63 Comments
Nov 16Liked by Meryl Nass

These last four years have shown us how treason unfolds in broad daylight.

Expand full comment

So many snakes in the grass. Americans killing Americans for money. It appears that the dark side has taken over so many it is frightening and difficult to stay ahead of it and Meryl you are so on top of things that your tireless research helps us see the magnitude of what we are facing. May God protect us in this war.

Expand full comment

It's the "realization" that becomes the protection in the "armor;" its strength to resist penetration by the evil intentions of this world. We, as people, must learn the Truth about evil and how it has infiltrated righteous morals among mankind. The "top" individuals who consistently devise and apply evil tactics are not simply "by chance" occupying those seats, making BANK and disrupting entire nations through corruptive measures. It is not a flippant accusation to levy upon them, which points to them being taught in a corrupt system of education for the very purposes that "evil" has as its intention. Naturally, secrecy is paramount, or the "movement" would die the death. Therefore, secret societies are formed in layers which define their authority and status, and underpin their intent to full-fill "duty" as directed. "Lucifer" (Satan) is their "worshipful master" and this is no speculation, but openly admitted in their manifestos and "bibles of their making." Like "Morals and Dogma" by Freemason's Grand Master A. Pike. There are plenty of others like Alice A. Bailey, Anton Lavey, who make no bones about worshiping the devil. But who, you might rightfully ask, is directly below the "top" of the pyramid (occupied by the devil). That is controlled (channeled) by the "Jesuit Order." Directed specifically by the devil himself. Do your homework to substantiate these things. There's a barge-load of proof to swallow. But it's getting sponged as we speak.

God bless your journey,

r.

Expand full comment

I second that!

Expand full comment

That is wickedness. Not all interventions are bad, but to force experimental injections on people is pure evil. “Where there is risk, there must be both transparency and choice.”

Expand full comment

Bad enough forced experimental injections are one thing, but to grant manufacturers of those injections immunity from prosecution besides?

THAT is tyrannical no matter how you look at it

Expand full comment

I have not be forced… but I staunchly have refused. I have autoimmune issues, those I know with similar issues and who received the jabs… deeply regretted the fall out.

Expand full comment

I have prayed and prayed that God would bind the evil over the WHO and reveal the wicked people involved. Thank you for all your work, Dr. Nass❣️

Expand full comment

Prayer is good…🙏🙏keep it up.

Expand full comment

That slimy skunk Becerra is from my home state of California.

And the media clowns keep talking about how RFK isn't qualified for the job.

Expand full comment

RFK's qualification is his physique .. nuf said

Expand full comment

My learning curve in the last four years has my brain going into neutral for days at a time. The guy running AHPRA I think his name is Fleming came direct from the WHO. I found out through a Cafe Locked out podcast he was cancelling medical licences and raiding medical practices and seizing medical records under a memorandum of understanding from the health department. Is any of that remotely legal?

Expand full comment

I'm sure RFK will squash it, whether it's legal or not. By next January he'll have a to-do list as long as two arms and a leg!.

Expand full comment

Would you have a link to that podcast? Thx.

Just watched a great interview with Griffiths this past week: https://docmalik.substack.com/p/248-michael-griffith-when-art-meets

Expand full comment

Lawrence Gostin - another player in this global mess I hadn't heard of till now. How many other's play a part in this we haven't been made aware of yet?

Expand full comment

Let's just hope one or two RINOs in the Senate don't manage to block RFK's confirmation as Secretary of HHS. And even if they do, I don't think it would stop President Trump from defunding the WHO immediately and exiting the UN altogether. And simply repealing the legislation that prevents Big Pharma from being sued wrt "vaccines" should stop THEM in their tracks. So in a couple of months, it shouldn't MATTER what these globalist evil-doers want.

Expand full comment

Praying that you are CORRECT…but we have to get him in there! 🤔🤔

Expand full comment

Great report on a key figure I’d never heard of. It does sound like Trump has the chance to scuttle this BS, at least as long as his term lasts.

Expand full comment

Can’t these people just go home and enjoy the rest of their lives with family and friends? They become drunk on (rather addicted to) their power and influence and can’t let go. Sad. They need to be ignored. They are so detached from the common folk.

Expand full comment

And detached from humanity. I would put them down as mass murderers. Put down is the proper terminology and not a pun. And yes why can't they just sail off into the sunset, God knows they have enough money to do so.

Expand full comment

MONEY BEGETS POWER…begets INSANITY!

Expand full comment

Yes it must be that power and control out strips money.

Expand full comment

Trump recently visited the White House to talk with Biden about the transition. Imagine being a fly on the wall for a transition meeting between Becerra and Kennedy.

Expand full comment

If I were Kennedy I'd just ignore Becerra. He's done his evil worst and now he's nothing. Not worth wasting a moment's thought on.

Expand full comment

This is what Laurence Gostin stated in the French magazine Le Temps:

'Gates Foundation funding is vital if the WHO is to achieve its ambitious goals of eradicating polio and increasing the world's global health security capacity. But it also has its drawbacks. Through their funding, private foundations can deviate from the global health agenda. The WHO should set its own priorities, but it is difficult to do so when funding is earmarked for specific projects chosen by the Gates Foundation.'

He also states:

'Member states have shamefully neglected the WHO for decades. The organization's funding is totally inadequate to its global mandate. What's more, most WHO funding (around 80%) is earmarked for specific projects, while certain mandatory mandates remain unfulfilled.'

https://www.letemps.ch/monde/lawrence-gostin-bill-gates-mauvais-cote-lhistoire-refusant-dassouplir-regles-propriete

Publié le 05 mai 2021

Expand full comment

Another demon

Expand full comment

Becerra is a verily demonic. Pray he repents

Expand full comment

Or roasts.

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Considering that the original US public health laws took effect in Southern states in 1877, written to impose Racial Segregation as an alleged disease-control measure because the Anti-Ku-Klux-Klan Act of 1871 made it a federal crime to impose a state Segregation law if the sole reason for it was because Black Americans are Black, and created an Office of Civil Rights at the Justice Department to enforce it, I'm not too surprised to see this narcissistic sociopath from Georgetown continuing to use the same tactics to deny liberty to the People of Earth. They simply make crap up then demand of us that we pretend to believe it, when we don't understand what it is they told us to do, nor why.

Expand full comment

Make sure RFK2 and Rubio read this. It's important: the IHR is an international treaty signed by US Congress. Even if Trump leaves the WHO (no more funding), it is still legally binding, and the next Mason president just has to follow the new IHR because Trump did not reject the amendments.

So the correct procedure is:

- Formally reject the IHR amendments, explaining that it violated the article 55 deadline to present the draft for approval and that the approval session was off-agenda and not all countries were invited, and not by voting but by an obscure "consensus" (nobody knows who consented) and because the new clauses violate the spirit of cooperation and turn the treaty into an anti-people weaponized legally binding WHO-dictatorship where the countries don't get to vote who the dictator is going to be.

- Nudge Congress to get out of the IHR treaty at least, and even better, out of the WHO and UN legal system.

- Form a non-binding International Health Cooperative Group (something like the G7, G20, etc.)

- Tell the world in a press conference and use the diplomats to help other countries join

Please consider adding this guy to the top villains list (will soon publish this):

The WHO masonic origin

Brock Chisholm, father of global pedophilia

Why was a psychiatrist chosen to found and lead the World Health Organization?

Freudian psychiatrist Chisholm “developed his strong Marxist view that children should be raised in an "as intellectually free environment" as possible, independent of the ‘prejudices and biases’ ” of their parents, either political, moral or religious.1

Freud and Chisholm are grand-parents of toddler sex ed (mason Alfred C. Kinsey is the father of the ideological monster). As most masons, he was a doomster, depopster, social-Darwinist.

He was chosen to:

a) fill all top WHO positions with masons and

b) prepare the health framework for the global legalization of pedophilia, through:

• An all-encompassing over-reaching fuzzy definition of health, enabling the WHO’s control on every single human, animal and vegetal activity.

• A definition of mental health free from guilt (caused by parental, adult and religious guide), which would eventually lead to the destruction of parental authority / parental rights and turning education into a perversion schooling, through a wrong “right” of children’s self-determination and complete autonomy from parents and teachers.

Zero-guilt psychology was the perfect relativistic framework to normalize perversions such as pedophilia, considered just one sexual orientation towards age, among hundreds of others.

Note: guilt is the consequence of violating the moral rules of conscience engraved in every human being even before birth (defense of truth, justice, love and life by not lying, stealing, cheating, revenging, injuring, killing, etc.). The only solution to guilt is repentance: asking for forgiveness, feasible amendment of wrongs and self-determination to avoid repetition, including avoiding occasions nudging to the error.

Like a fever which helps the immune system get rid of a disease, guilt is the first step towards curing self-inflicted wounds by immoral thoughts or actions. Killing or muffling the voice of conscience (guilt), does not heal the wound, which keeps bleeding wide open! Except scruples, denying guilt, does not lead to healing, but to new or deeper wounds by the repetition or worsening of self-injuring behavior, thus worsening mental disorders. Defining “sin” as a wilful thought or conduct violating the universal laws of universal conscience, the solution to guilt isn’t denial the concept of sin, but avoiding immoral behavior. “No “sin”, no guilt” is in fact “No sin, no guilt”. ‘Zero guilt’ psychology is the exact opposite of mental health: mental derangement.2

1946. “Chisholm took his views to the international scene, becoming the Executive Secretary of the Interim Commission of the World Health Organization, based in Geneva, Switzerland. He was one of 16 (masonic) i international experts consulted in drafting the agency's first constitution. The WHO became a permanent UN fixture in April 1948, and Chisholm became the agency's first Director-General on a 46–2 vote until 1953 .

The WHO succeeded the League of Nations's Health Organization. Chishom defined health for the WHO as "a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity."

1946. “Chisholm became an outspoken opponent of patriotism (NATIONalism). It was he who successfully argued that the organization be called the “World” and not the “InterNATIONAL Health Organization.”3

1947. Context: the (masonic) American Education Fellowship (formerly known as the Progressive Education Association) called for the "establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority…".4

1957. Chisholm served as president of the (masonic) World Federation of Mental Health.

1968. He was one of the signatories of the agreement to convene a convention for drafting a world constitution. As a result, for the first time in human history, a World Constituent Assembly convened to draft and adopt the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.5 The second masonic attempt for a global government after the League of Nations!

Chisholm's (masonic) awards:

1945: Medal of the Pasteur Institute

1950: "World Government News Medal" for his contribution to World Peace.

1953: Lasker Award

1957: Honorary President of the World Federalist Movement-Canada

1959: Humanist of the Year (American Humanist Association)

1967: Companion of the Order of Canada

Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine, of the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Public Health Association among others.“ 6

“Finest” quotes

This document is so compromising that it has been hidden, erased from the original DOI location. 7

He expands the line of thought of mason satanist Albert Pike’s Morals and Dogma:

1945. “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogmas.” 8

Is 5:20 “Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil …”

1946. … freedom, present in all children and known as innocence, has been destroyed or crippled by local certainties, by gods of local moralities, of local loyalty, of personal salvation (religion)

The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives … for charting the changes of human behavior.

The only lowest common denominator of all civilizations and the only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality, the concept of right and wrong …

In the old Hebrew story God warns the first man and woman to have nothing to do with good and evil. It is interesting to note that as long ago as that, "good" is recognized as just as great a menace as "evil."

We have been very slow to rediscover this truth and to recognize the unnecessary and artificially imposed inferiority, guilt and fear, commonly known as sin, under which we have almost all labored and which produces so much of the social maladjustment and unhappiness in the world. For many generations we have bowed our necks to the yoke of the conviction of sin. We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests, our newspapers and others with a vested interest in controlling us.

Thou shalt become as gods, "knowing good and evil," good and evil with which to keep children under control, with which to prevent free thinking, with which to impose local and familial and national loyalties and with which to blind children to their glorious intellectual heritage. Misguided by authoritarian dogma, bound by exclusive faith, stunted by inculcated loyalty, torn by frantic heresy, bedevilled by insistent schism, drugged by ecstatic experience, confused by conflicting certainty, bewildered by invented mystery, and loaded down by the weight of guilt and fear engendered by its own original promises, the unfortunate human race, deprived by these incubi of its only defences and its only reasons for striving, its reasoning power and its natural capacity to enjoy the satisfaction of its natural urges, struggles along under its ghastly self-imposed burden. The results, the inevitable results, are frustration, inferiority, neurosis and inability to enjoy living, to reason clearly or to make a world fit to live in.

… This can hardly possibly be a useful procedure from a racial point of view unless conceivably it could serve to reduce population pressures in some parts of the world. This end could surely be attained, however, in less painful ways and with better selection (of the fittest races) …

In that journal, another mason commented on Chisholm’s article:

I think that the peoples of the world would be less hesitant to become subjects of a world government eternally vigilant to maintain overwhelming destructive force, ready instantly to use every sanction and to destroy any who would again provoke war, if it were evident to the thoughtful among them that things other-wise were not going to go on much the same way that they have gone on up to' now; if, in other words, it were certain that this mighty garrison state which would exercise sovereignty over every person in the world was to be but a temporary precaution to protect the helpless while men of good will would be working out a fully civilized way of life for the peoples of the earth.

It is from the custodians of knowledge and those skilled in human techniques that the evidence of this benevolent probability must come. 9

more... soon to be published

Expand full comment