Lets start looking at some contradictions in the latest draft of the Pandemic Treaty.
This draft was named "pandemic agreement" to keep us guessing whether it is really the same document or something else
This is the official version, the latest draft of the pandemic treaty dated October 30, 2023 that both the developing nations and Pharma did not like. But is there much for we the people to like?
The term “infodemic” pops up in Article 1, where it is defined as too much information, false information or misleading information. Why is too much information a problem?
Equity is to be at the center of this document, at its heart. Let’s see how long that lasts.
Free, unhindered access to accurate information is also right at the start of the document, in its “Objective and scope” section.
But these mellifluous phrases didn’t last long. By the time we reach the Article 17, equity has morphed into choosing who will get first dibs on pandemic products. Everyone is not equal after all.
After promising free, full and fair access to information in earlier articles above, the WHO treaty yanks freedom of speech away. Everyone has to control infodemics (too much information or unwanted information) at the local, regional national and international level. That is some massive censorship project being contemplated…or perhaps already in place.
And here, the pandemic treaty promises transparency regarding government contracts for drugs and vaccines. Transparency! What a beautiful word. But guess what? It’s a charade. Because this very week, the European Parliament and the Canadian parliament voted to continue to hide the contracts for COVID vaccines from their citizens. Do you really think nations and the WHO will allow future pandemic vaccine contracts to be open to the public, when so many billions of dollars in gravy was involved, and no entity: not DOD, HHS or the so-called manufacturers wants to be held responsible for the resulting deaths and destruction?
Thabk you so much, Dr Nass for all you do and have done to wake the sleeping masses. I'm scared for our fate if more people don't come into the light. We outnumber "them" by what?, 1000 to 1? We all just have to stop showing up for work, shopping etc and let them know who's really in charge! US! God bless you and you're in my prayers always 🙏🏼🙏🏽🙏🏾🙏🏿❤️
"In 1948, when George Orwell began his novel of the future, 1984, he was writing from his experience as a writer of propaganda for the British during World War II. His novel was not so much a science fiction fantasy of a world to come as a direct projection of what he saw happening in the Britain of 1948--hence, the reversal of the date in the title. Most perceptively, he realized that to control a population you first have to control the language"
.....
"Traditional English allows for nuance and shades of meaning, but Newspeak will make "thoughtcrime" an impossibility , for there will be no words in which to express a subversive thought. And when each word is rigorously defined and shorn of its shades of meaning, the range of human consciousness will become smaller and smaller. Thus, for example, the word FREE is restricted to such meanings as "a field is FREE from weeds" or "a dog is FREE from fleas." There are no longer words in which to express such concepts as political or academic freedom or the ability to think in a free way. As Syme (character in 1984) puts it, "The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect." " from The Blackwinged Night: Creativity in Nature and Mind by F. David Peat
So, [insert four letter Anglo-Saxon word here] the infodemic. Each time they try to replace words, or redefine them, we refuse and reintroduce our own. Cede not a syllable to them!