One pandemic after another has been rolled out to condition us to think them inevitable, that we need to shift our societies to be ready to deal with them, trading freedom for some elusive safety
I wonder if a one of those so called ‘pandemics’ were ever naturally occurring. I am starting to feel incredibly stupid and sad how I was talked into so many of the unnecessary v🪓’s - but I have forgiven myself and vowed there will be no more.
"Latest draft." 'Places in the document where they still haven't filled in the blanks, etc.'
Ugh. I'm listening to this great talk, becoming nauseated while recalling all the stupid meetings I've attended in higher education admin bureaucracy: a bunch of profs and higher-lower exec admins and students in a conference room, believing they have some kind of important intelligence, sitting around "brainstorming" the next amazing program or event. (And now I have to experience this now in a different industry and have similar nauseated reactions live and in person.)
Either way, the picture is of a bunch of people with BULLSHIT JOBS (see David Graeber), supposedly possessing some sort of high intelligence, with absolutely NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to 'change the world'--in organizations that have WAY TOO MUCH FUNDING.
See website "Truth Comes To Light" as they just posted a video of Romanian Senator publicly accusing the globalists of causing the Turkey earthquake and all the signs of foreknowledge and why they did it.
Have any of these invented pandemics been particularly devastating? No. If there was a super deadly breakout of some virus or scary thing, millions would be dead before these clowns at the WHO or CDC could even think up a name for it.
There would be no vaccine for months and maybe a billion deaths in no time. Otherwise, whatever the next fake pandemic involves, you are certain to survive unless you already have underlying medical problems.
I have not had any vaccines or mRNA injections over the last 50 years and survived every pandemic. No doctors or hospitalizations. It's all part of the desire to control humanity and totally nonsensical. It's all a lie.
Feel free to pass this on to whatever contacts you have in MSM, journalists, lawyers working on the court cases, medical people fighting mandates and so on.
But if they ask where it came from to fact check then pass on my contacts and I will supply them the original for their due diligence.
MHRA answered me this morning . Strange for them to send out e-mails on a Sunday, normally it’s a Friday afternoon, answering these 2 questions:
Can you please supply: - the metric or standard that is used by the MHRA to quantify the term “safe” with regards/reference to a “covid vaccine” authorised for use by the MHRA?
- the metric or standard that is used by the MHRA to quantify the term “effective” with regards/reference to a “covid vaccine” authorised for use by the MHRA?
What an answer - they have no definitive standard to measure either safety nor effectiveness of any medicine or vaccine.
So how do they know something is “safe” or “effective”?
It is because they, or the manufacturer, say it is!!!
Here is their actual answer:
There is no ‘metric or standard’ used by the MHRA to quantify ‘safe’ in terms of a COVID-19 vaccine, or any other medicinal product. (my highlighting). No medicine is completely risk-free. For a medicine to be considered acceptably safe, its expected benefits should be greater than any associated risks of harmful reactions (my highlighting). This can be determined based on the data submitted with an application for a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product such as a COVID-19 vaccine. But the balance of benefits and risks for any product can change at any time during its marketed life, for example if a serious new side effect is established.
For this reason the MHRA continually monitors the safety of all medicinal products authorised in the UK, including the COVID-19 vaccines. The process is termed pharmacovigilance and this involves:
monitoring the use of medicines in everyday practice to identify previously unrecognised adverse effects or changes in the patterns of adverse effects
assessing the risks and benefits of medicines in order to determine what action, if any, is necessary to improve their safe use
providing information to healthcare professionals and patients to optimise safe and effective use of medicines
monitoring the impact of any action taken
You can read more about the MHRA’s safety assessments for COVID-19 vaccines here Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines adverse reactions - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
As stated above, all medicinal products are authorised based on an assessment of the benefit/risk - that is the benefit to the patient being greater than the known risks associated with taking that product. To understand the assessment of the benefit/risk for each of the Covid-19 vaccines authorised, please refer to the Public Assessment Reports (PARs) for each of the vaccines that we have provided links to in our previous responses to you.
Vaccine efficacy is usually measured in randomised controlled clinical trials. It is calculated by comparing the proportion of trial subjects that developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the vaccine arm with the proportion that developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the placebo arm. The calculation is made after a certain number of COVID-19 cases have occurred in the trial as a whole. This number is decided at the start of the trial. This means that a time period is not chosen.
More details on the measurement of vaccine efficacy are provided in the PARs that you have already received.
We hope this information is helpful.
But the PARs they mention do NOT prove the vaccines are safe nor effective when you read them.
I have read them many times and cannot find out what in them proves safety and/or effectiveness.
This is an excellent resource - thank you both so much. I'll link to it in my next column. It's important to me to find resources with which I can reach out to people who are not already au fait with the situation (using amusing animal anecdotes and stories of self-sufficiency - this really gets them). This video works perfectly. We're extremely fortunate to have you both. Thank you for your work - and the bravery you've had to show, Meryl.
I will get to watch you and James soon but want to promote Yeadon, Nass and Hooker summarizing their understanding to date of the monstrous covid fraud. This is one of the most important shows I've seen on CHD and the very gracious and courteous interaction between you and Mike Yeadon is a model for what scientific exploratory discussion ought to be : https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/friday-roundtable/toxic-by-design-with-michael-yeadon-phd-1676056671675/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=salsa&utm_campaign=CHDTV&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9e1e5c2a-b6ac-4af8-9fab-7aa0ed95cd78
I wonder if a one of those so called ‘pandemics’ were ever naturally occurring. I am starting to feel incredibly stupid and sad how I was talked into so many of the unnecessary v🪓’s - but I have forgiven myself and vowed there will be no more.
"Latest draft." 'Places in the document where they still haven't filled in the blanks, etc.'
Ugh. I'm listening to this great talk, becoming nauseated while recalling all the stupid meetings I've attended in higher education admin bureaucracy: a bunch of profs and higher-lower exec admins and students in a conference room, believing they have some kind of important intelligence, sitting around "brainstorming" the next amazing program or event. (And now I have to experience this now in a different industry and have similar nauseated reactions live and in person.)
Either way, the picture is of a bunch of people with BULLSHIT JOBS (see David Graeber), supposedly possessing some sort of high intelligence, with absolutely NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to 'change the world'--in organizations that have WAY TOO MUCH FUNDING.
The fear only works if you let it.
Great interview. I really like when you two get together.
A recent interview with Naomi Wolff on Dr Drew was very good. I am wondering do you share her views on the CCP and the Biden Admin?
China-Virus Fascists; CRT; BLM; MeToo; Antifa; Homo-Cabal; DEI; Open Border Lunatics; Climate Hysterics; and last, but hardly least, the Deep State.
Bullets and bombs defeated Nazi Germany. What do you think will be required to retake OUR America from our Mortal Enemies?
See website "Truth Comes To Light" as they just posted a video of Romanian Senator publicly accusing the globalists of causing the Turkey earthquake and all the signs of foreknowledge and why they did it.
Have any of these invented pandemics been particularly devastating? No. If there was a super deadly breakout of some virus or scary thing, millions would be dead before these clowns at the WHO or CDC could even think up a name for it.
There would be no vaccine for months and maybe a billion deaths in no time. Otherwise, whatever the next fake pandemic involves, you are certain to survive unless you already have underlying medical problems.
I have not had any vaccines or mRNA injections over the last 50 years and survived every pandemic. No doctors or hospitalizations. It's all part of the desire to control humanity and totally nonsensical. It's all a lie.
Feel free to pass this on to whatever contacts you have in MSM, journalists, lawyers working on the court cases, medical people fighting mandates and so on.
But if they ask where it came from to fact check then pass on my contacts and I will supply them the original for their due diligence.
MHRA answered me this morning . Strange for them to send out e-mails on a Sunday, normally it’s a Friday afternoon, answering these 2 questions:
Can you please supply: - the metric or standard that is used by the MHRA to quantify the term “safe” with regards/reference to a “covid vaccine” authorised for use by the MHRA?
- the metric or standard that is used by the MHRA to quantify the term “effective” with regards/reference to a “covid vaccine” authorised for use by the MHRA?
What an answer - they have no definitive standard to measure either safety nor effectiveness of any medicine or vaccine.
So how do they know something is “safe” or “effective”?
It is because they, or the manufacturer, say it is!!!
Here is their actual answer:
There is no ‘metric or standard’ used by the MHRA to quantify ‘safe’ in terms of a COVID-19 vaccine, or any other medicinal product. (my highlighting). No medicine is completely risk-free. For a medicine to be considered acceptably safe, its expected benefits should be greater than any associated risks of harmful reactions (my highlighting). This can be determined based on the data submitted with an application for a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product such as a COVID-19 vaccine. But the balance of benefits and risks for any product can change at any time during its marketed life, for example if a serious new side effect is established.
For this reason the MHRA continually monitors the safety of all medicinal products authorised in the UK, including the COVID-19 vaccines. The process is termed pharmacovigilance and this involves:
monitoring the use of medicines in everyday practice to identify previously unrecognised adverse effects or changes in the patterns of adverse effects
assessing the risks and benefits of medicines in order to determine what action, if any, is necessary to improve their safe use
providing information to healthcare professionals and patients to optimise safe and effective use of medicines
monitoring the impact of any action taken
You can read more about the MHRA’s safety assessments for COVID-19 vaccines here Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines adverse reactions - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
As stated above, all medicinal products are authorised based on an assessment of the benefit/risk - that is the benefit to the patient being greater than the known risks associated with taking that product. To understand the assessment of the benefit/risk for each of the Covid-19 vaccines authorised, please refer to the Public Assessment Reports (PARs) for each of the vaccines that we have provided links to in our previous responses to you.
Vaccine efficacy is usually measured in randomised controlled clinical trials. It is calculated by comparing the proportion of trial subjects that developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the vaccine arm with the proportion that developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the placebo arm. The calculation is made after a certain number of COVID-19 cases have occurred in the trial as a whole. This number is decided at the start of the trial. This means that a time period is not chosen.
More details on the measurement of vaccine efficacy are provided in the PARs that you have already received.
We hope this information is helpful.
But the PARs they mention do NOT prove the vaccines are safe nor effective when you read them.
I have read them many times and cannot find out what in them proves safety and/or effectiveness.
Here they are, read them for yourselves:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/the-4-official-ema-public-assessment
Good synthesis/analysis.
I totally agree with you.
These globalists seem unstoppable. What is there to do to have them indicted & prosecuted is what I'd like to read about soon.
Luc
Excellent and so well explained! Thank you.
Yet another investigative and reporting masterpiece. Thanks as always.
This is an excellent resource - thank you both so much. I'll link to it in my next column. It's important to me to find resources with which I can reach out to people who are not already au fait with the situation (using amusing animal anecdotes and stories of self-sufficiency - this really gets them). This video works perfectly. We're extremely fortunate to have you both. Thank you for your work - and the bravery you've had to show, Meryl.
Have you seen this video? 16 minutes and she tells it all! https://rumble.com/v27vr5k--huge-public-health-has-been-militarized-creating-kill-zones-for-depopulati.html