I was at Kaiser ER on Sunday night for a large corneal abrasion. The ER doc just hadta slip in "Did you get your booster?" I told her I don't let that kind of sh!t anywhere near me.
And we should always keep in mind that, before we start looking at "efficacy", virtually all these injections are NOT NECESSARY.
What would have happened - assuming perfect efficacy - if all these people had no injections and got covid? They would have sniffled and coughed for a couple of days, needing little more than rest, and been fine.
This virus is only genuinely dangerous to those who are either very elderly, and/or have some serious underlying conditions. (Even then, it is treatable - but that is yet another argument.)
Given that these injections are not necessary, once you add on top the fact that they are useless, and then on top of that, the fact that they can be so harmful, the situation changes from the absurd to the perverse.
I've always thought that, ultimately, it will be the Insurers who expose the truth. If they don't their profitability will fall dramatically. So far (see the German example of the Insurance CEO getting fired for blowing the whistle) they have managed to contain the Insurers, BUT they won't work for free and, unknown to many, the Insurers are actually immensely influential - possibly more so than the Banks. Si IMHO, it's only a matter of time.
I recall that the paper still makes the claim of positive protection agains serious illness at 150 days, despite the negative VE for infection.
Seems to me they’re still sticking tot he vaccines do no wrong narrative. Hilariously, they blame the negative VE on “confounding” -- but not the positive VE, of course.
It is worse than it appears. One, why start at 14 days, and is that 14 days post the second shot? We have studies and numbers that show the jabs initially lower resistance. If the vaccinated cohort tested positive prior to 14 days were they then in the unvaccinated cohort? And again, was it really about a five week window post jab one, and so one is only in the vaccinated cohort two weeks after jab two?
So the study needs to be redone, and the jabbed tracked from day one of the first jab. Also, all cause morbidity and mortality needs to be done with the same groups. (Then all results for jabs becomes negative) Even better, the results should be broken out via demographics.
This looks like a share piece with those still buying the "government is your friend" and vaccines are safe and EFFECTIVE narrative. Shoots the poop out of the EFFECTIVE part. good post. Obviously the US gov agencies did a nefarious job and not their real job.
If you look at the charts of the infection waves you see a variant only takes about 3 months to sweep through a population. After that there's no longer any reason to attempt to prevent it with a vaccine. The entire vaccination campaign was pointless from the beginning. Since these new variants have such a low fatality rate there's is no way to measure a potential benefit.
The health insurers and life insurers are the industries bearing the financial brunt of side effects and negative vaccine efficacy.
I've had Kaiser insurance for 20 years and I'm thinking of letting it go at the end of the year. My friend has an insurance where she goes to a smaller clinic for care. These past two years have made me rethink allopathic medicine altogether.
Unfortunately, I.grew up with the false notion that the US the best health-care system of all industrialized nations. However, In recent years, from reading and speaking to many doctors and other medical professionals, I have found that yes we are at the end of the scale, but, again unfortunately, the wrong end. We have the highest costs, the least effectiveness, the most botched procedures, and the mortality rate in the free world. Again unfortunatrly, many of us are facing the fact that big pharma controls the doctors rather than the other way around. We are hopefully also acknowledging that much of our healthcare systemic problems have been connected to Fauci, Gates, a corrupt government, and science community and unrestrained greed of the pharmaceutical industry. And, of course, sites like this one have very much helped too spread the word, as evidenced by Meryl's outstanding subscribership. If you will allow me to give the unprofessional advice of a layperson - the best antidote for covid or any other malody is truth.
"How Much Did 'Benedict Hunter Biden', Biden's? Make Creating COVID-19"!
'I expect we will be seeing a lot on this in coming days/weeks but wanted to provide some context. At this point it appears that Hunter Biden was at least indirectly involved in the creation of SARS-COV2. Think about the gravity of that statement and then consider if that explains the continued cover-up. Let me explain.'
ATTORNEY TOM RENZ FILES LAWSUIT SUPPORTED BY MAKE AMERICANS FREE AGAIN AGAINST ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE, DASZAK & BARIC FOR THE CREATION & COVER-UP OF COVID-19
How the Pandemic and the deaths of 6,548,093 people could have been avoided.
Well, that was never a question if you paid attention to the ARR, or absolute risk reduction factor which was published to be less than 1% for both pfizer and moderna mRNA injections. 95% effective they stated from the get go...that is the more useless RRR, or relative risk reduction factor, and now we see how much of a MAJOR lie that has become.
In fact, big pharma plays this game with every drug/vaccine they invent and market.
I was at Kaiser ER on Sunday night for a large corneal abrasion. The ER doc just hadta slip in "Did you get your booster?" I told her I don't let that kind of sh!t anywhere near me.
And we should always keep in mind that, before we start looking at "efficacy", virtually all these injections are NOT NECESSARY.
What would have happened - assuming perfect efficacy - if all these people had no injections and got covid? They would have sniffled and coughed for a couple of days, needing little more than rest, and been fine.
This virus is only genuinely dangerous to those who are either very elderly, and/or have some serious underlying conditions. (Even then, it is treatable - but that is yet another argument.)
Given that these injections are not necessary, once you add on top the fact that they are useless, and then on top of that, the fact that they can be so harmful, the situation changes from the absurd to the perverse.
It's also well documented to be strongly negative in the 0-14 day period.
Thank you for posting this, I am going to send it along to a few people who will make use of it.
I've always thought that, ultimately, it will be the Insurers who expose the truth. If they don't their profitability will fall dramatically. So far (see the German example of the Insurance CEO getting fired for blowing the whistle) they have managed to contain the Insurers, BUT they won't work for free and, unknown to many, the Insurers are actually immensely influential - possibly more so than the Banks. Si IMHO, it's only a matter of time.
I recall that the paper still makes the claim of positive protection agains serious illness at 150 days, despite the negative VE for infection.
Seems to me they’re still sticking tot he vaccines do no wrong narrative. Hilariously, they blame the negative VE on “confounding” -- but not the positive VE, of course.
It is worse than it appears. One, why start at 14 days, and is that 14 days post the second shot? We have studies and numbers that show the jabs initially lower resistance. If the vaccinated cohort tested positive prior to 14 days were they then in the unvaccinated cohort? And again, was it really about a five week window post jab one, and so one is only in the vaccinated cohort two weeks after jab two?
So the study needs to be redone, and the jabbed tracked from day one of the first jab. Also, all cause morbidity and mortality needs to be done with the same groups. (Then all results for jabs becomes negative) Even better, the results should be broken out via demographics.
Great post. Throwing it at my entire vax X’d friends and family on Facebook.
This looks like a share piece with those still buying the "government is your friend" and vaccines are safe and EFFECTIVE narrative. Shoots the poop out of the EFFECTIVE part. good post. Obviously the US gov agencies did a nefarious job and not their real job.
I love how the chart skips over the first 14 days, because what is a little 2 week negative efficacy window.among friends???
But but but.... how will I get my free toaster if I don't take the #6 injection???
If you look at the charts of the infection waves you see a variant only takes about 3 months to sweep through a population. After that there's no longer any reason to attempt to prevent it with a vaccine. The entire vaccination campaign was pointless from the beginning. Since these new variants have such a low fatality rate there's is no way to measure a potential benefit.
The health insurers and life insurers are the industries bearing the financial brunt of side effects and negative vaccine efficacy.
I've had Kaiser insurance for 20 years and I'm thinking of letting it go at the end of the year. My friend has an insurance where she goes to a smaller clinic for care. These past two years have made me rethink allopathic medicine altogether.
Unfortunately, I.grew up with the false notion that the US the best health-care system of all industrialized nations. However, In recent years, from reading and speaking to many doctors and other medical professionals, I have found that yes we are at the end of the scale, but, again unfortunately, the wrong end. We have the highest costs, the least effectiveness, the most botched procedures, and the mortality rate in the free world. Again unfortunatrly, many of us are facing the fact that big pharma controls the doctors rather than the other way around. We are hopefully also acknowledging that much of our healthcare systemic problems have been connected to Fauci, Gates, a corrupt government, and science community and unrestrained greed of the pharmaceutical industry. And, of course, sites like this one have very much helped too spread the word, as evidenced by Meryl's outstanding subscribership. If you will allow me to give the unprofessional advice of a layperson - the best antidote for covid or any other malody is truth.
"How Much Did 'Benedict Hunter Biden', Biden's? Make Creating COVID-19"!
'I expect we will be seeing a lot on this in coming days/weeks but wanted to provide some context. At this point it appears that Hunter Biden was at least indirectly involved in the creation of SARS-COV2. Think about the gravity of that statement and then consider if that explains the continued cover-up. Let me explain.'
https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/how-much-did-biden-make-creating
"Who Told You In 2021 That Peter Daszak & Ralph Baric Created COVID?
Another "conspiracy theory" turns out to be true this week."!
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/who-told-you-in-2021-that-peter-daszak?utm_source=post-email-title
A lot of Lawsuits! 10/06/2022!
ATTORNEY TOM RENZ FILES LAWSUIT SUPPORTED BY MAKE AMERICANS FREE AGAIN AGAINST ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE, DASZAK & BARIC FOR THE CREATION & COVER-UP OF COVID-19
How the Pandemic and the deaths of 6,548,093 people could have been avoided.
https://renz-law.com/attorney-tom-renz-files-lawsuit-supported-by-make-americans-free-again-against-ecohealth-alliance-daszak-baric-for-the-creation-cover-up-of-covid-19/
Well, that was never a question if you paid attention to the ARR, or absolute risk reduction factor which was published to be less than 1% for both pfizer and moderna mRNA injections. 95% effective they stated from the get go...that is the more useless RRR, or relative risk reduction factor, and now we see how much of a MAJOR lie that has become.
In fact, big pharma plays this game with every drug/vaccine they invent and market.