273 Comments
author

Let me tell you about my week:

Monday get car fixed. Tuesday night give lecture. Wednes drive 3.5 hrs then meet with lawyer. Thursday Board hearing all day . Friday drive home. Saturday Hold 5-6 hr Symposium on the attack on food and agriculture and how to fight back--i am producer and MC. Sunday--give another lecture.

So sorry Allen, since you have more spare time than I do, suggest you go read the blog since my positions are in black and white for all to read. It's searchable.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

That's a transparently evasive tactic. Sadly it's rather predictable and I did predict just this at the outset.

I attempted to engage in good faith and she threw in logical fallacies, excuses and diversions.

This is the way it always goes.

It is quite simply because she doesn't know the material and would be proven to be inexpert and thusly would lose perceived credibility.

Don't know why people react that way, though I could speculate, as I would see it as a chance to learn more or if I had a position that I held resolutely would want to defend it.

Expand full comment

Somehow I hear "The Invasion of The Trolls" theme song playing in the not-so-background...

Expand full comment
author

Dear, I said put up or shut up. I am tired of baseless accusations.

There are lots of substacks where people speculate without evidence. I don't want mine being one of them.

Ms. Coraggio, whom I respect, provided the evidence for her conclusions. That is fine with me.

Expand full comment

Malone says we don't know our enemies. I think I do. So from my perspective, it is he who makes the baseless accusation. I would like to ask you a question please. Do you consider the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation, DTRA, Merck, and CIA, to be allies or enemies of the people of the world?

Expand full comment

Help me understand. At 1 hr he is discussing Ebola and zika vaccines as if these were legitimate endeavors and successful medical products? These are both scams that never worked for anything other than causing injuries and death. Remdesivir came out of the same bogus "development during a tropical outbreak". Their favorite activity is to play pandemic in some tents in African jungle that nobody can monitor or check for clinical trial compliance or ethics. These practice runs were used by the US DOD to iron out the kinks in the "outbreak playbook" before they unleashed the covid warfare on the world.

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

Everything about the official Ebola story is fraud.

It's used mainly to cover up the consequences of colonialism and the current actions of vicious multinational corporations in Africa which create the conditions that create the diseases.

The real reasons for “Ebola” are industrial pollution; organophosphate pesticides (causes bleeding); vast overuse of antibiotics (causes bleeding); severe and debilitating nutritional deficiencies (which can cause bleeding); starvation; drastic electrolyte loss; chronic diarrhea; grinding poverty; war; stolen farm land; vaccination campaigns (in people whose immune systems are compromised, vaccines can easily wipe out their last shreds of health) and so forth.

This is social/political/epidemiology 101. That "our leaders" don't know this and speak to this means to me they are not well versed enough to be at the helm.

Expand full comment

On Zika.: That was a farce to push that vaccine.

I happened to be in Curacoa right when there was supposedly a break out but there wasn’t. But what they did do is give pregnant women another version of the tDap which is known to cause brain damage and swelling, and they sprayed some round up like chemical on the water in Brazil known to cause hydrocephali.

Expand full comment

It seems we are becoming really exasperated with anything which smacks of a limited hangout - the mechanism behind all of this is deep and pervasive PsyOps.

https://open.substack.com/pub/kwnorton/p/the-fourth-industrial-revolution?r=boqs0&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Back to square one: What is covid?

A few dozen and counting millennia-old human conditions, from death to sound health, in the presence of a fraudulent pcr result.

Expand full comment

Is Covid still square one? As being the latest and most visible mass murder by these forces it certainly has the earmarks of totalitarianism and in this instance medical fascism.

But the deeper issue of what forms the foundations for all of this are Chamber Of Commerce organizations such as the self branded "think tank" World Economic Forum and the larger agenda they represent.

In one organization we have all the issues promoted by the "liberals" - the Ukraine, the organization and implementation of the 15 minute cities, the Covid-related hoaxes, the Climate hoax and energy crisis, transgender ideology, and more totalitarian agendas through which they claim to be making the world a better place.

The WEF partners designed the Covid epidemic and orchestrated the events like clockwork.

Like fascism of old it represents a synergy between corporations, governments and institutions to gain absolute power and control. We must ask why the YMCA and the American Red Cross are united as partners of the WEF among all the larger figures.

Expand full comment

It seems to me as an outside observer that Malone is rarely the first one on the ball. This is probably even more true when it comes to questions and beliefs that are dear to him, like vaccines. It's the same phenomenon they discuss early on in the interview in the context of covid "vaccines" where Malone responds by saying that MDs are especially prone to denial of the true nature of these bio-weapons.

Expand full comment

Yes his blustering self promotion makes me suspicious. That is one of my own prejudices I’m afraid. Ruthless self promotion gives me pause. But my real concern is what seems to be the limited hangout he provides, not even mentioning some obvious suspects who are all connected at the top - whom everyone else has suspected from early on. We are plagued by limited hangouts.

Expand full comment

I subbed him and asked questions. Also on SageHana's stack. He doesnt answer.

Why does he continue to support mRNA? Why did he recommend his finding to be used for vaccines when they never studied downstream and long term effects on animals? Studies done in animals and human children show genetic injections have caused cancer leukemia within a handful of years. He knows about telomerase, reverse transcriptase and potential damage to genes. He knows LNP are meant to enter all cell types and pass BBB. He was recently connected with vaccine makers and has ties to all of these people. Why is he bragging and encourage others to brag about his invention which enabled inventions leading to medical genocide and tyranny? He claims he's vaccinated. I might too if I wanted to appear innocent and get away with bragging about my invention and recommendation for use in vaccines that paved the way....

Expand full comment
author

Why do people keep saying things like he continues to support mRNA when he doesn't?

Expand full comment

A lot of people are influenced by Substacks that use a lot of humor and in crowd jargon to disparage anyone with a brain that has worked in the industry, or for the government, or has talent in science mathematics or technology. They are coming at you because you won’t disavow Malone as they have decided to.

It’s easier for them since their time is spent criticizing folks like you without actually having to stand up against the evil establishment that has created this mess.

Expand full comment

Yes, the fight against the Establishment doesn't depend on your exact theory of what happened: gain of function, yes or no on viruses, etc. Malone says, this is incredibly "dark." The perps will say and do anything to perpetuate their program.

Expand full comment

And my take is that Malone is not one of the perpetrators. He spoke out against the jabs well before the mandates from Biden. That put him on the right side. I don’t care what he said or did before that. Anyone who openly opposes the jabs is a positive. I would prefer everyone to be against ALL jabs. And I prefer insiders that turn against their former cash cows. But I also understand the loss of income and desire not to have to lose your house and live in a cardboard box.

Expand full comment

Is that really a threat for RM? Why so much sympathy for those who should have known better....it was their profession. And the COVID vaccine is not the first rodeo of the FDA/CDC plausible deniability circus.

I am willing to give converts, like RM, the benefit of the doubt. But I will say that RM’s substack just yesterday, whereby he essentially is absolving the actors along the way of the past three years of any intentional malfeasance in supporting the toxic jab, is concerning.

He will say it was not intended as a bioweapon. So what? At this point....does that matter? It IS a bioweapon....he and Dr. Nass, and others are busy telling us all the reasons why it is toxic, yada, yada, yada.....but it remains on the market and continues to be mandated throughout the US. At this point, in my view, it is a known bio weapon being wielded.

So why now argue that hey....there is evil (which he has often gone on about) but then turn and seemingly suggest that the deadly shots are the product of the dumb banal, bland actors of the layered bureaucratic and administrative state (you know....the machinery/beast he was part of working as a consultant)?

And furthermore, he is now suggesting that the bureaucratic state cannot be corrected and he fears it will take a revolution, violence or catastrophe to fix what ails us. (begins a bit to sound like destruction to then ‘build back better’—-but who am I to judge).

Whoah....think about that....he use to pontificate about setting up parallel societies, growing your own food, building interdependent communities. He was hailed as a hero that recognized we had been harmed by those who used the system to satisfy greed.

Now he thinks it is just a product of a system that has been layered over and over again due to a growing centralized powerful government and that we can’t point fingers at any individuals relative to intent to do harm. But hey, time to go to war to ensure we do not end up in slavery because there is no way to right the ship. Is that what he is now saying?

At Christmas he was saying we should forgive our neighbors and friends....hold out the olive branch.

I have whiplash. And I feel even more disoriented than before.

And is this just an evolution of his thought process....curious then, when exactly does he think our government became the lying abusive state that he says is just a product of the natural governance by bureaucrats in a centralized power?

I tend to think it was when the fin/tech elite were allowed to lobby our politicians for their own interests funneling money into government to be soaked up by those more than happy to play the tune they are told to play rather than earn an honest days living like many Americans. And that particularly beast has swallowed pretty much the whole of our governance at this point, and in more than the precious medical sector. They have been playing with our children as lab rats in our schools for a decade now.

Did anyone in the MFM notice that? Or were their kids going to school in private institutions alongside the kids of the likes of Gates and others....spared the nonsense we have all paid for in public education.

Bottom line. The MFM, while doing some good work, is late to the game and they still have blind spots relative to their complicity along the way that stop them from maximizing the return on their resistance.

Expand full comment

Very insightful analysis! Malone has been very consistent in his many statements and interviews in denying that there was deliberate intent from the nefarious actors involved; he speaks about accidents, bureaucratic incompetence and about how things got out of control while denying that there was such a thing as an elitist, globalist agenda and puppetmasters in control; this is the root of his differences with the Breggins and why he is such a supporter of Mattias Desmet and mass formation, although Malone prefers the term "mass hypnosis"; for real critical thinkers who have studied the Breggins' position one has to realize that Peter Breggin makes a very strong case for the stance he has taken...

Expand full comment

Like so many other doctors and scientists in the past, Malone is trapped in the political machine. He cannot say the things people want to hear him saying. That's only a problem for the people, not for him.

He is in an unique position to defend himself, his family (he has sons and grandsons, I think.) He doesn't want slavery.

But he is not a miracle worker. This was political from the beginning. No amount of scientific truth, like the non-existence of sars-cov-2 or any other truth, can produce a sudden change in a political plan. Change is inevitble but slow. Obviously, people in the audience want things to move faster.

And the base is divided: some want to believe the virus was real, or anything else they promote. But the leaders who still push the virus already know there was no virus. They can't change that, yet.

Eventually, even the enemy will say there was never any virus, and will laugh at everyone for all the damage they have done.

But I don't think the base needs to be united. We at the base, everyone with their own opinions and preferences, has to understand that the world is changing. By force. In an unwanted direction by us, but a desired direction by the enemy. Our game is not to go back. Our game is to force the enemy to submit to the law. And build a world in a different direction, based around the notion of medical freedom, which is what our enemy hates the most.

We don't need to agree on everything. We just need to be united against the enemy. From that, we can change the politics.

Ultimately, civl disobedience was always the answer, from the start. There are more things to do, like all the good Meryl Nass does to inform the people at the base.

And Malone is not perfect, but I don't care. I don't need saints or angels. Tom Cowan is not an angel or a saint, nor is Stefan Lanka. The three are just humans. Don't expect too much from humans. Be rational. That's my message for everyone.

It is always a bad idea to develop a dependent relationship with any kind of leader.

That one-sided dependency breeds outrage. If one is outraged because a person one looks up to says something one doesn't like, then it's time to stop and reflect on the path one is walking.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the clarity. I see him as someone who tried for 10 years to figure out the lipids that might work but then failed. He helped others try for another 10 and saw failures. He thought at first that somebody had figured it out and the FDA was honest. He got the jabs. Now he sees the blunders and data hiding and feels both injured and angry. Seems quite open and honest IMHO. I do quite agree that 5GW was and is being used. Few have the patience and time to grapple with the many issues we are facing; not Malone, nor you, nor any of us. I just try not to be hasty.

Expand full comment

Exactly. He worked on the idea of mRNA vaccination which "came to him" because the immune systems interfered with gene experiments he was doing. He never developed the idea to a product. Others took the ball with $$$ in their eyes and or depopulation. Malone can be criticized for being a believer in the "system" for too long.

Expand full comment
Feb 25, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

First of all, I’m a mom of vaccine injured kids, so I get it. But you obviously haven’t read or listened to much of RM’s story or research over the past 3 years. He took the vaccine and was injured by it. That’s what started him on his journey and thank goodness for that! The very reason he is so knowledgeable is because he was in the field. He absolutely never brags about his invention. He’s one of the most humble people there are.

We need to use our anger and frustration wisely. Tearing down one of our most important fighters is not productive. Watch more of his interviews and you’ll see obvious truth. We need to let people grow and change, and welcome newcomers to our table. We need them all!

Expand full comment

I have been listening to him. Apparently you havent.

Expand full comment
author

Put up or shut up, Heidi Heil. I agree with Lora--there has been far too much fragging our own heroes, and I am done with hosting it on my substack. We need to build the movement not tear it down.

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

Why do you need heroes?

That is a very dangerous position and one of the many things that get IN THE WAY of movements.

Do you think anyone should be above criticism? Do you think you should be above criticism? Should I be above criticism? Should RFK be above criticism?

Once you get into these waters you are no longer speaking about a movement you are speaking about a "cult of personality."

Critical thinking and ongoing analysis should be first and foremost don't you agree?

If that means illustrating that someone, no matter who that someone is, is profoundly wrong on something than so be it.

If they are worthy they will be able to handle any and all criticisms levied at them.

Or do you assert people should remain silent, be censored, even if they have evidence that refutes said "leader."

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

Why do we need TROLLS? Sorry, all you military brats getting paid to do 5G propaganda warfare ON YOUR OWN PEOPLE WHO YOU TOOK AN OATH TO DEFEND, GROK THIS: The cat's already outta the bag and WE ARE NOT TAKING YOUR GODDAMN SHOTS-- OR YOUR BULLSHIT NARRATIVE OR "CONTROLLED OPPOSITION" EVERYTHING EVERYONE EVERYWHERE-- ANY MORE. YOU'RE TOO LATE. TELL THAT TO YOUR USEFUL IDIOT C.O.

Expand full comment

I am curious: when you tell your reader to shut up, how are you different from the predators that orchestrated

1. the pandemic that has never been

2. the propaganda around a non existing virus and disease

3. the censoring of dissident voices?

Expand full comment

Your denial of the existence of viruses is the Cass Sunstein headfake being run on substack.

Truth is not a matter of opinion.

Expand full comment

It is not a matter of opinion, because the scientific truth is that viruses don't exist. You need to overcome your preconceived notions and become informed.

But the movement is about medical freedom, not scientific truth, which is not necessary or sufficient to make the case of medical freedom.

Obviously, people who are in favor of slavery and deny good and evil are against medical freedom. They use fake viruses like they could use real dioxins. Their objective is power and destruction.

The most important thing for substack commenters is to reduce the drama and the confrontation. Just state your opinion and your supporting evidence, don't attack the persons and don't attack the leaders. Focus on solving the problem of getting more medical freedom.

At this point, the cat is out of the bag and you cannot convince anyone to go back believing in pathogenic viruses. But you can have a frutiful political alliance with people you disagree with, that will be mutually beneficial.

Let's all be civil and build bridges.

Expand full comment

I simply gave up on such comments. Not sure why they are even necessary or germane.

Expand full comment

I have many genuine questions and concerns. I came to your page with the upmost respect voicing them. Is it common for you to tell people who have concerns to shut up and put up?

I would truly like to know why he has chosen to promote himself as the inventor of technology that harmed people across the world. This shows his continued support of his inventions which have no safety studies in humans. They resulted in harm. Why talk about this if he doesnt support its use? I've followed many lines of study only to abandon them when I see they are harmful. He hasnt.

He abandon his very early *high quality* study of famotidine which might have saved millions of lives had he followed through. This is never talked about. There are many concerns I have which, added up, make him appear less than favorable to me. How might he affect the future of medicine with his current views and connections? He gives excuses to colleagues even when they continue to support these injections he says they have families to feed. A lot of people have been killed because someone has a family to feed.

You asked me to shut up so obviously none of this concerns you but it concerns me.

Expand full comment

Don't make it personal!

It's not about you, dear Heidi.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

+1 funny! :)

Maybe Malone is not the 'leader' some people want, but he was a scientist vested in the system - those guys tend to be careful with their statements. Malone's gotten pretty frank lately and I don't see any substantive reason to criticise his public statements.

Just people casting aspersions. The 'dont trust beard' is as substantive as anything else I've seen.

Expand full comment

Yeeeeaahhhh... there's SOMETHING I don't t-r-u-s-t about guys with BEARDS!!!

Expand full comment

That's because you are biased against the Orthodox Christianity, but give the orthobros a chance.

Expand full comment

Ya, I’ve listed to most of what he’s put out there. Apparently, you need to work on discernment and humility. Use your experiences for good rather than being bitter and angry at people on your own team. Best of luck!

Expand full comment

Attacking the messenger isnt helpful. It says more about you than it does about me.

Expand full comment

And somehow your attacking Dr. Malone's sincerity, without really knowing for sure, is not itself attaching the messenger? I am with Lora and Dr. Nass. You doth protest too much. When Dr. Malone originally discovered how to transfect cells with mRNA, how could he have known that a modified version would eventually be foisted on us without proper testing? How can his protestations against the vaccines for the last 1+ year be considered supportive of RNA?

Expand full comment

His study requires knowledge of how the sausage is made. He knows intimate details of cellular processes and the lack of safety studies. I'm not stating anything novel by acknowledging this.

If Malone has nothing to hide he could have answered my questions when he was communicating back and forth on SH. You're welcome to attack me but it isnt helping to find out why hes over focused on his contribution and doesnt share the dangers of what he was tinkering with and promoting

Edit: also it makes me very uncomfortable to see him interested in continuing this research and standing up for those who've harmed others by saying they had a family to feed. It reflects on him. Hes forgiving himself without even an apology, instead exclaiming how integral his part was in the making of this bioweapon as if it's a good thing

Expand full comment

🤣

Expand full comment

Not really. People also say stupid sh!t like the following first-grader crap: "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me."

NOW GO TELL THAT TO THE PEOPLE WHO GOT FRIGHTENED AND BULLIED BY 5G U.S. MILITARY GRADE PROPAGANDA INTO TAKING A FAKE "VACCINE" THAT WAS BARELY TESTED, THEN THE CONTROL GROUP WAS IMMEDIATELY DESTROYED BY VAXXING ALL THE POOR BASTARDS, AND FOR WHICH THERE WERE OVER ONE THOUSAND SIDE EFFECTS NOTED BY THE MANUFACTURER, AND ALL THE RESULTS OF THE TEST RESEARCH WAS RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC BY COURT-ORDER IN A FOIA REQUEST TO AN 8TH CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE. SHEESH.

Expand full comment

I’d encourage everyone to read every piece Dr Malone has published on his Substack. I mean, every single piece. Until I did that, I had a very jaded view of Malone. But after reading through every single article, my mind was opened. He is quite open with the details of his career and the discovery of mRNA. He also details his failings. We are human and tend to be driven by emotion. It’s natural to seek the ‘facts’ we want that will support our own beliefs. But ultimately, most of us want to be on the side of truth - even if it means we may have been wrong. This takes a bit of courage, but leads to wisdom.

Expand full comment

mRNA was an interesting new technology and there was / is no guarantee we'll get a product out of it that has a positive benefit to risk ratio.

But maybe. We'd have to prosecute the virus makers and spike-gene-jab makers first, to weed-out the good from the bad trees.

That time is, I am sure, almost nigh.

Expand full comment

I don't want to nitpick too much, but I will, so forgive me in advance, Brother bongoben.

Positive risk to benefit ratio is a bad measurment. What are the risks? That question has a different answer for every single person.

There is no such thing as one size fits all solution, as we all know.

Perhaps it would be useful to explain that most of what passes as science these days (and for the last 30 years) is just propaganda. Pure sophistry. For example, the so called two-dimensional material called graphene does not exist. It is simply abuse of language, marketting techniques to pump stocks scams. That is all there is to it.

There are many such frauds. People are helpless. They get mentally abused by all the media every single day.

What if mRNA techonology is always a failure? What if cells expell and destroy most of what tries to get near them? What if you have to make a person very sick first, like shutting down their immune system, in order for this tech to have a chance at doing something? What if, all thigns considered, there is no benefit anywhere, the same as it happens with all other medical frauds in history? There is only vain hope that is exploited by bad people.

This fraud is special, because it is not just about money, it is mostly about power and poltical change. There is no shame in admitting that a huge attack against humanity was based in a huge scientific fraud, based in turn in reasearch failure. Most research ends in failure. That's the truth.

We have been warned many times over the years, by many people. The powerful were fostering frauds to gain power, land, raise prices, and cull the deplorables. Science should not be political, and socialized medicine is evil, as all the accumulated experience over decades shows.

Not only it is immoral to coerce people to go through a test or a treatment, but it also produces bad outcomes for the patient and for society. Only the fraudsters win with the politization of everything.

Expand full comment

Quite right but the fraud in medical science and discovery began almost 200 years ago, not in the last 30 years; the real scientists and medical geniuses were not listened to then and today's frauds are direct descendents of the charlatans of the past; the quest for real health and well being was usurped when it was realized that money and power could be guaranteed with widespread use of "vaccines" and prescriptions and not in promoting natural immunity; welcome to the birth of allopathic medicine and the almost total control of medical research and medical training; only now the fraudsters not only want the money and control but want to completely eliminate any concept of "patient" and replace it with "victim"; the present time is ripe for enforcing their evil agenda because the masses have reached a critical point in embracing "collective stupidity".

Expand full comment

"Positive risk to benefit ratio is a bad measurment. What are the risks? That question has a different answer for every single person."

...

I agree with you but let me also nitpick: It's only a BAD measurement if some bureaucrat makes that decision for everyone.

...

It's a GOOD measurement if made by an invidual, by his or her own subjective preferences.

An example is government mandating crash safety for cars, or bumper types, or window types. That makes cars heavy, expensive, and higher gas consumption per mile. It takes the risk/benefit decision away from the individual purchaser.

Likewise, any 'public health official' making decisions like mask mandates, lockdowns, business closures and gene-transfection product mandates is never taking into account the real individual costs.

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

No, Heidi. Wrong. YOU haven't been listening. Are you hellbent for leather on fracturing the medical freedom movement? Just whose payroll are you on? Who the Hell are you working for, kiddo?

Expand full comment

You subbed his substack? Did you get a paid subscription then? That’s the only way you can comment it seems.

Expand full comment

Hi Heidi. Malone and McCullough both rub me the wrong way. There’s something dishonorable about them. ANYONE who speaks like vaccines have any merit IMMEDIATELY gets turned off by me.

Why?

I’ve said this so many times already and I’ll say it again...and again:

People need to do historical research and find out that anytime you inject anything into your body, you’re on a highway to hell.

NEVER in the history of mankind has injecting poisons into your body given you better health.

Quite the opposite. They’ve ALL maimed and killed. Read these and learn the history of this barbaric act:

The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations https://a.co/d/cfvx9Q6

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/coVuit4

- George William Winterburn, PhD, MD, The Value of Vaccination: A Non-partisan Review of Its History and Results, 1886

- History and Pathology of Vaccination, Edgar R. Crookshank, 1889

- Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination. A Strange Chapter of Medical History, 1889

https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds

There are many others, they’re just a few.

Finding the truth isn’t that hard

But you do have to get off your ass and turn off the tube and read.

We’ve known for well over 150 years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.

And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.

And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.

If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.

People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.

And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.

And those “doctors” who are shilling for the medical cartel, the pharmafia and allopathic medicine should hang their heads in shame.

They know the truth, but have sold their soul to the company because their payment on their yacht, McMansion, and jag is due.

Sickening, pathetic and pitiful.

Expand full comment

I think you have to be careful. I have two vaccine injured kids because I was unaware of this information, both discovered at age 14. My son’s medicine is $6000 a month. I’m not a stupid person. My son’s MMR injury a disease I had never heard of, I later found in an NIH study. My daughter’s tDap injury, a swollen brain, is a known contraindication on the CDC website.

As a parent that pissed me off. I would’ve much rather been given the information clearly known and decided for myself. So if that could happen to me -- that could happen to anybody.

I also want to say I was going to be a doctor. The study the doctors learn about in school is from 1996 with 1000 kids.. They are brainwashed and it’s intentional. Rothschild etc....

In my business now I have a healing gift and I get rid of negative conditioning that gets in your way. It’s been my observation the more educated people are the more difficult that is.

I’m just saying that everybody has to undo that brainwashing at their own pace. I’m happy these two prominent people are speaking out, and I don’t want to hold it against them because they drank the Kool-Aid for any period of time. 

I think instead of just discounting what they have to say, we should proceed with caution and separate the wheat from the chaff.

Expand full comment

I agree. And in a relatively brief period of time - if you listen to them regularly - you can actually see/hear the lights coming on. There was an immediate slight rift in Dr McCullough’s rock solid stance on childhood vaccines after he interviewed Dr Tenpenny. In subsequent interviews he started to express doubt about one (can’t recall which) and even quoted some of the same data and arguments she used to persuade him. His opinions are evolving as he comes into more information from sources he trusts and respects - something we all do. There is no timetable for this, it’s happens when it happens.

Expand full comment

It is always difficult to change deeply held beliefs.

We have to be more generous with people coming out of the cave.

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

What are there, a few million doctors in the US? How many of them have realized what a failure these injections were and yet still remain behind the curtain? Answer: The vast majority! ANYONE who comes out and speaks out, no matter what they did to promote vaccination before has my respect. Malone didn't invent these vaccines, just some of the early technology is all. People with serious nefarious intent made these various shots because they could. Blaming the invention of gun powder on JFK's death is about on par with these silly accusations on Malone. Also blaming Malone lets off the hook so many who were the real culprits.

Expand full comment

And people with nefarious intent coordinated the virus engineering.

Many in the know are now talking about a two-part bioweapon.

Expand full comment

Makes sense once we fully understand that we are under attack from our betters. The days when it was assumed that the Healthcare system was for our benefit are OVER. I am startimg to understand that vax injuries and covid complications are a coordinated one two punch and it matters not which is which.

Expand full comment

maybe it is a three part bioweapon:

1st) drive most people crazy with an engineered virus that kills almost no one

2nd) drive most people even crazier with an unnecessary vaccine that does nothing to reduce infection or disease and it is unsafe and a killing and disabling agent in itself

3rd) out of the near total despair create the biggest financial bubble in history, bigger than the FED itself, and then burst it in order to destroy all means of production and create a total war and carnage everywhere

I happen to think that a human is always more dangerous to another human than any microbe. Humans are the bioweapons in each of the three parts of this conjecture: people harm each other in each phase.

Malone said "military grade psychologic manipulation" over everyone, all the time, with visual cues, extremely nasty propaganda, abusive messaging, literally no way out. Under this conditioning of the mind to cause the greatest possible mental wreakage in the greatest number of victims possible, who needs a pathogenic virus?

If number 3 happens, we can easily see 6 billion dead corpses in a few months, of which I will probably be one. No need for a virus, only another victim of an ideological war.

I don't think this conjecture is valid. There was no virus, the injectable products are a bioweapon, perhaps meant to mass sterilization, aimed to reduce human fertility just enough so that total human population is continually reduced slowly over the decades. The psychological manipulation is not meant to create a war, but to render people helpless and unable to fight. That's all. No need for two-part bioweapon either.

Expand full comment

Very good comment!

Expand full comment

Except if one blames Malone it won't be Malone alone; in actuality it's many of Malone's statements themselves that appear designed to let the real culprits off the hook; your apologetics and what you call "silly accusations" does not contribute towards discovering the truth and facts and only confirms that there still remain serious and genuine questions regarding Malone.

Expand full comment

We are separating "the wheat from the chaff!"

Expand full comment

Great comment.

There was no viral pandemic or epidemiological emergency in 2020- it was mass murder. They will use a similar template and roll this out again unless there are prosecutions for the crimes committed.

Why do so many Covid dissident alt-celebs avoid this reality?

The mandated the use of ventilators/remdesivir/barticinib/midazolam/vancomyacin,fentanyl etc. combined with complete neglect when not being harassed/abused killed off hundreds of thousands of "Covid" (rebranded flu and bacterial pneumonia) patients.

All of this was (and much more) was done to create the mass hysteria event in order to hide the massive economic collapse of 2019 and hide the $13 trillion (so far) worth of bailouts AND to jump start the Pharma bio-security system as THE new economic driver in a bankrupt system. Covid-19 is the biggest money laundering/racketeering scheme in the history of this country.

99% of people falsely certified as having 'died from covid' actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and 'public health' despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.

No one has 'died from covid' as "covid" is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, flu and many other disease conditions.

In short whatever "excess deaths" which may have occurred anywhere can be attributed to people who didn't have to die but were KILLED due to the unnecessary use of ventilators, harsh toxic drugs, people dying prematurely due to lack of medical treatment, ill effects from the lockdowns and so on.

Expand full comment

That’s true the death numbers were manipulated - I wrote about how they did that in 2020. I think people can finally see my blog now because we JUST found the malicious code they put in there to block it right after I wrote this article!!

http://pamraglandsblog.com/2020/07/how-covid-death-and-hospitalization-numbers-in-the-us-are-grossly-exaggerated-on-purpose/

Expand full comment

Why do so many Covid dissident alt-celebs avoid this reality?

Politics is difficult, dear Allan.

We the guppies cannot imagine the amount of crow Meryl has eaten over the years to earn a position to speak for the voiceless. She paid the price, she has the guts to confront the enemy head on and she gets to speak as a leader.

I respect her and I don't try to convert her.

I think I would be ungrateful if I called her a virus pusher. I do have patience with people who have chosen to be in the political frontline.

But I repeat, politics is a difficult praxis. There are many levels of action. My people in the no-virus side are attacking another flank.

It is a very bad idea to have only one voice, even if it is the correct one.

Expand full comment

Yes, but there is no need to demonize those who haven't got all the way there. Just the Warp Speed un-tested or fake-tested vaxxx danger is enough for the fight.

Expand full comment

I didn't demonize anyone, simply asked for evidence for the assertion there was a pandemic in Spring 2020 and Meryl couldn't provide it nor could Malone nor could RFK because there isn't any.

Not only could she not provide it if you go back and look through the dialogue she blatantly skirted it and when this was pointed out got downright irascible.

Why won't these people simply provide the evidence that they use to back up this assertion? Not too difficult of a request.

Expand full comment

Meryl agreed that the definition of 'pandemic' was changed and that she was using the new definition.

Expand full comment

I think, like me, it isn't very useful to argue that point. The evil of the vaxxx, on the other hand, is clear.

Expand full comment

Good points and these two will lead the charge next time, and fall for the same game of “just sharing the data” come the next poisoning and call for better quackzines that “look like they may be working....blah blah blah” I wouldn’t be surprised if they would still promote Pfizer and Moderna if they just did it better wink wink.

https://open.substack.com/pub/sinatana/p/the-mask-of-all-skams-f07?utm_source=direct&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Here’s my perspective.☝️

Expand full comment

Spot on. 💞

Expand full comment
author

Prove he says he likes mRNA vaccines, guys, or shut up

Expand full comment

I never used the word vaccine.

Expand full comment

Extremely well stated and exactly it is absolutely necessary to read and research the medical history, as you so correctly and strongly argue; we didn't get here by accident and find ourselves being controlled by the fraudsters in medical science and government bureaucracy and all of the other nefarious actors; there were many medical geniuses and discoverers who were vilified for their honest endeavours and relegated to obscurity precisely because their truth was a threat to the status-quo dominated by lies and deception; there is absolutely no difference today except for the degree of depravity and evil being perpetrated by that hierarchy of satanists who want nothing less than for you to relinquish your very body and soul.

Expand full comment

Fighting the Establishment does not depend on agreeing on vaccines overall, gain of function, viruses, etc. I do wish he would shave his beard and drop his lawsuit, tho. The evidence against the Covid vaxxx is overwhelming and getting more so. We need to focus on that for the time being. Enough crime there to bring the perps to the dock

Expand full comment

Extremely well stated!

Expand full comment

Hi, Heidi. I'm one of the people Robert is talking about who writes on whether he's controlled opposition. I have three episodes on my Substack. It was in response to the first that he asked a co-presenter (from his own account) how to handle accusations of being controlled op. The other person says, "If they're thinking for themselves, that's good. We should consider everyone as potentially controlled op." In this video, he turns that around and says he needs to trust others, which seems like a false way of saying others should trust him.

I would never have questioned this if it wasn't for his $25M lawsuit against the Breggins. A lawsuit is an act of aggression, not a difference of opinion. The Breggins list my articles as #1 and #3 on their page of Who is Robert Malone? along with 19 articles by other journalists.

When Robert talks about people who accuse you of being controlled op unless you agree there was no virus, he's distorting the video JJ Couey did called Carlson and Malone discuss the Scooby-Doo. As a virologist, JJ does a credible job of explaining why man-made viruses can't replicate to become a pandemic, and how this is a set-up to get the DoD and WHO massive funding and control against bioweapons. But it's the staged Pfizer 'expose' of Project Veritas that he--and I--see Malone and Tucker being complicit in. No one needs to agree on the conclusions, but that was so obviously an act that it was yet another 'tell.'

Expand full comment

The thing that bothers me about Malone is that someone in the resistance shouldn't go around suing someone who has been in the resistance since the first someone was in diapers.

The weapon being used against us is propaganda/censorship. A lawsuit is a great way to silence someone and send a message. If we're in essence fighting for free speech (the fight against censorship) then it really doesn't help to have someone on "our team" working hard to censor another someone on our team.

I don't buy this "I'm being hurt financially so need to shut the guy up" excuse.

Malone needs to drop the damn lawsuit.

Expand full comment

Excellent points, Jim. In this first episode I go into detail analyzing the filing for the lawsuit, which Robert posted. Until I saw how flimsy his charges were, mainly based on ideological differences over Desmet's book, I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. When I realized that his only substantive claims for their defamation of him were things he said himself--including in the filing so the judge would see he was an important person to the DoD--it was like a cold shower. Their conclusion was that he was controlled op, but their facts that led to that conclusion are all things he's admitted.

https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/who-is-robert-malone-really

Expand full comment

Heidi,

I appreciate your thoughtful comments and the intelligent discussion on this page.

Someone with this pedigree SHOULD stand the test of time and SHOULD be subjected to intense scrutiny. Here's Malone's 17-page CV. Everyone can examine it for themselves. Do leopards change their spots..? hmmm. Don't confuse personality with performance.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b084/t/60b61dbe39f1e800244e53e4/1622547902895/RWM+CV+1+June+2021+.pdf

I have read most of his book, "Lies my gov't told me." There are some discrepancies. For example, he paints himself as the owner of a "small, quiet farm in Virginia" where he "pitches manure and raises horses." In reality, his farm is a high-tech breeding compound for Lusitano horses. https://www.lusitanostud.com/new-page

The concept of **Perception Management** comes to mind. Developed by the DoD and used throughout military actions and high-level negotiations, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, covert deception, and psychological techniques.

In other words, is he really trying to expose and stand against the actions of his former pharma/DoD/government buddies, OR are his interviews and articles crafted to give the **perception** he is on the side of the people?

I hope he's sincere, but that should not be an accepted given.

Have you noticed he's *everywhere* these days? At EVERY conference, at strategy meetings, at legal and political social events? He admits to sometimes doing 9 podcasts/day (THAT'S exhausting!)

I'm not throwing Malone under the bus, but he is a highly-skilled, and even admits to being well-trained by top lawyers and law firms to speak in specific ways as an Expert Witness. On pg4 of his book, he says of himself: "I have spent much of my career working on vaccine development. I have also had extensive experience in drug repurposing for infectious disease outbreaks. I am not an “anti-vaxxer” in any way, shape, or form.”

Again, do leopards change their spots..? Sometimes..? Watchful waiting and observing is often in the best interest of everyone.

Expand full comment

This reply went to me, Sherri, although hopefully Heidi is keeping an eye on this lively thread she started. May I cut and paste your comment if I do another episode on Malone? I think it's very balanced and cautious, and the CV you link is very interesting. It certainly seems like a stretch to call him a whistleblower when he's not revealing any new information but 'holding a finger in the wind' to see which way the resistance is going, as someone on Sasha Latypova's comments said (a similar discussion is going on there.)

Expand full comment

I'm going to make a post on my substack using that info later today (Eye on the Evidence) - but you're welcome to use it too! thanks!

Expand full comment

I'll wait for yours and link it. I've subbed but post a link when you have it up. We may part ways on other topics, however. The other episode I'm working on is a critique of Naomi Wolf's Return of the Gods post. In fact, I see her and RM doing the same thing with diverting attention to "pure evil" and Satan.

My focus is on economics and systems, which may be hard to change but not something with supernatural forces arrayed against us. I note that you recommend her, and I have her book and like her too. But I'm happy to join forces in the places where we agree!

Expand full comment

Hi Dr. Tee.

Did Peter McCullough change his spots? But he is not a vaccinologist.

In due time, even after his book, he will admit there was no virus. The full blown germ theory denial is unlikely from him, and I don't care. I want medical freedom, not conversions to my cult.

One day, someone with a platform ought to explain that most of what is known as public health and disease prevention was always politics.

A device to control the thoughts and the actions of both patients and doctors. A form of slavery, if you will.

It has gone out of control, like all other political schemes.

All based on lies.

But those who are like Malone, have the privilege of being in a significant position in the political game. He is a politician now. I don't expect truth from politicians.

My thesis is that the medical freedom movement cannot have just one voice. Unity is not uniformity in every little detail. Unity in this issue is focusing in the enhancing medical freedom, which entails the legal prosecution of the perpetrators. They have to be attacked from many angles.

Expand full comment

I like Peter and would consider him loosely as a "friendly colleague" - meaning, I speak with him fairly regularly, and have had dinner with him a few times, but not a "buddy" or friend. Peter has spoken out STRONGLY against the Covid jab in all age groups... but even though he did a great interview with me, he BURIED it on his radio and made it difficult to search and find (protecting himself..?) He's said a few things against the rest of the vax schedule, but not sure he's 'changed his spots' about vaccines in general. ;)

Expand full comment

Under current law, defamation is considered an act of aggression. I don't think it should be, but under current law, a case can be made that Breggins were aggressor.

Expand full comment

Excellent points!

Expand full comment

Did you pay for his substack? That’s the only way you can comment I see. If there is another way to read let me know as I’m tapped out on substack.

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

Malone's substack is for paid members' comments only. There was a day when Steve Kirsch's substack wouldn't let me post so I paid for a year. I was informed by some of the freeloading trolls there that they were able to post comments even though they weren't paid members. Who knows? Steve does have a roaming junkyard dog over there, name of "WayneBGood," apparently his "moderator," a former cop or maybe a DA, or just acts like one, who polices (harasses?) commenters and will time you out and threaten to throw you off if he doesn't like a post. At first I thought he was a hacker, who knows, maybe he is. I have spoken out there about his "Wild-wild West" sense of "justice" and lame attempts at "law" enforcement. Imagine treating all your paid subscribers this way...

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

Oh, so now we're hearing that Pfizer staged an expose of Project Veritas, and Robert Malone as well as Tucker Carlson are in on it?? L.O.L. You're a D.o.D PLANT.

Expand full comment

And your "contribution" is void

Expand full comment

Why is he trying to silence and destroy the Breggins and there book “COVID 19-we are the prey”

With a $25 M lawsuit with a high dollar DC law firm he is not paying for. Actions speak louder than words.

Expand full comment

I suspect Malone is actually the naive nerd scientist and he got maneuvered by some deepstate operatives posing as 'friends' to do the lawsuit.

He should drop the lawsuit.

Expand full comment

The lawsuit is baseless and malicious and is an example of the very tactics that Malone is supposed to be against; it's another way to stifle dialogue and debate and shape and control the narrative; die-hard Malone followers have resorted to ad hominem attacks and name-calling against the Breggins such as calling Peter a "senile psychiatrist".

Expand full comment

Insults are bad most of the time.

In the case of Breggin, it is also the worst attack against him, because he is not senile and he is one of the bravest defenders of the voiceless. The attackers will regret it.

If one wants to attack Breggin, go for his mistakes and never for his character. And he corrects his mistakes most of the time, so there are no many options to chose from.

Breggin is a pro at this.

Expand full comment

I haven't seen any rational argument for the lawsuit. What's the best justification they got?

Ah here is a list of alleged statements by Breggins. I'd be pissed too. And yes, under current US 'law' such statements could be grounds for 'defamation'.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/just-the-facts

Still i don't think defamation is a legit crime -- in principle!

I should be able to say things like: 'Tony Porcaro takes baths with rubber duckies!" without incurring a lawsuit. Dr. Walter Block makes a good point that you do not own other people's opinions of you. If somebody lies about somebody else, that's mean but doesn't violate any of your valid property rights. So go ahead and lie back. Or whatever. Or explain why the lie isn't true.

Expand full comment

As I posted above, bongoben, this Just the Facts with the list of alleged statements is what I analyze here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/who-is-robert-malone-really. None of their factual statements that led to their conclusion are untrue--they were all admitted by Robert himself. Check it out and tell me in the comments if you think I'm wrong. And yes, opinions aren't defamation, only untrue statements that are presented as if they're facts. The Breggins never do that. I suspect this was just an act of intimidation and was never meant to go through a court where I think it would be thrown out, from my reading of it.

Expand full comment

You write much that I agree with; i never thought Matthias really came up with anything new with his book (about how people can lock-on to a false idea and reinforce each other in that erroneous belief). It was stated better 400 years ago by Étienne de La Boétie in "The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude".

https://mises.org/library/politics-obedience-discourse-voluntary-servitude

As for the statements by the Breggins:

"“Malone IS Dangerous. I knew from day one, this man is in the middle of every horrific thing that has happened to humanity. He is an operative running interference to keep this thing going. "

I wonder - how do you get more defamatory than that? How are they going to prove to the court that Malone was in the middle of the Rape of Nanking, and the firebombing of Tokyo? How about the Holodomor, or Mao's Great Leap Forward?

I'd like a lot of people to improve their alignment with reality, including Dr. Malone. Has he mentioned the telltale fingerprint of apparent racial profiling in the furin cleavage site insert?

⠀⢀⡴⠶⠶⢦⡀⠀⠀⢀⡀⢀⡀⠀⣀⣀⠀⠀⣀⣀⠀⢀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⠀⢀⣀⡀⠀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀

⠀⣸⣧⣥⣬⣼⣇⠀⠀⢸⣷⡋⠀⠈⣁⠼⠃⢸⡧⢬⡁⢸⣧⡼⠃⠀⠀⢸⡧⢼⡃⠀⣿⠀⢸⡇⢸⡇⠀⠀

⢸⣿⢿⣿⣿⡿⣿⡇⠀⠘⠃⠙⠂⠘⠓⠒⠂⠈⠓⠚⠁⠘⠃⠙⠂⠀⠀⠘⠓⠚⠁⠐⠛⠂⠈⠓⠚⠁⠀⠀

⢘⡛⣼⣿⣿⣧⢛⡃⠀⠀⢀⡀⠀⣀⠀⢀⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⣀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⠀⠀⢀⣀⡀⠀⢀⡀⢀⡀⠀⠀⠀

⠈⢡⣿⡟⢻⣿⡌⢁⣐⣒⢸⣇⣄⣿⠀⢸⡧⠄⠀⠀⣾⠭⣷⠀⢸⡧⠼⠃⠀⣿⠀⣿⠀⢸⡿⣾⡇⣒⣂⡀

⠀⣾⣿⠁⠈⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠘⠋⠈⠛⠀⠘⠓⠒⠂⠀⠛⠀⠛⠀⠘⠃⠀⠀⠀⠙⠒⠋⠀⠘⠃⠘⠃⠀⠀⠀

Expand full comment

I looked at that line too but if I say, "bongoben is a Monster!" is that defamation? It's clearly hyperbole. No one's going to take that seriously.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I loved those rubber duckies!

Expand full comment

I prefer the lawsuit is thrown away by the court.

But I will settle for what you say.

It was a bad idea from the get go.

.

Expand full comment
Feb 25, 2023·edited Feb 25, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass

Thank you for flagging this interview. Dr Malone is one of my most trusted sources. BTW, I try to avoid giving any views to YouTube.where anything that differs from the state propaganda is deleted. So here's the same interview on Rumble. They actually allow free speech.

https://rumble.com/v2aiyhv-pandemic-post-mortem-the-truth-vs.-the-narrative-with-dr.-robert-malone.html

Expand full comment

I hate to tell you but little old me is actually censored on Rumble!!!

I only have three videos because of it which must be exactly over the target... and what they do is turn them private, so you have to have the link or search exactly by my name with no space to find them.

Trust nothing I hate to say. So we just need to keep posting the same thing everywhere. Even YouTube when we can. 

Expand full comment

Robert Malone believes there was a pandemic in Spring 2020. RFK also holds this belief. They are flat wrong on this point as the evidence illustrates conclusively. This is not some minor side issue.

There was no pandemic ever- there is no 'lab leak'- there is no unique viral pathogen- no "targeted aerosolization"- no "China Virus"- there is no "There" there. It is all fraud piled on top of fraud.

This kind of nonsense becomes the "acceptable alternative Covid narrative" if not challenged. This is isn't simply a host of minor omissions it is completely misdirecting people AND covering up what ACTUALLY happened which had NOTHING to do with any "Lab leak" or GoF or unique medical emergency.

We are way past the point in understanding why it is that reifying the Big Lie that there ever was a "pandemic" in 2020 is hugely problematic. This needs to be confronted head on in the "health freedom movement" as those with the biggest audiences by and large reinforce the "pandemic" narrative and create fertile ground for justifying all sorts of "emergency measures" in the future.

Does Malone highlight the slaughter in the nursing homes that occurred in Spring 2020?

Does Malone highlight the iatrogenic events in hospitals around the world and how they were called "Covid?"

Does Malone highlight how "Covid deaths" were manufactured through false attribution and recategorization of mortality data?

Does Malone reinforce the pandemic narrative- falsely claiming that there was one?

Expand full comment
author

As do I claim that there was a new virus. Not sure why you are reading my work if you are convinced there is no COVID virus, since my work is based on the fact there is.

The officials lied about pretty much every aspect of this pandemic (to be clear, I'm using the WHO definition of pandemic) but that does not mean doctors did not see a new illness we had never seen before. Are you telling me I misdiagnosed hundreds of COVID patients? Can't buy that.

Do you also not believe in biological warfare?

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

You can claim whatever you want but you have to provide evidence to substantiate your claim.

Before going further I am going to put it out there that I believe you will ultimately abandon this conversation once it is illustrated that your logic is faulty. That is your history so let's see if that holds true.

I am strictly an evidence based person. I do not defer to anyone or put anyone on a pedestal.

Now let's get back to the topic. Let's do this sequentially and dispassionately.

First- do you think there was a pandemic in Spring 2020 that was caused by a viral pathogen?

You can use whatever defintion of pandemic you like- I will go with that.

If so tell me what were its mortality impacts in the United States (where we live) and Italy (where the pandemic allegedly originated in The West)?

What were the specific mortality outcomes (demographics and regions) for each nation and in what exact locales did this pandemic first surface in Spring 2020?

Let's not throw in any superfluous topics at this point- they can be addressed separately.

Later, I would definitely be interested in seeing your diagnosis of this new illness in great detail.

Expand full comment
author

Read my blog--start in March 2020 for a birds eye view of all of the issues you mentioned. Warning--there are over 1,000 posts and they cover all your questions/issues. After you finish reading, happy to chime in if I have not already. It's anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com.

Expand full comment
Feb 26, 2023·edited Feb 26, 2023

Familiar with your blog.

You are being evasive. That is typically one of your methods to avoid a discussion that you aren't able to handle.

Once someone who has knowledge of the topic comes around you run off Meryl.

What is it you fear? Losing credibility? Challenging your assumptions? Being wrong?

My questions above would have taken you only a few minutes to answer if you had the answers.

Instead you use the "drown them in documentation" evasion.

Any viewers can see that you are avoiding these simple questions. Disingenuous at best.

Expand full comment
author

Let me tell you about my week:

Monday get car fixed. Tuesday night give lecture. Wednes drive 3.5 hrs then meet with lawyer. Thursday Board hearing all day . Friday drive home. Saturday Hold 5-6 hr Symposium on the attack on food and agriculture and how to fight back--i am producer and MC. Sunday--give another lecture.

So sorry Allen, since you have more spare time than I do, suggest you go read the blog since my positions are in black and white for all to read. It's searchable.

Expand full comment

That's presumptuous in the extreme.

But I'll play along.

If you were to even attempt what I do in one week every week you would be hospitalized- you couldn't keep up.

Your week looks like a cakewalk compared to what I do every week. Who cares? Noone on this forum should.

Now shall we flex before the cameras?

But here we are- let's get back to the discussion- as I said I only care about the evidence. You don't seem to be able to provide any as of yet.

Tell me what is your evidence that there was a pandemic in Spring 2020 (use whatever definition you want)?

Quite frankly Meryl I don't think you know that much about what happened in Italy and/or the US during that time- I mean the specific, nitty, gritty details. If you did you wouldn't be trying to dance around it like you are.

And that's fine just admit it and then learn from others.

You wouldn't be the first- it's not a crime. RFK knows next to nothing about what happened in Italy in Spring 2020 and still concocts an absurd theory about what happened. People do it all the time.

There was no pandemic anywhere in the world in Spring 2020. Perpetuating this fraud does a lot of damage. It also is dishonorable to those who were killed (not by some virus but by administrative decrees) in nursing homes and hospitals, directly due to human actions, to continue with this lie that there was an aberrant epidemiological event.

Tell your friends that next time you see them, tell Mary and RFK. Make sure they know that there are many who know precisely what happened and will not relent until these truths are understood.

Expand full comment

STFU, "Allen." Not even your real name. Phony, at best ;-)

Expand full comment

But Malone has said this is not biological warfare....no evidence of a bio weapon being deployed, just the evil of banality.

Damn, it is hard to keep up.

Expand full comment

It is true the numbers were intentionally manipulated. I believe they also altered the definition of “Pandemic”.

100% the numbers were skewed upward to maybe 5+% of actuals being COVID deaths. I wrote an article from my unique perspective in healthcare to explain exactly how they did it.

I do think there was and is a unique set of symptoms not seen before. But everyone didn’t have them. As you can see by my article, they were allowed to categorize deaths as COVID for two months prior to passing the Cares act.

They were also allowed to categorize a diagnosis as Covid based on symptoms and not any testing -- although my understanding is the testing is also flawed.

But even with all these numbers and keeping this in perspective -- we still had half as many deaths as heart attacks the year before.. So was that technically a pandemic?

Anyway I explained how they were able to do this manipulation in great detail in this article.

http://pamraglandsblog.com/2020/07/how-covid-death-and-hospitalization-numbers-in-the-us-are-grossly-exaggerated-on-purpose/

Expand full comment
author

The pandemic definition was altered in 2009 for that "pandemic" which did not meet the earlier definition. It was later changed again.

Agree, patients presented with variable symptoms but there were clear syndromes that I saw over and over, like the temp up temp down temp up temp down one. And it last so long for some people, weeks or longer.

I too have blogged about many ways the manipulation was done. It was very well calculated, must have been planned ahead.

Expand full comment

" patients presented with variable symptoms but there were clear syndromes that I saw over and over, like the temp up temp down temp up temp down one. And it last so long for some people, weeks or longer."

Do you have any further specifics on the "Covid" symptoms you diagnosed?

How did you determine it was "Covid?"

Expand full comment

Allen, you've made it MORE than clear that you're here to harass and fracture the medical freedom movement. EVERYBODY here knows your "schtick" and NOBODY appreciates your brand of D.o.D.-sponsored bullshit. Go back in your hole and pull it in behind you. You're too late anyway-- the American people are onto the bullshit and you can't stop us now.

Expand full comment

I understand his question. It’s along the lines of the virus hasn’t been isolated, and / or the PCR test is unreliable so how do you know it’s COVID.

There are people who think the virus hasn’t been isolated, I personally don’t know. I think the evidence is pretty clear the PCR test is unreliable even by the inventor.

But that’s why I commented like I did… Because I think a lot of doctors have seen a similar pattern in symptoms in their patients, and there’s no harm in treating it as-if.

Expand full comment

Pam, we have a set of tested and true techniques for identifying viruses and sars-cov-2 has been abundantly verified thousands of times. The 'no-virus' crowd is part of the Cass Sunstein subversion operation.

Just like the ufo baloney they're spewing into the nets, just like the flatearthers, the nano-bot stories, the graphene oxide.

They're fogging the battlefield to provide some cover for the documented and proven kabbal that ran the Gain of Function network and the Sars-Cov-2 engineering.

Expand full comment

The rtpcr test is not a test and it's the cornerstone of the fraud. Covid is only a label that packs many things to distract from the real attack.

A small part of the disease of three years ago was psychogenic We never talk about that. A lot of people, some using many drugs and already with disease, got very badly abused and were made worse by their own anxiety. That is not all about the crisis, but it is a part that deserves more investigation.

Placebos help people. Adjusting or removing medicaitons also helps people in a crisis. Truth also helps. Throwing the tv set off the window also helps. Opening a book also helps.

The dancing nurses was pure mockery meant to break people's minds. One of many tactics that worked as intended.

Doctors do what they can. But it is good to do away with emotional dependency. Let's be careful to not subtitute one dependency with another dependency.

The agreed solution to the virus debate should be all doctors and patients should develop moral autonomy. And the doctors and nurses who don't like morally autonomous patients should move to North Corea or Cuba, where they can be happy forever. Or go to Ohio to help clean up everything.

Medicine is not a good job for bullies.

Expand full comment

If I suspected the thing that attacks the epithelium called COVID I would treat as-if. I completely respect every doctor who went out on a limb to do what they knew was working not just follow the agenda.

Expand full comment

It had to be planned. No question.

I know you’re busy but skim my article sometime, because I plainly show how the CDC, the FDA, HHS, CMS a division of HHS, Congress (though I don’t think everyone was aware of what they were doing but I think some people were), WHO, Bill Gates, and all the I’m going to call them “world agencies” supporting the WHO were plainly in cahoots -- with links & screen shots.

So now we know why my blog started getting immediately censored and me with it.

And this is before my video about how Charles Rockefeller owns the vaccine passport app in Orange County California, and the database is a national database funded by George Soros--all from public records. 

Then there is the whole layer of Collins, Fauci, Gates & Ralph Barac from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, with Eco Health Alliance.. Guess where Collins went to school? UNC, Chapel Hill!!! I found that by accident… I could go on and on.

It all sounds like a conspiracy theory -- except it’s not.

Expand full comment

Excellent report.

There is no such thing as a "Covid death" outside the propaganda systems.

From the CDC itself 7/16/21:

“Of the 540,667 hospitalized coronavirus patients included in the study, 80,174 died during the observation period (March 2020 to March 2021). A whopping 99.1% of the patients who died had at least one pre-existing condition, with just 740 having no prior condition on record. Most patients who "died from COVID" had multiple pre-existing conditions, with just 2.6% suffering from only one condition, compared to 32.3% who had two to five preexisting conditions, 39.1% who had six to ten, and 25.1% who have more than ten pre-existing conditions.”

Translation: No one has "died from Covid" as “Covid” is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, “flu” and many other disease conditions.

It’s imperative that everyone stop ceding ground to these fascists by reifying the Big Lie that "Covid" is a unique disease and that it is responsible for a global pandemic.

"Covid" the disease is pure fiction. All the rest of it (biolabs / batsoup / bioweapons / lableaks) is political theatre and bread and circuses. They gamed the system to code for "covid deaths."

This has never had anything to with what is nothing more than a computer-generated genome falsely attributed to a novel pathogen. It is a global conspiracy by the worlds transnational ruling class which was planned out and war-gamed at the WEF, the central bankers summit in Jackson Hole and at Event 201.

Once you get people to assent to a world that makes no sense you can get them to do anything. That's precisely what the Covid Cult is: it competes with the real world. Strategy of tension, mass mind manipulation, a psychological operation, the general population hypnotised right in front of your eyes.

Expand full comment

Sorry to have to explain this to you, Allen. Please pay attention:

Having a pre-existing condition does NOT automatically mean it's inappropriate to attribute cause of death to sars-cov-2.

You can have cancer, and then while swimming in the ocean, get eaten by a shark.

...

The shark is the cause of death there, despite having a pre-existing condition.

Expand full comment

That example is an exaggeration.

What makes it inappropiate to attribute the COD to a non-existent virus is the fact that homicides try very hard to not self-incriminate by saying "COD: pulmonary failure by excessive pressure because I'm evil or I'm a victim of misinformation from the Gov."

Even Fauci said many years ago that the flu from 1918 people died from bacterial pneumonia, not a virus. Which is another way of saying without saying that there was no virus then. Because an expert liar knows how to lie with the truth. They put all truths together in a shaker and serve a coctail that the powerful asked for. Nothing to do with medicine.

Expand full comment

Allen, the WHO subverted old definition of 'pandemic' as one with significant excess death, and struck out the significant deaths part.

So now, according to the WHO, Covid was a 'pandemic' -- but acne is also a 'pandemic' by their new definition.

If Dr. Nass is accepting the subverted definition of Pandemic, I think that's an error. But she's correct that there was a new (engineered) virus.

Expand full comment

Familiar with all of that.

Guess this "new engineered virus" is a bit of a dud as it only took out fragile, institutionalized 80 year olds who had 3-4 chronic conditions who were placed on vetns and heavy respiratory inhibiting medications which blew out their lungs.

And what a weird virus which observed jurisdictional boundaries and national borders and waited for government decrees before killing people.

Of course a microbe didn't do any of this but people can't think clearly due to the mass conditioning and social engineering they've been subjected to.

Expand full comment

It's a nasty engineered sars variant - but it did not justify forcing lockdowns, forcing masks, forcing gene-jabs, destroying businesses, and banning effective treatment alternatives.

Expand full comment

If it's so nasty how come it didn't spread to various regions, even within a few miles, which were next to others where the alleged virus supposedly damaged people?

If it's so nasty how come zero healthy people were impacted?

If it's so nasty how come it didn't start killing people until March 11, 2020?

If it's so nasty how come even where it allegedly impacted the elderly and disabled it only happened in hospital settings and nursing homes?

If it's so nasty why wasn't it wiping out the homeless and street people?

And so on...

Expand full comment

The heavy smokers were protected because a complicated argument involving nicoting saturating ACE2 receptors and what not. The truth is far more simple than that: ther was no virus, as we know.

My point here is that if when they said that "smokers" are protected from "it" that was a clue they threw at people, and then the bastards in control threw a hissy fit saying "NO DON'T SMOKE DON'T BE IRRESPONSIBLE WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE JUST 14,000 DAYS TO FLATTEN YOUR RIGHTS BRO WASH YOUR HANDS OBEY."

It wasn't smoking. It was simply the truth: they attacked us with a BIG LIE, they killed us, they robbed us, they severily damaged the minds of people, they must pay for all that.

Expand full comment

Meryl, please cite the scientific evidence of "the virus", since you claim that Robert (known to some as "the Dark Vaccine Wizard": https://rense.com/general96/DR-ROBERT-MALONE-DARK-VACCINE-WIZARD.pdf) is telling the truth. Or better yet, have your buddy cite it.

Expand full comment

She can’t.

She won’t.

Her beliefs are based on fraudulent concepts.

Expand full comment

The existence of viruses is confirmed by the congruence of tens of thousands of experiments. An alternative hypothesis explaining that body of experiments and observations has never been submitted -- not by you, not by Bimbo Bailey et al...

You're part of the Cass Sunstein subversion squad, wittingly or not.

Expand full comment

Virology is a fraud

Germ theory is a fraud

Pasteur lied and stole from his contemporaries for fame and money and admitted such

There is no such thing and it has been proven as “pathogenic viruses”

It’s a con game made to control by fear by those who want control

The same con game is used for the criminal barbaric act of “vaccination”

Your tens of thousands of experiments were all done with smoke and mirrors with one goal in mind: to “prove” no matter how fraudulently done, that they are right and their processes should never be questioned

Any “proof” they came up with were made by charlatans paid to lie, scare, confuse and control the innocent walking morons of the world

Expand full comment

I worked with viruses and you're telling a car mechanic that engines aren't real.

Expand full comment

Engines are real for mechanincs. It is easy to isolate an object of the physical world!

The viruses you worked with are not what you were told they were. It is normal for scientists to use a wrong model and then discover the model fails and what they were researching is better explained from another angle.

Unlike car mechanics which don't have many angles to explain what is happening there.

Expand full comment

Cite a scientific study. Unsubstantiated claims don't cut it.

Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (212 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/

Do virologists perform valid control experiments? Is virology a science?

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/

“So What The Hell Is Going On”?

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/

Expand full comment

Since you’re car mechanic, I’ve worked with car mechanics and they lie, steal and cheat to purposely prove they’re right.

Just like virologists.

Expand full comment

Right see you're telling them they're lying to you for saying there's an engine in the car. You probably don't believe in alternators and mufflers either.

Expand full comment

No. I never said that. That’s YOU putting words in my mouth, as people like you often do to try to prove your point when you have no other alternative but to lie.

Expand full comment

Sorry, friend, that's wrong.

Read viroliegy.com and follow the references. There is just no way. I resisted this too! lol

Or, better yet, go directly to Stefan Lanka experiments.

Try to find the error in his work.

If there are pathogenic viruses, there must be proof. If there is no proof (we are here, alive, that is enough) then the diseases are caused by something else.

Thanks to the Almighty God for giving us livers!

Expand full comment

Cite one of these alleged experiments and save your childish ad hominen attacks and accusations.

Expand full comment

I love Dr. Malone! The opposition would love us to think he’s “controlled opposition”. They have tried to do that to Robert Kennedy Jr. too. Time will prove he’s on our side. I am just so extremely grateful to him and his wife for all that they’re doing!

Expand full comment

Im sure you'd agree it isn't controlled opposite to have questions that need answers.

I have a son with a congenital genetic deletion, now age 25. I've done medical research for over 20 years and see more than he did? I doubt it. He pushed inventions that would alter humans and bring harm. He brags about them. I have a lot of concerns.

Expand full comment

Hi Heidi - I gave a like to your first comment above because I think it's important to remain skeptical of all sources -- whether we feel they are "on our side" or not.

I started out as a Malone believer. Now I evaluate everything about him and from him carefully. The agenda is too vast and the stakes too high to do otherwise. (Disclaimer: I haven't watched the video referenced in this post yet.)

Expand full comment

🙏

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

At some point I feel we need to stop trusting people who got us into this mess. Sure he's charming, hes shared some of the trade secrets that make him popular. Hes also extremely intelligent. I believe he deserves more credit than people are giving him and I dont mean that in a good way. I stand by my other concerns in comments on this page as well. The unanswered questions, unapologetic manner, excusing his guilty allies because they were "good germans" who had families to feed, lack of accountability, playing ignorant.

Expand full comment

If the subject were nuclear weapons and materials rather than biological poison weapons would your comments still hold? The reason i ask is that there are still many who design and process such things who have since become disgusted by the system, but could suffer extreme consequences if they revealed less than Malone. I don’t say automatically trust him, but there are many in the various weapons rackets that don’t say anything even though they know horrible truths.

Expand full comment

He researched his idea of using mRNA as a vaccine and some methods of doing so. He never claimed he had a vaccine ready for use: NO WHERE NEAR. He was guilty of thinking others had properly carried the idea to fruition. He didn't "get us into this mess."

Expand full comment

TROLLS are here to mess with the truth. Such transparent @-holes, wonder if they could afford their rent if they quit and got a real job..

Expand full comment

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

That goes for TROLLS-- And "just" useful idiots, too-- who come here in some misguided Johnny-One-Note attempt whose net effect is to stop the American people from waking up by singing the songs of their "heroes," Pfizer et al.

Expand full comment

Malone was wrong and then changed his mind, corrected his position.

Let's hope the other people in the wrong do the same.

Expand full comment

He is a gatekeeper..

You might want to read his book from February 2020. He must own a crystal ball and even though speaks like a snail, must write at the speed of light.

https://rosemaryfrei.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Novel%20Coronavirus%20A%20Practical%20Guide%20for%20Preparation%20and%20Protection%20Robert%20W.%20Malone%20MD%20and%20Jill%20Glasspool%20Malone%20Phd%20Trade%20Paperback%209781648267031%20Powell's%20Books.pdf

Expand full comment

Umm…What exactly is this supposed to prove? It was published in Feb. 2020 a month before Covid reached the US. We all knew it was coming. This seems perfectly reasonable given where he was in his journey at the time.

Expand full comment

Very naive and hypnotised.

Expand full comment

We all need to use our discernment. Take the truth we find and leave the rest.

If he is controlled opposition, and I don’t know that that’s true or not, nonetheless the left or really I should say the dark side does sprinkle truth with lies.

Expand full comment

Lol. You are confused.

Expand full comment

I am tired of posting all the excellent investigative pieces about him, and his early tweets.

Expand full comment

Exactly! I knew COVID was a conspiracy from the beginning. . .I deduced that from the sudden lockstep in the media lead by the NYT / Washington Post which I have been able to do since 1984 when Walter Cronkite lied about Barry Goldwater at the Cow Palace. I don't expect other who have tried to successfully work within the system to be able to do that.

Expand full comment

That's weird.

You love him?

This whole fawning over anybody outside your closest personal friends and family (and pets maybe) seems strange and desperate- especially bizarre given we are involved in electronic communications here.

Expand full comment

Yes Allen, something about Dr Bob causes fawning. His mellifluous voice and dark good looks, his mysterious ties to the MIIC, his horse farm, how he spins up teams. He is the new Camel 🐪 man!!

Expand full comment

I'm better looking than him <cough>.

He was in establishment science. He had a few wrong positions. He corrected himself, like a good scientist should.

Don't worship him, just respect that he came around to the right side of the facts.

Expand full comment

I certainly don’t worship him and I also don’t believe he came around to the right side. I think “limited hangout” is operational with him. Also, I’m sure you are better looking!

Expand full comment

Hm well i dont 'trust' public figures but i agree with what he's saying.. God bless.

Expand full comment

Have you seen Aubrey Marcus interview with Ed Dowd? It’s also amazing

Expand full comment

Have followed Malone since first Weinstein interview. He’s obviously VERY intelligent, and speaks many things true. However, his substack offering yesterday, “the banality of evil” in his own words is the best case yet for him being controlled opposition. While urging everyone to check out Katherine Watt, He is actually doing a limited hangout on her by giving her faint praise for “granular documentation” and redirecting readers away from the overwhelming legal evidence she documents showing crystal clear intent to destroy the U.S. and its citizens. Malone’s long winded intellectual smoke screen concludes that there is no intent to harm by any organized entity, its just those goofy pesky greedy people misbehaving. You’d have to be an idiot to believe this nonsense at this point, which Malone clearly is not.

Expand full comment

What an interview! Thank you Dr. Nass for posting this. My husband and I are 76 and 73...never had the shot, followed the FLCCC protocol, take ivermectin once a week and the appropriate supplements and I make my own elderberry syrup, which we take daily five days a week . We have never had Covid. Our adult children are all “shot” up and think we’re crazy....they have all had Covid..some twice and say ..well at least we didn’t die! I pray for them.

Expand full comment

Since you know Robert, Meryl, why is he acting so badly towards Peter Breggin and wife?

Expand full comment
author

Read the history. They started it. Egos. Schmegos.

Expand full comment

Just because Malone can respond with a lawsuit, doesn't mean he should. He's abusing the legal system to try to financially hurt a critic, like the Maine board is doing with you.

Expand full comment

This is exactly the point. Malone is engaging in a form of censorship. I thought we were supposed to be fighting censorship.

Expand full comment

Agree. Why is everyone so upset about the lawsuit? If what the Breggins said was true, they stand to make Malone take a tremendous loss as well as pay their attorney fees. Isn’t that what the Malone haters would salivate over? Breggins first response to the lawsuit was that they were elderly victims-they have never acted that way in their entire public careers. This is just the first time anyone called them out. All the others have ignored the Breggins - it’s frankly a hat tip to them to be sued. It shows that Dr Malone believes their opinions are powerful. So why play the victim? If you believe what you say and have the receipts, get in the fight and defend your position.

Expand full comment

For how long have you known Malone?

Expand full comment

Attn. Merl w regard to the kangaroo court and Dr Faust (the name fits) didn’t the PCR get contraindicated from the relevant time frame pertaining to Harvey’s studies that he testifies were unimpressive? In other words, you were treating patients appropriately for a set of symptoms one could only assume were cv19..this problem has reared it’s head over and over again. He’s fine backing the advice of the agencies that quietly admitted their ‘test’ was full on what all of us knew , a parlor trick. So why trust the advice w/regard to HCQ or anything else they say?......Let them have their standard protocol for their replication incompetent BS diseases and you can continue to treat for the intentional poisoning that you’ve encountered your whole career. Case dismissed!!! We’ll await 9 pages of new Merck Manual sars 2 diseases actually caused by the quackzine.

Btw please may I offer some perspective?

https://open.substack.com/pub/sinatana/p/the-mask-of-all-skams?utm_source=direct&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Never in the history of healthcare were there special swabs just for a test. Why is that? Why did the US have them first?

Why did the CDC let you guess if someone had Covid or not for three months, especially in the death numbers, because they were the only source of the test --and they were behind in producing them because of not having the special swabs?

All I can tell you is one of my clients in Canada had an anaphylactic reaction to that test. Who’s going to have an anaphylactic reaction to a swab? She was never previously allergic to swabs, and still isn’t -- so there was something on that swab. That’s the only possible conclusion.

She refused to take the vaccine so she was forced to test. Because she’s in Canada and she worked in the hospital-- they actually fired her from her job, because they couldn’t tell what she was allergic to.

Expand full comment

Have you heard about sterile EO? Very toxic. Could also have the shot components....

Expand full comment

Yes I’m aware of that & it’s also in the masks. I’m not sure if that’s it but again in my 10 years in healthcare I never saw special swabs-- just sterile, or not sterile.

What’s interesting about the EO is that’s on the prop 65 list in California as a known carcinogen. I’ve been trying to tell people in California that they could sue over the masks the PCR test etc. under Prop 65, because they don’t have the proper signage.

I actually got Trader Joes to drop their mask mandate when I wrote them a letter and told them that, and gave them all the law--because you can sue as a private Attorney General and it’s $2500 per day per incident so that was I believe $151 million minimum!! 

Expand full comment

Ethelyne Oxide is known carcinogen but as always carcinogens and mutagens have a dose-dependent stochaistic curve. We'd need to have good evidence that the swabs/probes/masks have significant qtys of EO remaining and that stuff is hard to prove.

We are always exposed to mutagenic radiation and chemicals. We have cells going mutant every day and there's no preventing that.

Not getting cancer is just a matter of our bodies handling the repair and aptoptic signalling and immune responses correctly.

Expand full comment

I've been looking forward to watching this. I subscribe to Aubry Markus' YouTube channel and saved this one to watch later due to the length. Markus does outstanding interviews by the way. Speaking of subscriptions, I believe it is time to do one here.

Expand full comment

And it's on youtube -- seems complete, because it hits _very_ hard. This is a really good sign.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYaLgeEBgaU

Expand full comment

And I just noticed something that could also be a good sign: the absence of that little "For information on Covid-19 see CDC guidelines" (paraphrased) caveat that used to appear under every youtube video that in any way ran counter to the official narrative.

Expand full comment