NGOs and USG begin sowing the ground for the new pandemic treaty etc.
'The Science' is invoked to insist that COVID came from a bat, not a lab. Clearly this is an important narrative for the future plans of the globalists.
Jordan Schactel told us today about a conference happening in Washington today and tomorrow to push the COVID zoonosis (it came from a bat, dammit!) agenda (and others) as Science.
Let’s look at some of the conference materials. Note that speakers are from the State Department, EcoHealth Alliance (which is still operating, unbelievably, and probably still collecting and creating deadly viruses from its grantees in 31 countries around the world) and the NGOs that coalesce around a big pot of money ($7 Billion/year in the US before the pandemic, and considerably more since) for so-called pandemic preparedness, from which pot the money was spent to create new PPPs (Potential Pandemic Pathogens), which Fauci’s organization was supposed to oversee, but didn’t, according to his deputy Hugh Auchincloss, whose FOIA’d email revealed that not a single coronavirus experiment had been looked at by the PPP committee that approved Gain of Function (aka biowarfare) research.
Now I present a couple of paragraphs from the 2021 Annual Report of the Global Health Council, which is the organization holding this meeting. Note the use of the “Build Back Better” meme and the hat tip to “Examining language to make the case for US investment in global health, which is intended to shift the narrative around global health security.” Also don’t miss the “focus on increased global health funding” where global health is now the justification to spend large sums via multinational organizations, with little making it to the people whose health is truly at risk.
https://globalhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/GHCAnnualReport2021.pdf
It seems that the Global Health Council is mainly a policy amplifier. And the policies they will amplify this week are those they are paid to amplify.
Back in May, this is what the Global Health Council told the World Health Assembly about the International Health Regulation Amendments (IHRs). Rah Rah!
Hope I have not wasted your time. This is the means by which a so-called consensus is manufactured, by using these bought NGOs to parrot whatever is desired. This is being rolled out now because the IHRs and the Pandemic Treaty/ Accord or whatever name they give it are coming soon.
Just for fun:
The Global Health Security Agenda is Obama’s silent instrument for smashing up the Old World Order - no one has heard of it but it has been controlling vital parts of global policy since it was quietly unveiled in 2014. Only a few of us perhaps realised how critical vaccines could be to international stability. When I looked up the GHSA in British Medical Journal Rapid Responses I found only one direct reference in a letter I wrote in March 2019. Maybe Obama is an evil genius but destroying government is probably a lot easier than running it. This is pretty twisted. Anyhow, this was my letter:-
Rapid Response:
Information and Misinformation: the Global Health Security Agenda
These trends in global politics [1] (and most particularly Italy) simply cannot be talked about without reference to the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) which never gets to be mentioned in the mainstream news media. It is hopeless to lament the election of a right wing government in Italy divorcing it from the appointment of Italy and its erstwhile centre-left government to head the GHSA in 2014 [2], leading it to push vaccine compulsion. This, as a matter of record: it began in the White House [3] and was enshrined in Barack Obama's executive order of 4 November 2016 [4].
It is conceivable that the public would be less resistant to concern about measles if the quid pro quo was not in effect surrendering the right to refuse whatever vaccine products a government bureaucracy might choose to nominate, now or in the future.
Nor is it helpful to cite random "facts" about measles [1]. For instance, in Brazil, how many of the 10,262 cases for 2018 were confirmed? Is it really possible to believe there were no cases in 2017? How far is any of this real, and how much an artefact of simply looking? Brazil is a country of approximately 210m, so how many "red rashes" which might have been measles [5] did not get reported in 2017?
It is not good enough to leave it to national or global bureaucracies to decide what truth is: not in the past, not now. There is no global emergency requiring this departure.
[1] Owen Dyer, 'Measles: alarming worldwide surge seriously threatens children, says UN' BMJ 2019; 364 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l981 (Published 01 March 2019)
[2] John Stone, 'Re: MEPs devise strategy to tackle vaccine hesitancy among public -Echoes of WMD', 26 March 2018, https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k1378/rr
[3] 'Italia capofila per le strategie vaccinali a livello mondiale', http://www.aifa.gov.it/content/italia-capofila-le-strategie-vaccinali-li...
[4] Executive Order 13747, 'Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda to Achieve a World Safe and Secure From Infectious Disease Threats', https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-11-09/pdf/2016-27171.pdf
[5] WHO 'Measles – Brazil 'Disease outbreak news 11 June 2018, see figure 1, https://www.who.int/csr/don/11-june-2018-measles-brazil/en/
Preventing Pandemics at the biolab Source: Spontaneous Combustion meets Controlled Demolition: win-win strategies for people and the planet