Members of the European Parliament demand to know how the EU is defining misinfo and disinfo since it is negotiating the IHRs and treaty which include this language
Members of the European Parliament demand to know how the EU is defining misinfo and disinfo since it is negotiating the IHRs and treaty which include this language
Yet there is no definition in international law or of what these words mean and it is questionable whether 'countering' them is compatible with existing law
As a historical matter, the right to speak against government policy had a legitimate purpose, even if some government authorities sought to suppress such speech as “misinformation.” That purpose was to root out corruption (“bad ministers.”) This power to criticize policy and actors is essential to maintaining good government.
Totalitarian governments always suppress criticism of their regime. This is a hallmark of such regimes.
The globalists want to root out criticism because they don’t want to root out the corruption upon which their schemes rely, to the detriment of the people they wish to fleece.
This is why they installed Catherine Maher, a WEF acolyte, as the new CEO of NPR.
That's an excellent and key question to ask. Of course, we know the real, hidden answer: mis- and disinformation is anything that exposes or opposes globalist plans, agendas and narratives, or any truth that conflicts with globalist agendas, or anything globalists don't like.
Curtail free speech .. first thing the WHO seem to focus on.. remove freedom to choose..not focus on measures to a fast response to any health emergency .. gobbledygook to handcuff every nation to a totalitarian over reach and curtail a person’s autonomy and right to freely choose what is best for their own health.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra share this morning on X. " Huge victory . Almost all WHO proposals has been dropped. victory for freedom , free speech, human rights"
I can understand the concern about misinformation and disinformation. They can interfere with informed consent. When the jabs rolled out fact checkers warned of false claims that the vaccine contents could be accidentally injected directly into the bloodstream, didn't stay at the injection site in the deltoid and weren't cleared by the body within a few days but instead persisted in the body long term and were dispersed throughout the body to all organ systems and into the placenta and breast milk and into the developing foetus and newborn infant. They warned that it was false that injectees do not become dead ends for the virus but could be infected and could transmit the virus. They warned that it was false that purported immunity was limited and declined fast and that the injections did not provide mucosal immunity. They warned that it was false that myocardial scarring would be decteable for some more than one year after the condition developed. It's good that the fact checkers called out this misinformation because it would have been unethical not to ensure informed consent before people were jabbed.
The world demands to know how viroliegists think putting snot on cell cultures then poisoning with antibiotics to produce cytopathic effects is proof of a virus??? 😀
Meryl, I got this post on X. "While we have been worrying about the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the threats to liberty it poses, the United States Government has a plan to seize control of the “Global Health Security Agenda”.
$30 Billion for a worldwide plan with cross coordination between 70 governments with US agencies like the HHS and USAID taking the lead.
So even if the WHO Treaty fails it doesn’t mean the power grab goes away. Read this 64 page report and tell me I’m wrong."
Ah the irony of these jerks calling other people liars. Cannot fathom how this topic has not been the subject of litigation. Its quite obvious truth can be manufactured, the actual truth is irrelevant.
Mis, dis and mal have no real meaning which is why no one should be using them. These terms are applied to factual information that counters the narrative.
This is a brilliant point highlighting the incompatibility of arbitrary definitions and rigorous legal consistency. However, it must be noted that a skilfully written deceitful draft can be just as bad as a cack-handed poorly written draft, and indeed even worse if it successfully deceives people into accepting it. I think we must argue strongly that all nations should simply #ExitTheWHO because they revealed their goal to be introduction of global control systems rather than assisting global health improvement. I think we should argue they simply cannot be trusted. And furthermore that they are USELESS:
As a historical matter, the right to speak against government policy had a legitimate purpose, even if some government authorities sought to suppress such speech as “misinformation.” That purpose was to root out corruption (“bad ministers.”) This power to criticize policy and actors is essential to maintaining good government.
Totalitarian governments always suppress criticism of their regime. This is a hallmark of such regimes.
The globalists want to root out criticism because they don’t want to root out the corruption upon which their schemes rely, to the detriment of the people they wish to fleece.
This is why they installed Catherine Maher, a WEF acolyte, as the new CEO of NPR.
That's an excellent and key question to ask. Of course, we know the real, hidden answer: mis- and disinformation is anything that exposes or opposes globalist plans, agendas and narratives, or any truth that conflicts with globalist agendas, or anything globalists don't like.
Curtail free speech .. first thing the WHO seem to focus on.. remove freedom to choose..not focus on measures to a fast response to any health emergency .. gobbledygook to handcuff every nation to a totalitarian over reach and curtail a person’s autonomy and right to freely choose what is best for their own health.
The "truth" is what we tell you it is, shut up and take it.
Monopoly. It's malignant.
Thus the proclivity of institutional high office and administration to select-for sociopaths in positions of authority.
And so they work and wait, as the swelling malignancy slowly selects-for the eventual psychopath who can control them all.
Perhaps Sondheim said it best: "The history of the world, my sweet, is who gets eaten and who gets to eat."
Shall it be "Paradise Lost" or "Monopoly Destroyed."
Medical Monopoly Kills.
The minute someone or some entity claims to be the arbiter of truth, the situation is rife for abuse.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra share this morning on X. " Huge victory . Almost all WHO proposals has been dropped. victory for freedom , free speech, human rights"
I can understand the concern about misinformation and disinformation. They can interfere with informed consent. When the jabs rolled out fact checkers warned of false claims that the vaccine contents could be accidentally injected directly into the bloodstream, didn't stay at the injection site in the deltoid and weren't cleared by the body within a few days but instead persisted in the body long term and were dispersed throughout the body to all organ systems and into the placenta and breast milk and into the developing foetus and newborn infant. They warned that it was false that injectees do not become dead ends for the virus but could be infected and could transmit the virus. They warned that it was false that purported immunity was limited and declined fast and that the injections did not provide mucosal immunity. They warned that it was false that myocardial scarring would be decteable for some more than one year after the condition developed. It's good that the fact checkers called out this misinformation because it would have been unethical not to ensure informed consent before people were jabbed.
Misinformation and disinformation are what we say they are. Now shut up!
The world demands to know how viroliegists think putting snot on cell cultures then poisoning with antibiotics to produce cytopathic effects is proof of a virus??? 😀
Meryl, I got this post on X. "While we have been worrying about the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the threats to liberty it poses, the United States Government has a plan to seize control of the “Global Health Security Agenda”.
$30 Billion for a worldwide plan with cross coordination between 70 governments with US agencies like the HHS and USAID taking the lead.
So even if the WHO Treaty fails it doesn’t mean the power grab goes away. Read this 64 page report and tell me I’m wrong."
Here is the full report. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Global-Health-Security-Strategy-2024-1.pdf
What do you think? More to be worried about?
Ah the irony of these jerks calling other people liars. Cannot fathom how this topic has not been the subject of litigation. Its quite obvious truth can be manufactured, the actual truth is irrelevant.
Good question.
I think we know the de facto answer is :
« Any thought, fact, opinion or argument that dissents from our official Narrative or might cause another person to dissent from our Narrative. »
They can STUFF their censorship. We will always find ways ROUND IT!
A third question: Has the WHO ever produced misinformation or disinformation?
Mis, dis and mal have no real meaning which is why no one should be using them. These terms are applied to factual information that counters the narrative.
This is a brilliant point highlighting the incompatibility of arbitrary definitions and rigorous legal consistency. However, it must be noted that a skilfully written deceitful draft can be just as bad as a cack-handed poorly written draft, and indeed even worse if it successfully deceives people into accepting it. I think we must argue strongly that all nations should simply #ExitTheWHO because they revealed their goal to be introduction of global control systems rather than assisting global health improvement. I think we should argue they simply cannot be trusted. And furthermore that they are USELESS:
https://theodoreholtomphd.substack.com/p/exitthewho-glasgow-speech-by-theodore