Of course I could be completely wrong, but it sounds to me like the NIH capitulated because the plaintiffs' aren't asking for the right documents, the most damning documents, and the release of the documents the plaintiffs' are asking for, upon NIH's review, were determined will do little or no harm to "vaccine" devotion, etc. It appears there's something the plaintiffs' aren't seeing and/or are missing.
But, needless to say, the NIH is going to withhold whatever they can get away with withholding, including the most damning evidence against them. So, at minimum, this is a whitewash and a transparent attempt on the part of the government to make themselves look "fair and reasonable"; when, in-truth, they are anything but. If there is something being hidden that the plaintiffs' failed to FOIA request, I hope they figure out what it is and re-petition the court to have it provided to them.
While this is good news, it’s also incomprehensible that the judge would grant NIH their request for a one month extension for the release of information—which is available for release, instantly. And still, no mention of any internal investigations of the NIH. And nobody’s being fired or brought up on charges. And no mention or recommendation to create independent Nuremberg-style courts and investigative offices to examine & secure evidence, then begin hearings & trials of the entire Justice & State Department, FBI, CDC, FDA, all the Senators, the AG, the President and all of their Security Briefers—just to get started, which is absolutely necessary to open up this can of shit under full sunlight. The public deserves better, expedited action at this point, and is legally entitled to it. Instead, it’s moving and functioning exactly like the 9/11 sweep & clean investigations. Stonewalling doesn’t come close to describing this intentionally-slow, inadequate process.
I think the tide is turning. I’ve made it a habit of mine to let random people know I’m a healthcare professional who got laid off due to the Vax mandate (when I can work it into the convo, of course) and strangers are staring to respond differently. Before they would just stare at me, doe eyed, but now they are like “yeah, my so and so got sick after the vax” or “my clients are coming in in wheelchairs”. I’m not happy to hear this devastating news, it truly saddens me, but it signals this is becoming common knowledge. Lawsuits like these are necessary to keep people talking.
I hate to be cynical, but the chances of them, revealing all the emails is slim to none and slim is out of town
Probably burn the good stuff and hand over the rest....
Thank you CHD!
I wonder how badly they will redact the information forwarded and how many of the really bad documents will be destroyed???
Of course I could be completely wrong, but it sounds to me like the NIH capitulated because the plaintiffs' aren't asking for the right documents, the most damning documents, and the release of the documents the plaintiffs' are asking for, upon NIH's review, were determined will do little or no harm to "vaccine" devotion, etc. It appears there's something the plaintiffs' aren't seeing and/or are missing.
But, needless to say, the NIH is going to withhold whatever they can get away with withholding, including the most damning evidence against them. So, at minimum, this is a whitewash and a transparent attempt on the part of the government to make themselves look "fair and reasonable"; when, in-truth, they are anything but. If there is something being hidden that the plaintiffs' failed to FOIA request, I hope they figure out what it is and re-petition the court to have it provided to them.
I meant hope not home. Autoincorrect.
Perhaps a little justice can prevail
Afraid of a Court battle they could lose?
I do not believe we can trust anything coming out of the NIH. Their reports with be altered, no doubt.
Great news! Now let's home that its not 90% "redacted" for BS reasons.
Good news!
The Judge gave them more time after all this time, there's your answer, no chance.
I agree with even the seemingly contradictory comments..yes the corruption of the agencies
paid to protect our rights may 'win' all the noticeable and superficial 'battles' but no one
benefits if we open our arms to that. Sometimes standing on principle and standing firm
has long range benefits.
Redacted
While this is good news, it’s also incomprehensible that the judge would grant NIH their request for a one month extension for the release of information—which is available for release, instantly. And still, no mention of any internal investigations of the NIH. And nobody’s being fired or brought up on charges. And no mention or recommendation to create independent Nuremberg-style courts and investigative offices to examine & secure evidence, then begin hearings & trials of the entire Justice & State Department, FBI, CDC, FDA, all the Senators, the AG, the President and all of their Security Briefers—just to get started, which is absolutely necessary to open up this can of shit under full sunlight. The public deserves better, expedited action at this point, and is legally entitled to it. Instead, it’s moving and functioning exactly like the 9/11 sweep & clean investigations. Stonewalling doesn’t come close to describing this intentionally-slow, inadequate process.
I think the tide is turning. I’ve made it a habit of mine to let random people know I’m a healthcare professional who got laid off due to the Vax mandate (when I can work it into the convo, of course) and strangers are staring to respond differently. Before they would just stare at me, doe eyed, but now they are like “yeah, my so and so got sick after the vax” or “my clients are coming in in wheelchairs”. I’m not happy to hear this devastating news, it truly saddens me, but it signals this is becoming common knowledge. Lawsuits like these are necessary to keep people talking.