Meryl ■ I saw you for the first time on a recent video; you offered help with the medical and willing to work with the legal in this time of Experiment; thank you, I share when appropriate.
Since the day our Maine state medical licensing board criminally suspended you, as one of your patients I personally have sorely missed your unmatched medical care. On the other hand, all this extraordinary work you've been doing continues to be an immense benefit to everyone.
Thank You, Sister Meryl. More where that came from...
Evidence of harm , Steve Kirsch
A short collection of key pieces of evidence showing the COVID vaccines are not "safe and effective." Not even close. They are the most deadly vaccines we've ever produced.
The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed absolutely no all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit. There were no all-cause benefits at all. It was all negative...
Dr. Malhotra was a prominent advocate for COVID-vaccination until his dad died of a cardiac event right after getting a booster. He investigated...
‘Peer-reviewed papers in the Journal of Insulin Resistance present findings that are leading to calls for the suspension of all Covid-19 vaccines’
In a two-part paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine,” real-world data reveals that in the non-elderly population the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from Covid-19 runs into thousands and that re-analysis of randomised controlled trial data suggests a greater risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the vaccine than to be hospitalised with Covid-19..
..Writing in the peer-reviewed Journal of Insulin Resistance one of the UK’s most eminent Consultant Cardiologists Dr Aseem Malhotra, who was one of the first to take two doses of the vaccine and promote it on ITV’s Good Morning Britain (GMB) says that since the roll out of the vaccine the evidence of its effectiveness and true rates of adverse events have changed...
Speaking about the report, Dr Aseem Malhotra said, “There has been a rise in out of hospital cardiac arrests and heart attacks linked to Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine with plausible biological mechanisms of harm” and “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”
Preprint: COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function
Conclusions: Pregnancy and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than that of Influenza vaccinations. A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring.
Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk
Results: Of 11 lactating individuals enrolled, trace amounts of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were detected in 7 samples from 5 different participants at various times up to 45 hours postvaccination (Table 2). The mean (SD) yield of EVs isolated from EBM was 9.110 (5.010) particles/mL, and the mean (SD) particle size was 110.0 (3.0) nm. The vaccine mRNA appears in higher concentrations in the EVs than in whole milk (Table 2). No vaccine mRNA was detected in prevaccination or postvaccination EBM samples beyond 48 hours of collection.
I'm convinced it's you and a handful of others on here that are driving the great awakening. Thank you for your consistent hard work. You make it easy to print out talking points to give to people when having conversations.
Please don't call it "gene THERAPY"! There is NOTHING "therapeutic" in an unapproved experimental synthetic gene MODIFICATION DEVICE! Using the word 'therapy' suggests there is some healing or amelioration going on rather than some questionable programming of one's DNA. Don't help them gaslight!
The use of the term gene therapy is designed to place it back in that category of regulatred product--as FDA has strict requirements for gene therapy products --at least stricter than for vaczines, so ther term implies a particular regulatory standardd that was not met.
I understand the legal and statute-related reasons for the term, one the companies themselves used in their original touting. They should certainly be held to the strictest standards possible. And the term should be used when pushing that requirement before those with the power to do something about it.
However, there is a subconscious and devious implication that goes under the critical radar when a positive term -- "therapy" -- is used to label something that is not therapeutic, and we should not help pHarma by using such a loaded, beneficial-sounding descriptive when discussing it in public forums. WE have to defeat their framing and put the right understanding in the public's mind, by using gene "editing" or gene "modification" or gene "changing" to reinforce that understanding as much as possible.
For years we've been bombarded with the "Safe & Effective" (TM) mantra, repeated by medical shills, politicians and officials who pimp for Big pHarma, and media presstitutes. It's going to take much deconditioning and re-framing to unbrainwash the general consciousness on this and other big lies that they keep shoving down our throats. I'm simply trying to do my part to move the needle (literally and figuratively) by pointing out these linguistic jabs that infect us with dangerous mental images.
Well said! Thank you for clarifying the point of the verbal scheme. It is critical to expose all the immoral and unscientific propaganda techniques used in this corrupt plandemic public health model. Fight fire with fire.
Perhaps put the word in inverted commas i.e., gene 'therapy'. Many are coming to the realisation there is nothing therapeutic about it. There will come a time (none too soon) when GM is recognised for what it has always been - genetic meddling.
"Adequate vitamin D levels in a Swedish population living above latitude 63°N: The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA study"
"Results
Mean (median) level of vitamin D3 was 65.2 (63.6) nmol/l in men and 71.0 (67.7) nmol/l in women. Adequate levels were found in 79.2%, more often in women (82.7%) than in men (75.6%). Only 0.7% of the population were vitamin D3–deficient but 23.1% of men and 17.1% of women had insufficient levels. Levels of vitamin D3 increased with age and insufficient status was most common among those aged 25–34 years, 41.0% in men and 22.3% in women.
If subjects using vitamin D-supplementation are excluded, the population level of D3 is 1–2 nmol/l lower than in the general population across sex- and age groups. There were no differences between the northern or the southern parts, between urban or rural living or according to educational attainment. Those subjects born outside of Sweden or Finland had lower levels."
Thank you Meryl !!!
She Is A 'Great American'!
'When You Thought It Could Not Get Any Crazier!'
'Thinking Caps and the Biden Admin and Private Employer's Mandated these Jabs!'
"Judicial Watch: New Documents Reveal COVID-19 Vaccine Studies Used by HHS were Conducted in China"
https://www.judicialwatch.org/covid-vaccine-studies-conducted-in-china/
Thanks for all the information. Strike while the iron as they say is hot. Narratives breaking down everywhere. Hope it continues.
Thank you so much!
Meryl ■ I saw you for the first time on a recent video; you offered help with the medical and willing to work with the legal in this time of Experiment; thank you, I share when appropriate.
Dear Dr. Nass,
Since the day our Maine state medical licensing board criminally suspended you, as one of your patients I personally have sorely missed your unmatched medical care. On the other hand, all this extraordinary work you've been doing continues to be an immense benefit to everyone.
-Rob Lord
Thank You, Sister Meryl. More where that came from...
Evidence of harm , Steve Kirsch
A short collection of key pieces of evidence showing the COVID vaccines are not "safe and effective." Not even close. They are the most deadly vaccines we've ever produced.
The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed absolutely no all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit. There were no all-cause benefits at all. It was all negative...
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-evidence
Dr. Malhotra was a prominent advocate for COVID-vaccination until his dad died of a cardiac event right after getting a booster. He investigated...
‘Peer-reviewed papers in the Journal of Insulin Resistance present findings that are leading to calls for the suspension of all Covid-19 vaccines’
In a two-part paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine,” real-world data reveals that in the non-elderly population the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from Covid-19 runs into thousands and that re-analysis of randomised controlled trial data suggests a greater risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the vaccine than to be hospitalised with Covid-19..
..Writing in the peer-reviewed Journal of Insulin Resistance one of the UK’s most eminent Consultant Cardiologists Dr Aseem Malhotra, who was one of the first to take two doses of the vaccine and promote it on ITV’s Good Morning Britain (GMB) says that since the roll out of the vaccine the evidence of its effectiveness and true rates of adverse events have changed...
Speaking about the report, Dr Aseem Malhotra said, “There has been a rise in out of hospital cardiac arrests and heart attacks linked to Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine with plausible biological mechanisms of harm” and “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/peer-reviewed-papers-suspension-covid-19-vaccines/
Preprint: COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function
Conclusions: Pregnancy and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than that of Influenza vaccinations. A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring.
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v1
Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk
Results: Of 11 lactating individuals enrolled, trace amounts of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were detected in 7 samples from 5 different participants at various times up to 45 hours postvaccination (Table 2). The mean (SD) yield of EVs isolated from EBM was 9.110 (5.010) particles/mL, and the mean (SD) particle size was 110.0 (3.0) nm. The vaccine mRNA appears in higher concentrations in the EVs than in whole milk (Table 2). No vaccine mRNA was detected in prevaccination or postvaccination EBM samples beyond 48 hours of collection.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2796427
I watched the talk. It was great. Thank you Dr. Nass.
I'm convinced it's you and a handful of others on here that are driving the great awakening. Thank you for your consistent hard work. You make it easy to print out talking points to give to people when having conversations.
So appreciate all you are doing!
Please don't call it "gene THERAPY"! There is NOTHING "therapeutic" in an unapproved experimental synthetic gene MODIFICATION DEVICE! Using the word 'therapy' suggests there is some healing or amelioration going on rather than some questionable programming of one's DNA. Don't help them gaslight!
"Unapproved Investigational Experimental Bioweaponized Gene Modification Pathogen Creator Synthetic Biologic Agent Device Drug."
I'm not the first person to be this specific, as I believe Dr. David Martin and others used some of this terminology.
The use of the term gene therapy is designed to place it back in that category of regulatred product--as FDA has strict requirements for gene therapy products --at least stricter than for vaczines, so ther term implies a particular regulatory standardd that was not met.
I understand the legal and statute-related reasons for the term, one the companies themselves used in their original touting. They should certainly be held to the strictest standards possible. And the term should be used when pushing that requirement before those with the power to do something about it.
However, there is a subconscious and devious implication that goes under the critical radar when a positive term -- "therapy" -- is used to label something that is not therapeutic, and we should not help pHarma by using such a loaded, beneficial-sounding descriptive when discussing it in public forums. WE have to defeat their framing and put the right understanding in the public's mind, by using gene "editing" or gene "modification" or gene "changing" to reinforce that understanding as much as possible.
I agree with you.
I wonder how many people think, "I don't want/ need GENE therapy"
Often I simply call it poison, since it does more harm than good.
For years we've been bombarded with the "Safe & Effective" (TM) mantra, repeated by medical shills, politicians and officials who pimp for Big pHarma, and media presstitutes. It's going to take much deconditioning and re-framing to unbrainwash the general consciousness on this and other big lies that they keep shoving down our throats. I'm simply trying to do my part to move the needle (literally and figuratively) by pointing out these linguistic jabs that infect us with dangerous mental images.
Well said! Thank you for clarifying the point of the verbal scheme. It is critical to expose all the immoral and unscientific propaganda techniques used in this corrupt plandemic public health model. Fight fire with fire.
Perhaps put the word in inverted commas i.e., gene 'therapy'. Many are coming to the realisation there is nothing therapeutic about it. There will come a time (none too soon) when GM is recognised for what it has always been - genetic meddling.
Will do
What the big Harma Harmacy scamdemic has done to Womanity is biggest crime ever, a trillion dollars war crime.
Thanks for your work.
Always on the case! Your efforts do not go unnoticed.
GOD bless you Dr. Nass - a true TRUTH Warrior ...
MRNA shots are iffy at best and deadly at worst.Do not comply with the anti-human globalists
Excellent
What is your explanation for Sweden having a high vaccination rate and no excess mortality?
Could vitamin D supplementation be a protective confounder?
I don't have an explanation.
But consider that the vaccines may vary a lot.
Consider that the statistics are more or less reliable in different countries.
"Adequate vitamin D levels in a Swedish population living above latitude 63°N: The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA study"
"Results
Mean (median) level of vitamin D3 was 65.2 (63.6) nmol/l in men and 71.0 (67.7) nmol/l in women. Adequate levels were found in 79.2%, more often in women (82.7%) than in men (75.6%). Only 0.7% of the population were vitamin D3–deficient but 23.1% of men and 17.1% of women had insufficient levels. Levels of vitamin D3 increased with age and insufficient status was most common among those aged 25–34 years, 41.0% in men and 22.3% in women.
If subjects using vitamin D-supplementation are excluded, the population level of D3 is 1–2 nmol/l lower than in the general population across sex- and age groups. There were no differences between the northern or the southern parts, between urban or rural living or according to educational attainment. Those subjects born outside of Sweden or Finland had lower levels."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432023/