest. What do you anticipate they are preparing with bringing back mumps and measles?
Self-assembling inset ferritin nanoparticles to present antigens? And be magnetic? Defund the NIH. Lock up Fauci till he squeals about what his team has really been doing.
They have to be careful about loosing mumps or measles on the population, as it could be the death knell of the vaccine program, when it turns out that most of the cases are fully vaccinated.
I agree! What exactly was given to the placebo group? Their numbers seem to nearly mimic the vax group. In some cases we’re told the same vax adjuvant was used in the placebo group.
I sincerely admire your earnestness and crusading spirit. But you might want to use a pen name, a false return address, gloves when handling the paper and stamp, and the most generic paper widely available. And wear a disguise when you drop the letter in a (video-monitored) mailbox.
Thank-you, for sharing. It is important for the public to see the risks with all the medicines and drugs they are talking. It is becoming clearer that the science is profits.
And still to this day, every day, TV ads are aired by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists urging pregnant women to get the Covid19 MRNA injections. I’m beyond disgusted by it all.
We just moved to Elizabethtown Ky, and there’s a billboard that says “ if you love your neighbor get vaccinated. “ Obviously not what JESUS meant when HE said it.
How many serious/severe/life threatening AEs occur in babies per one baby life saved from RSV? How many serious/severe/life threatening AEs occur in the mothers per one baby life saved?
I searched the NEJM pager and the supplement. It uses "placebo" everywhere. I used the PDF search which found the hits and I skimmed a few places, but found no obvious definition of what they used for placebo.
Probably an adjuvant or the solution with all other ingredients except for the RSV. Funny how they get away with calling toxic and reactive substances placebos when they are the exact opposite!
These people are criminals by design or negligence, there is no other way to understand this.
“By design” gets my vote.
The breadth of injury is too thorough to be accidental or “negligent”. Add to that: the unknowing don’t drag branches to obscure their tracks. The hiding do.
Some are architects of the Cult, most just follow.
Like my Oregon Governor, she believes WEF is saving us. She believes counselors who ease the path to wack genitals is preventing suicide. Sad, but truth is people are stupid.
Imho, and with due respect, the spiritual battle can't so easily be intellectualized, nor is it attributable to the intelligence quotient of the respective parties. More than a few years of planning(premeditation) has gone into this, demonstrating considerable and orchestrated intent, to say nothing of the deliberate commission of acts requisite to its execution at every level. This was methodical criminality. There's rationally no straddling the fence of ignored safety signals WHILE claiming the very "safety of the public" was the paramount impetus. The CDC's own graphics identified the infection fatality rate as nominal! The conventional protections already in place were brazenly set aside, curatives purposely suppressed, orthodox definitions abandoned, public outcry silenced, all in the name of a very sinister and deadly unity of spirit! And I do mean SPIRIT. No lipstick is beautifying this PIG.
It's provably not a mere secular difference of opinion. (With "validating" data in hand, WHERE have the robust "Follow the Science" debates been? 🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗)
Self-extinction is simply not a human appetite. Look through a larger, older, historically storied lens. We were warned.
For your governor:
https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/sex-reassignment-doesnt-work-here-the-evidence
Excellent article, best anlysis that I have read. "Follow the money" usually prevails in my mind leading one down the path of who is paying for these gender transformation surgeries and lifelong care.
According to the article, Obama's CMS in 2016 would not approve gender surgeries yet how has this become so lucrative. Is the taxpayer paying for this? THOUGHTS?
Obama's administration also had initial safeguards in place prohibiting gain-of-function research, and yet here we are.
(By the way, I salute your handle.
☘️☺️👍🏻)
Eirinn go bragh!
Regarding the costs of gender reassignment surgeries and life-long care, how can we distill any degree of true/reliable empirical data from a shell-game government which column-shuffles every unsavory agenda appropriation funded by unwilling taxpayers?
This administration unabashedly admits to BILLIONS in unaccounted-for Ukraine aid! The very same fiduciary malfeasance played out surrounding another "stimulus" cash bonanza in which the current president had a hand: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
So, in brief, do we have any legit idea who's picking up the transgender tab? NO.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/08/05/federal-spending-transparency-money-missing/13485581/
Thank you. Cheeps for posting your research and information. I dont understand why more people are not asking about this lucrative funding as nobody seems to know. I am certain insurance companies are not paying if they won't pay for fertility treatments for infertile couples. I believe if money WAS THE OBJECT, individuals would accept their sex determined at conception and move on with life, recognizing that the moral degradation and decay of every aspect of our society is not without outside influences and has been in subtle transition for almost 100 years.. Thank you again, I will keep asking. Most grateful to have these platforms for the exchange of information!
I feel like they really believe.
But really, does it matter? What does matter is the result.
To an extent, yes. I should know who I’m dealing with.
I don't. I think they are willfully blind and ignorant. With all the evidence to the contrary they cannot possibly have a righteous belief that these shots are not harmful.
That’s not what I really meant.
I think they really believe in their jobs and in their science. I worked with people like this in hospitals and universities. They live in a bubble and they buy into completely. They feel rather proud of themselves and enjoy being above it all, which makes it easy for them to objectify others who do not operate within their system.
While unsurprising still very disturbing. I appreciate hearing this from someone with direct experience of these monsters.
brainwashed into not caring about other people ... in their jobs, that amounts to criminality.
Absolutely.
People are ignorant because they haven't received information that might change their thinking. For example, if they read the Real Anthony Fauci - which most book stores have banned .... as I confirmed from a recent visit to one of the Southeast's most famous book stores.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/book-lovers-dont-mind-banning-books
A large part of the problem is they aren't looking for information to change their thinking. Of course another part of the problem is so much information has been hidden from the masses. BTW I had no problem finding RFK, Jr's book. I pre-ordered it on Amazon, but I recently noticed it is in Barnes & Noble.
I ordered it on-line too. I've heard from other readers who said that it was not available at their Barnnes & Noble. Some said they could find it at Books-A-Million, another bookstore chain. I'm most interested in the "independent" book-sellers like Sundog Books.
So it's a feeling issue?
A lot of life is, yeah.
Be true to your gut . . . if you’re in tune with it, that is.
A simple sentence accurate and truthful!
I much prefer to focus on the issues, and not the people, but in this case I could not help but notice that Iona Munjal has the same blank look that so many others who are involved in nefarious dealings in the recent past. As soon as I saw her picture, it reminded me of the blank look in so many western politicians currently. For example, Justin Trudeau of Canada. Have these people been subjected to some horrible form of brain-washing? I have no idea, but it seems odd to me that so many prominent people in the west have blank looks on their faces.
They have cold hearts
Twisted minds and dark souls.
Check into the newly-released film, “Nefarious”.
The blank look will suddenly make sense. Ransomware has come to humanity’s “operating system”.
I refer to a new movie released only last month entitled "Nefarious"(it's not a documentary), based on a book by Steve Deace, dealing with demonic possession.
You can say that again!
Seeing the countenance allows one to use some measure of discernment.
Mind control tech is real and has been deployed. This is not to provide get out of jail free passes. Regardless of the conjecture, they have been involved in genocide and must pay fully for the crime.
Like their souls are missing,empty suits.
They are possessed. In the spiritual sense. It’s clear to me.
They have been taught how to lie - with a straight face! Some of them - in order for them to be in the profession of telling lies to the public - probably have at least minor psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies (thus they have minimal conscience )
Thank you for sharing. It is such a crime.
You beat me to it you were typing slightly ahead of me
Great catch, Meryl—just as I would expect from your eagle eye!
Have you seen this WSJ article from January 2021 saying WHO recommends *against* Moderna and Pfizer for “most pregnant women”?
• “WHO Recommends Against Moderna, Pfizer Vaccines for Most Pregnant Women” (https://www.wsj.com/articles/who-recommends-against-moderna-pfizer-vaccines-for-most-pregnant-women-11611775138)
Funny how the WHO’s guidance is paramount when it aligns with the narrative and swept under the carpet when it doesn’t. I’m just amazed the WHO dared to say this aloud.
Meryl, I wanted to let you know I included your excellent CHD interview with Sucharit in the piece I published on him yesterday:
• “Profiles in Courage: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-prof-dr-sucharit)
I also launched an #IStandWithSucharit campaign and include graphics people can use for that on social media. I know you are as concerned as the rest of us about his upcoming trial and thought you might want to share this to help build a groundswell of support prior to May 23.
No one recommended it for pregnant women in Jan 2021. CDC was the first I know of to advise it in pregnancy--claiming in April 2021 (maybe May) they had data showing it was safe in pregnancy. Then Rochelle had to walk that back. Then roughly a week later CDC announced they DID have data showing pregnancy safety and they continue lying about that to this day and pushing the shot on pregnant women.
Ah, thank you for that clarification, Meryl—thank goodness your memory is so good. I have been subscribed to the daily propaganda reports from Oregon Health Authority, and I remember being appalled when they started pushing it on pregnant women, seemingly from the beginning, but I’d have to wade through the archives to try and find a specific date. I’ll bet it was after the CDC pulled that fast one, though, since they just took marching orders from them.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210430071246/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html
Recommended for pregnant women despite limited info in April 2021
You da bomb! 💣
and did we not already have volumes of evidence that these agencies are woefully corrupt? For this reason this country need to revode membership immediately. Trump was right again...
That sounds completely criminal to me. Immunity for pharmaceutical Harms needs to come to an end.
What one must realize: if one has poison injected into oneself, that poison is in the body working its black magic until it is removed. Just because adverse effects are not felt or realized does not mean one is not poisoned. Oh, and I do not accept Pfizer's numbers. And nobody should. It is a joke that they are discussed whatsoever. Yes, because Pfizer admits to these numbers, we can agree that AT A MINIMUM we can expect "1 in 200 mothers to have a serious adverse event , 1 in 250 to have a severe adverse event (the difference between serious and severe is unknown) and 1 in 500 to have a life-threatening event". Needless to say, Pfizer would never admit to these lower limits if not provably true, but they will never admit that 100% of the people they helped poison are poisoned until further action or notice. It is, as they say, what it is.
Never believe their numbers!
Look who owns the patent
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170298101A1/en
Also Gates foundation UK operation Pirbright Institute has their hands in this and other world weaponry:
https://patents.justia.com/assignee/pirbright-institute
THANK YOU!!! The patent he shows us for the antigen (the F protein) is from HHS, and a patnet owner, Barney Graham, one of Fauci's boys, heads the NIAID Vaccine Research Center.
Barney, like Baric, is a great indicator to watch for the next moves. Baric is heavy in the Dengue world now. I'm linking Barney's patents/grants from newest to oldest. What do you anticipate they are preparing with bringing back mumps and measles?
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/barney-graham
Self-assembling inset ferritin nanoparticles to present antigens? And be magnetic? Defund the NIH. Lock up Fauci till he squeals about what his team has really been doing.
They have to be careful about loosing mumps or measles on the population, as it could be the death knell of the vaccine program, when it turns out that most of the cases are fully vaccinated.
.
If You Are Vaccinated
It Is Too Bad That You
Hate Speech.
Because As We Have Been Saying
All Along
“Boy Does That Vaccine Hate You”
.
That poem is unavoidably unsafe.
"...thoroughly, irreversibly, personally...genetically."
I’d like to know what the “placebo” was. These criminals are using something other than saline for “placebo”
I agree! What exactly was given to the placebo group? Their numbers seem to nearly mimic the vax group. In some cases we’re told the same vax adjuvant was used in the placebo group.
sorry just seen this. asking exactly the same...
The scale of the Y axis is also geared toward minimizing the visibility of impact. Very deceiving.
Thanks for bring these worrisome facts to my attention.
For what its worth, i plan to write the FDA and serve them notice that they are not operating in the dark.
After the vaccine crime, let them know we are watching.
I recommend anyone who has the time to do the same.
I cant imagine how these people put their head on their pillow and fall asleep.
Steveb
I sincerely admire your earnestness and crusading spirit. But you might want to use a pen name, a false return address, gloves when handling the paper and stamp, and the most generic paper widely available. And wear a disguise when you drop the letter in a (video-monitored) mailbox.
Thank-you, for sharing. It is important for the public to see the risks with all the medicines and drugs they are talking. It is becoming clearer that the science is profits.
And still to this day, every day, TV ads are aired by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists urging pregnant women to get the Covid19 MRNA injections. I’m beyond disgusted by it all.
We just moved to Elizabethtown Ky, and there’s a billboard that says “ if you love your neighbor get vaccinated. “ Obviously not what JESUS meant when HE said it.
Exactly. One more strategy of propaganda, preying of peoples’ kindness. So immoral.
How many serious/severe/life threatening AEs occur in babies per one baby life saved from RSV? How many serious/severe/life threatening AEs occur in the mothers per one baby life saved?
Nothing Pfizer makes can save even one life..
And since those mothers may have children already, imagine the exponential motherless children/families that would leave.
🎯No victim class is too young for democide. The financial realm sees this as "portfolio diversification".
Maximum loss at minimum cost.
(Theoretically) saved.
I dug around in the links and pulled out some numbers for one of the primary endpoints (severe, 180 days). See other post.
Disgusting. Absolutely, disgusting. 😣
Hi Meryl. Do you know if there was a true placebo controlled group to compare this group to?
I do not recall the placebo being mentioned, so no.
Why am I not surprised? Thanks for the response.
I searched the NEJM pager and the supplement. It uses "placebo" everywhere. I used the PDF search which found the hits and I skimmed a few places, but found no obvious definition of what they used for placebo.
Probably an adjuvant or the solution with all other ingredients except for the RSV. Funny how they get away with calling toxic and reactive substances placebos when they are the exact opposite!