To my knowledge, the FDA no longer has to approve individual ingredients for vaccines but only the final product or mixture. In this case, they have authorized and approved vaccines containing SM102.
In my humble opinion, the better issue is the lack of informed consent because recipients have not been told the true risks and benefits tha…
To my knowledge, the FDA no longer has to approve individual ingredients for vaccines but only the final product or mixture. In this case, they have authorized and approved vaccines containing SM102.
In my humble opinion, the better issue is the lack of informed consent because recipients have not been told the true risks and benefits that are well-known at this point. They have also not been told the alternative products, nor the medical consequences of refusing
Thank you, interesting to note that someone had noticed that Cayman chemical updated there website on SM101 and removed the information on it being a possible carcinogenic although there was no clear case as to what had changed in the product.
To my knowledge, the FDA no longer has to approve individual ingredients for vaccines but only the final product or mixture. In this case, they have authorized and approved vaccines containing SM102.
In my humble opinion, the better issue is the lack of informed consent because recipients have not been told the true risks and benefits that are well-known at this point. They have also not been told the alternative products, nor the medical consequences of refusing
Thank you, interesting to note that someone had noticed that Cayman chemical updated there website on SM101 and removed the information on it being a possible carcinogenic although there was no clear case as to what had changed in the product.