71 Comments

Right on every point except calling RFK Jr. bonkers for his beliefs about vaccines. I, too, wrote him off years ago as a cranky curmudgeon to be ignored. After the Covid jab debacle, I opened my eyes to the possibility that he was right and read the voluminous studies he has presented over the years. I now believe he was right all along and I owe him an apology if I ever have the pleasure of meeting him.

Expand full comment

Andrew, she was being sarcastic...she does a show/podcast on Children’s Health Defense.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/vaxunvax-let-the-science-speak/

Expand full comment

Thanks for setting me straight, I was too hasty in responding. I should have known better since I watch her on CHD. I thought to myself, “why is she criticizing him?’ but, unfortunately, the thought was fleeting.

Expand full comment

You both missed the point thattit was the POST that said he was bonkers, and she replied with (??!!) Like WTF?

Expand full comment

Thanks, Jon, apparently I did.

Expand full comment

Appreciate the acknowledgment.

Expand full comment

It was confusing.

Expand full comment

Brenda, Grasshopper, thank you for clearing that up.

I also missed the sarcasm. I felt like Andrew that people should not condemn easily. Our child had vaccine side effects so I know the truth is not "safe and effective" as the propaganda says.

Expand full comment

your kid and millions more. I feel like we have our own 'me too' thing going on but I hate to equate it to the other thing that came off as trite (even though it really isn't)

Expand full comment

She was being sarcastic I believe

Expand full comment

The article was NOT Meryl's words. She has re-posted the NY Post editorial in its entirety. And that is specified at the top of the article.

Pretty sure Meryl would not refer to RFK as bonkers.

Expand full comment

Thanks for setting me straight, I was too hasty in responding.

Expand full comment

Of course not! Her remark was (??!!) to the conclusion of the POST article.

Expand full comment

The New York Times is only good for lining litter boxes and bird cages.

Expand full comment

Don't scare the poor birds nor cats please

Expand full comment

It's also very useful for wrapping fish entrails when you're cleaning fish.

Expand full comment

Not even for that- Ha Ha!

Expand full comment

You mean like when the NYT refused to report the genocide in Ukraine in the 1930’s or their refusing to report on the holocaust during WW II. They have never believed in a free press.

Expand full comment

Very good points.

Expand full comment

I fully agree with the NY Post and Dr. Nass' commentary. It should be self-evident to the NYTimes that they are on the wrong side of the U.S. Constitution, tradition, and case law. Funny how the less intelligent and less confident are incapable of admitting their glaring errors and acknowledging the simplest of truths.

Expand full comment

They won't admit it because it would be admitting crimes, and/or violating the Constitution and Bill of Rights, known as THE SUPREME LAW(S) OF THE LAND!

Expand full comment

Japan kills a few thousand men & some old war ships and it War! Big Pharma kills millions with there patented, gain of function bio warfare, and we send them billions of dollars, & jab up! With Satan's law & guidance it's what we Godless brain dead suckers' & fools deserve! I.E. "The wages of sin, Death"! In this short life & the next long one!

Expand full comment

I find it ‘funny’ how on MSM news yesterday, Honda has recalled 124,000 vehicles because of a problem detected with the brakes. But Pfizer, Moderna, AZ, etc...doesn’t have to recall any 💉💉💉due to how many real deaths...

It’s a clown world we live in, and just seems to get more crazy every day!

Expand full comment

I happened see that Tapper a-hole on CNN yesterday (barf! only cuz a client had his boob tube on) announcing that the FDA just approved a new drug for Alzheimer's (cue the poignant family member story...). I literally yelled at the tv: "FDA approves ALL drugs. its 'pay to play', dumbass!" but of course Mr Sponsored-by-pharma must know that.

Expand full comment

For the most definitive & well cited study on that "pay to play" evil, Google, Dr. John Abramson's "America's Broken health Care! Very informative!

Expand full comment

Good point!!!

Expand full comment

Dr. David Martin best makes & supports your point! see@ https://rumble.com/v2qm8ne-dr.-david-martin-fact-covid-19-was-biological-warfare-on-the-human-race.html

& remember, Illegitimi non carborundum!

Expand full comment

Hope you get that the NY Post is only pro freedom of speech because the NYT isn't. It's tit for tat, just like in what passes for the federal government. The Post does not have integrity. It's opposing sides sniping at each other for short-sighted, partisan reasons. If you doubt what I'm saying, how do you explain the Post's trashing of RFK Jr in this article? Guilt by omission: just see how they (and all the Republicans in Congress) focus on the origin of the virus but shy away from addressing the real problem: faulty vaccines, tens of thousands of deaths, hundreds of thousands of injuries, lockdowns never before used in medical history, fraudulent PCR swabs, masks that don't work...The list goes on and on

Expand full comment

absolutely. the GOP need to grow a pair. they are severely dropping the ball with the BS in public schools as well. like hellllloooo guys (and gals), is this mike on?

Expand full comment

When I spoke freely I went to jail.

When the times and Judith Miller promote war on Iraq, which we still occupy, she is a freedom fighter sic.

The first times amend is the right to stifle all viewpoints that arrr unfit to print.

All the news that's fit to print, and nothing the slimey times doesn't like, which the slimey times themselves decide.

To Impeach is Patriotic

Is the phrase I went to jail over.

What is yours?

Expand full comment

Once upon a time NYT believed in truth and the constitution.

Now they are just a mouthpiece for the far left, and none of that matters.

Their job is propaganda.

Expand full comment

Has never been true. Even as far back as the Civil War the NYT has hated freedom and Liberty.

Expand full comment

When was that time? They shilled for Nazi Germany. Are we talking before then?

Expand full comment

The merger of government industry and religion with the banks as the glue/guidance IS Fascism = NWO.

Expand full comment

Biden’s bosses have weren’t shy about disenfranchising millions of voters in the 2020 election.

They weren’t reluctant to tap the communications of a sitting President.

Why would they give a damn about silencing the people?

They operate out of a bunker in some big metropolitan area, near an international airport and do nothing but try to figure out how to bring this country down.

...Using taxpayer money to fund theirs operations ( of course ! )

Expand full comment

Yes, getting us to pay for our own demise, and literally laugh all the way to the bank profiting off millions of peoples' deaths and maiming. It is not hyperbole to say that they are a death cult. Fascism is a death cult, and the Earth's fascism has always been such. They love genocide.

Expand full comment

"That applies even to RFK Jr.’s bonkers arguments about the dangers of vaccines, which are now getting suppressed by YouTube. [?!!!--Nass]"

I wonder who on the Post's editorial team is responsible for THAT snide piece of DISINFORMATION? Someone needs to call them out on that B.S. and set them straight on the scientifically documented REAL dangers of vaccines!

Expand full comment

Yes, the vaccine is a killer

Expand full comment

No vaccine has ever been compared to a true placebo (saline) to demonstrate safety. They always use another vaccine or an "inert" adjuvant for their placebo.

Expand full comment

All these "private companies" are corporations CHARTERED BY and therefor CREATED BY government. Their very existence depends on government. They are therefor PART OF government and MUST be directly subject to the 1st Amendment. What they are doing should be illegal even without "suggestions" from government. Congress or, barring that, the 50 state legislatures, need to require their compliance with the 1st Amendment through legislation.

Expand full comment

But who is going to enforce it? Certainly not the increasingly totalitarian militarized police state that the U.S. and most (all?) of the Western countries have become, that are COMPLETELY in favor of the tyranny and despotism, and of ratcheting-up the oppression and repression "creepingly".

Creepily?

Both.

Expand full comment

Who will enforce Doughty's injunction? We must elect legislators with balls, and we're more likely to be successful with 2 or 3 of 50 states than with DC. Decisions need to be decentralized. CMS should not be dictating protocols; that power must be decentralized to the local and even the county level to restore the GP-patient relationship.

Expand full comment

My woketard sis is all in. “We really have to do something about all this disinformation “. How about never turning on your TV again or even peaking at an MSM sourcefor the rest of your life sis?

Expand full comment

Amen! Get a REAL life thinking for yourself and not blindly bowing to the gub'ment & MSM who are clearly not truly defending and preserving our liberty(ies) and freedom(s) as it is their primary DUTY to do since it is one of the main purposes for a truly-free government's existence, its raison d'être, and/or its justification for being, to SERVE a government of, by and for THE PEOPLE.

I know I'm dreaming, but what we need is for everyone, instead of being force-fed false propaganda incessantly, being "force-fed" humanities and civics. The majority don't know what their true civic duties are; and, God forbid you try to tell them they have any "duties" at all, and they will at least verbally fight you on it angrily and forcefully. This is what was intentionally brought about by the neo-Nazi, "Fourth Reich" PTB, the death of understanding civics properly. See how well it worked out for them? They've got most of the citizenry supporting fascism and falsely believing they're "free", when they are anything but Truly Free, and less so every day!

The "People" are on their knees and don't even know it. I'd say the PTB's complete success is quite telling. Like they did with "democratic" Germany in the 1920s and '30s, they have now done with the entire Western world with monolithic success. The people have been turned into prisoners (in a mass-open-air prison like in Palestine but on a much larger scale) and slaves, falsely believing this life under tyranny and despotism is the "preferable" 'life' to live! Madness!

GOD HELP US ALL!

Expand full comment

I heard a good one from Jordan Peterson today: if you abdicate your civic duty, it will be taken up by a tyrant.

Expand full comment

IMO, the whole coverage of this censorship issue is based on partisanship. It seems to me that the problem is not which side you’re on but how the heck we got ourselves into this situation in the first place: a) passage of Citizens United and b) replacement of educated (degreed) journalists with social media. How how can we reestablish some independent and well informes professional journalists?

Expand full comment

Degreed journalists? Nope - you do NOT require a degree to report the truth. We are WAY past that. Citizen journalism is one bright spot in the glaring swamp of mainstream media lies. A swamp of lies that goes back much longer than we can bear to face, truth be told.

Now, had we protected truthful journalism as an institution WHEN IT MATTERED, and fought the consolidation of media and the decimation of local journalism via wage cuts and firings due to said consolidations, etc., we would not be in this pickle.

However, this much is clear: the mainstream press no longer gets a society-wide "free pass" on their integrity test; they can no longer lie with impunity. That ship has sailed.

Expand full comment

"https://merylnass.substack.com/p/not-the-1st-time-the-ny-post-correctly?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxNTQ2OTYzLCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxMzM3MjAxMTQsImlhdCI6MTY4ODc0Nzk4NCwiZXhwIjoxNjkxMzM5OTg0LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNzQ2MzY4Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.nrp6ldNB7rSe-UARlvedSwaEw9fSCKpfLTs5UV7pZE0&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email"

As I recall, the WSJ article used the snarky term "Trump appointed" to describe the judge. That is meant to be taken to mean something that is not the ordinary meaning. Why is it that extraneous information such as who appointed the judge is considered relevant to what is "misinformation."

I remember when the new term "misinformation" came into the alternative media back around 2006. There is no legal definition in any law anywhere.

Generally, people reasonably understand "misinformation" means that information that is not accurate, or wrong. "Disinformation" implies that the speaker knows they are communicating misinformation and is doing so intentionally.

For many many years there are those who want to mess with the First Amendment and indeed all of the Constitution's Amendments.

Been there, done that.

Expand full comment

Doughty's appointment was ratified 98-0 by the Senate.

Expand full comment

Chairman Mao promised freedom of speech and the press... except for “enemies of the state.”

Expand full comment