Here is his intro: One thing we all should have learned from the COVID experience is that not all is well in the land of mass vaccination and we need to rethink our approach to regulatory oversight. Instead of taking a pause, the FDA and CDC are about to blitz us with new approvals based on bad data. We’re joined today by Dr. Meryl Nass, a 42-year internist who is well-studied on all things vaccines. She watched all three days of the CDC’s advisory panel on vaccines recommend approval for so many new vaccines. She explains how the regulatory process works and why it’s corrupt from head to toe. Officials replace real data with fake modeling while ignoring glaring and blaring signals about safety and negative efficacy. COVID was just the tip of the iceberg.
Jun 28, 2023·edited Jun 29, 2023Liked by Meryl Nass
You are my hero! All that Maine has put you thru, ugh! Used to live in Bar Harbor now Orono. Really missed out by not having YOU as my physician. Following you on substack after listening to those hours of BS state medical hearings. You’ve been the big topic for over a year with the staff of the law firm I just retired from. I wanted you to know PEOPLE IN MAINE are so sorry for what you endured, for being a compassionate doctor. You need to know that !❤️
About 5 years ago I saw an ACIP meeting, what struck me was the presence of military not one but quiet a few, so thinking if they’re in it why shouldn’t they be in the CDC, FDA, NIAID and is there no more question about medicine boards functioning independently? Do no harm medically and the military do no harm? strange bedfellows!
many CDC employees are members of the UNIFORMED public health service (PHS), a quasi military operation, where they can be deployed for emergencies. Then some HHS officials are given military titles like Admiral Rachel Levine, who was not in the PHS previously. I presume this increases her retirement. Dr. Kim (on the FDA's VRBPAC) wears a PHS uniform to meetings. Here is his CV so you can see he joined CDC and PHS as a young doctor and stayed in.
I’m still stuck with Francis Boyle’s interpretation of the DOD, first thank you for enlightening me, so we have a quasi military public health service for emergencies, but what if these emergencies are constantly created and we’ll never be prepared when they happen for real, can we now confirm there’s no more a DOD but a DOO, a department of offence a department going in the offensive, going to war? Correct me if I’m wrong, thank you.
I have no correction. It's a questionable operation and Admiral Rachel Levine was unable to shed more light when asked specifically what this rank means--she is now a 4 star Admiral in the PHS.
The DOD has in-truth always really been the DOO ever since they changed their name from the DOW, Department of War, after WW2. It's been more and more double-speak from then on.
What is keeping those who know the truth from piling on the pressure on these corrupt agencies? How do we stop them from their continued criminal activity?
That is complicated. The agencies have issued their own rules for how they operate, which make most of their machinations legal, and previously judges have avoided second guessing them.
However, I believe the FDA has exceeded its authorities with the COVID vaccines and several new vaccines. The animal rule required a correlate of protection yet there has not been one for some of these vaccines. And there has been no real evidence of efficacy either. Modelling is not acceptable as a substitute for evidence that a product works. At some point a judge will get really annoyed (which happened with Judge Emmet Sullivan and the anthrax vaccine) because the FDA went so far over the line--and the judge revoked the license in 2004.
Why isn't someone interviewing Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz in Hawaii? As a public health expert, he's been telling it like it is for decades about things like the "vaccines", HIV AIDS, Ebola, Malathion, and so on. He's selling a new book on Amazon about the "Covid" disaster, called, "COVID COUP: 'The Rise of the Fourth Reich'", linked to as follows:
Let's face it, these injections (Vaccines - as they are misnamed) are not properly monitored, inspected, trialled, safety controlled or quality controlled because the makers PULL ALL THE STRINGS, (Hold all the aces) with the benefit and absolution of NO LIABILITY whatsoever!
All Big Pharma Safety and Efficacy checks are blatantly adjusted, modified, and altered to suit the overriding intention to SELL the DEADLY injections, no matter what impact on humanity!
It's now conceded that Post Vax Heart issues (supposedly) represent 1.6% of all VAX RELATED adverse health problems. It is reasonable to assume, therefore, that after adding non-hospitalised cases, the % could be massively increased - this could easily be doubled = 3.2%.
Then there are the other 99 serious HEALTH problems, like blood clots and autism, that seem to occur POST-VAX. This seems like a 100% possibility of short or long-term VAX RELATED DEATHS or serious HEALTH PROBLEMS!
Stop this lunacy now!
If a Vax recipient accepts just one jab, he or she is probably, at best, just going to experience a shorter LIFE EXPECTANCY!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
If Post Vax Heart issues supposedly represent 1.6% of all VAX RELATED health problems, it's reasonable to assume that after adding non-hospitalised cases, the % could be massive - this could easily be doubled = 3.2%.
Then there are the other 99 serious HEALTH problems, like blood clots and autism, that seem to occur POST-VAX. This seems like a 100% possibility of short or long-term VAX RELATED DEATHS or serious HEALTH PROBLEMS!
Stop this lunacy now!
If a Vax recipient accepts just one jab, he or she is probably, at best, just going to experience a shorter LIFE EXPECTANCY!
Off topic. Meryl, I don’t want Donald trump for President, but I want Biden less. Given the choice, I will vote republican. I don’t think I am alone in this. How do we get this message across to the Dems?
"Corrupt head to toe." Exactly. But how did this happen? Apparently the members of our Ruling Club took over every important institution in the world. And they are now simply defending their kingdome. That's what my "logic" tells me anyway.
In _JFK and the Unspeakable_ by James W. Douglass, it is argued (I don't have a page ref.) that LBJ, knowing what he knew, had three choices: 1. go along with the assassination planners' WWIII ambitions and accuse the Russians and Cubans of being responsible, 2. reveal the truth, which would result in a perpetual civil war fomented by the spymasters and violently dividing the public against itself, or 3. cover everything up. He chose option 3.
The number of free guns doesn't necessarily weigh on the side of freedom if the spymasters get to influence a significant fraction of the targeting decisions.
You are my hero! All that Maine has put you thru, ugh! Used to live in Bar Harbor now Orono. Really missed out by not having YOU as my physician. Following you on substack after listening to those hours of BS state medical hearings. You’ve been the big topic for over a year with the staff of the law firm I just retired from. I wanted you to know PEOPLE IN MAINE are so sorry for what you endured, for being a compassionate doctor. You need to know that !❤️
Being pestered by grandkids is an honor and a privilege, they love you dearly.
...and so do we!
What a gift to be pestered by grandkids!! They are so fortunate to have you as their grandmother. Thank you for all that you do and share.
About 5 years ago I saw an ACIP meeting, what struck me was the presence of military not one but quiet a few, so thinking if they’re in it why shouldn’t they be in the CDC, FDA, NIAID and is there no more question about medicine boards functioning independently? Do no harm medically and the military do no harm? strange bedfellows!
many CDC employees are members of the UNIFORMED public health service (PHS), a quasi military operation, where they can be deployed for emergencies. Then some HHS officials are given military titles like Admiral Rachel Levine, who was not in the PHS previously. I presume this increases her retirement. Dr. Kim (on the FDA's VRBPAC) wears a PHS uniform to meetings. Here is his CV so you can see he joined CDC and PHS as a young doctor and stayed in.
https://fda.report/media/155881/VRBPAC-Curriculum-Vitae-David-Kim.pdf
I’m still stuck with Francis Boyle’s interpretation of the DOD, first thank you for enlightening me, so we have a quasi military public health service for emergencies, but what if these emergencies are constantly created and we’ll never be prepared when they happen for real, can we now confirm there’s no more a DOD but a DOO, a department of offence a department going in the offensive, going to war? Correct me if I’m wrong, thank you.
I have no correction. It's a questionable operation and Admiral Rachel Levine was unable to shed more light when asked specifically what this rank means--she is now a 4 star Admiral in the PHS.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dawnstaceyennis/2021/10/19/call-her-admiral-rachel-levine-now/
Thank you
The DOD has in-truth always really been the DOO ever since they changed their name from the DOW, Department of War, after WW2. It's been more and more double-speak from then on.
My favorite people are those who don't get vaccinated and won't give it to their kids.
What is keeping those who know the truth from piling on the pressure on these corrupt agencies? How do we stop them from their continued criminal activity?
That is complicated. The agencies have issued their own rules for how they operate, which make most of their machinations legal, and previously judges have avoided second guessing them.
However, I believe the FDA has exceeded its authorities with the COVID vaccines and several new vaccines. The animal rule required a correlate of protection yet there has not been one for some of these vaccines. And there has been no real evidence of efficacy either. Modelling is not acceptable as a substitute for evidence that a product works. At some point a judge will get really annoyed (which happened with Judge Emmet Sullivan and the anthrax vaccine) because the FDA went so far over the line--and the judge revoked the license in 2004.
Thank you for all you do!
We can hope!😳
Why isn't someone interviewing Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz in Hawaii? As a public health expert, he's been telling it like it is for decades about things like the "vaccines", HIV AIDS, Ebola, Malathion, and so on. He's selling a new book on Amazon about the "Covid" disaster, called, "COVID COUP: 'The Rise of the Fourth Reich'", linked to as follows:
https://www.amazon.com/COVID-COUP-Rise-Fourth-Reich/dp/B09MGV2CGX/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=Leonard+Horowitz&qid=1687986504&sr=8-6
.
The Vaccines
Dissolve Cells.
The Vaccinated
Are Dissolving.
.
In the 21st century wars are fought in the mind using mass hypnosis and nanotechnology. Brains are the battlefield, and the spoils of war.
More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/the-first-world-mind-war
Legalize freedom and free speech
I have been living with almost no vaccines or drugs for a long time. Nutrition and exercise. Drugs will change who you are and not for the better.
Let's face it, these injections (Vaccines - as they are misnamed) are not properly monitored, inspected, trialled, safety controlled or quality controlled because the makers PULL ALL THE STRINGS, (Hold all the aces) with the benefit and absolution of NO LIABILITY whatsoever!
All Big Pharma Safety and Efficacy checks are blatantly adjusted, modified, and altered to suit the overriding intention to SELL the DEADLY injections, no matter what impact on humanity!
It's now conceded that Post Vax Heart issues (supposedly) represent 1.6% of all VAX RELATED adverse health problems. It is reasonable to assume, therefore, that after adding non-hospitalised cases, the % could be massively increased - this could easily be doubled = 3.2%.
Then there are the other 99 serious HEALTH problems, like blood clots and autism, that seem to occur POST-VAX. This seems like a 100% possibility of short or long-term VAX RELATED DEATHS or serious HEALTH PROBLEMS!
Stop this lunacy now!
If a Vax recipient accepts just one jab, he or she is probably, at best, just going to experience a shorter LIFE EXPECTANCY!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
If Post Vax Heart issues supposedly represent 1.6% of all VAX RELATED health problems, it's reasonable to assume that after adding non-hospitalised cases, the % could be massive - this could easily be doubled = 3.2%.
Then there are the other 99 serious HEALTH problems, like blood clots and autism, that seem to occur POST-VAX. This seems like a 100% possibility of short or long-term VAX RELATED DEATHS or serious HEALTH PROBLEMS!
Stop this lunacy now!
If a Vax recipient accepts just one jab, he or she is probably, at best, just going to experience a shorter LIFE EXPECTANCY!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
Off topic. Meryl, I don’t want Donald trump for President, but I want Biden less. Given the choice, I will vote republican. I don’t think I am alone in this. How do we get this message across to the Dems?
If you still want a country you had better not vote democrat
Vote for RFK, Jr. in the primary.
FYI, regarding this talk, I'm getting a "playback error" but it may be due to being on a bad system.
"Corrupt head to toe." Exactly. But how did this happen? Apparently the members of our Ruling Club took over every important institution in the world. And they are now simply defending their kingdome. That's what my "logic" tells me anyway.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/i-try-to-use-logic-in-my-articles?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
They did. But their kingdom has a lot of widgets and they don't control all of them.
For example, their window of opportunity to get rid of guns in the USA has closed.
In _JFK and the Unspeakable_ by James W. Douglass, it is argued (I don't have a page ref.) that LBJ, knowing what he knew, had three choices: 1. go along with the assassination planners' WWIII ambitions and accuse the Russians and Cubans of being responsible, 2. reveal the truth, which would result in a perpetual civil war fomented by the spymasters and violently dividing the public against itself, or 3. cover everything up. He chose option 3.
The number of free guns doesn't necessarily weigh on the side of freedom if the spymasters get to influence a significant fraction of the targeting decisions.