WHO has the right to choose: who can live, who must die, who is allowed to reproduce, what size family they can have, who can love, what food someone can grow, what medication they must take, what shots they must take, the length of someone's life?
I would hope that the readers that were unfamiliar with the Kissinger Report and the organizations involved in its global implementation would find the actions of our government and others very disturbing. Instead many of these comments are attacking the author. It really doesn't matter who is presenting this info - it has been documented. So if you believe that these programs don't affect you - they do and they continue today and rest assure they are planning for our future, which could be very short. If more folks had been aware of this evil, and those that were aware stood up - perhaps we would not be in the mess we are today. I guess it is easy to be in favor of population reduction - so long as its happening far away, you don't know the victims, your ignorant of the methods, you don't have to watch, and it doesn't involve you or your loved ones.
Right, Jewell. I had to look at the dates of these comments and make sure I was still on the same article. How could they not know about these things by now? They should also research the slander against the good doctor Malone to see why he's suing. He's done nothing but inform us and from where I sit, it's been all legit. They're angry at the wrong people.
He sounds like a righteous dude in this case. There are many people in the World who are not saints but aren't demons either. Right now we have to worry about the demons, because they are running the show.
The very unpleasant topic of Depop, and the role of the Department of Defense in Operation Warp Speed, has been building little by little in discussions elsewhere (on various other stacks) for a long time now. But by now the voices saying it is Depop have gotten loud enough that 🐴 cannot afford to ignore the topic any longer while *maintaining his media status as omnipresent Thought Leader.* Therefore, I think this is why his staff, who i presume produces his substack product, is trotting out this Depop discussion now. P.S. His actions namely suing the Breggins ... and i think also Dr. Jane Ruby (?) ... for $25 million convinced me that 🐴 = wolf.
*edit - changed
"maintaining credibility as a Thought Leader"
to
"maintaining his media status as omnipresent Thought Leader"
Yes I agree. I like your logo! The gang who are responsible for the creation of gene edited jabs have over the years used private jets to attend various meetings. I'm a pilot and though I have never flown these creeps I do know a few who have and have been a "fly on the wall" and will soon retire. Once they retire they plan to expose the trojan horses. It's amazing what people will say at 30,000 with a few drinks. They are liars and he's controlled opposition. Discernment will always open our minds and point us towards the truth. I know many will defend Malone but know beyond any doubt what he and others have said at 30,000 feet and one of the pilots maintains a cabin flight recorder.
Yes I have read and listened. Malone, is on record as having had direct association with the patent for the gene jab. He has refused to answer important questions and is taken a number of MD's and researches to court who question him. He's a wolf!
First, an "association with a patent for the gene jab?" Uh no. I'm a patent attorney. You're not understanding how it works. He is not associated with "the" Covid vaccine patent.
Second, the right to sue others is part of our legal system. Both the Malones and the Breggins knew that as they went back and forth with each other. The Breggins could have stopped publishing criticisms of Malone after he asked, but they chose not to. I'm sure Malone had a part in the problems, as well, and he could have stopped the lawsuit, but he, also, made his choices. Bringing a lawsuit does not a bad person make. The Malones and the Breggins. They can settle if they want to.
***There are 2 places you never want to be: one is a Hospital, and the other is a Courtroom. If you find yourself in either place, YOU'VE ALREADY LOST. The question is only HOW MUCH? ***
The lawsuit seems imo more like a strategy by 🐴 to
(1) hurt financially the people who dared to question his narratives,
(2) shut down other voices that disagree with him by making them also afraid of him,
(3) get even more attention and time in the spotlight for himself, and
(4) to warn everyone else: Don't you dare question me or you too might get slapped with a high-dollar lawsuit, which even if you win in the end, you still lose.
IMO it may have been intended by 🐴 to cause questioning voices to self-censor. And throughout history, those who cause censorship are NEVER the "good guys."
I hear you. But I think whether he chooses to sue someone is significant, but a personal choice. We don't know the complete situation. Personally, I think Robert just couldn't stand the public allegations/accusations any longer. Someone like Trump wouldn't care, but I think Robert just didn't know what else to do. I'm not saying the Breggins' comments were wring. I don't really know.
What I think is important is that we him the benefit of the doubt because of what he is writing and saying now (last Sup. Ct. Speech) about the harms and depopulation that our government is doing. No one working for the CIA or government vaccine-connected groups is going to dare say that.
Another reason I changed my mind about Robert is that Pierre Kory, Paul Merrick, Simone Gold, Dr. Nass and really several other doctors we regard highly think very highly of him and the work he is doing to help the Medical Freedom cause. I don't think they would all be wrong. So, I am trusting them that Robert, is working to helping our medical freedom cause. So, he gets my benefit of the doubt. I don't think it's helpful for people to keep saying Robert this, or Robert that, whenever they become aware that someone believes Omani supports him.
You seem to have a very trusting nature in assuming 🐴 is not CIA himself.
🐴 may well imo be CIA who is now letting the DePop cat out of the bag becuz all of the many Died Suddenlies, the many Drowned Suddenlies, the many Died-While-Asleeps, and the many Single-Car Crashes (Vaxxidents) can no longer be ignored. 🐱
So now the Overton Window (of what is acceptable discussion) changes yet again. Then two years from now even "normies" will be acknowledging DePop. 🐱
Hope i'm wrong but, like the commenter opines in the link below, i'm "[t}aking bets on the next big reveal from the Marlboro Man. I got 10:1 on 5G, 12:1 on graphene oxide and a long shot at 20:1 on self assembling nanobots."
Dr. Malone will go down as one of the great heroic figures of our time. That someone of his immense calibre is willing to bring this most important and taboo issue to light is of profound significance and an act of immense courage & integrity. I am sure Bobby will eventually be talking about this as well and the collective fallout may be just the lightning rod we need to really start waking people up en masse. May God protect Dr. Malone and all those who have taken up the banner of truth at their own cost and peril for the sake of the rest of us.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once said "all I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen". In much the same way while I cannot answer your question and I know very little about said lawsuit, everything I've witnessed from Dr. Malone-- combined with the ingetrity and character of people like Meryl Nass who vouch for him-- has left me entirely confident that whatever is going on is probably more fallout from the sinister and malignant forces that we're all up against and that have been trying to bring him down ever since he stood up and started speaking out. In a world where so many people and so many institutions have let me down I think it's worth a pause and bit of reflection before we start turning on those courageous few who have put everything on the line and endured great personal sacrifices to bring us the truth.
Malone is literally from the deep state and he helped create these nightmare vaccines without much remorse for what has been unleashed on humanity. I don't see how people can trust someone that is attacking the Breggins and Dr. Jane Ruby for $25 million in an obvious effort to silence them. Dr. Peter Breggin has saved countless of lives by shining the light on the psychiatric industry and by stopping the barbaric practice of lobotomies. What he has done for humanity is immeasure and now him and his wife are being attacked because they are questioning Malone's history and background.
Here is what I wrote to someone else about the Malone situation.
Jennifer Jones
2 min ago
I hear you. But I think whether he chooses to sue someone is significant, but a personal choice. We don't know the complete situation. Personally, I think Robert just couldn't stand the public allegations/accusations any longer. Someone like Trump wouldn't care, but I think Robert just didn't know what else to do. I'm not saying the Breggins' comments were wring. I don't really know.
What I think is important is that we him the benefit of the doubt because of what he is writing and saying now (last Sup. Ct. Speech) about the harms and depopulation that our government is doing. No one working for the CIA or government vaccine-connected groups is going to dare say that.
Another reason I changed my mind about Robert is that Pierre Kory, Paul Merrick, Simone Gold, Dr. Nass and really several other doctors we regard highly think very highly of him and the work he is doing to help the Medical Freedom cause. I don't think they would all be wrong. So, I am trusting them that Robert, is working to helping our medical freedom cause. So, he gets my benefit of the doubt. I don't think it's helpful for people to keep saying Robert this, or Robert that, whenever they become aware that someone believes Omani supports him.
It is significant, but the question is, what is the true significance of it? Many of us know the complete situation and you can too by looking at both sides. Here is just one of the latest articles from the Breggins that is critical of Malone's recent speech about 5th generation warfare: https://www.americaoutloud.news/malone-becomes-a-fifth-generation-warrior-but-who-is-the-enemy/
Who else in the health freedom movement is suing others in the same movement? Why doesn't he utilize all of this time and effort to go after the true enemies instead of a couple in their 80's that have been on the forefront of the health freedom movement for decades? Malone is causing a lot more division in this movement than many people are able to recognize and it's important to call it out.
Actually, I think people who keep going on and on, and on, about this on a Substack that is not their own, after they've already told people what they think once or twice, are being vindictive. I don't care how old someone is. I image both the Breggins and Robert have attorneys who explain it all to them. I was an attorney. Ya gotta let people solve their problems their way. Both sides of the lawsuit have options to resolve it/settle it, so know that.
I think we should concentrate our attention and energy on our Medical Freedom Movement. There is so much to be done and we only have so much energy that we can give.
Yes, and it is worse than described by the Kissinger report.
Although perhaps not as bad as the Georgia Guidestones either.
Apex predators, on this planet that is us, typically grow in numbers and density until the environment can no longer support them.
There are countless bacterial models showing this trend.
Growth phase, stagnation, die off.
In order to maintain control of the planet and ensure the continued survival of our species for generations to come. A system must be engineered in order to reduce the population, whilst concurrently, better controlling the systems and resources that allows the population to survive. Food, energy, shelter, clothing, water and all the components that go into renewing those resources indefinitely.
Because our current systems are incredibly inefficient, monopolies exist, artificial supply and demand, middle men for middle men and these systems are wasteful.
The whole Great Reset (literally in the name) is aimed towards making more efficient systems whilst reducing the consumption by eliminating those "useless eaters"
You see, eugenics hasn't entirely gone away.
It has just changed forms.
The social credit systems being introduced will encourage and reward those who behave. Whilst condemning those who do not.
The cull is not going to happen quickly, but over the remainder of the century.
There will be both an increase of "natural deaths" and a decrease in births.
Complicated further by famines and war.
Those famines and war are in essence, not just to destroy human life, but to destroy industry whilst concurrently using the laws of the jungle... Survival of the fittest... Survival of the most adaptable... Survival of those with the highest social credit scores.
Leaving us and our world with less mouths to feed, asses to wipe, more efficient systems and a more adept/skilled population.
And they see this as the greater good.
Because, if 5 billion are to suffer now, that is better than the cumulative effect of many more billions suffering for many generations to come until our eventual natural collapse where nobody, even the super rich, will be immune and capable of survival.
I am not suggesting I agree with their logic. But there it is.
They are doing this now because it is in their eyes, less evil than the consequences of not.
It's all nonsense. They don't have a clue. The latest and most accurate assessment of World population is it will peak @ 9.6B in 2064 and then fall to 8.9B in 2100. That is not a problem. We can easily sustain that population with a high standard of living essentially forever.
Food is a limiting factor and Bangladesh even has not exceeded that limiting factor with a population density of 1141/sq.km. USA with 35/sq.km. Canada with 4/sq.km.
In Netherlands they farm up to 7m below sea level and are a wealthy country. They are the #2 agricultural exporter in the World @ $94B vs #1 USA @$150B. While Holland is #69 in population & #131 by area and not even a warm or sunny environment. With a population density of 520/sq.km.
And Japan supplies 70% of their food on 13% of their land mass, with 157m people on a small resource poor island and very high living standard. With a population density of 330/sq.km.
The only resource you really need is energy. Everything else can be recycled. With even nuclear fission energy, just the resource on the surface of the Earth's land area would power our civilization for a 100Myrs. And then there is the Moon, Mars & the Asteroids. Fusion is quite achievable, in fact we could do it right now if we had to. So abundance is the reality, which is why the Malthusian overlords do their damnedest to stifle unlimited nuclear energy.
Nonsense, you are making arm-waving arguments. Agricultural yields have been increasing dramatically in the past 50yrs and continue to do so. In China now they farm under poly tarps and use like 10% of the water, and get much higher yields. And they are doing massive irrigation trenches from the wet south to the dry north. Irrigation is opening up farming to otherwise to dry regions all over the World. With increased CO2 causing increased crop yields.
Paul Ehrlich ignores abundance again. From 1980 to 2020, global population increased 75.8 percent while global food abundance increased by 665.1 percent.
Even still we waste large amounts of farmland on idiotic, energy-negative agrofuels. Over 40% of the US corn crop. We can quit that right now and REDUCE fossil consumption.
Food Loves More C02. Since 1940, increased CO2 has increased corn yields 10 percent, soybean yields 30 percent, and wheat yields 40 percent.
"...Greenhouses have been built and produce crops in the hottest deserts now. They have climate and humidity control. They use 7% of the water to grow crops compared to open-air farming.
Climate Change is something to be minimized. However, climate change only impact open-air farming. All food production can be brought indoors where it will be virtually immune to climate change.
China is planning to have over 2 million hectares of greenhouse buildings by 2025 with mechanized-automation of farming. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Monday issued a guideline to promote the country’s facility-based agricultural planting, outlining goals for infrastructure upgrades and mechanization to boost output and farmers’ income. By 2025, China will maintain over 2 million hectares of facilities, including plastic greenhouses, and achieve above 50 percent mechanization for facility-based planting, a sector of the so-called controlled-environment agriculture (CEA), or protected agriculture.
The world already has about 500,000 hectares of climate-controlled greenhouses. China has 4 million hectares of crude plastic sheeting covering land in partially enclosed conditions. The plastic sheets lie over simple metal poles and crude framing.
China’s newer greenhouses maintain optimal growing conditions throughout the development of crops, and optimizes the use of resources such as water, energy, space, capital and labor. Production takes place within an enclosed structure, such as a greenhouse or building.
Robotic greenhouse buildings can be up to 30 times more productive than the same area of regular farmland.
China under non-emergency conditions will build climate-controlled greenhouses to replace 10% of open-air farm production every year. If needed it would take ten years or much less to bring all agricultural production globally into climate-controlled conditions that use 7% of the water.
Doomer scenarios about billions forced to move because of widescale farm and water problems or collapsing megacities are a bunch of crap.
Pure Harvest is a startup that built a one-hectare facility in the Abu Dhabi desert in 2018. The warehouse has since been producing around two tons of tomatoes a day, which are retailing for around $2 (8 dirhams) for 300 grams..."
Are We Running Out? Not. From 1980 to 2020, every one percent increase in population corresponded to a four percent increase in personal resource abundance and an eight percent increase in global resource abundance.
I am talking about local environments, soil nutrients, water, microbiomes and toxins in the environment.
In the places where food is grown.
We can increase yields, but only at the expense of using more energy, having more moving pieces in the supply chain, having more maintenance on those moving pieces.
Entropy for a lack of a better word, is omnipresent.
Once upon a time we had to do it all by hand and beasts. Then came the industrial revolution and new tools, machines, vehicles, irrigation systems, pesticides and fertilizers.
Production increased exponentially.
But the total energy, to get the steel, the rubber, the fuels, to make the chemicals and to build and maintain those machines and tools.
To get the workers to where they need to be to maintain those tools and machines.
To replace parts.
To extract the fertilizers. To distribute it where it needs to go.
The sum of all the moving parts in the supply chain is always going to be greater and use more energy in the big picture.
So yes production and yield increases.
And what used to take 100 farm hands now seems to only take 10 or so.
Actually employs 1000, but the other 990 are just not being seen they don't work on the farm. They make up the total of all the other moving pieces.
And it is, actually less efficient.
Great for making money though.
We can produce more, faster, but only for a short term. We can sprint, but not forever and not indefinitely.
Affordability crisis in an increasingly complex society relying on access to credit in the debt based economy and hoping for the next supply of cheap, on demand portable energy of the correct types to run all the facets of modern industrial civilization. Real economy vs. Financial economy.
Entropy has nothing to do with it. And energy consumption is going down in Western nations. We are wasting large amounts of energy on idiotic scams like wind, solar, hydrogen, agrofuels, ITER, CCS, utility battery storage. And idiotic wars like the Ukraine war. And overinflated military. If we switched to Nuclear Energy we would increase the Energy Return on Invested by 40X or more. Obviously we can't supply a growing population forever but as long as we achieve zero population growth, as we are (and even less than zero) there will be no problem except for Malthusian Psychopath Parasites who are deliberately destroying our Food & Energy supplies.
Superabundance: The Age of Plenty | Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley | #284
"...After analyzing the prices of hundreds of commodities, goods, and services spanning two centuries, Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley found that resources became more abundant as the population grew. That was especially true when they looked at “time prices,” which represent the length of time that people must work to buy something.
To their surprise, the authors also found that resource abundance increased faster than the population―a relationship that they call “superabundance.” On average, every additional human being created more value than he or she consumed. This relationship between population growth and abundance is deeply counterintuitive, yet it is true.
Thus they desire a "Great Reset" and to remove those inefficiencies.
But to do that, they want to break the current system to rebuild it from the ashes.
It's easier to tear an old building down and start anew than to remodel the existing.
And perhaps nuclear energy is their solution.
I don't really know if it is. What about the spent materials?
I am fairly sure their goal is to have planetary homeostasis, a world where renewables (like crops, or the breakdown of toxins in the soil and water) renews as fast as the energy is consumed and the environment spoiled.
A balance with nature of sorts.
A symbiotic relationship with the planet.
The easiest way to do this is to destroy the current systems, reduce the mouths to feed, consumers to consumer and to start anew.
Thus, depopulation agenda. Social credit systems. Environmental climate change narratives. Economic crisis. Wars. And so on an so on.
Climate change us governed by the God who created it. Nothing will ever change that. Man (in ANOTHER way to deny God and their ability to ascend to god (hmmm....where have I heard that before?) worships the creation rather than the Creator.
"Fusion is quite achievable, in fact we could do it right now if we had to."
Fusion would solve a lot of problems which is precisely why it will never happen. Those in control don't want a cheap source of abundant energy. My guess is that fusion has already happened successfully and those who achieved it were killed because you just can't upset big oil, big climate change and the government like that and live to tell about it.
There is a lot more money and power to be made by "green energy" scams than there is to be made from actually solving the problem. It is exactly like big pharma's relationship to any number of illnesses. If cancer was cured, big pharma would go extinct and they know it so they will never allow that to happen.
Hell, they won't even solve something as simple as high blood pressure because fixing it is detrimental to long term profitability.
Fusion was proceeding at a linear steady pace. Between 1970 & 1997 fusion power produced in experimental Tokamaks grew a trillionX. Steady progress. Then some major power (now who would that be?) decided the way to go is an International Cooperative giant effort to make a giganormous Tokamak in one country, instead of spirited competition between nations. The pinnacle of bureaucratic boondoggles. They spent 5yrs arguing about where to build it. $65B cost estimate now. Might finally start making plasma in 2025, maybe. And it was already obsolete from the first shovelful of dirt to build it.
Giant improvements in superconductors meant much smaller magnets could be used and much smaller, practical $million scale Tokamaks that will outperform the giant boondoggle, which is now all screwed up, because the myriad of international contractors manufactured components out of spec and they don't fit together properly. And other practical fusion methods like LPP Focus Fusion, General Fusion, Commercial Fusion Systems, Polywell fusion, Helion energy, Zap energy, Tokamak Energy, First Light Fusion, ARC fusion, TAE technologies, Lockheed Compact fusion, Tri-Alpha Energy are being build with trivial levels of funding compared to Wind, Solar/H2/Battery subsidies & ITER.
"ITER Is a Suicidal Plan That Would Discredit Nuclear Fusion, Scientist Says, Again, Ernesto Mazzucato"
"...A retired plasma physicist has given New Energy Times permission to republish critical letters he wrote about the ITER fusion reactor project many years ago. He has done this despite risks associated with publicly criticizing the international project.
Ernesto Mazzucato spent his entire career — from 1965 to 2014 — working at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory. Mazzucato continues to work on his own fusion concepts.
He told us about pressure from some of his peers from 1996 to 2006 when he openly criticized the ITER project, but he asked us to withhold those details for fear that it would interfere with his present access to resources and the ability to publish in peer-reviewed journals.
Mazzucato is the second retired fusion physicist from the Princeton laboratory with whom New Energy Times has spoken who is critical of ITER. The first was Mazzucato’s colleague, Daniel Jassby, who has been publishing critical articles about ITER on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Web site.
Jassby was the first scientist to provide New Energy Times with clear values for the ITER reactor power requirements, following our attempts to obtain this information directly from the ITER organization.
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that he “suffered dearly” shortly after Science magazine published his first critical comments in 1996.
“I knew that speaking out was risky, but I had to say what was on my mind,” Mazzucato said. “I thought that ITER would ruin fusion, and I had spent all my life working on fusion. ITER was the wrong track.”
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that, decades earlier, at the beginning of the discussions about the ITER concept, the conversation was purely about physics. The conversation soon shifted to the bait-and-switch scheme, as Nobel laureate Masatoshi Koshiba called it.
“The scientists were not talking about power production,” Mazzucato said, “but then slowly, the bureaucrats were put in charge of this project, and they started talking about a power gain, that ITER would produce 10 times more power than it would use.
“But none of the scientists said anything. We all knew that the power values only applied to the particles, not the overall reactor.”
These are the three letters Mazzucato provided: ..."
So as you would expect, once the ITER boondoggle started fusion progress has stalled from 1997 to present.
It tells all --that they do not believe in God the creator of the Universe. Instead they have placed themselves on the pedestal to be the world’s Gods. It is quite evil. God made it all, and God would handle it all in His own natural way. But No---these demons got together and decided to kill human beings created by God, and decided to make it “their” world. Yep, Satan is at work.....I believe that these people have become demon narcissist, and I will not be seeing them in Heaven. God will be casting them into the lake of fire
Even though it was not difficult to arrive at the conclusion more than 2 years ago that depopulation was on the agenda, it is still chilling to see documented evidence of that intent dating back many years. And the confusing, contradictory and divisive assertions of polarized reality we've lived with since 2020 - a "narrative" world vs a critical thinker world - only make sense when viewed in the context of a depopulation agenda. THAT explains the continual and relentless pushing of a dangerous pathological gene therapy despite obvious and appalling harms, and it explains the denial and indifference to those harms on the part of the powers that be. They are playing God and committing crimes against humanity in doing so.
Indeed, Rockefeller cousin and CFR member and Wall Street lawyer, Allen Dulles created CIA, his brother John Foster Dulles was up to his neck in the deep state swamp.
The Bankster Overlords are Parasites and like most entitled parasites they embrace Malthusianism because it gives them an opportunity to virtue signal and convince themselves they have some worth in this world. They don't.
What is notable about these WEF/Bankster paid propagandists is it's very hard to impossible to get them to debate their wacky plans with an opponent. I would love to see these dimwits sit down to a debate with Shellenberger, Lomborg, Koonin, Moore or Tupy & Pooley below. They would get beat up bad. At the very least these WEF birdbrains should watch this video:
Degrowth is just another effort by the Malthusian Psychopath Tyrants to impose their Scarcity Agenda down our throats. "You will own nothing" = "We will own everything and you will rent everything you want off of us for the price we dictate and only if we deem you a good citizen".
Curious fact. Why are DeGrowthers so vehemently opposed to Nuclear power? Energy is the one and only essential resource. If you have plentiful energy there is always workarounds for every other resource. And even with nuclear fission, just the uranium & thorium on the Earth's accessible land mass is enough to power our civilization for a 100Myrs. And that is with negligible pollution and negligible resource usage. And include deuterium supply and we can power a much, much larger civilization until the Sun eats the Earth. You would think DeGrowthers would be all onboard with Nuclear Power. But the opposite is true, they are big on "Renewables" by which they mean wind & solar.
Supporting wind & solar and in the same breath expounding "Efficiency". What hypocrisy. Do these idiots realize that Wind & Solar are the pinnacles of Inefficiency? 20X the material inputs. Terrible EROI (Energy Return On Invested), even below unity in many instances. Even far more materials when you include the need for long distance transmission and battery storage, more like 60X the material inputs. 300X the land area destroyed - that's inefficiency. That same land destroyed could produce large amounts of food. The need to have an entire parallel fossil/nuclear/hydro grid for when the wind & solar craps out. Overbuild and Curtailment waste - that's inefficiency. Hydrogen production for storage & fuel with efficiencies as low as 15%. These DeGrowthers are lunatics. Or do they have an alternative agenda = Malthusianism, Misanthropy and a Techno-Feudal Totalitarian World Government. See how badly they get beaten up here:
Superabundance: The Age of Plenty | Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley | #284
"...Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley are co-authors of the new book, “Super Abundance”. They sit down with Dr Jordan B Peterson to discuss their studies into overpopulation, the myths surrounding the subject, and how academia has created a new philosophy that demonizes modern man simply for existing.
Marian Tupy is the co-author of “Super Abundance”, as well as “10 Global Trends Every Smart Person Should Know” and “The Simon Abundance Index”. He is the current editor of humanprogress.org, and is a senior fellow at the center for global liberty and prosperity.
Gale Pooley is the co-author of “Super Abundance,” and is also an Associate Professor of business management at Brigham Young University in Hawaii. He has taught economics all over the world, and earned his PHD from the University of Idaho. He is also well known for his role in the development of the Simon Abundance Index...'
Superabundance: The Story of Population Growth, Innovation, and Human Flourishing on an Infinitely Bountiful Planet Hardcover – Aug. 31 2022
by Marian L. Tupy (Author), Gale L. Pooley (Author), & 1 more
"...After analyzing the prices of hundreds of commodities, goods, and services spanning two centuries, Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley found that resources became more abundant as the population grew. That was especially true when they looked at “time prices,” which represent the length of time that people must work to buy something.
To their surprise, the authors also found that resource abundance increased faster than the population―a relationship that they call “superabundance.” On average, every additional human being created more value than he or she consumed. This relationship between population growth and abundance is deeply counterintuitive, yet it is true.
Why? More people produce more ideas, which lead to more inventions. People then test those inventions in the marketplace to separate the useful from the useless. At the end of that process of discovery, people are left with innovations that overcome shortages, spur economic growth, and raise standards of living.
But large populations are not enough to sustain superabundance―just think of the poverty in China and India before their respective economic reforms. To innovate, people must be allowed to think, speak, publish, associate, and disagree. They must be allowed to save, invest, trade, and profit. In a word, they must be free...."
Can we keep this running with Sovereign currencies? I've seen this argument pretty much point by point articulated on the surplus energy forums in response to straight forward data on a pending affordability crisis ie the answer is always abundance, abiotic oil, suppressed energy, next discovery of fusion, space solar and scaling up nuclear etc.
Should be no problem. The physical economy is what counts, the Bankster financial fake economy we can do without. We don't need Banksters either, they are just Parasites, produce nothing, good for nothing, but demand the lion's share of World Resources just because of who they are. We could replace the entire Bankster elites with an A.I., after all in the end all they are is glorified accountants, and they should all be making an accountants wage. Not $trillions.
There is contradiction. If Kissinger et al pushed global depopulation so that the United States would benefit (not having to support undeveloped countries whilst plundering their resources), why is the United States government trying to depopulate the United States? Why are the globalists transferring 3rd world populations (unvaccinated) to the US and other western nations where they will reproduce and flourish vs living in mud huts?
I do not read Malone very closely these days even though much of what he writes is very important. I downloaded NSSM 200 a couple decades ago and one can hear an excellent analsyis of it and related programs from many sources, e.g. Global Vax Campaigns Or GENOCIDE?! Dr. David Ayoub On NSSM 200 Govt Depopulation Policy (2005)
I want to point out briefly some of the oddities of the COVAX debacle and related issues that make sense of their role in facilitating the greater agenda of depopulation. Here are just a few of the top oddities off what’s left of the top of my head. Yes, of course, most of the players who implement the plan are motivated by nothing deeper than greed or careerism but they have been steered in the right direction.
1) I refer anyone worried about Global Warming to the YouTube Heartland Institute channel that has exposed the fiction of global warming. The purpose of the Global Warming now Global Boiling fiction is to justify transition to alternative energy sources incapable of sustaining most of the earth’s population. Mass deaths by starvation for a good cause. https://www.youtube.com/@HeartlandInstitute Global Warming is as big a fiction as “Safe & Effective.”
2) The introduction of CBDC with its metrics for measuring carbon footprints and controlling the use of the digital currency and the obligations it imposes upon the Central Bank [sic!!] is intended to monitor and control all economic (and derivative) activity. You will be controlled to death for a very good purpose.
3) Both the Craig Pardekooper data showing Big Pharma companies taking turns experimenting with toxicity levels, as well as the decision by Pfizer to replace the mRNA with placebos were designed to encourage trust in mass vaccination so that depopulation can occur as vaccine technology progresses. They they can pick between mass sterilization (Children of Men) or something quicker . “Pfizer Vaccine Batches in the EU Were Placebos, Say Scientists” https://www.globalresearch.ca/pfizer-vaccine-batches-eu-were-placebos-say-scientists/5824154
4) Bill Gates intractable emphasis on vaccines and nothing but vaccines for African health is not some psychological quirk or tic of his in the face of the obvious fact that what Africa needs most of clean water, better sanitation and nutrition. It is his public commitment to a health methodology that best lends itself to sterilization and eugenics.
Meryl, The answer to your ver poinient question as the title of your latest posting is yes, yes, yes.
Your previous posting of jokes was very much appreciated. I have been a jokester for most of my eightl decades on this earth.
While we all need a laugh now and then, however,, it is extremely unfortunate these days the real laugh is on us!
Sorry to be a stick I in the mud but whether we believe it or not, this year will be the hottest day on record and likely the coolest year of our lives.
It's time to rethink the so called "Conspiracy Theorists" and look around the world as we are being affronted from all angles.
We must wake up to these realities or just focus on the old song title, Enjoy Yourself It's Latter Than You Think." Because it really is!
If you want to know the truth of global warming and it's greatest contributer and what we can possible do about it, please go to geoengineeringwatch.org. believe me, I'm not paid for this endorsement. No one will attempt to pull your teeth if you do this, but I'm sure you will be surprised and motivated by the truth.
If you insist that geoengineering is a hoax, so be it and accept an other oldie, "AllI I Have To Do Is Dream." This would probable be more pleasant.
I guess if the geoengineering is real, then it can be undone for them when the rest of us die. Unless they want to cause another Ice Age before it might happen naturally! They aren't following any of the rules they have for us peeps. PS: poignant is the correct spelling not poinient. If it's just a type-o, I apologize.
I don't know what these power-crazy monsters and their mindless minions think. Maybe they somehow believe that they can live indefinitely like royal rats in their luxurious underground abodes. Unfortunately your question is a reason why many people choose to ignore the travesty of geoengineeting even though it has been going on in front of their noses for decades. And this is certainly not a legitimate reason not to at least investigate it. I have personally witnessed this atrocity for the past ten years. My initial basic curiosity caused me to find out about this blatant reality that not many seem to see. My conscience compels me to speak out against it.
This is a great article on Global Research.ca Website called "Climate Change Crime - Depopulation In The Name of Human Rights" by Peter Koenig. It sums it up beautifully.
Thanks Patricia, looks like a very valuable atricle. I need to read it again when I have more time to fully digest it. I certainly agree the the major climate offenders are the planned ones like Geoengineering a d HAARP, but I need to look more into the other aspects of the report. Thanks again, Larry
Yes and Dane's weekly Global Alert New Radio broadcasts will keep them wide open! Recordings of these can be found on home page of geoengineeringwatch.org. But I'm sure that you know this and I'm also sure of my appreciation that you are an ally in this struggle.
In 1947, four German doctors were hanged for failure to provide informed consent. I believe this would be a good attention getter now. Actually, I have in mind a number one candidate in mind.
so what took Malone so long to figure out and come out???? he should be wealthy by now and at retirement age so he has less to lose than if he came out 30 years ago. how is that I have been aware of kissingers nssm for at least 25 years????????????????? what took malone so long??? or another question, what is he really trying to do like maybe save his own ass, his reputation and his ability to make mo' $$$. I don't trust his motives one bit.
and can you tell me what this means:
Dr. Malone would appear to personify the very science we ought to be following.
Appear???
personify???
just what science ought we to follow???
there are many thngs to read in a day, i got bogged down in this report because it lacks any new information.
Malone the Damage Controller is my take on this but what do i know???
i haven't got those kinda credentials and popularity, i aint no celebrity scientist!!!
WHO has the right to choose: who can live, who must die, who is allowed to reproduce, what size family they can have, who can love, what food someone can grow, what medication they must take, what shots they must take, the length of someone's life?
I would hope that the readers that were unfamiliar with the Kissinger Report and the organizations involved in its global implementation would find the actions of our government and others very disturbing. Instead many of these comments are attacking the author. It really doesn't matter who is presenting this info - it has been documented. So if you believe that these programs don't affect you - they do and they continue today and rest assure they are planning for our future, which could be very short. If more folks had been aware of this evil, and those that were aware stood up - perhaps we would not be in the mess we are today. I guess it is easy to be in favor of population reduction - so long as its happening far away, you don't know the victims, your ignorant of the methods, you don't have to watch, and it doesn't involve you or your loved ones.
Right, Jewell. I had to look at the dates of these comments and make sure I was still on the same article. How could they not know about these things by now? They should also research the slander against the good doctor Malone to see why he's suing. He's done nothing but inform us and from where I sit, it's been all legit. They're angry at the wrong people.
I totally believe these mRNA shots for fake diseases are in order to depopulate the world.
Malone is part of it. Malone is part of the problem and being promoted as a patriot. He's a wolf!
He sounds like a righteous dude in this case. There are many people in the World who are not saints but aren't demons either. Right now we have to worry about the demons, because they are running the show.
would be good to hear him speak of spike protein.
https://seemorerocks.is/dr-shankara-chetty-the-covid-spike-protein-is-a-poison-with-an-agenda/
The very unpleasant topic of Depop, and the role of the Department of Defense in Operation Warp Speed, has been building little by little in discussions elsewhere (on various other stacks) for a long time now. But by now the voices saying it is Depop have gotten loud enough that 🐴 cannot afford to ignore the topic any longer while *maintaining his media status as omnipresent Thought Leader.* Therefore, I think this is why his staff, who i presume produces his substack product, is trotting out this Depop discussion now. P.S. His actions namely suing the Breggins ... and i think also Dr. Jane Ruby (?) ... for $25 million convinced me that 🐴 = wolf.
*edit - changed
"maintaining credibility as a Thought Leader"
to
"maintaining his media status as omnipresent Thought Leader"
Yes I agree. I like your logo! The gang who are responsible for the creation of gene edited jabs have over the years used private jets to attend various meetings. I'm a pilot and though I have never flown these creeps I do know a few who have and have been a "fly on the wall" and will soon retire. Once they retire they plan to expose the trojan horses. It's amazing what people will say at 30,000 with a few drinks. They are liars and he's controlled opposition. Discernment will always open our minds and point us towards the truth. I know many will defend Malone but know beyond any doubt what he and others have said at 30,000 feet and one of the pilots maintains a cabin flight recorder.
Have you listened to any of his interviews or read any of his substack? What media puts out vs what he actually says are quite different.
Yes I have read and listened. Malone, is on record as having had direct association with the patent for the gene jab. He has refused to answer important questions and is taken a number of MD's and researches to court who question him. He's a wolf!
First, an "association with a patent for the gene jab?" Uh no. I'm a patent attorney. You're not understanding how it works. He is not associated with "the" Covid vaccine patent.
Second, the right to sue others is part of our legal system. Both the Malones and the Breggins knew that as they went back and forth with each other. The Breggins could have stopped publishing criticisms of Malone after he asked, but they chose not to. I'm sure Malone had a part in the problems, as well, and he could have stopped the lawsuit, but he, also, made his choices. Bringing a lawsuit does not a bad person make. The Malones and the Breggins. They can settle if they want to.
But $25 million?
***There are 2 places you never want to be: one is a Hospital, and the other is a Courtroom. If you find yourself in either place, YOU'VE ALREADY LOST. The question is only HOW MUCH? ***
The lawsuit seems imo more like a strategy by 🐴 to
(1) hurt financially the people who dared to question his narratives,
(2) shut down other voices that disagree with him by making them also afraid of him,
(3) get even more attention and time in the spotlight for himself, and
(4) to warn everyone else: Don't you dare question me or you too might get slapped with a high-dollar lawsuit, which even if you win in the end, you still lose.
IMO it may have been intended by 🐴 to cause questioning voices to self-censor. And throughout history, those who cause censorship are NEVER the "good guys."
I hear you. But I think whether he chooses to sue someone is significant, but a personal choice. We don't know the complete situation. Personally, I think Robert just couldn't stand the public allegations/accusations any longer. Someone like Trump wouldn't care, but I think Robert just didn't know what else to do. I'm not saying the Breggins' comments were wring. I don't really know.
What I think is important is that we him the benefit of the doubt because of what he is writing and saying now (last Sup. Ct. Speech) about the harms and depopulation that our government is doing. No one working for the CIA or government vaccine-connected groups is going to dare say that.
Another reason I changed my mind about Robert is that Pierre Kory, Paul Merrick, Simone Gold, Dr. Nass and really several other doctors we regard highly think very highly of him and the work he is doing to help the Medical Freedom cause. I don't think they would all be wrong. So, I am trusting them that Robert, is working to helping our medical freedom cause. So, he gets my benefit of the doubt. I don't think it's helpful for people to keep saying Robert this, or Robert that, whenever they become aware that someone believes Omani supports him.
You seem to have a very trusting nature in assuming 🐴 is not CIA himself.
🐴 may well imo be CIA who is now letting the DePop cat out of the bag becuz all of the many Died Suddenlies, the many Drowned Suddenlies, the many Died-While-Asleeps, and the many Single-Car Crashes (Vaxxidents) can no longer be ignored. 🐱
So now the Overton Window (of what is acceptable discussion) changes yet again. Then two years from now even "normies" will be acknowledging DePop. 🐱
Hope i'm wrong but, like the commenter opines in the link below, i'm "[t}aking bets on the next big reveal from the Marlboro Man. I got 10:1 on 5G, 12:1 on graphene oxide and a long shot at 20:1 on self assembling nanobots."
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/were-at-war-with-a-virus/comment/21733855
I meant, "or supports."
Please share your evidence.
I don't see that at all.
have another booster mate
Dr. Malone will go down as one of the great heroic figures of our time. That someone of his immense calibre is willing to bring this most important and taboo issue to light is of profound significance and an act of immense courage & integrity. I am sure Bobby will eventually be talking about this as well and the collective fallout may be just the lightning rod we need to really start waking people up en masse. May God protect Dr. Malone and all those who have taken up the banner of truth at their own cost and peril for the sake of the rest of us.
Then why is Malone suing the Breggins and Dr. Jane Ruby for $25 million? Seems like he has his own agenda.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once said "all I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen". In much the same way while I cannot answer your question and I know very little about said lawsuit, everything I've witnessed from Dr. Malone-- combined with the ingetrity and character of people like Meryl Nass who vouch for him-- has left me entirely confident that whatever is going on is probably more fallout from the sinister and malignant forces that we're all up against and that have been trying to bring him down ever since he stood up and started speaking out. In a world where so many people and so many institutions have let me down I think it's worth a pause and bit of reflection before we start turning on those courageous few who have put everything on the line and endured great personal sacrifices to bring us the truth.
My sentiments as well.
AMEN
Malone is literally from the deep state and he helped create these nightmare vaccines without much remorse for what has been unleashed on humanity. I don't see how people can trust someone that is attacking the Breggins and Dr. Jane Ruby for $25 million in an obvious effort to silence them. Dr. Peter Breggin has saved countless of lives by shining the light on the psychiatric industry and by stopping the barbaric practice of lobotomies. What he has done for humanity is immeasure and now him and his wife are being attacked because they are questioning Malone's history and background.
Here is what I wrote to someone else about the Malone situation.
Jennifer Jones
2 min ago
I hear you. But I think whether he chooses to sue someone is significant, but a personal choice. We don't know the complete situation. Personally, I think Robert just couldn't stand the public allegations/accusations any longer. Someone like Trump wouldn't care, but I think Robert just didn't know what else to do. I'm not saying the Breggins' comments were wring. I don't really know.
What I think is important is that we him the benefit of the doubt because of what he is writing and saying now (last Sup. Ct. Speech) about the harms and depopulation that our government is doing. No one working for the CIA or government vaccine-connected groups is going to dare say that.
Another reason I changed my mind about Robert is that Pierre Kory, Paul Merrick, Simone Gold, Dr. Nass and really several other doctors we regard highly think very highly of him and the work he is doing to help the Medical Freedom cause. I don't think they would all be wrong. So, I am trusting them that Robert, is working to helping our medical freedom cause. So, he gets my benefit of the doubt. I don't think it's helpful for people to keep saying Robert this, or Robert that, whenever they become aware that someone believes Omani supports him.
It is significant, but the question is, what is the true significance of it? Many of us know the complete situation and you can too by looking at both sides. Here is just one of the latest articles from the Breggins that is critical of Malone's recent speech about 5th generation warfare: https://www.americaoutloud.news/malone-becomes-a-fifth-generation-warrior-but-who-is-the-enemy/
Who else in the health freedom movement is suing others in the same movement? Why doesn't he utilize all of this time and effort to go after the true enemies instead of a couple in their 80's that have been on the forefront of the health freedom movement for decades? Malone is causing a lot more division in this movement than many people are able to recognize and it's important to call it out.
Actually, I think people who keep going on and on, and on, about this on a Substack that is not their own, after they've already told people what they think once or twice, are being vindictive. I don't care how old someone is. I image both the Breggins and Robert have attorneys who explain it all to them. I was an attorney. Ya gotta let people solve their problems their way. Both sides of the lawsuit have options to resolve it/settle it, so know that.
I think we should concentrate our attention and energy on our Medical Freedom Movement. There is so much to be done and we only have so much energy that we can give.
Many others have been doing it for years. He is just the latest to roll it out. Ask yourself why him, why now.
We got the numbers but do nothing...
Lord, give us the strength to stand and make the hard decisions that need to be made.
If we continue to wait, all will be lost.
Yes, and it is worse than described by the Kissinger report.
Although perhaps not as bad as the Georgia Guidestones either.
Apex predators, on this planet that is us, typically grow in numbers and density until the environment can no longer support them.
There are countless bacterial models showing this trend.
Growth phase, stagnation, die off.
In order to maintain control of the planet and ensure the continued survival of our species for generations to come. A system must be engineered in order to reduce the population, whilst concurrently, better controlling the systems and resources that allows the population to survive. Food, energy, shelter, clothing, water and all the components that go into renewing those resources indefinitely.
Because our current systems are incredibly inefficient, monopolies exist, artificial supply and demand, middle men for middle men and these systems are wasteful.
The whole Great Reset (literally in the name) is aimed towards making more efficient systems whilst reducing the consumption by eliminating those "useless eaters"
You see, eugenics hasn't entirely gone away.
It has just changed forms.
The social credit systems being introduced will encourage and reward those who behave. Whilst condemning those who do not.
The cull is not going to happen quickly, but over the remainder of the century.
There will be both an increase of "natural deaths" and a decrease in births.
Complicated further by famines and war.
Those famines and war are in essence, not just to destroy human life, but to destroy industry whilst concurrently using the laws of the jungle... Survival of the fittest... Survival of the most adaptable... Survival of those with the highest social credit scores.
Leaving us and our world with less mouths to feed, asses to wipe, more efficient systems and a more adept/skilled population.
And they see this as the greater good.
Because, if 5 billion are to suffer now, that is better than the cumulative effect of many more billions suffering for many generations to come until our eventual natural collapse where nobody, even the super rich, will be immune and capable of survival.
I am not suggesting I agree with their logic. But there it is.
They are doing this now because it is in their eyes, less evil than the consequences of not.
It's all nonsense. They don't have a clue. The latest and most accurate assessment of World population is it will peak @ 9.6B in 2064 and then fall to 8.9B in 2100. That is not a problem. We can easily sustain that population with a high standard of living essentially forever.
Food is a limiting factor and Bangladesh even has not exceeded that limiting factor with a population density of 1141/sq.km. USA with 35/sq.km. Canada with 4/sq.km.
In Netherlands they farm up to 7m below sea level and are a wealthy country. They are the #2 agricultural exporter in the World @ $94B vs #1 USA @$150B. While Holland is #69 in population & #131 by area and not even a warm or sunny environment. With a population density of 520/sq.km.
And Japan supplies 70% of their food on 13% of their land mass, with 157m people on a small resource poor island and very high living standard. With a population density of 330/sq.km.
The only resource you really need is energy. Everything else can be recycled. With even nuclear fission energy, just the resource on the surface of the Earth's land area would power our civilization for a 100Myrs. And then there is the Moon, Mars & the Asteroids. Fusion is quite achievable, in fact we could do it right now if we had to. So abundance is the reality, which is why the Malthusian overlords do their damnedest to stifle unlimited nuclear energy.
Currently we are using artificial and environmentally toxic fertilizers. A short term gain for a long term tummy ache.
The microbiome of our soil is damaged and depleting.
The micronutrients are being lost.
The only sustainable solution is a return to permaculture and crop rotation systems.
Which are great, but are unable to yield the quantity of food we produce and consume today.
Thus, current models cannot accurately reflect future needs.
Nonsense, you are making arm-waving arguments. Agricultural yields have been increasing dramatically in the past 50yrs and continue to do so. In China now they farm under poly tarps and use like 10% of the water, and get much higher yields. And they are doing massive irrigation trenches from the wet south to the dry north. Irrigation is opening up farming to otherwise to dry regions all over the World. With increased CO2 causing increased crop yields.
Paul Ehrlich ignores abundance again. From 1980 to 2020, global population increased 75.8 percent while global food abundance increased by 665.1 percent.
https://galepooley.substack.com/p/paul-ehrlich-ignores-abundance-again
Even still we waste large amounts of farmland on idiotic, energy-negative agrofuels. Over 40% of the US corn crop. We can quit that right now and REDUCE fossil consumption.
Food Loves More C02. Since 1940, increased CO2 has increased corn yields 10 percent, soybean yields 30 percent, and wheat yields 40 percent.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/04/food-and-water-worries-are-not-reasons-to-fight-climate-change.html
"...Greenhouses have been built and produce crops in the hottest deserts now. They have climate and humidity control. They use 7% of the water to grow crops compared to open-air farming.
Climate Change is something to be minimized. However, climate change only impact open-air farming. All food production can be brought indoors where it will be virtually immune to climate change.
China is planning to have over 2 million hectares of greenhouse buildings by 2025 with mechanized-automation of farming. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Monday issued a guideline to promote the country’s facility-based agricultural planting, outlining goals for infrastructure upgrades and mechanization to boost output and farmers’ income. By 2025, China will maintain over 2 million hectares of facilities, including plastic greenhouses, and achieve above 50 percent mechanization for facility-based planting, a sector of the so-called controlled-environment agriculture (CEA), or protected agriculture.
The world already has about 500,000 hectares of climate-controlled greenhouses. China has 4 million hectares of crude plastic sheeting covering land in partially enclosed conditions. The plastic sheets lie over simple metal poles and crude framing.
China’s newer greenhouses maintain optimal growing conditions throughout the development of crops, and optimizes the use of resources such as water, energy, space, capital and labor. Production takes place within an enclosed structure, such as a greenhouse or building.
Robotic greenhouse buildings can be up to 30 times more productive than the same area of regular farmland.
China under non-emergency conditions will build climate-controlled greenhouses to replace 10% of open-air farm production every year. If needed it would take ten years or much less to bring all agricultural production globally into climate-controlled conditions that use 7% of the water.
Doomer scenarios about billions forced to move because of widescale farm and water problems or collapsing megacities are a bunch of crap.
Pure Harvest is a startup that built a one-hectare facility in the Abu Dhabi desert in 2018. The warehouse has since been producing around two tons of tomatoes a day, which are retailing for around $2 (8 dirhams) for 300 grams..."
Are We Running Out? Not. From 1980 to 2020, every one percent increase in population corresponded to a four percent increase in personal resource abundance and an eight percent increase in global resource abundance.
https://galepooley.substack.com/p/are-we-running-out-not
I am not talking about climate change.
I am talking about local environments, soil nutrients, water, microbiomes and toxins in the environment.
In the places where food is grown.
We can increase yields, but only at the expense of using more energy, having more moving pieces in the supply chain, having more maintenance on those moving pieces.
Entropy for a lack of a better word, is omnipresent.
Once upon a time we had to do it all by hand and beasts. Then came the industrial revolution and new tools, machines, vehicles, irrigation systems, pesticides and fertilizers.
Production increased exponentially.
But the total energy, to get the steel, the rubber, the fuels, to make the chemicals and to build and maintain those machines and tools.
To get the workers to where they need to be to maintain those tools and machines.
To replace parts.
To extract the fertilizers. To distribute it where it needs to go.
The sum of all the moving parts in the supply chain is always going to be greater and use more energy in the big picture.
So yes production and yield increases.
And what used to take 100 farm hands now seems to only take 10 or so.
Actually employs 1000, but the other 990 are just not being seen they don't work on the farm. They make up the total of all the other moving pieces.
And it is, actually less efficient.
Great for making money though.
We can produce more, faster, but only for a short term. We can sprint, but not forever and not indefinitely.
They know this already.
Affordability crisis in an increasingly complex society relying on access to credit in the debt based economy and hoping for the next supply of cheap, on demand portable energy of the correct types to run all the facets of modern industrial civilization. Real economy vs. Financial economy.
Entropy has nothing to do with it. And energy consumption is going down in Western nations. We are wasting large amounts of energy on idiotic scams like wind, solar, hydrogen, agrofuels, ITER, CCS, utility battery storage. And idiotic wars like the Ukraine war. And overinflated military. If we switched to Nuclear Energy we would increase the Energy Return on Invested by 40X or more. Obviously we can't supply a growing population forever but as long as we achieve zero population growth, as we are (and even less than zero) there will be no problem except for Malthusian Psychopath Parasites who are deliberately destroying our Food & Energy supplies.
Superabundance: The Age of Plenty | Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley | #284
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iC_hY4qhyk
Superabundance: The Story of Population Growth, Innovation, and Human Flourishing on an Infinitely Bountiful Planet Hardcover – Aug. 31 2022
by Marian L. Tupy (Author), Gale L. Pooley (Author), & 1 more
https://www.amazon.com/Superabundance-Population-Innovation-Flourishing-Infinitely/dp/1952223393/
"...After analyzing the prices of hundreds of commodities, goods, and services spanning two centuries, Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley found that resources became more abundant as the population grew. That was especially true when they looked at “time prices,” which represent the length of time that people must work to buy something.
To their surprise, the authors also found that resource abundance increased faster than the population―a relationship that they call “superabundance.” On average, every additional human being created more value than he or she consumed. This relationship between population growth and abundance is deeply counterintuitive, yet it is true.
nuclear waste disposal ???
I agree we (they) are wasting a lot of energy.
Thus they desire a "Great Reset" and to remove those inefficiencies.
But to do that, they want to break the current system to rebuild it from the ashes.
It's easier to tear an old building down and start anew than to remodel the existing.
And perhaps nuclear energy is their solution.
I don't really know if it is. What about the spent materials?
I am fairly sure their goal is to have planetary homeostasis, a world where renewables (like crops, or the breakdown of toxins in the soil and water) renews as fast as the energy is consumed and the environment spoiled.
A balance with nature of sorts.
A symbiotic relationship with the planet.
The easiest way to do this is to destroy the current systems, reduce the mouths to feed, consumers to consumer and to start anew.
Thus, depopulation agenda. Social credit systems. Environmental climate change narratives. Economic crisis. Wars. And so on an so on.
What of the argument about accumulated human biomass in super abundance at the expense of other species?
Climate change us governed by the God who created it. Nothing will ever change that. Man (in ANOTHER way to deny God and their ability to ascend to god (hmmm....where have I heard that before?) worships the creation rather than the Creator.
"Fusion is quite achievable, in fact we could do it right now if we had to."
Fusion would solve a lot of problems which is precisely why it will never happen. Those in control don't want a cheap source of abundant energy. My guess is that fusion has already happened successfully and those who achieved it were killed because you just can't upset big oil, big climate change and the government like that and live to tell about it.
There is a lot more money and power to be made by "green energy" scams than there is to be made from actually solving the problem. It is exactly like big pharma's relationship to any number of illnesses. If cancer was cured, big pharma would go extinct and they know it so they will never allow that to happen.
Hell, they won't even solve something as simple as high blood pressure because fixing it is detrimental to long term profitability.
You are entirely correct.
Fusion was proceeding at a linear steady pace. Between 1970 & 1997 fusion power produced in experimental Tokamaks grew a trillionX. Steady progress. Then some major power (now who would that be?) decided the way to go is an International Cooperative giant effort to make a giganormous Tokamak in one country, instead of spirited competition between nations. The pinnacle of bureaucratic boondoggles. They spent 5yrs arguing about where to build it. $65B cost estimate now. Might finally start making plasma in 2025, maybe. And it was already obsolete from the first shovelful of dirt to build it.
Giant improvements in superconductors meant much smaller magnets could be used and much smaller, practical $million scale Tokamaks that will outperform the giant boondoggle, which is now all screwed up, because the myriad of international contractors manufactured components out of spec and they don't fit together properly. And other practical fusion methods like LPP Focus Fusion, General Fusion, Commercial Fusion Systems, Polywell fusion, Helion energy, Zap energy, Tokamak Energy, First Light Fusion, ARC fusion, TAE technologies, Lockheed Compact fusion, Tri-Alpha Energy are being build with trivial levels of funding compared to Wind, Solar/H2/Battery subsidies & ITER.
news.newenergytimes.net/2020/12/05/iter-is-a-suicidal-plan-that-would-discredit-nuclear-fusion/
"ITER Is a Suicidal Plan That Would Discredit Nuclear Fusion, Scientist Says, Again, Ernesto Mazzucato"
"...A retired plasma physicist has given New Energy Times permission to republish critical letters he wrote about the ITER fusion reactor project many years ago. He has done this despite risks associated with publicly criticizing the international project.
Ernesto Mazzucato spent his entire career — from 1965 to 2014 — working at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory. Mazzucato continues to work on his own fusion concepts.
He told us about pressure from some of his peers from 1996 to 2006 when he openly criticized the ITER project, but he asked us to withhold those details for fear that it would interfere with his present access to resources and the ability to publish in peer-reviewed journals.
Mazzucato is the second retired fusion physicist from the Princeton laboratory with whom New Energy Times has spoken who is critical of ITER. The first was Mazzucato’s colleague, Daniel Jassby, who has been publishing critical articles about ITER on the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Web site.
Jassby was the first scientist to provide New Energy Times with clear values for the ITER reactor power requirements, following our attempts to obtain this information directly from the ITER organization.
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that he “suffered dearly” shortly after Science magazine published his first critical comments in 1996.
“I knew that speaking out was risky, but I had to say what was on my mind,” Mazzucato said. “I thought that ITER would ruin fusion, and I had spent all my life working on fusion. ITER was the wrong track.”
Mazzucato told New Energy Times that, decades earlier, at the beginning of the discussions about the ITER concept, the conversation was purely about physics. The conversation soon shifted to the bait-and-switch scheme, as Nobel laureate Masatoshi Koshiba called it.
“The scientists were not talking about power production,” Mazzucato said, “but then slowly, the bureaucrats were put in charge of this project, and they started talking about a power gain, that ITER would produce 10 times more power than it would use.
“But none of the scientists said anything. We all knew that the power values only applied to the particles, not the overall reactor.”
These are the three letters Mazzucato provided: ..."
So as you would expect, once the ITER boondoggle started fusion progress has stalled from 1997 to present.
It tells all --that they do not believe in God the creator of the Universe. Instead they have placed themselves on the pedestal to be the world’s Gods. It is quite evil. God made it all, and God would handle it all in His own natural way. But No---these demons got together and decided to kill human beings created by God, and decided to make it “their” world. Yep, Satan is at work.....I believe that these people have become demon narcissist, and I will not be seeing them in Heaven. God will be casting them into the lake of fire
EXACTLY
Trolls??? What "trolls"? People ain't stupid. They are right
Meryl, why don't you stop calling people names and instead engage in a real debate and arguments?
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-the-5-billion-contract
https://outraged.substack.com/p/r-w-malone-speaks-out
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-d0c
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-and-countermeasures
Exactly.
Imagine Gates stranded out in the jungle and trying to survive.
Like really, imagine that.
I doubt he could handle himself at my local pub and make it out alive.
Clearly he is not built to be the fittest. Not without swarms of others doing all the work for him.
Although, definitions do seem to change a lot these days.
When US average population reverses from 79.5 years to 76.2 based Ed Dowd’s analysis speaks volumes!
Even though it was not difficult to arrive at the conclusion more than 2 years ago that depopulation was on the agenda, it is still chilling to see documented evidence of that intent dating back many years. And the confusing, contradictory and divisive assertions of polarized reality we've lived with since 2020 - a "narrative" world vs a critical thinker world - only make sense when viewed in the context of a depopulation agenda. THAT explains the continual and relentless pushing of a dangerous pathological gene therapy despite obvious and appalling harms, and it explains the denial and indifference to those harms on the part of the powers that be. They are playing God and committing crimes against humanity in doing so.
Rockefellers did this: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1976/eirv03n21-19760525/eirv03n21-19760525_015-rockefellers_club_of_rome_launch.pdf
And their Oligarch buddies: https://www.nndb.com/lists/439/000127058/
These are the droids your looking for
They also run the CIA.
Indeed, Rockefeller cousin and CFR member and Wall Street lawyer, Allen Dulles created CIA, his brother John Foster Dulles was up to his neck in the deep state swamp.
And Dulles led the team that assassinated JFK.
Disgusting, and Biden wont give RFK jr secret service protection... all being exposed now!!
And on the Waren Commision!!!
The Bankster Overlords are Parasites and like most entitled parasites they embrace Malthusianism because it gives them an opportunity to virtue signal and convince themselves they have some worth in this world. They don't.
What is notable about these WEF/Bankster paid propagandists is it's very hard to impossible to get them to debate their wacky plans with an opponent. I would love to see these dimwits sit down to a debate with Shellenberger, Lomborg, Koonin, Moore or Tupy & Pooley below. They would get beat up bad. At the very least these WEF birdbrains should watch this video:
Degrowth is just another effort by the Malthusian Psychopath Tyrants to impose their Scarcity Agenda down our throats. "You will own nothing" = "We will own everything and you will rent everything you want off of us for the price we dictate and only if we deem you a good citizen".
Curious fact. Why are DeGrowthers so vehemently opposed to Nuclear power? Energy is the one and only essential resource. If you have plentiful energy there is always workarounds for every other resource. And even with nuclear fission, just the uranium & thorium on the Earth's accessible land mass is enough to power our civilization for a 100Myrs. And that is with negligible pollution and negligible resource usage. And include deuterium supply and we can power a much, much larger civilization until the Sun eats the Earth. You would think DeGrowthers would be all onboard with Nuclear Power. But the opposite is true, they are big on "Renewables" by which they mean wind & solar.
Supporting wind & solar and in the same breath expounding "Efficiency". What hypocrisy. Do these idiots realize that Wind & Solar are the pinnacles of Inefficiency? 20X the material inputs. Terrible EROI (Energy Return On Invested), even below unity in many instances. Even far more materials when you include the need for long distance transmission and battery storage, more like 60X the material inputs. 300X the land area destroyed - that's inefficiency. That same land destroyed could produce large amounts of food. The need to have an entire parallel fossil/nuclear/hydro grid for when the wind & solar craps out. Overbuild and Curtailment waste - that's inefficiency. Hydrogen production for storage & fuel with efficiencies as low as 15%. These DeGrowthers are lunatics. Or do they have an alternative agenda = Malthusianism, Misanthropy and a Techno-Feudal Totalitarian World Government. See how badly they get beaten up here:
Superabundance: The Age of Plenty | Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley | #284
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iC_hY4qhyk
"...Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley are co-authors of the new book, “Super Abundance”. They sit down with Dr Jordan B Peterson to discuss their studies into overpopulation, the myths surrounding the subject, and how academia has created a new philosophy that demonizes modern man simply for existing.
Marian Tupy is the co-author of “Super Abundance”, as well as “10 Global Trends Every Smart Person Should Know” and “The Simon Abundance Index”. He is the current editor of humanprogress.org, and is a senior fellow at the center for global liberty and prosperity.
Gale Pooley is the co-author of “Super Abundance,” and is also an Associate Professor of business management at Brigham Young University in Hawaii. He has taught economics all over the world, and earned his PHD from the University of Idaho. He is also well known for his role in the development of the Simon Abundance Index...'
Superabundance: The Story of Population Growth, Innovation, and Human Flourishing on an Infinitely Bountiful Planet Hardcover – Aug. 31 2022
by Marian L. Tupy (Author), Gale L. Pooley (Author), & 1 more
https://www.amazon.com/Superabundance-Population-Innovation-Flourishing-Infinitely/dp/1952223393/
"...After analyzing the prices of hundreds of commodities, goods, and services spanning two centuries, Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley found that resources became more abundant as the population grew. That was especially true when they looked at “time prices,” which represent the length of time that people must work to buy something.
To their surprise, the authors also found that resource abundance increased faster than the population―a relationship that they call “superabundance.” On average, every additional human being created more value than he or she consumed. This relationship between population growth and abundance is deeply counterintuitive, yet it is true.
Why? More people produce more ideas, which lead to more inventions. People then test those inventions in the marketplace to separate the useful from the useless. At the end of that process of discovery, people are left with innovations that overcome shortages, spur economic growth, and raise standards of living.
But large populations are not enough to sustain superabundance―just think of the poverty in China and India before their respective economic reforms. To innovate, people must be allowed to think, speak, publish, associate, and disagree. They must be allowed to save, invest, trade, and profit. In a word, they must be free...."
Can we keep this running with Sovereign currencies? I've seen this argument pretty much point by point articulated on the surplus energy forums in response to straight forward data on a pending affordability crisis ie the answer is always abundance, abiotic oil, suppressed energy, next discovery of fusion, space solar and scaling up nuclear etc.
Should be no problem. The physical economy is what counts, the Bankster financial fake economy we can do without. We don't need Banksters either, they are just Parasites, produce nothing, good for nothing, but demand the lion's share of World Resources just because of who they are. We could replace the entire Bankster elites with an A.I., after all in the end all they are is glorified accountants, and they should all be making an accountants wage. Not $trillions.
There is contradiction. If Kissinger et al pushed global depopulation so that the United States would benefit (not having to support undeveloped countries whilst plundering their resources), why is the United States government trying to depopulate the United States? Why are the globalists transferring 3rd world populations (unvaccinated) to the US and other western nations where they will reproduce and flourish vs living in mud huts?
So they can vote for Democrats.
I do not read Malone very closely these days even though much of what he writes is very important. I downloaded NSSM 200 a couple decades ago and one can hear an excellent analsyis of it and related programs from many sources, e.g. Global Vax Campaigns Or GENOCIDE?! Dr. David Ayoub On NSSM 200 Govt Depopulation Policy (2005)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hEqgfbTEijCS/
I want to point out briefly some of the oddities of the COVAX debacle and related issues that make sense of their role in facilitating the greater agenda of depopulation. Here are just a few of the top oddities off what’s left of the top of my head. Yes, of course, most of the players who implement the plan are motivated by nothing deeper than greed or careerism but they have been steered in the right direction.
1) I refer anyone worried about Global Warming to the YouTube Heartland Institute channel that has exposed the fiction of global warming. The purpose of the Global Warming now Global Boiling fiction is to justify transition to alternative energy sources incapable of sustaining most of the earth’s population. Mass deaths by starvation for a good cause. https://www.youtube.com/@HeartlandInstitute Global Warming is as big a fiction as “Safe & Effective.”
2) The introduction of CBDC with its metrics for measuring carbon footprints and controlling the use of the digital currency and the obligations it imposes upon the Central Bank [sic!!] is intended to monitor and control all economic (and derivative) activity. You will be controlled to death for a very good purpose.
3) Both the Craig Pardekooper data showing Big Pharma companies taking turns experimenting with toxicity levels, as well as the decision by Pfizer to replace the mRNA with placebos were designed to encourage trust in mass vaccination so that depopulation can occur as vaccine technology progresses. They they can pick between mass sterilization (Children of Men) or something quicker . “Pfizer Vaccine Batches in the EU Were Placebos, Say Scientists” https://www.globalresearch.ca/pfizer-vaccine-batches-eu-were-placebos-say-scientists/5824154
4) Bill Gates intractable emphasis on vaccines and nothing but vaccines for African health is not some psychological quirk or tic of his in the face of the obvious fact that what Africa needs most of clean water, better sanitation and nutrition. It is his public commitment to a health methodology that best lends itself to sterilization and eugenics.
I couldn't find an actual link to the petition to demand the RFK Jr. be permitted to debate Biden. Please post a clickable link.
Meryl, The answer to your ver poinient question as the title of your latest posting is yes, yes, yes.
Your previous posting of jokes was very much appreciated. I have been a jokester for most of my eightl decades on this earth.
While we all need a laugh now and then, however,, it is extremely unfortunate these days the real laugh is on us!
Sorry to be a stick I in the mud but whether we believe it or not, this year will be the hottest day on record and likely the coolest year of our lives.
It's time to rethink the so called "Conspiracy Theorists" and look around the world as we are being affronted from all angles.
We must wake up to these realities or just focus on the old song title, Enjoy Yourself It's Latter Than You Think." Because it really is!
If you want to know the truth of global warming and it's greatest contributer and what we can possible do about it, please go to geoengineeringwatch.org. believe me, I'm not paid for this endorsement. No one will attempt to pull your teeth if you do this, but I'm sure you will be surprised and motivated by the truth.
If you insist that geoengineering is a hoax, so be it and accept an other oldie, "AllI I Have To Do Is Dream." This would probable be more pleasant.
,
I
I guess if the geoengineering is real, then it can be undone for them when the rest of us die. Unless they want to cause another Ice Age before it might happen naturally! They aren't following any of the rules they have for us peeps. PS: poignant is the correct spelling not poinient. If it's just a type-o, I apologize.
I don't know what these power-crazy monsters and their mindless minions think. Maybe they somehow believe that they can live indefinitely like royal rats in their luxurious underground abodes. Unfortunately your question is a reason why many people choose to ignore the travesty of geoengineeting even though it has been going on in front of their noses for decades. And this is certainly not a legitimate reason not to at least investigate it. I have personally witnessed this atrocity for the past ten years. My initial basic curiosity caused me to find out about this blatant reality that not many seem to see. My conscience compels me to speak out against it.
Hi Larry:
This is a great article on Global Research.ca Website called "Climate Change Crime - Depopulation In The Name of Human Rights" by Peter Koenig. It sums it up beautifully.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-change-crime-name-human-rights/5825577
Thanks Patricia, looks like a very valuable atricle. I need to read it again when I have more time to fully digest it. I certainly agree the the major climate offenders are the planned ones like Geoengineering a d HAARP, but I need to look more into the other aspects of the report. Thanks again, Larry
Have a good day!
The Dimming is an EXCELLENT documentary. A must see and a real eye opener!!!
Yes and Dane's weekly Global Alert New Radio broadcasts will keep them wide open! Recordings of these can be found on home page of geoengineeringwatch.org. But I'm sure that you know this and I'm also sure of my appreciation that you are an ally in this struggle.
Thank you, Larry!
In 1947, four German doctors were hanged for failure to provide informed consent. I believe this would be a good attention getter now. Actually, I have in mind a number one candidate in mind.
"Thanks for making us a 'vaccine' ... We made you a 'play swing' "
https://img.ifunny.co/images/3841bfc1512d4e297376c3751e184850a2de0746837f3de548d449eace682db4_1.jpg
so what took Malone so long to figure out and come out???? he should be wealthy by now and at retirement age so he has less to lose than if he came out 30 years ago. how is that I have been aware of kissingers nssm for at least 25 years????????????????? what took malone so long??? or another question, what is he really trying to do like maybe save his own ass, his reputation and his ability to make mo' $$$. I don't trust his motives one bit.
and can you tell me what this means:
Dr. Malone would appear to personify the very science we ought to be following.
Appear???
personify???
just what science ought we to follow???
there are many thngs to read in a day, i got bogged down in this report because it lacks any new information.
Malone the Damage Controller is my take on this but what do i know???
i haven't got those kinda credentials and popularity, i aint no celebrity scientist!!!