I don’t need a freaking babysitter. The thought of NOT having complete control over every single thing that breathes gives these miserable pricks nightmares. Deranged aberrant assholes.
This came to my attention from two lawyers in NZ yesterday. I have shared with many here and adding my input. Agree re NZ Health Ministry being joined at the hip to WHO via Sir Ashley Bloomfield, co-chair of WGIHR, and former NZ PM Helen Clark. Many people here are complacent, BUT many are awakening to the 'coercion' and we need, the voters need to keep the heat on those MP's that reserved the right of sovereign choice in the final say. Honest enquiry?? mmm need more people to take a stand!
You know, there is a solution to this, someone just needs to act on it. People have become far to complacent to actually act, even when the results of inaction will affect them and their descendants for the rest of their lives. At some point you just have to accept that things will not improve without serious personal sacrifice.
Different issue but clearly related to rights & freedoms:
« Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday vowed to never allow the use of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), as it would “give the government absolute control over your money.”
“This would be a dangerous threat to freedom – and I will stop it from coming to America. We are also going to put in place strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to de-bank you for your political beliefs. »
Like all the globalist bureaucratic outfits, the WHO produces documents intended to make people’s eyes glaze over. They don’t want people reading their verbiage & understanding its meaning.
Their current documents, aimed at controlling the planet, say in effect:
« Cede sovereignty to our unelected club - give us power to rule the PLANET ».
I don’t often swear but humanity needs to tell the WHO-WEF to simply F OFF.
QUESTION: This "treaty" magically circumvents approval by member countries' legislators, but since those countries are expected to pass laws without which the WHO's mandates can't be enforced, doesn't that give them the ipso-facto right to preserve sovereignty? Or do we expect that any nation that doesn't opt out will buckle under, and pass those laws?
Some countries, including the US and Australia that we know about, already passed laws agreeing to ago along with the WHO's global biosecurity agenda. The WHO placed multiple compliance mechanisms into the documents, and so for many provisions the enforcement mechanism exists without domestic legislation. For something like authorizing vaccines without a license, and providing the liability shield, that law exists in the US but not in every country in the world, so WHO demands all enact such law. The amended IHR itself will automatically apply to all countries that are members of the document already (196 countries)
I remember when our worst enemies were China and Russia...seems US is the US's worst enemy. So sick of this $#!++ When will everyone else finally get sick of it?! When we are all triple vaxxed, starving, no guns, drag queers running everything?! Because apparently 911, autism caused by vaxs, a created scamdemic that killed so many, a vax that CONTINUES to murder, a cheated election ETC hasn't been enough.
Thank you, Meryl. You've done an admirable job of warning us that the US has already passed such laws, and is no doubt one of the co-conspirators in this debacle. I was just hoping that any of the 196 countries that didn't file objections in time, not realizing what this soft coup really entails, might later balk at a draconian demand by the WHO and be unable to enforce it. Sorry if you've already covered this, but can you clarify how enforcement mechanisms exist for countries that haven't already passed laws subverting human rights in an "emergency"? Or maybe that's too complicated, because each country's equivalent of the Constitution is different. But for the EU, I assume it's uniform?
The real issue (beyond the compliance committees and focal points etc.) is the willingness of most of the developed nations' leaders to go along. The WEF's young global leaders, for example, were placed on the chessboard to govern most western nations or at least be in the cabinets, pulling the same strings. We don't know about the role of bribery nor blackmail but given Jeffrey Epstein we know that took place also.
Potential enforcement mechanisms could include (and basically already do) enforcement through the IMF and World Bank. Not to mention UN peacekeepers. Then there were those African heads of state who died suddenly, unvaxxed, some of whom were not playing ball as in Tanzania.
Just because we cannot put on fingers on every method of enforcement does not mean they can't enforce. Oh yes they can.
NISs have nothing to do with the best interests of the people.
Will will continue to have performing political clowns, until we abolish circuses on the grounds of cruelty to dumb animals, or some other relevant or irrelevant agenda.
We are facing some serious horrors in 2024, but we'll also make great strides in response. Actually, more and more we are moving to offense rather than defense. We win this thing with words. Check out my new word, coincidist, describing people who blame medical harm on coincidence. Coincidism is a filthy thing that goes right along with fascism and communism. We counter coincidism not only with solid science, but also with creativity, humor and love.
Let’s not forget that communism considers itself to be very technical. We are dealing with communists. This will require other means to fix than political.
I think we may see an honest enquiry and I just saw a flying pig...
I don’t need a freaking babysitter. The thought of NOT having complete control over every single thing that breathes gives these miserable pricks nightmares. Deranged aberrant assholes.
Spot on.
This came to my attention from two lawyers in NZ yesterday. I have shared with many here and adding my input. Agree re NZ Health Ministry being joined at the hip to WHO via Sir Ashley Bloomfield, co-chair of WGIHR, and former NZ PM Helen Clark. Many people here are complacent, BUT many are awakening to the 'coercion' and we need, the voters need to keep the heat on those MP's that reserved the right of sovereign choice in the final say. Honest enquiry?? mmm need more people to take a stand!
They ain't gonna do $h!+. Our people won't either. They all disgust me.
You know, there is a solution to this, someone just needs to act on it. People have become far to complacent to actually act, even when the results of inaction will affect them and their descendants for the rest of their lives. At some point you just have to accept that things will not improve without serious personal sacrifice.
Different issue but clearly related to rights & freedoms:
« Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday vowed to never allow the use of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), as it would “give the government absolute control over your money.”
“This would be a dangerous threat to freedom – and I will stop it from coming to America. We are also going to put in place strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to de-bank you for your political beliefs. »
GOOD!!
(Source: VigilantNews)
Like all the globalist bureaucratic outfits, the WHO produces documents intended to make people’s eyes glaze over. They don’t want people reading their verbiage & understanding its meaning.
Their current documents, aimed at controlling the planet, say in effect:
« Cede sovereignty to our unelected club - give us power to rule the PLANET ».
I don’t often swear but humanity needs to tell the WHO-WEF to simply F OFF.
QUESTION: This "treaty" magically circumvents approval by member countries' legislators, but since those countries are expected to pass laws without which the WHO's mandates can't be enforced, doesn't that give them the ipso-facto right to preserve sovereignty? Or do we expect that any nation that doesn't opt out will buckle under, and pass those laws?
Some countries, including the US and Australia that we know about, already passed laws agreeing to ago along with the WHO's global biosecurity agenda. The WHO placed multiple compliance mechanisms into the documents, and so for many provisions the enforcement mechanism exists without domestic legislation. For something like authorizing vaccines without a license, and providing the liability shield, that law exists in the US but not in every country in the world, so WHO demands all enact such law. The amended IHR itself will automatically apply to all countries that are members of the document already (196 countries)
I remember when our worst enemies were China and Russia...seems US is the US's worst enemy. So sick of this $#!++ When will everyone else finally get sick of it?! When we are all triple vaxxed, starving, no guns, drag queers running everything?! Because apparently 911, autism caused by vaxs, a created scamdemic that killed so many, a vax that CONTINUES to murder, a cheated election ETC hasn't been enough.
Thank you, Meryl. You've done an admirable job of warning us that the US has already passed such laws, and is no doubt one of the co-conspirators in this debacle. I was just hoping that any of the 196 countries that didn't file objections in time, not realizing what this soft coup really entails, might later balk at a draconian demand by the WHO and be unable to enforce it. Sorry if you've already covered this, but can you clarify how enforcement mechanisms exist for countries that haven't already passed laws subverting human rights in an "emergency"? Or maybe that's too complicated, because each country's equivalent of the Constitution is different. But for the EU, I assume it's uniform?
The real issue (beyond the compliance committees and focal points etc.) is the willingness of most of the developed nations' leaders to go along. The WEF's young global leaders, for example, were placed on the chessboard to govern most western nations or at least be in the cabinets, pulling the same strings. We don't know about the role of bribery nor blackmail but given Jeffrey Epstein we know that took place also.
Potential enforcement mechanisms could include (and basically already do) enforcement through the IMF and World Bank. Not to mention UN peacekeepers. Then there were those African heads of state who died suddenly, unvaxxed, some of whom were not playing ball as in Tanzania.
Just because we cannot put on fingers on every method of enforcement does not mean they can't enforce. Oh yes they can.
NISs have nothing to do with the best interests of the people.
Will will continue to have performing political clowns, until we abolish circuses on the grounds of cruelty to dumb animals, or some other relevant or irrelevant agenda.
Just posted a podcast on reversing Vaccine induced Autism. May help many people.
https://soberchristiangentlemanpodcast.substack.com/p/s2-ep-5-autism-vaccine-injury-my
We are facing some serious horrors in 2024, but we'll also make great strides in response. Actually, more and more we are moving to offense rather than defense. We win this thing with words. Check out my new word, coincidist, describing people who blame medical harm on coincidence. Coincidism is a filthy thing that goes right along with fascism and communism. We counter coincidism not only with solid science, but also with creativity, humor and love.
https://open.substack.com/pub/coincidism/p/ive-created-a-concept-i-call-coincidism?
Let’s not forget that communism considers itself to be very technical. We are dealing with communists. This will require other means to fix than political.
https://www.brighteon.com/41abdf2c-0668-49d7-9eac-3a87282c9c4d
Lets use a worldwide citizens plebiscite to overrule governments https://donfindlay.substack.com/p/they-are-trying-to-kill-us
The Ministry of Health decoded: The purveyors of death.
You Dr. Nass are a true gem, reflecting the light for all to see.